Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Firefighters Local Union No. 1784 v. Stotts et al.: Upholding Bona Fide Seniority Systems under Title VII

Firefighters Local Union No. 1784 v. Stotts et al.: Upholding Bona Fide Seniority Systems under Title VII

Date: Jun 13, 1984
Firefighters Local Union No. 1784 v. Stotts et al.: Upholding Bona Fide Seniority Systems under Title VII Introduction The Supreme Court case Firefighters Local Union No. 1784 v. Stotts et al., 467...
Public Safety Exception to Miranda Established in New York v. Quarles

Public Safety Exception to Miranda Established in New York v. Quarles

Date: Jun 13, 1984
Public Safety Exception to Miranda Established in New York v. Quarles Introduction New York v. Quarles, 467 U.S. 649 (1984), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case that carved out a...
Title IV's Exclusive Remedies Preclude Title I Court Orders in Union Elections: Analysis of Local No. 82 v. Crowley et al.

Title IV's Exclusive Remedies Preclude Title I Court Orders in Union Elections: Analysis of Local No. 82 v. Crowley et al.

Date: Jun 13, 1984
Title IV's Exclusive Remedies Preclude Title I Court Orders in Union Elections: Analysis of Local No. 82 v. Crowley et al. Introduction Local No. 82, Furniture Piano Moving, Furniture Store Drivers,...
Preemption of State Agricultural Marketing Regulations under the Agricultural Fair Practices Act

Preemption of State Agricultural Marketing Regulations under the Agricultural Fair Practices Act

Date: Jun 12, 1984
Preemption of State Agricultural Marketing Regulations under the Agricultural Fair Practices Act Introduction The case Michigan Canners Freezers Association, Inc., et al. v. Agricultural Marketing...
Appellate Jurisdiction Limitations: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Allstate Insurance Company

Appellate Jurisdiction Limitations: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Allstate Insurance Company

Date: Jun 12, 1984
Navigating Appellate Jurisdiction: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Allstate Insurance Company Introduction Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Allstate Insurance Company, 467 U.S....
Double Jeopardy Permits Separate Prosecutions for Unresolved Charges: Analysis of Ohio v. Johnson

Double Jeopardy Permits Separate Prosecutions for Unresolved Charges: Analysis of Ohio v. Johnson

Date: Jun 12, 1984
Double Jeopardy Clause Does Not Bar Further Prosecution on Serious Charges Following Guilty Pleas to Lesser Offenses: Analysis of Ohio v. Johnson Introduction Ohio v. Johnson (467 U.S. 493) is a...
United States Postal Service Must Comply with State Tax Withholding Orders Under Sovereign Immunity Waiver

United States Postal Service Must Comply with State Tax Withholding Orders Under Sovereign Immunity Waiver

Date: Jun 12, 1984
United States Postal Service Must Comply with State Tax Withholding Orders Under Sovereign Immunity Waiver Introduction In the landmark case Franchise Tax Board of California v. United States Postal...
Preservation of Breath Samples in DUI Cases: Analysis of California v. Trombetta

Preservation of Breath Samples in DUI Cases: Analysis of California v. Trombetta

Date: Jun 12, 1984
Preservation of Breath Samples in DUI Cases: Analysis of California v. Trombetta Introduction California v. Trombetta et al. is a pivotal case decided by the United States Supreme Court in 1984. The...
Establishing the Inevitable Discovery Exception in Nix v. Williams

Establishing the Inevitable Discovery Exception in Nix v. Williams

Date: Jun 12, 1984
Establishing the Inevitable Discovery Exception in Nix v. Williams Introduction Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431 (1984), is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision that significantly shaped the...
No Constitutional Right to Enforce Withdrawn Plea Agreements: A Comprehensive Analysis of Mabry v. Johnson

No Constitutional Right to Enforce Withdrawn Plea Agreements: A Comprehensive Analysis of Mabry v. Johnson

Date: Jun 12, 1984
No Constitutional Right to Enforce Withdrawn Plea Agreements: A Comprehensive Analysis of Mabry v. Johnson Introduction Mabry, Commissioner, Arkansas Department of Correction v. Johnson, 467 U.S. 504...
Stevic v. INS: Upholding the Clear Probability Standard for Withholding of Deportation

Stevic v. INS: Upholding the Clear Probability Standard for Withholding of Deportation

Date: Jun 6, 1984
Stevic v. INS: Upholding the Clear Probability Standard for Withholding of Deportation Introduction Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) v. Stevic (467 U.S. 407, 1984) is a landmark decision...
ICC's Authority to Retroactively Reject Tariffs: A New Precedent

ICC's Authority to Retroactively Reject Tariffs: A New Precedent

Date: Jun 6, 1984
ICC's Authority to Retroactively Reject Tariffs: A New Precedent Introduction The case of Interstate Commerce Commission ET AL. v. American Trucking Associations, Inc., ET AL. (467 U.S. 354, 1984)...
Aluminum Company of America v. Central Lincoln: Interpretation of Power Allocation in the Regional Act

Aluminum Company of America v. Central Lincoln: Interpretation of Power Allocation in the Regional Act

Date: Jun 6, 1984
Aluminum Company of America v. Central Lincoln: Interpretation of Power Allocation in the Regional Act Introduction Aluminum Company of America et al. v. Central Lincoln Peoples' Utility District et...
Consumers Barred from Judicial Review of Milk Market Orders: Block v. Community Nutrition Institute

Consumers Barred from Judicial Review of Milk Market Orders: Block v. Community Nutrition Institute

Date: Jun 5, 1984
Consumers Barred from Judicial Review of Milk Market Orders: Block v. Community Nutrition Institute Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case Block, Secretary of Agriculture, et al. v. Community...
Establishing Clear and Convincing Evidence in Interstate Water Diversion: COLORADO v. NEW MEXICO

Establishing Clear and Convincing Evidence in Interstate Water Diversion: COLORADO v. NEW MEXICO

Date: Jun 5, 1984
Establishing Clear and Convincing Evidence in Interstate Water Diversion: COLORADO v. NEW MEXICO Introduction COLORADO v. NEW MEXICO et al. (467 U.S. 310) is a landmark decision by the United States...
Legitimacy of Preventive Detention in Juvenile Justice: Schall v. Martin

Legitimacy of Preventive Detention in Juvenile Justice: Schall v. Martin

Date: Jun 5, 1984
Legitimacy of Preventive Detention in Juvenile Justice: Schall v. Martin Introduction In the landmark case of Schall, Commissioner of New York City Department of Juvenile Justice v. Martin et al....
Citizenship Requirement for Notary Publics Violates Equal Protection: Bernal v. Fainter

Citizenship Requirement for Notary Publics Violates Equal Protection: Bernal v. Fainter

Date: May 31, 1984
Citizenship Requirement for Notary Publics Violates Equal Protection: Bernal v. Fainter Introduction Bernal v. Fainter, Secretary of State of Texas, et al. (467 U.S. 216, 1984) is a landmark decision...
Reaffirming Rational Basis: The Midkiff Decision on Eminent Domain and Public Use

Reaffirming Rational Basis: The Midkiff Decision on Eminent Domain and Public Use

Date: May 31, 1984
Reaffirming Rational Basis: The Midkiff Decision on Eminent Domain and Public Use Introduction Hawaii Housing Authority et al. v. Midkiff et al., 467 U.S. 229 (1984), addresses the constitutionality...
Dismissing Certiorari as Improvidently Granted: Insights from NEW YORK v. UPLINGER ET AL.

Dismissing Certiorari as Improvidently Granted: Insights from NEW YORK v. UPLINGER ET AL.

Date: May 31, 1984
Dismissing Certiorari as Improvidently Granted: Insights from NEW YORK v. UPLINGER ET AL. Introduction In NEW YORK v. UPLINGER ET AL. (467 U.S. 246, 1984), the United States Supreme Court addressed a...
Double Jeopardy Protections in Capital Sentencing: Arizona v. Rumsey

Double Jeopardy Protections in Capital Sentencing: Arizona v. Rumsey

Date: May 30, 1984
Double Jeopardy Protections in Capital Sentencing: Arizona v. Rumsey 1. Introduction Arizona v. Rumsey (467 U.S. 203, 1984) is a pivotal Supreme Court case that delves into the application of the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert