Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

United States v. Rojas-Contreras: Clarifying the Speedy Trial Act's Application to Superseding Indictments

United States v. Rojas-Contreras: Clarifying the Speedy Trial Act's Application to Superseding Indictments

Date: Dec 17, 1985
United States v. Rojas-Contreras: Clarifying the Speedy Trial Act's Application to Superseding Indictments Introduction United States v. Rojas-Contreras, 474 U.S. 231 (1985), is a pivotal United...
Substantive Due Process in Academic Dismissal: Regents of the University of Michigan v. Ewing

Substantive Due Process in Academic Dismissal: Regents of the University of Michigan v. Ewing

Date: Dec 13, 1985
Substantive Due Process in Academic Dismissal: Regents of the University of Michigan v. Ewing Introduction Regents of the University of Michigan v. Ewing is a landmark United States Supreme Court...
Qualified vs. Absolute Immunity for Prison Discipline Officials: Cleavinger v. Saxner

Qualified vs. Absolute Immunity for Prison Discipline Officials: Cleavinger v. Saxner

Date: Dec 11, 1985
Qualified vs. Absolute Immunity for Prison Discipline Officials: Cleavinger v. Saxner Introduction Clevelander v. Saxner, 474 U.S. 193 (1985), was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
Enhancing Sixth Amendment Protections: Maine v. Moulton and the Right to Counsel Post-Indictment

Enhancing Sixth Amendment Protections: Maine v. Moulton and the Right to Counsel Post-Indictment

Date: Dec 11, 1985
Enhancing Sixth Amendment Protections: Maine v. Moulton and the Right to Counsel Post-Indictment Introduction Maine v. Moulton (474 U.S. 159) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Reaffirming the Unconstitutionality of the Death Penalty for Mentally Retarded Individuals: Insights from Smith v. Francis Dissenting Opinions

Reaffirming the Unconstitutionality of the Death Penalty for Mentally Retarded Individuals: Insights from Smith v. Francis Dissenting Opinions

Date: Dec 10, 1985
Reaffirming the Unconstitutionality of the Death Penalty for Mentally Retarded Individuals: Insights from Smith v. Francis Dissenting Opinions Introduction William Alvin Smith v. Robert O. Francis,...
UNITED STATES v. RIVERSIDE BAYVIEW HOMES: Affirming Comprehensive Corps Jurisdiction Over Adjacent Wetlands

UNITED STATES v. RIVERSIDE BAYVIEW HOMES: Affirming Comprehensive Corps Jurisdiction Over Adjacent Wetlands

Date: Dec 5, 1985
UNITED STATES v. RIVERSIDE BAYVIEW HOMES: Affirming Comprehensive Corps Jurisdiction Over Adjacent Wetlands Introduction UNITED STATES v. RIVERSIDE BAYVIEW HOMES, Inc., 474 U.S. 121 (1985), is a...
Waiver of Appellate Review in Federal Habeas Corpus Proceedings: THOMAS v. ARN

Waiver of Appellate Review in Federal Habeas Corpus Proceedings: THOMAS v. ARN

Date: Dec 5, 1985
Waiver of Appellate Review in Federal Habeas Corpus Proceedings: THOMAS v. ARN 1. Introduction THOMAS v. ARN, Superintendent, Ohio Reformatory for Women, 474 U.S. 140 (1985), is a pivotal Supreme...
Dual Sovereignty Affirmed in Heath v. Alabama: Implications for Double Jeopardy Clause

Dual Sovereignty Affirmed in Heath v. Alabama: Implications for Double Jeopardy Clause

Date: Dec 4, 1985
Dual Sovereignty Affirmed in Heath v. Alabama: Implications for Double Jeopardy Clause Introduction Heath v. Alabama (474 U.S. 82, 1985) is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that reaffirms the dual...
Eleventh Amendment Constraints on Federal Relief: Insights from Green v. Mansour

Eleventh Amendment Constraints on Federal Relief: Insights from Green v. Mansour

Date: Dec 4, 1985
Eleventh Amendment Constraints on Federal Relief: Insights from Green v. Mansour Introduction Green v. Mansour, 474 U.S. 64 (1985), is a significant Supreme Court case that addresses the interplay...
Independent Federal Determination of Confession Voluntariness Established in MILLER v. FENTON

Independent Federal Determination of Confession Voluntariness Established in MILLER v. FENTON

Date: Dec 4, 1985
Independent Federal Determination of Confession Voluntariness Established in MILLER v. FENTON Introduction MILLER v. FENTON, 474 U.S. 104 (1985), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
Reliability of Confessions in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Del Vecchio v. Illinois

Reliability of Confessions in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Del Vecchio v. Illinois

Date: Dec 3, 1985
Reliability of Confessions in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Del Vecchio v. Illinois Introduction George W. Del Vecchio v. Illinois is a significant case adjudicated by the United States Supreme...
Restricting Federal Courts' Authority to Compel US Marshals for Transporting State Prisoner-Witnesses

Restricting Federal Courts' Authority to Compel US Marshals for Transporting State Prisoner-Witnesses

Date: Nov 19, 1985
Restricting Federal Courts' Authority to Compel US Marshals for Transporting State Prisoner-Witnesses Introduction Pennsylvania Bureau of Correction v. United States Marshals Service Et Al., 474 U.S....
HILL v. LOCKHART: Establishing the Strickland Standard in Guilty Plea Challenges

HILL v. LOCKHART: Establishing the Strickland Standard in Guilty Plea Challenges

Date: Nov 19, 1985
HILL v. LOCKHART: Establishing the Strickland Standard in Guilty Plea Challenges Introduction HILL v. LOCKHART, 474 U.S. 52 (1985), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Judicial Indifference to Probable Cause: Insights from McCommon v. Mississippi

Judicial Indifference to Probable Cause: Insights from McCommon v. Mississippi

Date: Nov 13, 1985
Judicial Indifference to Probable Cause: Insights from McCommon v. Mississippi Introduction Jerry McCommon v. Mississippi, 474 U.S. 984 (1985), represents a significant moment in the ongoing...
Double Jeopardy Implications in PENNSYLVANIA v. GOLDHAMMER

Double Jeopardy Implications in PENNSYLVANIA v. GOLDHAMMER

Date: Nov 13, 1985
Double Jeopardy Implications in PENNSYLVANIA v. GOLDHAMMER Introduction PENNSYLVANIA v. GOLDHAMMER, 474 U.S. 28 (1985), is a pivotal Supreme Court case addressing the application of the Double...
Secretary’s Unreviewable Discretion in Withdrawing OSHA Citations Affirmed

Secretary’s Unreviewable Discretion in Withdrawing OSHA Citations Affirmed

Date: Nov 5, 1985
Secretary’s Unreviewable Discretion in Withdrawing OSHA Citations Affirmed Introduction Cuyahoga Valley Railway Co. v. United Transportation Union ET AL. is a landmark case decided by the U.S....
Lorain Journal Co. v. Michael Milkovich: Redefining Public Figure Status in Defamation Law

Lorain Journal Co. v. Michael Milkovich: Redefining Public Figure Status in Defamation Law

Date: Nov 5, 1985
Lorain Journal Co. v. Michael Milkovich: Redefining Public Figure Status in Defamation Law Introduction The case of Lorain Journal Co. v. Michael Milkovich, adjudicated by the United States Supreme...
State-Imposed Tax Collection Obligations on Indian Tribes: A Comprehensive Analysis of California State Board of Equalization v. Chemehuevi Indian Tribe

State-Imposed Tax Collection Obligations on Indian Tribes: A Comprehensive Analysis of California State Board of Equalization v. Chemehuevi Indian Tribe

Date: Nov 5, 1985
State-Imposed Tax Collection Obligations on Indian Tribes: A Comprehensive Analysis of California State Board of Equalization et al. v. Chemehuevi Indian Tribe Introduction The case of California...
Delaware v. Fensterer: Reaffirming Confrontation Clause Protections in the Context of Expert Testimony

Delaware v. Fensterer: Reaffirming Confrontation Clause Protections in the Context of Expert Testimony

Date: Nov 5, 1985
Delaware v. Fensterer: Reaffirming Confrontation Clause Protections in the Context of Expert Testimony Introduction Delaware v. Fensterer (474 U.S. 15) is a pivotal United States Supreme Court case...
The Scope of Declaratory Relief Against the United States Under the Tucker Act: Insights from North Side Lumber Co. v. Block

The Scope of Declaratory Relief Against the United States Under the Tucker Act: Insights from North Side Lumber Co. v. Block

Date: Oct 22, 1985
The Scope of Declaratory Relief Against the United States Under the Tucker Act: Insights from North Side Lumber Co. v. Block Introduction North Side Lumber Co. v. John R. Block, Secretary of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert