Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Petition Clause Does Not Confer Absolute Immunity in Libel Cases: McDonald v. Smith

Petition Clause Does Not Confer Absolute Immunity in Libel Cases: McDonald v. Smith

Date: Jun 20, 1985
Petition Clause Does Not Confer Absolute Immunity in Libel Cases: McDonald v. Smith Introduction McDonald v. Smith, 472 U.S. 479 (1985), is a significant United States Supreme Court decision that...
Supreme Court Upholds ERISA Benefit Plans' Authority to Audit Employer Records

Supreme Court Upholds ERISA Benefit Plans' Authority to Audit Employer Records

Date: Jun 20, 1985
Supreme Court Upholds ERISA Benefit Plans' Authority to Audit Employer Records Introduction In the landmark case of CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND ET AL. v. CENTRAL TRANSPORT,...
Reaffirming Partial Invalidation of Obscenity Statutes: Analysis of Brocket v. Spokane Arcades

Reaffirming Partial Invalidation of Obscenity Statutes: Analysis of Brocket v. Spokane Arcades

Date: Jun 20, 1985
Reaffirming Partial Invalidation of Obscenity Statutes: Analysis of Brocket v. Spokane Arcades Introduction Brocket v. Spokane Arcades, Inc., et al. (472 U.S. 491) is a significant decision by the...
Mitchell v. Forsyth: Supreme Court Establishes Qualified Immunity for National Security Officials

Mitchell v. Forsyth: Supreme Court Establishes Qualified Immunity for National Security Officials

Date: Jun 20, 1985
Mitchell v. Forsyth: Supreme Court Establishes Qualified Immunity for National Security Officials Introduction Mitchell v. Forsyth, 469 U.S. 929 (1985), is a landmark decision by the United States...
Johnson v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore: Establishing BFOQ Standards under the ADEA

Johnson v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore: Establishing BFOQ Standards under the ADEA

Date: Jun 18, 1985
Johnson v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore: Establishing BFOQ Standards under the ADEA Introduction Johnson et al. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore et al. (472 U.S. 353, 1985) is a landmark...
Establishing the "Some Evidence" Standard for Revoking Good Time Credits under the Due Process Clause

Establishing the "Some Evidence" Standard for Revoking Good Time Credits under the Due Process Clause

Date: Jun 18, 1985
Establishing the "Some Evidence" Standard for Revoking Good Time Credits under the Due Process Clause Introduction In Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional Institution at Walpole v. Hill et al.,...
Strict Application of BFOQ Exception under the ADEA: Western Air Lines, Inc. v. Criswell

Strict Application of BFOQ Exception under the ADEA: Western Air Lines, Inc. v. Criswell

Date: Jun 18, 1985
Strict Application of BFOQ Exception under the ADEA: Western Air Lines, Inc. v. Criswell Introduction Western Air Lines, Inc. v. Criswell et al., 472 U.S. 400 (1985), is a landmark decision by the...
Limits on Immediate Appeal of Counsel Disqualification in Civil Cases: Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller

Limits on Immediate Appeal of Counsel Disqualification in Civil Cases: Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller

Date: Jun 18, 1985
Limits on Immediate Appeal of Counsel Disqualification in Civil Cases: Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller Introduction In the landmark case of Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller, 472 U.S. 424 (1985),...
Baldwin v. Alabama: Upholding Judicial Discretion in Capital Sentencing

Baldwin v. Alabama: Upholding Judicial Discretion in Capital Sentencing

Date: Jun 18, 1985
Baldwin v. Alabama: Upholding Judicial Discretion in Capital Sentencing Introduction Baldwin v. Alabama, 472 U.S. 372 (1985), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that addressed...
Maryland v. Macon: Upholding Fourth Amendment Protections in Obscenity Cases

Maryland v. Macon: Upholding Fourth Amendment Protections in Obscenity Cases

Date: Jun 18, 1985
Maryland v. Macon: Upholding Fourth Amendment Protections in Obscenity Cases Introduction Maryland v. Macon (472 U.S. 463, 1985) is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that delves into the intricacies...
Reliability in Capital Sentencing: Caldwell v. Mississippi

Reliability in Capital Sentencing: Caldwell v. Mississippi

Date: Jun 12, 1985
Reliability in Capital Sentencing: Caldwell v. Mississippi Introduction Caldwell v. Mississippi, 472 U.S. 320 (1985), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that addressed the...
In Pari Delicto Defense in Securities Fraud: Supreme Court's Stance in Bateman Eichler v. Berner

In Pari Delicto Defense in Securities Fraud: Supreme Court's Stance in Bateman Eichler v. Berner

Date: Jun 12, 1985
In Pari Delicto Defense in Securities Fraud: Supreme Court's Stance in Bateman Eichler v. Berner Introduction The case of Bateman Eichler, Hill Richards, Inc. v. Berner et al. (472 U.S. 299, 1985)...
Per Se Antitrust Liability in Cooperative Expulsions: Insights from Northwest Wholesale Stationers, Inc. v. Pacific Stationery Printing Co.

Per Se Antitrust Liability in Cooperative Expulsions: Insights from Northwest Wholesale Stationers, Inc. v. Pacific Stationery Printing Co.

Date: Jun 12, 1985
Per Se Antitrust Liability in Cooperative Expulsions: Insights from Northwest Wholesale Stationers, Inc. v. Pacific Stationery Printing Co. Introduction The United States Supreme Court case Northwest...
Validating Land Conveyance under §17 of the Pueblo Lands Act: An Analysis of Mountain States Telephone Telegraph Co. v. Pueblo of Santa Ana

Validating Land Conveyance under §17 of the Pueblo Lands Act: An Analysis of Mountain States Telephone Telegraph Co. v. Pueblo of Santa Ana

Date: Jun 11, 1985
Validating Land Conveyance under §17 of the Pueblo Lands Act: An Analysis of Mountain States Telephone Telegraph Co. v. Pueblo of Santa Ana Introduction Mountain States Telephone Telegraph Co. v....
Northeast Bancorp v. Board of Governors: Affirming Regional Interstate Banking under the Douglas Amendment

Northeast Bancorp v. Board of Governors: Affirming Regional Interstate Banking under the Douglas Amendment

Date: Jun 11, 1985
Northeast Bancorp v. Board of Governors: Affirming Regional Interstate Banking under the Douglas Amendment Introduction Northeast Bancorp, Inc., et al. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve...
Exclusion of Bona Fide Investment Publications from the Investment Advisers Act: Lowe v. SEC

Exclusion of Bona Fide Investment Publications from the Investment Advisers Act: Lowe v. SEC

Date: Jun 11, 1985
Exclusion of Bona Fide Investment Publications from the Investment Advisers Act: Lowe v. SEC Introduction Case: Lowe et al. v. Securities and Exchange Commission Court: U.S. Supreme Court Date: June...
Schreiber v. Burlington Northern: Defining "Manipulative" Under §14(e) of the Securities Exchange Act

Schreiber v. Burlington Northern: Defining "Manipulative" Under §14(e) of the Securities Exchange Act

Date: Jun 5, 1985
Schreiber v. Burlington Northern: Defining "Manipulative" Under §14(e) of the Securities Exchange Act Introduction The Supreme Court case SCHREIBER v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN, INC., et al., 472 U.S. 1...
Wallace v. Jaffree: A Landmark Ruling on the Establishment Clause

Wallace v. Jaffree: A Landmark Ruling on the Establishment Clause

Date: Jun 5, 1985
Wallace v. Jaffree: A Landmark Ruling on the Establishment Clause Introduction Wallace, Governor of Alabama, et al. v. Jaffree et al. is a significant U.S. Supreme Court case decided on June 4, 1985....
Equal Protection Violation in State Use Tax Credit Schemes: Williams v. Vermont

Equal Protection Violation in State Use Tax Credit Schemes: Williams v. Vermont

Date: Jun 5, 1985
Equal Protection Violation in State Use Tax Credit Schemes: Williams v. Vermont Introduction Williams v. Vermont, 472 U.S. 14 (1985), is a significant United States Supreme Court case that...
ATKINS v. PARKER: Upholding Statutory Notice Requirements Under the Due Process Clause in Food Stamp Benefit Adjustments

ATKINS v. PARKER: Upholding Statutory Notice Requirements Under the Due Process Clause in Food Stamp Benefit Adjustments

Date: Jun 5, 1985
ATKINS v. PARKER: Upholding Statutory Notice Requirements Under the Due Process Clause in Food Stamp Benefit Adjustments Introduction ATKINS, Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Public...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert