Log In
  • India
  • US
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Commentaries
    United Kingdom
    England and Wales
    Scotland
    Northern Ireland
    Ireland
Log In Sign Up UK Judgments
  • India
  • US

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Limits of Ancient Title Doctrine in Determining Internal Waters: Insights from UNITED STATES v. MAINE et al.

Limits of Ancient Title Doctrine in Determining Internal Waters: Insights from UNITED STATES v. MAINE et al.

Date: Feb 26, 1986
Limits of Ancient Title Doctrine in Determining Internal Waters: Insights from UNITED STATES v. MAINE et al. Introduction The case of UNITED STATES v. MAINE et al., decided by the U.S. Supreme Court...
Harmless Error Doctrine Applied to Grand Jury Rule Violations in UNITED STATES v. MECHANIK Et Al.

Harmless Error Doctrine Applied to Grand Jury Rule Violations in UNITED STATES v. MECHANIK Et Al.

Date: Feb 26, 1986
Harmless Error Doctrine Applied to Grand Jury Rule Violations in UNITED STATES v. MECHANIK Et Al. Introduction UNITED STATES v. MECHANIK Et Al., 475 U.S. 66 (1986), addressed a significant procedural...
New York v. Class: Permissibility of VIN Searches During Traffic Stops

New York v. Class: Permissibility of VIN Searches During Traffic Stops

Date: Feb 26, 1986
New York v. Class: Permissibility of VIN Searches During Traffic Stops Introduction New York v. Class, 475 U.S. 106 (1986), addresses the constitutionality of a police officer's search of a vehicle...
Misjoinder Under Rule 8(b): Harmless-Error Analysis in UNITED STATES v. LANE et al.

Misjoinder Under Rule 8(b): Harmless-Error Analysis in UNITED STATES v. LANE et al.

Date: Jan 28, 1986
Misjoinder Under Rule 8(b): Harmless-Error Analysis in UNITED STATES v. LANE et al. Introduction UNITED STATES v. LANE et al., 474 U.S. 438 (1986), is a seminal Supreme Court decision addressing the...
Limitations on Bankruptcy Trustees’ Abandonment Power under MIDLANTIC National Bank v. New Jersey DEP

Limitations on Bankruptcy Trustees’ Abandonment Power under MIDLANTIC National Bank v. New Jersey DEP

Date: Jan 28, 1986
Limitations on Bankruptcy Trustees’ Abandonment Power under MIDLANTIC National Bank v. New Jersey DEP Introduction MIDLANTIC National Bank v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (474...
Parsons Steel v. First Alabama Bank: Reinforcing Full Faith and Credit and Limiting Federal Intrusion via Anti-Injunction Act

Parsons Steel v. First Alabama Bank: Reinforcing Full Faith and Credit and Limiting Federal Intrusion via Anti-Injunction Act

Date: Jan 28, 1986
Parsons Steel v. First Alabama Bank: Reinforcing Full Faith and Credit and Limiting Federal Intrusion via Anti-Injunction Act Introduction Parsons Steel, Inc., Et Al. v. First Alabama Bank Et Al.,...
State Aid to Individuals for Education Does Not Constitute Endorsement of Religion: Analysis of Witters v. Washington Department of Services for the Blind

State Aid to Individuals for Education Does Not Constitute Endorsement of Religion: Analysis of Witters v. Washington Department of Services for the Blind

Date: Jan 28, 1986
State Aid to Individuals for Education Does Not Constitute Endorsement of Religion: Analysis of Witters v. Washington Department of Services for the Blind Introduction Witters v. Washington...
Resolving Circuit Conflicts on Statute of Limitations for §1983 Actions: Commentary on Preuit & Mauldin v. Jones

Resolving Circuit Conflicts on Statute of Limitations for §1983 Actions: Commentary on Preuit & Mauldin v. Jones

Date: Jan 28, 1986
Resolving Circuit Conflicts on Statute of Limitations for §1983 Actions: Commentary on Preuit & Mauldin v. Jones Introduction The Supreme Court case Preuit & Mauldin v. Samuel Jones, Jr., 474 U.S....
Supreme Court Clarifies Enmund Compliance: Factual Findings Essential for Capital Sentencing

Supreme Court Clarifies Enmund Compliance: Factual Findings Essential for Capital Sentencing

Date: Jan 23, 1986
Supreme Court Clarifies Enmund Compliance: Factual Findings Essential for Capital Sentencing Introduction The United States Supreme Court case Cabana, Superintendent, Mississippi State Penitentiary,...
Limitation of Federal Reserve's Authority in Defining "Bank": Commentary on Board of Governors v. Dimension Financial Corp.

Limitation of Federal Reserve's Authority in Defining "Bank": Commentary on Board of Governors v. Dimension Financial Corp.

Date: Jan 23, 1986
Limitation of Federal Reserve's Authority in Defining "Bank": Commentary on Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. Dimension Financial Corp. Introduction In Board of Governors of the...
Federal Supremacy in Natural Gas Regulation Affirmed: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. v. State Oil and Gas Board of Mississippi

Federal Supremacy in Natural Gas Regulation Affirmed: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. v. State Oil and Gas Board of Mississippi

Date: Jan 23, 1986
Federal Supremacy in Natural Gas Regulation Affirmed: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. v. State Oil and Gas Board of Mississippi Introduction Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. v. State Oil and...
Disability Discrimination under Section 504: County of Los Angeles v. Mary L. Kling

Disability Discrimination under Section 504: County of Los Angeles v. Mary L. Kling

Date: Jan 22, 1986
Disability Discrimination under Section 504: County of Los Angeles v. Mary L. Kling Introduction County of Los Angeles v. Mary L. Kling is a significant case adjudicated by the United States Supreme...
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: Analysis of James E. Messer, Jr. v. Ralph Kemp

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: Analysis of James E. Messer, Jr. v. Ralph Kemp

Date: Jan 22, 1986
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: Analysis of James E. Messer, Jr. v. Ralph Kemp Introduction The case of James E. Messer, Jr. v. Ralph Kemp, 474 U.S. 1088 (1986), presents a...
Due Process and Negligence: Establishing Boundaries in DANIELS v. WILLIAMS

Due Process and Negligence: Establishing Boundaries in DANIELS v. WILLIAMS

Date: Jan 22, 1986
Due Process and Negligence: Establishing Boundaries in DANIELS v. WILLIAMS Introduction DANIELS v. WILLIAMS, 474 U.S. 327 (1986), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that clarifies the scope of the...
Negligence by State Prison Officials Does Not Constitute Due Process Violation Under the Fourteenth Amendment

Negligence by State Prison Officials Does Not Constitute Due Process Violation Under the Fourteenth Amendment

Date: Jan 22, 1986
Negligence by State Prison Officials Does Not Constitute Due Process Violation Under the Fourteenth Amendment Introduction Davidson v. Cannon et al., 474 U.S. 344 (1986) is a landmark case...
Exclusion of Unrestrained Period and Interlocutory Appeals in Speedy Trial Claims: Insights from UNITED STATES v. LOUD HAWK

Exclusion of Unrestrained Period and Interlocutory Appeals in Speedy Trial Claims: Insights from UNITED STATES v. LOUD HAWK

Date: Jan 22, 1986
Exclusion of Unrestrained Period and Interlocutory Appeals in Speedy Trial Claims: Insights from UNITED STATES v. LOUD HAWK Introduction UNITED STATES v. LOUD HAWK et al., 474 U.S. 302 (1986), is a...
Vasquez v. Hillery: Upholding Equal Protection in Grand Jury Selection

Vasquez v. Hillery: Upholding Equal Protection in Grand Jury Selection

Date: Jan 15, 1986
Vasquez v. Hillery: Upholding Equal Protection in Grand Jury Selection Introduction Vasquez, Warden v. Hillery, 474 U.S. 254 (1986), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Using Post-Miranda Silence as Evidence of Sanity: Wainwright v. Greenfield

Using Post-Miranda Silence as Evidence of Sanity: Wainwright v. Greenfield

Date: Jan 15, 1986
Using Post-Miranda Silence as Evidence of Sanity: Wainwright v. Greenfield Introduction Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections v. Greenfield, 474 U.S. 284 (1986), is a landmark...
Timely Processing of Remission Petitions and Due Process: United States v. Von Neumann

Timely Processing of Remission Petitions and Due Process: United States v. Von Neumann

Date: Jan 15, 1986
Timely Processing of Remission Petitions and Due Process: United States v. Von Neumann Introduction United States v. Von Neumann, 474 U.S. 242 (1986), is a landmark Supreme Court case that addresses...
Death Penalty for Juveniles and Mentally Impaired: Insights from Roach v. Aiken

Death Penalty for Juveniles and Mentally Impaired: Insights from Roach v. Aiken

Date: Jan 10, 1986
Death Penalty for Juveniles and the Mentally Impaired: Insights from Roach v. Aiken Introduction James Terry Roach v. James Aiken, Warden, 474 U.S. 1039 (1986), presents a critical examination of the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert

We use cookies to improve your experience

You can accept all cookies or turn off analytical ones.