Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Eleventh Amendment Sovereign Immunity in Employment Discrimination Cases Under the Rehabilitation Act

Affirmation of Eleventh Amendment Sovereign Immunity in Employment Discrimination Cases Under the Rehabilitation Act

Date: Jun 29, 1985
Affirmation of Eleventh Amendment Sovereign Immunity in Employment Discrimination Cases Under the Rehabilitation Act Introduction The case of Atascadero State Hospital et al. v. Scanlon (473 U.S....
Dowling v. United States: Restricting 18 U.S.C. §2314 to Traditional Property Crimes

Dowling v. United States: Restricting 18 U.S.C. §2314 to Traditional Property Crimes

Date: Jun 29, 1985
Dowling v. United States: Restricting 18 U.S.C. §2314 to Traditional Property Crimes Introduction Dowling v. United States (473 U.S. 207, 1985) is a landmark Supreme Court case that addressed the...
Upholding VA Fee Limitations: Implications of Walters v. National Association of Radiation Survivors

Upholding VA Fee Limitations: Implications of Walters v. National Association of Radiation Survivors

Date: Jun 29, 1985
Upholding VA Fee Limitations: Implications of Walters v. National Association of Radiation Survivors Introduction Walters, Administrator of Veterans' Affairs, et al. v. National Association of...
Kentucky v. Graham: Clarifying Attorney's Fee Recovery under §1988 in Personal-Capacity Suits

Kentucky v. Graham: Clarifying Attorney's Fee Recovery under §1988 in Personal-Capacity Suits

Date: Jun 29, 1985
Kentucky v. Graham: Clarifying Attorney's Fee Recovery under §1988 in Personal-Capacity Suits Introduction In the landmark case Kentucky, DBA Bureau of State Police v. Graham et al., 473 U.S. 159...
Feres Doctrine Reaffirmed: United States v. Shearer (1985)

Feres Doctrine Reaffirmed: United States v. Shearer (1985)

Date: Jun 28, 1985
Feres Doctrine Reaffirmed: United States v. Shearer (1985) Introduction United States v. Shearer is a landmark Supreme Court decision that reaffirmed the applicability of the Feres Doctrine within...
Marek v. Chesny: Integration of §1988 Attorney's Fees into Rule 68 Cost-Shifting

Marek v. Chesny: Integration of §1988 Attorney's Fees into Rule 68 Cost-Shifting

Date: Jun 28, 1985
Marek v. Chesny: Integration of §1988 Attorney's Fees into Rule 68 Cost-Shifting Introduction Marek et al. v. Chesny, individually, and as administrator of the estate of Chesny, 473 U.S. 1 (1985), is...
Supreme Court Upholds 'Work Preservation' Agreements: NLRB v. International Longshoremen's Assn.

Supreme Court Upholds 'Work Preservation' Agreements: NLRB v. International Longshoremen's Assn.

Date: Jun 28, 1985
Supreme Court Upholds 'Work Preservation' Agreements: NLRB v. International Longshoremen's Assn. Introduction In NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S ASSN., AFL-CIO, ET AL.,...
ERISA §409(a) Does Not Provide for Extracontractual Damages to Plan Beneficiaries: Analysis of Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Russell

ERISA §409(a) Does Not Provide for Extracontractual Damages to Plan Beneficiaries: Analysis of Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Russell

Date: Jun 28, 1985
ERISA §409(a) Does Not Provide for Extracontractual Damages to Plan Beneficiaries: Analysis of Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Russell Introduction The landmark case of Massachusetts...
Supreme Court Upholds NLRB's Stance on Union-Imposed Resignation Restrictions: Pattern Makers' League v. NLRB

Supreme Court Upholds NLRB's Stance on Union-Imposed Resignation Restrictions: Pattern Makers' League v. NLRB

Date: Jun 28, 1985
Supreme Court Upholds NLRB's Stance on Union-Imposed Resignation Restrictions: Pattern Makers' League v. NLRB Introduction In the landmark case Pattern Makers' League of North America, AFL-CIO, et...
Absolute Religious Accommodation in Employment Violates the Establishment Clause

Absolute Religious Accommodation in Employment Violates the Establishment Clause

Date: Jun 27, 1985
Absolute Religious Accommodation in Employment Violates the Establishment Clause Introduction Estate of Thornton et al. v. Caldor, Inc., 472 U.S. 703 (1985), is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case...
Limits on Forum-State Choice of Law in Multistate Class Actions: Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts

Limits on Forum-State Choice of Law in Multistate Class Actions: Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts

Date: Jun 27, 1985
Limits on Forum-State Choice of Law in Multistate Class Actions: Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts Introduction Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts et al. (1985), addressed critical issues concerning the...
Ensuring Non-Discrimination in Immigration Parole Decisions: The JEAN v. NELSON Precedent

Ensuring Non-Discrimination in Immigration Parole Decisions: The JEAN v. NELSON Precedent

Date: Jun 27, 1985
Ensuring Non-Discrimination in Immigration Parole Decisions: The JEAN v. NELSON Precedent Introduction Jean et al. v. Nelson, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service, et al. (472 U.S....
Affirmation of Presumed and Punitive Damages in Non-Public Concern Defamation: Dun Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders, Inc.

Affirmation of Presumed and Punitive Damages in Non-Public Concern Defamation: Dun Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders, Inc.

Date: Jun 27, 1985
Affirmation of Presumed and Punitive Damages in Non-Public Concern Defamation: Dun Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders, Inc. Introduction Dun Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders, Inc., 472 U.S....
IRS's Provisional Levy on Joint Bank Accounts Upheld Under §6331(a)

IRS's Provisional Levy on Joint Bank Accounts Upheld Under §6331(a)

Date: Jun 27, 1985
IRS's Provisional Levy on Joint Bank Accounts Upheld Under §6331(a) Introduction UNITED STATES v. NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE (472 U.S. 713), decided on June 26, 1985, is a pivotal Supreme Court case...
Harmful Error Must Substantially Prejudice Individual Rights Under CSRA: Cornelius v. Nutt

Harmful Error Must Substantially Prejudice Individual Rights Under CSRA: Cornelius v. Nutt

Date: Jun 25, 1985
Harmful Error Must Substantially Prejudice Individual Rights Under CSRA: Cornelius v. Nutt Introduction Cornelius, Acting Director, Office of Personnel Management v. Nutt et al., 472 U.S. 648 (1985),...
Reevaluating Professional Conduct Standards: The Supreme Court's Decision in In re Snyder

Reevaluating Professional Conduct Standards: The Supreme Court's Decision in In re Snyder

Date: Jun 25, 1985
Reevaluating Professional Conduct Standards: The Supreme Court's Decision in In re Snyder Introduction The Supreme Court case In re Snyder (472 U.S. 634, 1985) addresses the boundaries of...
Strict Application of 18 U.S.C. §1382 to Reentry During Public Events: UNITED STATES v. ALBERTINI

Strict Application of 18 U.S.C. §1382 to Reentry During Public Events: UNITED STATES v. ALBERTINI

Date: Jun 25, 1985
Strict Application of 18 U.S.C. §1382 to Reentry During Public Events: UNITED STATES v. ALBERTINI Introduction UNITED STATES v. ALBERTINI (472 U.S. 675, 1985) is a pivotal Supreme Court case that...
The Necessity of Individualized Sentencing in Capital Cases: Maxwell v. Pennsylvania

The Necessity of Individualized Sentencing in Capital Cases: Maxwell v. Pennsylvania

Date: Jun 25, 1985
The Necessity of Individualized Sentencing in Capital Cases: Comprehensive Commentary on Maxwell v. Pennsylvania Introduction Maxwell v. Pennsylvania, 469 U.S. 971 (1985), is a significant case that...
Equal Protection and Residency Requirements in Veterans’ Tax Exemptions: HOOPER v. BERNALILLO COUNTY ASSESSOR

Equal Protection and Residency Requirements in Veterans’ Tax Exemptions: HOOPER v. BERNALILLO COUNTY ASSESSOR

Date: Jun 25, 1985
Equal Protection and Residency Requirements in Veterans’ Tax Exemptions: HOOPER v. BERNALILLO COUNTY ASSESSOR A Comprehensive Legal Commentary Introduction Hooper et al. v. Bernalillo County Assessor...
Monopolist's Duty to Cooperate: Insights from Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp.

Monopolist's Duty to Cooperate: Insights from Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp.

Date: Jun 20, 1985
Monopolist's Duty to Cooperate: Insights from Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp. Introduction Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp., 472 U.S. 585 (1985), is a landmark...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert