Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Standing and Grand Jury Representation: Insights from Parker Ford v. Kentucky

Standing and Grand Jury Representation: Insights from Parker Ford v. Kentucky

Date: Nov 6, 1984
Standing and Grand Jury Representation: Insights from Parker Ford v. Kentucky Introduction Parker Ford v. Kentucky, 469 U.S. 984 (1984), represents a pivotal moment in the dialogue surrounding grand...
Strengthening Fifth Amendment Protections: Insights from James v. Arizona

Strengthening Fifth Amendment Protections: Insights from James v. Arizona

Date: Nov 6, 1984
Strengthening Fifth Amendment Protections: Insights from James v. Arizona Introduction Steven Craig James v. Arizona, 469 U.S. 990 (1984), is a pivotal case that addresses the limitations imposed by...
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: The ALVORD v. WAINWRIGHT Case and Its Implications

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: The ALVORD v. WAINWRIGHT Case and Its Implications

Date: Oct 30, 1984
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: The ALVORD v. WAINWRIGHT Case and Its Implications Introduction The case of Gary Eldon Alvord v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections...
Enhancing Self-Representation Rights: Analysis of James David Raulerson v. Louie L. Wainwright

Enhancing Self-Representation Rights: Analysis of James David Raulerson v. Louie L. Wainwright

Date: Oct 30, 1984
Enhancing Self-Representation Rights: Analysis of James David Raulerson v. Louie L. Wainwright Introduction James David Raulerson v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections...
Reassessing the Burden of Proof in Self-Defense: Insights from Moran v. Ohio

Reassessing the Burden of Proof in Self-Defense: Insights from Moran v. Ohio

Date: Oct 30, 1984
Reassessing the Burden of Proof in Self-Defense: Insights from Moran v. Ohio Introduction Moran v. Ohio (469 U.S. 948, 1984) presents a critical examination of the allocation of the burden of proof...
Double Jeopardy and Multi-District Prosecutions: Insights from Borchardt v. United States

Double Jeopardy and Multi-District Prosecutions: Insights from Borchardt v. United States

Date: Oct 30, 1984
Double Jeopardy and Multi-District Prosecutions: Insights from Borchardt v. United States Introduction Borchardt v. United States is a significant case that delves into the complexities of the Double...
Heiney v. Florida: Reevaluating Mitigating Circumstances in Death Penalty Sentencing

Heiney v. Florida: Reevaluating Mitigating Circumstances in Death Penalty Sentencing

Date: Oct 16, 1984
Heiney v. Florida: Reevaluating Mitigating Circumstances in Death Penalty Sentencing Introduction Heiney v. Florida (No. 83-6994) is a pivotal case that underscores the ongoing debate surrounding the...
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: Insights from Alton Waye v. Morris

Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: Insights from Alton Waye v. Morris

Date: Oct 10, 1984
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: Insights from Alton Waye v. Morris Introduction Alton Waye v. Edward C. Morris, Superintendent, Mecklenburg Correctional Center (469 U.S. 908) is a...
Evaluation of Maryland's Death Penalty Statute in Light of Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments

Evaluation of Maryland's Death Penalty Statute in Light of Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments

Date: Oct 10, 1984
Evaluation of Maryland's Death Penalty Statute in Light of Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments Introduction The case of Annette Louise Stebbing v. Maryland (469 U.S. 900, 1984) revolves around the...
Federal Review of Tribal Jurisdiction: Insights from National Farmers Union Insurance Companies v. Crow Tribe of Indians

Federal Review of Tribal Jurisdiction: Insights from National Farmers Union Insurance Companies v. Crow Tribe of Indians

Date: Sep 11, 1984
Federal Review of Tribal Jurisdiction: Insights from National Farmers Union Insurance Companies v. Crow Tribe of Indians Introduction The Supreme Court case National Farmers Union Insurance Companies...
DOBBERT v. WAINWRIGHT: Reevaluating Recantation in Capital Habeas Corpus Petitions

DOBBERT v. WAINWRIGHT: Reevaluating Recantation in Capital Habeas Corpus Petitions

Date: Sep 8, 1984
DOBBERT v. WAINWRIGHT: Reevaluating Recantation in Capital Habeas Corpus Petitions Introduction DOBBERT v. WAINWRIGHT (468 U.S. 1231, 1984) is a pivotal United States Supreme Court case that...
Prospective Application of the Deficit Reduction Act in AFDC Income Calculations

Prospective Application of the Deficit Reduction Act in AFDC Income Calculations

Date: Aug 11, 1984
Prospective Application of the Deficit Reduction Act in AFDC Income Calculations Introduction In the landmark case Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. Sandra Turner et al.,...
Smith v. Robinson: Supreme Court Decision Limits Attorney's Fees in EHA Cases

Smith v. Robinson: Supreme Court Decision Limits Attorney's Fees in EHA Cases

Date: Jul 6, 1984
Smith v. Robinson: Supreme Court Decision Limits Attorney's Fees in EHA Cases Introduction Smith v. Robinson, Rhode Island Associate Commissioner of Education, et al. (468 U.S. 992, 1984) is a...
Mootness Doctrine Reinforced in Boston Firefighters Union v. Boston Chapter, NAACP, Inc.

Mootness Doctrine Reinforced in Boston Firefighters Union v. Boston Chapter, NAACP, Inc.

Date: Jul 6, 1984
Mootness Doctrine Reinforced in Boston Firefighters Union, Local 718 v. Boston Chapter, N.A.A.C.P., Inc. Introduction In the landmark case of Boston Firefighters Union, Local 718 v. Boston Chapter,...
Clean Intermittent Catheterization as a Related Service under the Education of the Handicapped Act

Clean Intermittent Catheterization as a Related Service under the Education of the Handicapped Act

Date: Jul 6, 1984
Clean Intermittent Catheterization as a Related Service under the Education of the Handicapped Act Introduction Irving Independent School District v. Tatro et ux., Individually, 468 U.S. 883 (1984),...
Section 12(f) of the Military Selective Service Act Upheld: Selective Service System v. Minnesota Public Interest Research Group

Section 12(f) of the Military Selective Service Act Upheld: Selective Service System v. Minnesota Public Interest Research Group

Date: Jul 6, 1984
Section 12(f) of the Military Selective Service Act Upheld: Selective Service System v. Minnesota Public Interest Research Group Introduction In the landmark case of Selective Service System et al....
Establishing the Good-Faith Exception: A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Leon

Establishing the Good-Faith Exception: A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Leon

Date: Jul 6, 1984
Establishing the Good-Faith Exception: A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Leon Introduction In the landmark case of United States v. Leon et al., 468 U.S. 897 (1984), the United States...
Good-Faith Exception Reinforced in Massachusetts v. Sheppard

Good-Faith Exception Reinforced in Massachusetts v. Sheppard

Date: Jul 6, 1984
Good-Faith Exception Reinforced in Massachusetts v. Sheppard Introduction The landmark decision in Massachusetts v. Sheppard, 468 U.S. 981 (1984), addresses the applicability of the exclusionary rule...
Exclusionary Rule Exclusion in Civil Deportation Proceedings: INS v. Lopez-Mendoza

Exclusionary Rule Exclusion in Civil Deportation Proceedings: INS v. Lopez-Mendoza

Date: Jul 6, 1984
Exclusionary Rule Exclusion in Civil Deportation Proceedings: INS v. Lopez-Mendoza Introduction Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Lopez-Mendoza et al., 468 U.S. 1032 (1984), is a landmark...
Independent Source Doctrine Affirmed in Segura v. United States

Independent Source Doctrine Affirmed in Segura v. United States

Date: Jul 6, 1984
Independent Source Doctrine Affirmed in Segura et al. v. United States Introduction Segura et al. v. United States, 468 U.S. 796 (1984), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that clarified the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert