Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Langley v. FDIC: Upholding Statutory Requirements for Bank Agreements Introduction Langley et ux. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (484 U.S. 86) is a seminal United States Supreme Court case...
Protecting Confidential Business Information under Mail and Wire Fraud Statutes: Carpenter et al. v. United States Introduction Carpenter et al. v. United States is a landmark decision by the United...
Affirming the Confidentiality of Redacted Tax Information: Church of Scientology v. IRS Introduction Church of Scientology of California v. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is a landmark case decided...
Admissibility of Unadjudicated Offenses in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Williams v. Texas Introduction Williams v. Texas, 484 U.S. 935 (1987), presents a critical examination of the...
Limits on Appellate Jurisdiction in Tax Deficiency Assessments: Commissioner v. McCoy Comprehensive Legal Commentary Introduction Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. McCoy, Executor of the Estate of...
Ensuring Effective Defense: The Right to Expert Assistance in Capital Cases Introduction Malcolm Rent Johnson v. Oklahoma (484 U.S. 878) is a pivotal case addressing the constitutional rights of...
Supreme Court Denies Certiorari in Muehleman v. Florida: Implications for the Death Penalty and Sixth Amendment Rights Introduction Jeffrey Allen Muehleman v. Florida, 484 U.S. 882 (1987), is a...
NOLLAN v. CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMmission: Defining the Nexus in Takings Law Introduction Nollan et ux. v. California Coastal Commission (483 U.S. 825, 1987) is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that...
Strict Interpretation of Lodestar Method: Rejection of Risk-Based Enhancements in Fee-Shifting under §304(d) Clean Air Act Introduction In the landmark decision of Pennsylvania et al. v. Delaware...
Greer v. Miller: Clarifying the Limits of Prosecutorial Inquiries into Postarrest Silence Introduction Greer v. Miller, 483 U.S. 756 (1987), is a significant Supreme Court decision that addresses the...
Griffin v. Wisconsin: Establishing Warrantless Searches of Probationers under Special Needs Exception Introduction Griffin v. Wisconsin is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court,...
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: Insights from BURGER v. KEMP Introduction BURGER v. KEMP, Warden, 483 U.S. 776 (1987), is a significant Supreme Court decision that delves into the...
Bowen v. Gillard: Affirmation of Rational Basis Standard for AFDC Eligibility under DEFRA Amendments Introduction Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. Gillard et al. is a landmark U.S....
Limitations on Bivens Actions in Military Contexts: Insights from United States v. Stanley Introduction United States et al. v. Stanley, 483 U.S. 669 (1987), is a pivotal Supreme Court case that...
Reaffirming State Sovereign Immunity: The Eleventh Amendment in Welch v. Texas Department of Highways and Public Transportation Introduction Welch v. Texas Department of Highways and Public...
Exclusive Trademark Rights of USOC in "Olympic" Branding: SFAA v. USOC Introduction The case of San Francisco Arts Athletics, Inc., et al. v. United States Olympic Committee et al. (483 U.S. 522,...
Refining Qualified Immunity for Law Enforcement: Insights from Anderson v. Creighton (483 U.S. 635) Introduction Anderson v. Creighton (483 U.S. 635), decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on June 25,...
Overruling O'Callahan: Court-Martial Jurisdiction Based on Military Status Introduction SOLORIO v. UNITED STATES (483 U.S. 435), decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on June 25, 1987, marks a pivotal...
Affirmation of Preponderance of Evidence Standard in Paternity Cases: RIVERA v. MINNICH Introduction RIVERA v. MINNICH (483 U.S. 574) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Protected Speech in Non-Policymaking Roles: Analyzing Rankin v. McPherson Introduction Rankin et al. v. McPherson, 483 U.S. 378 (1987), is a landmark Supreme Court decision addressing the balance...