Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Standing and Grand Jury Representation: Insights from Parker Ford v. Kentucky Introduction Parker Ford v. Kentucky, 469 U.S. 984 (1984), represents a pivotal moment in the dialogue surrounding grand...
Strengthening Fifth Amendment Protections: Insights from James v. Arizona Introduction Steven Craig James v. Arizona, 469 U.S. 990 (1984), is a pivotal case that addresses the limitations imposed by...
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: The ALVORD v. WAINWRIGHT Case and Its Implications Introduction The case of Gary Eldon Alvord v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections...
Enhancing Self-Representation Rights: Analysis of James David Raulerson v. Louie L. Wainwright Introduction James David Raulerson v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections...
Reassessing the Burden of Proof in Self-Defense: Insights from Moran v. Ohio Introduction Moran v. Ohio (469 U.S. 948, 1984) presents a critical examination of the allocation of the burden of proof...
Double Jeopardy and Multi-District Prosecutions: Insights from Borchardt v. United States Introduction Borchardt v. United States is a significant case that delves into the complexities of the Double...
Heiney v. Florida: Reevaluating Mitigating Circumstances in Death Penalty Sentencing Introduction Heiney v. Florida (No. 83-6994) is a pivotal case that underscores the ongoing debate surrounding the...
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: Insights from Alton Waye v. Morris Introduction Alton Waye v. Edward C. Morris, Superintendent, Mecklenburg Correctional Center (469 U.S. 908) is a...
Evaluation of Maryland's Death Penalty Statute in Light of Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments Introduction The case of Annette Louise Stebbing v. Maryland (469 U.S. 900, 1984) revolves around the...
Federal Review of Tribal Jurisdiction: Insights from National Farmers Union Insurance Companies v. Crow Tribe of Indians Introduction The Supreme Court case National Farmers Union Insurance Companies...
DOBBERT v. WAINWRIGHT: Reevaluating Recantation in Capital Habeas Corpus Petitions Introduction DOBBERT v. WAINWRIGHT (468 U.S. 1231, 1984) is a pivotal United States Supreme Court case that...
Prospective Application of the Deficit Reduction Act in AFDC Income Calculations Introduction In the landmark case Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. Sandra Turner et al.,...
Smith v. Robinson: Supreme Court Decision Limits Attorney's Fees in EHA Cases Introduction Smith v. Robinson, Rhode Island Associate Commissioner of Education, et al. (468 U.S. 992, 1984) is a...
Mootness Doctrine Reinforced in Boston Firefighters Union, Local 718 v. Boston Chapter, N.A.A.C.P., Inc. Introduction In the landmark case of Boston Firefighters Union, Local 718 v. Boston Chapter,...
Clean Intermittent Catheterization as a Related Service under the Education of the Handicapped Act Introduction Irving Independent School District v. Tatro et ux., Individually, 468 U.S. 883 (1984),...
Section 12(f) of the Military Selective Service Act Upheld: Selective Service System v. Minnesota Public Interest Research Group Introduction In the landmark case of Selective Service System et al....
Establishing the Good-Faith Exception: A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Leon Introduction In the landmark case of United States v. Leon et al., 468 U.S. 897 (1984), the United States...
Good-Faith Exception Reinforced in Massachusetts v. Sheppard Introduction The landmark decision in Massachusetts v. Sheppard, 468 U.S. 981 (1984), addresses the applicability of the exclusionary rule...
Exclusionary Rule Exclusion in Civil Deportation Proceedings: INS v. Lopez-Mendoza Introduction Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Lopez-Mendoza et al., 468 U.S. 1032 (1984), is a landmark...
Independent Source Doctrine Affirmed in Segura et al. v. United States Introduction Segura et al. v. United States, 468 U.S. 796 (1984), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that clarified the...