Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Double Jeopardy Implications in Death Penalty Sentencing: Insights from Robert Patten v. Florida

Double Jeopardy Implications in Death Penalty Sentencing: Insights from Robert Patten v. Florida

Date: Oct 8, 1985
Double Jeopardy Implications in Death Penalty Sentencing: Insights from Robert Patten v. Florida Introduction The case of Robert Patten v. Florida, 474 U.S. 876 (1985), presents significant...
Limitations on Vicarious Intent in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Stewart v. Texas

Limitations on Vicarious Intent in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Stewart v. Texas

Date: Oct 8, 1985
Limitations on Vicarious Intent in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Stewart v. Texas Introduction Darryl Elroy Stewart v. Texas, 474 U.S. 866 (1985), is a significant case that touches upon the...
Reaffirming Judicial Conscience: The Significance of Burr v. Florida in Capital Sentencing

Reaffirming Judicial Conscience: The Significance of Burr v. Florida in Capital Sentencing

Date: Oct 8, 1985
Reaffirming Judicial Conscience: The Significance of Burr v. Florida in Capital Sentencing Introduction Charlie L. Burr v. Florida, 474 U.S. 879 (1985), presents a pivotal moment in the jurisprudence...
Proportionality of Attorney's Fees under 42 U.S.C §1988: Analysis of City of Riverside v. Santos Rivera

Proportionality of Attorney's Fees under 42 U.S.C §1988: Analysis of City of Riverside v. Santos Rivera

Date: Sep 6, 1985
Proportionality of Attorney's Fees under 42 U.S.C §1988: Analysis of City of Riverside v. Santos Rivera Introduction The case City of Riverside v. Santos Rivera, No. A-122 (473 U.S. 1315),...
Clarifying Judicial Limits on Preliminary Injunctions in Medicare Reimbursement: Heckler v. Redbud Hospital District

Clarifying Judicial Limits on Preliminary Injunctions in Medicare Reimbursement: Heckler v. Redbud Hospital District

Date: Aug 29, 1985
Clarifying Judicial Limits on Preliminary Injunctions in Medicare Reimbursement: Heckler v. Redbud Hospital District Introduction Heckler v. Redbud Hospital District, 473 U.S. 1308 (1985), is a...
Jurisdictional Limits on Appeals of Temporary Restraining Order Denials: Insights from OPM v. AFGE

Jurisdictional Limits on Appeals of Temporary Restraining Order Denials: Insights from OPM v. AFGE

Date: Jul 25, 1985
Jurisdictional Limits on Appeals of Temporary Restraining Order Denials: Insights from Office of Personnel Management v. American Federation of Government Employees Introduction The case of Office of...
Supreme Court Clarifies Criteria for Vacating Stay of Execution: Emphasizing Limited Deference to Appellate Courts

Supreme Court Clarifies Criteria for Vacating Stay of Execution: Emphasizing Limited Deference to Appellate Courts

Date: Jul 19, 1985
Supreme Court Clarifies Criteria for Vacating Stay of Execution: Emphasizing Limited Deference to Appellate Courts Introduction In the landmark case of Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida...
United States v. Bagley: Defining Materiality in Brady Violations

United States v. Bagley: Defining Materiality in Brady Violations

Date: Jul 3, 1985
United States v. Bagley: Defining Materiality in Brady Violations Introduction United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985), represents a pivotal moment in the interpretation of the BRADY v. MARYLAND...
Defining Nonpublic Forums: An Analysis of Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund

Defining Nonpublic Forums: An Analysis of Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund

Date: Jul 3, 1985
Defining Nonpublic Forums: An Analysis of Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund Introduction The landmark case of Cornelius, Acting Director, Office of Personnel Management v. NAACP...
Arbitrability of Antitrust Claims in International Contracts: Insights from Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.

Arbitrability of Antitrust Claims in International Contracts: Insights from Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.

Date: Jul 3, 1985
Arbitrability of Antitrust Claims in International Contracts: Insights from Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. Introduction Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth,...
Extinguishment of Tribal Hunting and Fishing Rights: Oregon Dept. of Fish and Wildlife v. Klamath Indian Tribe

Extinguishment of Tribal Hunting and Fishing Rights: Oregon Dept. of Fish and Wildlife v. Klamath Indian Tribe

Date: Jul 3, 1985
Extinguishment of Tribal Hunting and Fishing Rights: Oregon Dept. of Fish and Wildlife v. Klamath Indian Tribe Introduction Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife et al. v. Klamath Indian Tribe (473...
Article III of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Excludes Probation-Violation Charges

Article III of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Excludes Probation-Violation Charges

Date: Jul 3, 1985
Article III of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Excludes Probation-Violation Charges Introduction In the landmark case CARCHMAN, MERCER COUNTY PROSECUTOR v. NASH, the United States Supreme Court...
Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center: Defining Equal Protection Standards for Mental Retardation Classifications

Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center: Defining Equal Protection Standards for Mental Retardation Classifications

Date: Jul 2, 1985
Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center: Defining Equal Protection Standards for Mental Retardation Classifications Introduction In the landmark case of City of Cleburne, Texas, et al. v. Cleburne Living...
U.S. Supreme Court Upholds FIFRA's Arbitration Scheme: Implications and Analysis

U.S. Supreme Court Upholds FIFRA's Arbitration Scheme: Implications and Analysis

Date: Jul 2, 1985
U.S. Supreme Court Upholds FIFRA's Arbitration Scheme: Implications and Analysis Introduction In the landmark case Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., the United States Supreme Court...
Clarifying RICO Injury Claims: American National Bank Trust Company of Chicago v. Haroco, Inc.

Clarifying RICO Injury Claims: American National Bank Trust Company of Chicago v. Haroco, Inc.

Date: Jul 2, 1985
Clarifying RICO Injury Claims: American National Bank Trust Company of Chicago v. Haroco, Inc. Introduction American National Bank Trust Company of Chicago et al. v. Haroco, Inc., et al., 473 U.S....
Supreme Court Upholds Establishment Clause: Grand Rapids Educational Programs Violate Religious Neutrality

Supreme Court Upholds Establishment Clause: Grand Rapids Educational Programs Violate Religious Neutrality

Date: Jul 2, 1985
Supreme Court Upholds Establishment Clause: Grand Rapids Educational Programs Violate Religious Neutrality Introduction In the landmark case of SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF GRAND RAPIDS ET AL. v....
Montoya de Hernandez: Establishing Reasonable Suspicion for Alimentary Canal Smuggling Detentions at Borders

Montoya de Hernandez: Establishing Reasonable Suspicion for Alimentary Canal Smuggling Detentions at Borders

Date: Jul 2, 1985
Montoya de Hernandez: Establishing Reasonable Suspicion for Alimentary Canal Smuggling Detentions at Borders Introduction UNITED STATES v. MONTOYA DE HERNANDEZ, 473 U.S. 531 (1985), is a landmark...
Excessive Entanglement of Church and State in Educational Funding: Insights from AGUILAR v. FELTON (1985)

Excessive Entanglement of Church and State in Educational Funding: Insights from AGUILAR v. FELTON (1985)

Date: Jul 2, 1985
Excessive Entanglement of Church and State in Educational Funding: Insights from Aguilar et al. v. Felton et al. (1985) Introduction The Supreme Court case AGUILAR ET AL. v. FELTON ET AL., 473 U.S....
Sedima v. Imrex: Expanding the Scope of Civil RICO Actions Without Prior Convictions

Sedima v. Imrex: Expanding the Scope of Civil RICO Actions Without Prior Convictions

Date: Jul 2, 1985
Sedima v. Imrex: Expanding the Scope of Civil RICO Actions Without Prior Convictions Introduction Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co., Inc., et al. (473 U.S. 479) is a landmark decision by the United...
Ripeness Requirement for Takings Claims under §1983: Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank

Ripeness Requirement for Takings Claims under §1983: Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank

Date: Jun 29, 1985
Ripeness Requirement for Takings Claims under §1983: Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank Introduction In Williamson County Regional Planning Commission et al. v. Hamilton...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert