Log In
  • India
  • US
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Commentaries
    United Kingdom
    England and Wales
    Scotland
    Northern Ireland
    Ireland
Log In Sign Up UK Judgments
  • India
  • US

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

The Constitutionality of Death-Qualified Juries in Joint Trials: Insights from Buchanan v. Kentucky

The Constitutionality of Death-Qualified Juries in Joint Trials: Insights from Buchanan v. Kentucky

Date: Jun 25, 1987
The Constitutionality of Death-Qualified Juries in Joint Trials: Insights from Buchanan v. Kentucky Introduction Buchanan v. Kentucky, 483 U.S. 402 (1987), is a pivotal United States Supreme Court...
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints v. Amos: Upholding §702 Exemption under the Establishment Clause

Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints v. Amos: Upholding §702 Exemption under the Establishment Clause

Date: Jun 25, 1987
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints v. Amos: Upholding §702 Exemption under the Establishment Clause Introduction In Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of The Church of Jesus Christ of...
McNally v. United States: Defining the Scope of Mail Fraud to Property Rights

McNally v. United States: Defining the Scope of Mail Fraud to Property Rights

Date: Jun 25, 1987
McNally v. United States: Defining the Scope of Mail Fraud to Property Rights Introduction McNally v. United States (483 U.S. 350) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Enforcement of the Extradition Clause: Puerto Rico v. Branstad Establishes Federal Authority

Enforcement of the Extradition Clause: Puerto Rico v. Branstad Establishes Federal Authority

Date: Jun 24, 1987
Enforcement of the Extradition Clause: Puerto Rico v. Branstad Establishes Federal Authority 1. Introduction Puerto Rico v. Branstad, 483 U.S. 219 (1987), is a landmark decision by the United States...
Establishing the 'Internal Consistency' Test: A Comprehensive Analysis of American Trucking Associations v. Scheinner

Establishing the 'Internal Consistency' Test: A Comprehensive Analysis of American Trucking Associations v. Scheinner

Date: Jun 24, 1987
Establishing the 'Internal Consistency' Test: A Comprehensive Analysis of American Trucking Associations v. Scheinner Introduction The United States Supreme Court case American Trucking Associations,...
Commerce Clause Violations in State Taxation: An Analysis of Tyler Pipe Industries, Inc. v. Washington State Department of Revenue

Commerce Clause Violations in State Taxation: An Analysis of Tyler Pipe Industries, Inc. v. Washington State Department of Revenue

Date: Jun 24, 1987
Commerce Clause Violations in State Taxation: An Analysis of Tyler Pipe Industries, Inc. v. Washington State Department of Revenue Introduction The landmark case Tyler Pipe Industries, Inc. v....
Fourth Amendment Protections in Communal Trash Searches: An Analysis of California v. Rooney

Fourth Amendment Protections in Communal Trash Searches: An Analysis of California v. Rooney

Date: Jun 24, 1987
Fourth Amendment Protections in Communal Trash Searches: An Analysis of California v. Rooney Introduction California v. Rooney (483 U.S. 307) is a pivotal U.S. Supreme Court case that addresses the...
Clarifying the Co-Conspirator Hearsay Exception and Bootstrapping Rule: Analysis of BOURJAILY v. United States

Clarifying the Co-Conspirator Hearsay Exception and Bootstrapping Rule: Analysis of BOURJAILY v. United States

Date: Jun 24, 1987
Clarifying the Co-Conspirator Hearsay Exception and Bootstrapping Rule: Analysis of BOURJAILY v. United States Introduction BOURJAILY v. UNITED STATES, 483 U.S. 171 (1987), is a pivotal case in the...
South Dakota v. Dole: Affirming Congressional Power to Condition Federal Funds on State Compliance

South Dakota v. Dole: Affirming Congressional Power to Condition Federal Funds on State Compliance

Date: Jun 24, 1987
South Dakota v. Dole: Affirming Congressional Power to Condition Federal Funds on State Compliance 1. Introduction South Dakota v. Dole (483 U.S. 203, 1987) is a landmark decision by the United...
Immediate Loss Deductions Disallowed for Dominant Shareholder's Voluntary Stock Surrender

Immediate Loss Deductions Disallowed for Dominant Shareholder's Voluntary Stock Surrender

Date: Jun 23, 1987
Immediate Loss Deductions Disallowed for Dominant Shareholder's Voluntary Stock Surrender Introduction The case of Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Fink et al., 483 U.S. 89 (1987), addresses a...
Citicorp Industrial Credit, Inc. v. Brock: Establishing the Applicability of FLSA's "Hot Goods" Provision to Secured Creditors

Citicorp Industrial Credit, Inc. v. Brock: Establishing the Applicability of FLSA's "Hot Goods" Provision to Secured Creditors

Date: Jun 23, 1987
Citicorp Industrial Credit, Inc. v. Brock: Establishing the Applicability of FLSA's "Hot Goods" Provision to Secured Creditors Introduction CITICORP INDUSTRIAL CREDIT, INC. v. BROCK, SECRETARY OF...
Affirming the Constitutional Right to Hypnotically Refreshed Testimony: ROCK v. ARKANSAS

Affirming the Constitutional Right to Hypnotically Refreshed Testimony: ROCK v. ARKANSAS

Date: Jun 23, 1987
Affirming the Constitutional Right to Hypnotically Refreshed Testimony: ROCK v. ARKANSAS Introduction ROCK v. ARKANSAS, 483 U.S. 44 (1987), represents a pivotal moment in American jurisprudence...
Uniform Statute of Limitations for Civil RICO Actions: Analysis of AGENCY HOLDING CORP. ET AL. v. MALLEY-DUFF ASSOCIATES, INC.

Uniform Statute of Limitations for Civil RICO Actions: Analysis of AGENCY HOLDING CORP. ET AL. v. MALLEY-DUFF ASSOCIATES, INC.

Date: Jun 23, 1987
Uniform Statute of Limitations for Civil RICO Actions: Analysis of AGENCY HOLDING CORP. ET AL. v. MALLEY-DUFF ASSOCIATES, INC. Introduction In the landmark decision of Agency Holding Corp. et al. v....
Double Jeopardy and Plea Agreement Breaches: Insights from Rickets v. Adamson

Double Jeopardy and Plea Agreement Breaches: Insights from Rickets v. Adamson

Date: Jun 23, 1987
Double Jeopardy and Plea Agreement Breaches: Insights from Rickets v. Adamson Introduction Rickets, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al. v. Adamson, 483 U.S. 1 (1987), is a seminal...
Clarifying Rule 606(b) and 18 U.S.C. §371 in Tanner v. United States

Clarifying Rule 606(b) and 18 U.S.C. §371 in Tanner v. United States

Date: Jun 23, 1987
Clarifying Rule 606(b) and 18 U.S.C. §371 in Tanner v. United States Introduction Tanner et al. v. United States, 483 U.S. 107 (1987) is a significant Supreme Court decision that addressed two...
Mandatory Death Sentences for Life-Term Inmates Violate Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments

Mandatory Death Sentences for Life-Term Inmates Violate Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments

Date: Jun 23, 1987
Mandatory Death Sentences for Life-Term Inmates Violate Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments Introduction Sumner, Director, Nevada Department of Prisons, et al. v. Shuman (483 U.S. 66) is a landmark 1987...
Application of Personal Injury Statute of Limitations to §1981 Discrimination Claims: GOODMAN v. LUKENS STEEL CO.

Application of Personal Injury Statute of Limitations to §1981 Discrimination Claims: GOODMAN v. LUKENS STEEL CO.

Date: Jun 20, 1987
Application of Personal Injury Statute of Limitations to §1981 Discrimination Claims: GOODMAN v. LUKENS STEEL CO. Introduction Goodman et al. v. Lukens Steel Co. et al., 482 U.S. 656 (1987), is a...
Permissibility of Warrantless Inspections in Closely Regulated Industries: New Precedent from New York v. Burger

Permissibility of Warrantless Inspections in Closely Regulated Industries: New Precedent from New York v. Burger

Date: Jun 20, 1987
Permissibility of Warrantless Inspections in Closely Regulated Industries: New Precedent from New York v. Burger Introduction New York v. Burger, 482 U.S. 691 (1987), is a landmark decision by the...
HELMS v. HEWITT: Clarifying "Prevailing Party" Status for Attorney’s Fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988

HELMS v. HEWITT: Clarifying "Prevailing Party" Status for Attorney’s Fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Date: Jun 20, 1987
HELMS v. HEWITT: Clarifying "Prevailing Party" Status for Attorney’s Fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 Introduction HELMS v. HEWITT, 482 U.S. 755 (1987), is a pivotal Supreme Court case that addresses the...
Supreme Court Sets Precedent on Establishment Clause: Louisiana's Creationism Act Found Unconstitutional

Supreme Court Sets Precedent on Establishment Clause: Louisiana's Creationism Act Found Unconstitutional

Date: Jun 20, 1987
Supreme Court Sets Precedent on Establishment Clause: Louisiana's Creationism Act Found Unconstitutional Introduction In Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987), the United States Supreme Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert

We use cookies to improve your experience

You can accept all cookies or turn off analytical ones.