Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Allen v. Wright: Clarifying Standing Requirements in Class Actions Against IRS Policies on Racially Discriminatory Schools

Allen v. Wright: Clarifying Standing Requirements in Class Actions Against IRS Policies on Racially Discriminatory Schools

Date: Jul 4, 1984
Allen v. Wright: Clarifying Standing Requirements in Class Actions Against IRS Policies on Racially Discriminatory Schools Introduction Case: Allen v. Wright et al. Court: United States Supreme Court...
Regan v. Time, Inc. (468 U.S. 641): Striking Down Content-Based Restrictions on Currency Reproductions

Regan v. Time, Inc. (468 U.S. 641): Striking Down Content-Based Restrictions on Currency Reproductions

Date: Jul 4, 1984
Regan v. Time, Inc. (468 U.S. 641): Striking Down Content-Based Restrictions on Currency Reproductions Introduction Regan, Secretary of the Treasury, et al. v. Time, Inc. is a significant U.S....
Hudson v. Palmer: Reaffirming No Fourth Amendment Privacy in Prison Cells

Hudson v. Palmer: Reaffirming No Fourth Amendment Privacy in Prison Cells

Date: Jul 4, 1984
Hudson v. Palmer: Reaffirming No Fourth Amendment Privacy in Prison Cells Introduction Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517 (1984), is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision that addressed the...
United States Jaycees v. Minnesota: Upholding Anti-Discrimination Laws Over Freedom of Association

United States Jaycees v. Minnesota: Upholding Anti-Discrimination Laws Over Freedom of Association

Date: Jul 4, 1984
United States Jaycees v. Minnesota: Upholding Anti-Discrimination Laws Over Freedom of Association Introduction United States Jaycees v. Minnesota Department of Human Rights is a landmark case...
Affirmation of Sentencing Enhancement Based on Intervening Conduct in Wasman v. United States

Affirmation of Sentencing Enhancement Based on Intervening Conduct in Wasman v. United States

Date: Jul 4, 1984
Affirmation of Sentencing Enhancement Based on Intervening Conduct in Wasman v. United States Introduction Wasman v. United States (468 U.S. 559), decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on July 3, 1984,...
Block v. Rutherford: Validating Strict Policies on Contact Visits and Unobserved Cell Searches in Pretrial Detention

Block v. Rutherford: Validating Strict Policies on Contact Visits and Unobserved Cell Searches in Pretrial Detention

Date: Jul 4, 1984
Block v. Rutherford: Validating Strict Policies on Contact Visits and Unobserved Cell Searches in Pretrial Detention Introduction In Block, Sheriff of the County of Los Angeles, et al. v. Rutherford...
UNITED STATES v. KARO et al.: Fourth Amendment Implications on Electronic Surveillance

UNITED STATES v. KARO et al.: Fourth Amendment Implications on Electronic Surveillance

Date: Jul 4, 1984
UNITED STATES v. KARO et al.: Fourth Amendment Implications on Electronic Surveillance Introduction UNITED STATES v. KARO et al., 468 U.S. 705 (1984), is a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court...
Preemption of State Union Regulations under the NLRA: Insights from Brown v. Hotel Restaurant Employees Bartenders International Union

Preemption of State Union Regulations under the NLRA: Insights from Brown v. Hotel Restaurant Employees Bartenders International Union

Date: Jul 3, 1984
Preemption of State Union Regulations under the NLRA: Insights from Brown v. Hotel Restaurant Employees Bartenders International Union Introduction The case of Brown, Director, Department of Law and...
Discrimination in Federal Grand Jury Foreman Selection: Hobby v. United States Establishes Due Process Limits

Discrimination in Federal Grand Jury Foreman Selection: Hobby v. United States Establishes Due Process Limits

Date: Jul 3, 1984
Discrimination in Federal Grand Jury Foreman Selection: Hobby v. United States Establishes Due Process Limits Introduction Hobby v. United States (468 U.S. 339, 1984) is a landmark decision by the...
First Amendment Protections Affirmed in FCC v. League of Women Voters of California

First Amendment Protections Affirmed in FCC v. League of Women Voters of California

Date: Jul 3, 1984
First Amendment Protections Affirmed in FCC v. League of Women Voters of California Introduction In the landmark case of Federal Communications Commission v. League of Women Voters of California et...
Berkemer v. McCarty: Extending Miranda Protections to Custodial Interrogations in Misdemeanor Traffic Offenses

Berkemer v. McCarty: Extending Miranda Protections to Custodial Interrogations in Misdemeanor Traffic Offenses

Date: Jul 3, 1984
Berkemer v. McCarty: Extending Miranda Protections to Custodial Interrogations in Misdemeanor Traffic Offenses Introduction Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420 (1984), is a landmark decision by the...
Affirmation of Judicial Authority in Capital Sentencing: Spaziano v. Florida (1984)

Affirmation of Judicial Authority in Capital Sentencing: Spaziano v. Florida (1984)

Date: Jul 3, 1984
Affirmation of Judicial Authority in Capital Sentencing: Spaziano v. Florida (1984) Introduction Spaziano v. Florida (468 U.S. 447, 1984) is a landmark case in which the United States Supreme Court...
Commerce Clause Prevails Over State Tax Exemptions for Local Alcoholic Beverages: Bacchus Imports, Ltd. v. Dias

Commerce Clause Prevails Over State Tax Exemptions for Local Alcoholic Beverages: Bacchus Imports, Ltd. v. Dias

Date: Jun 30, 1984
Commerce Clause Prevails Over State Tax Exemptions for Local Alcoholic Beverages: Bacchus Imports, Ltd. v. Dias Introduction Bacchus Imports, Ltd., et al. v. Dias, Director of Taxation of Hawaii, et...
Clark v. Community for Creative Non-Violence: Upholding Time, Place, and Manner Restrictions on Expressive Conduct in Public Parks

Clark v. Community for Creative Non-Violence: Upholding Time, Place, and Manner Restrictions on Expressive Conduct in Public Parks

Date: Jun 30, 1984
Clark v. Community for Creative Non-Violence: Upholding Time, Place, and Manner Restrictions on Expressive Conduct in Public Parks Introduction Clark, Secretary of the Interior, et al. v. Community...
Double Jeopardy and Hung Juries: The Richardson Decision

Double Jeopardy and Hung Juries: The Richardson Decision

Date: Jun 30, 1984
Double Jeopardy and Hung Juries: The Richardson Decision Introduction Richardson v. United States (468 U.S. 317, 1984) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that addresses the...
Securities Industry Association v. Federal Reserve: Defining Securities under Glass-Steagall

Securities Industry Association v. Federal Reserve: Defining Securities under Glass-Steagall

Date: Jun 29, 1984
Securities Industry Association v. Federal Reserve: Defining Securities under Glass-Steagall Introduction In the landmark case of Securities Industry Association et al. v. Board of Governors of the...
Expanding the Scope of Banking Regulation: Insights from SECURITIES INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION v. BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Expanding the Scope of Banking Regulation: Insights from SECURITIES INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION v. BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Date: Jun 29, 1984
Expanding the Scope of Banking Regulation: Insights from Securities Industry Association v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Introduction The landmark case of Securities Industry...
Preservation of Presidential Authority Under IEEPA: An Analysis of Regan v. Wald

Preservation of Presidential Authority Under IEEPA: An Analysis of Regan v. Wald

Date: Jun 29, 1984
Preservation of Presidential Authority Under IEEPA: An Analysis of Regan v. Wald Introduction Regan, Secretary of the Treasury, et al. v. Wald et al., 468 U.S. 222 (1984), is a pivotal Supreme Court...
Clarifying Qualified Immunity Standards in §1983 Suits: Davis v. Scherer

Clarifying Qualified Immunity Standards in §1983 Suits: Davis v. Scherer

Date: Jun 29, 1984
Clarifying Qualified Immunity Standards in §1983 Suits: Davis v. Scherer Introduction Davis et al. v. Scherer, 468 U.S. 183 (1984), is a significant Supreme Court decision that delves into the...
NCAA v. Board of Regents: Establishing Antitrust Boundaries in Collegiate Sports Television Contracts

NCAA v. Board of Regents: Establishing Antitrust Boundaries in Collegiate Sports Television Contracts

Date: Jun 28, 1984
NCAA v. Board of Regents: Establishing Antitrust Boundaries in Collegiate Sports Television Contracts Introduction The Supreme Court case National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Board of Regents...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert