Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Langley v. FDIC: Upholding Statutory Requirements for Bank Agreements

Langley v. FDIC: Upholding Statutory Requirements for Bank Agreements

Date: Dec 2, 1987
Langley v. FDIC: Upholding Statutory Requirements for Bank Agreements Introduction Langley et ux. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (484 U.S. 86) is a seminal United States Supreme Court case...
Protecting Confidential Business Information under Mail and Wire Fraud Statutes: Carpenter et al. v. United States

Protecting Confidential Business Information under Mail and Wire Fraud Statutes: Carpenter et al. v. United States

Date: Nov 17, 1987
Protecting Confidential Business Information under Mail and Wire Fraud Statutes: Carpenter et al. v. United States Introduction Carpenter et al. v. United States is a landmark decision by the United...
Affirming the Confidentiality of Redacted Tax Information: Church of Scientology v. IRS

Affirming the Confidentiality of Redacted Tax Information: Church of Scientology v. IRS

Date: Nov 11, 1987
Affirming the Confidentiality of Redacted Tax Information: Church of Scientology v. IRS Introduction Church of Scientology of California v. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is a landmark case decided...
Admissibility of Unadjudicated Offenses in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Williams v. Texas

Admissibility of Unadjudicated Offenses in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Williams v. Texas

Date: Nov 3, 1987
Admissibility of Unadjudicated Offenses in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Williams v. Texas Introduction Williams v. Texas, 484 U.S. 935 (1987), presents a critical examination of the...
Limits on Appellate Jurisdiction in Tax Deficiency Assessments: Commissioner v. McCoy

Limits on Appellate Jurisdiction in Tax Deficiency Assessments: Commissioner v. McCoy

Date: Oct 20, 1987
Limits on Appellate Jurisdiction in Tax Deficiency Assessments: Commissioner v. McCoy Comprehensive Legal Commentary Introduction Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. McCoy, Executor of the Estate of...
Ensuring Effective Defense: The Right to Expert Assistance in Capital Cases - Commentary on Johnson v. Oklahoma

Ensuring Effective Defense: The Right to Expert Assistance in Capital Cases - Commentary on Johnson v. Oklahoma

Date: Oct 6, 1987
Ensuring Effective Defense: The Right to Expert Assistance in Capital Cases Introduction Malcolm Rent Johnson v. Oklahoma (484 U.S. 878) is a pivotal case addressing the constitutional rights of...
Supreme Court Denies Certiorari in Muehleman v. Florida: Implications for the Death Penalty and Sixth Amendment Rights

Supreme Court Denies Certiorari in Muehleman v. Florida: Implications for the Death Penalty and Sixth Amendment Rights

Date: Oct 6, 1987
Supreme Court Denies Certiorari in Muehleman v. Florida: Implications for the Death Penalty and Sixth Amendment Rights Introduction Jeffrey Allen Muehleman v. Florida, 484 U.S. 882 (1987), is a...
NOLLAN v. CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMmission: Defining the Nexus in Takings Law

NOLLAN v. CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMmission: Defining the Nexus in Takings Law

Date: Jun 27, 1987
NOLLAN v. CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMmission: Defining the Nexus in Takings Law Introduction Nollan et ux. v. California Coastal Commission (483 U.S. 825, 1987) is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that...
Strict Interpretation of Lodestar Method: Rejection of Risk-Based Enhancements in Fee-Shifting under §304(d) Clean Air Act

Strict Interpretation of Lodestar Method: Rejection of Risk-Based Enhancements in Fee-Shifting under §304(d) Clean Air Act

Date: Jun 27, 1987
Strict Interpretation of Lodestar Method: Rejection of Risk-Based Enhancements in Fee-Shifting under §304(d) Clean Air Act Introduction In the landmark decision of Pennsylvania et al. v. Delaware...
Greer v. Miller: Clarifying the Limits of Prosecutorial Inquiries into Postarrest Silence

Greer v. Miller: Clarifying the Limits of Prosecutorial Inquiries into Postarrest Silence

Date: Jun 27, 1987
Greer v. Miller: Clarifying the Limits of Prosecutorial Inquiries into Postarrest Silence Introduction Greer v. Miller, 483 U.S. 756 (1987), is a significant Supreme Court decision that addresses the...
Griffin v. Wisconsin: Establishing Warrantless Searches of Probationers under Special Needs Exception

Griffin v. Wisconsin: Establishing Warrantless Searches of Probationers under Special Needs Exception

Date: Jun 27, 1987
Griffin v. Wisconsin: Establishing Warrantless Searches of Probationers under Special Needs Exception Introduction Griffin v. Wisconsin is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court,...
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: Insights from BURGER v. KEMP

Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: Insights from BURGER v. KEMP

Date: Jun 27, 1987
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: Insights from BURGER v. KEMP Introduction BURGER v. KEMP, Warden, 483 U.S. 776 (1987), is a significant Supreme Court decision that delves into the...
Bowen v. Gillard: Affirmation of Rational Basis Standard for AFDC Eligibility under DEFRA Amendments

Bowen v. Gillard: Affirmation of Rational Basis Standard for AFDC Eligibility under DEFRA Amendments

Date: Jun 26, 1987
Bowen v. Gillard: Affirmation of Rational Basis Standard for AFDC Eligibility under DEFRA Amendments Introduction Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. Gillard et al. is a landmark U.S....
Limitations on Bivens Actions in Military Contexts: Insights from United States v. Stanley

Limitations on Bivens Actions in Military Contexts: Insights from United States v. Stanley

Date: Jun 26, 1987
Limitations on Bivens Actions in Military Contexts: Insights from United States v. Stanley Introduction United States et al. v. Stanley, 483 U.S. 669 (1987), is a pivotal Supreme Court case that...
Reaffirming State Sovereign Immunity: The Eleventh Amendment in Welch v. Texas Department of Highways and Public Transportation

Reaffirming State Sovereign Immunity: The Eleventh Amendment in Welch v. Texas Department of Highways and Public Transportation

Date: Jun 26, 1987
Reaffirming State Sovereign Immunity: The Eleventh Amendment in Welch v. Texas Department of Highways and Public Transportation Introduction Welch v. Texas Department of Highways and Public...
Exclusive Trademark Rights of USOC in "Olympic" Branding: SFAA v. USOC

Exclusive Trademark Rights of USOC in "Olympic" Branding: SFAA v. USOC

Date: Jun 26, 1987
Exclusive Trademark Rights of USOC in "Olympic" Branding: SFAA v. USOC Introduction The case of San Francisco Arts Athletics, Inc., et al. v. United States Olympic Committee et al. (483 U.S. 522,...
Refining Qualified Immunity for Law Enforcement: Insights from Anderson v. Creighton (483 U.S. 635)

Refining Qualified Immunity for Law Enforcement: Insights from Anderson v. Creighton (483 U.S. 635)

Date: Jun 26, 1987
Refining Qualified Immunity for Law Enforcement: Insights from Anderson v. Creighton (483 U.S. 635) Introduction Anderson v. Creighton (483 U.S. 635), decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on June 25,...
Overruling O'Callahan: Court-Martial Jurisdiction Based on Military Status

Overruling O'Callahan: Court-Martial Jurisdiction Based on Military Status

Date: Jun 26, 1987
Overruling O'Callahan: Court-Martial Jurisdiction Based on Military Status Introduction SOLORIO v. UNITED STATES (483 U.S. 435), decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on June 25, 1987, marks a pivotal...
Affirmation of Preponderance of Evidence Standard in Paternity Cases: RIVERA v. MINNICH

Affirmation of Preponderance of Evidence Standard in Paternity Cases: RIVERA v. MINNICH

Date: Jun 26, 1987
Affirmation of Preponderance of Evidence Standard in Paternity Cases: RIVERA v. MINNICH Introduction RIVERA v. MINNICH (483 U.S. 574) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Protected Speech in Non-Policymaking Roles: Analyzing Rankin v. McPherson

Protected Speech in Non-Policymaking Roles: Analyzing Rankin v. McPherson

Date: Jun 25, 1987
Protected Speech in Non-Policymaking Roles: Analyzing Rankin v. McPherson Introduction Rankin et al. v. McPherson, 483 U.S. 378 (1987), is a landmark Supreme Court decision addressing the balance...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert