Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Kentucky v. Stincer: Upholding Defendant’s Confrontation Rights Despite Exclusion from Competency Hearing

Kentucky v. Stincer: Upholding Defendant’s Confrontation Rights Despite Exclusion from Competency Hearing

Date: Jun 20, 1987
Kentucky v. Stincer: Upholding Defendant’s Confrontation Rights Despite Exclusion from Competency Hearing Introduction In Kentucky v. Stincer, 482 U.S. 730 (1987), the United States Supreme Court...
FRAZIER v. HEEBE: Supreme Court Limits Local Bar Admission Requirements

FRAZIER v. HEEBE: Supreme Court Limits Local Bar Admission Requirements

Date: Jun 20, 1987
FRAZIER v. HEEBE: Supreme Court Limits Local Bar Admission Requirements Introduction In FRAZIER v. HEEBE, 482 U.S. 641 (1987), the United States Supreme Court addressed whether a federal district...
Federal Arbitration Act Preempts California Labor Code in Enforcing Arbitration Agreements for Wage Claims: Perry v. Thomas

Federal Arbitration Act Preempts California Labor Code in Enforcing Arbitration Agreements for Wage Claims: Perry v. Thomas

Date: Jun 16, 1987
Federal Arbitration Act Preempts California Labor Code in Enforcing Arbitration Agreements for Wage Claims: Perry v. Thomas Introduction The case of Perry et al. v. Thomas (482 U.S. 483) presents a...
Limits on Overbroad Municipal Ordinances Restricting Speech Towards Police: Analysis of CITY OF HOUSTON, TEXAS v. HILL

Limits on Overbroad Municipal Ordinances Restricting Speech Towards Police: Analysis of CITY OF HOUSTON, TEXAS v. HILL

Date: Jun 16, 1987
Limits on Overbroad Municipal Ordinances Restricting Speech Towards Police: Analysis of City of Houston, Texas v. Hill Introduction City of Houston, Texas v. Hill, 482 U.S. 451 (1987), is a landmark...
Limitation on Federal Courts to Tax Expert Witness Fees as Costs: Crawford Fitting Co. v. J.T. Gibbons, Inc.

Limitation on Federal Courts to Tax Expert Witness Fees as Costs: Crawford Fitting Co. v. J.T. Gibbons, Inc.

Date: Jun 16, 1987
Limitation on Federal Courts to Tax Expert Witness Fees as Costs: Crawford Fitting Co. v. J.T. Gibbons, Inc. Introduction Crawford Fitting Co. et al. v. J.T. Gibbons, Inc. is a pivotal Supreme Court...
Hague Evidence Convention Not Exclusive in U.S. Federal Discovery Process

Hague Evidence Convention Not Exclusive in U.S. Federal Discovery Process

Date: Jun 16, 1987
Hague Evidence Convention Not Exclusive in U.S. Federal Discovery Process Introduction Société Nationale Industrielle Aéropatiale et al. v. United States District Court for the Southern District of...
Absolute Ban on First Amendment Activities at Public Airports Unconstitutional

Absolute Ban on First Amendment Activities at Public Airports Unconstitutional

Date: Jun 16, 1987
Absolute Ban on First Amendment Activities at Public Airports Unconstitutional Introduction In Board of Airport Commissioners of the City of Los Angeles v. Jews for Jesus, Inc., 482 U.S. 569 (1987),...
Eighth Amendment Implications of Victim Impact Statements in Capital Sentencing: Analysis of Booth v. Maryland

Eighth Amendment Implications of Victim Impact Statements in Capital Sentencing: Analysis of Booth v. Maryland

Date: Jun 16, 1987
Eighth Amendment Implications of Victim Impact Statements in Capital Sentencing: Analysis of Booth v. Maryland Introduction Booth v. Maryland, 482 U.S. 496 (1987), is a landmark case that addresses...
Retrospective Application of Sentencing Guidelines and the Ex Post Facto Clause: An Analysis of Miller v. Florida

Retrospective Application of Sentencing Guidelines and the Ex Post Facto Clause: An Analysis of Miller v. Florida

Date: Jun 10, 1987
Retrospective Application of Sentencing Guidelines and the Ex Post Facto Clause: An Analysis of Miller v. Florida Introduction Miller v. Florida, 482 U.S. 423 (1987), is a landmark decision by the...
Recognition of Compensation for Temporary Regulatory Takings under the Fifth Amendment

Recognition of Compensation for Temporary Regulatory Takings under the Fifth Amendment

Date: Jun 10, 1987
Recognition of Compensation for Temporary Regulatory Takings under the Fifth Amendment Introduction In the landmark case First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. County of Los...
Complete Preemption Doctrine Affirmed in Caterpillar Inc. v. Williams

Complete Preemption Doctrine Affirmed in Caterpillar Inc. v. Williams

Date: Jun 10, 1987
Complete Preemption Doctrine Affirmed in Caterpillar Inc. v. Williams Introduction Caterpillar Inc. v. Williams, 482 U.S. 386 (1987), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Montana Parole Statute Establishes Protected Liberty Interest Under Due Process

Montana Parole Statute Establishes Protected Liberty Interest Under Due Process

Date: Jun 10, 1987
Montana Parole Statute Establishes Protected Liberty Interest Under Due Process Introduction Board of Pardons et al. v. Allen et al. (482 U.S. 369) is a pivotal Supreme Court decision rendered on...
Establishing the Reasonableness Standard: Insights from O'Lone v. Estate of Shabazz

Establishing the Reasonableness Standard: Insights from O'Lone v. Estate of Shabazz

Date: Jun 10, 1987
Establishing the Reasonableness Standard: Insights from O'Lone v. Estate of Shabazz Introduction The Supreme Court case of O'Lone, Administrator, Leesburg Prison Complex, et al. v. Estate of Shabazz...
Extradition Act Limits Asylum State Habeas Corpus: California v. Superior Court of California (Smolin)

Extradition Act Limits Asylum State Habeas Corpus: California v. Superior Court of California (Smolin)

Date: Jun 10, 1987
Extradition Act Limits Asylum State Habeas Corpus: California v. Superior Court of California (Smolin) Introduction California v. Superior Court of California, San Bernardino County (Smolin et al.,...
Non-Reviewability of Agency Denials to Reopen Based on Material Error: Interstate Commerce Commission v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers

Non-Reviewability of Agency Denials to Reopen Based on Material Error: Interstate Commerce Commission v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers

Date: Jun 9, 1987
Non-Reviewability of Agency Denials to Reopen Based on Material Error: Interstate Commerce Commission v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers Introduction The case of Interstate Commerce Commission v....
Ginnie Mae Securities and State Taxation: Insights from Rockford Life Insurance Co. v. Illinois Dept. of Revenue

Ginnie Mae Securities and State Taxation: Insights from Rockford Life Insurance Co. v. Illinois Dept. of Revenue

Date: Jun 9, 1987
Ginnie Mae Securities and State Taxation: Insights from Rockford Life Insurance Co. v. Illinois Dept. of Revenue Introduction The landmark case Rockford Life Insurance Co. v. Illinois Department of...
U.S. Supreme Court Validates SSA's Severity Regulation in Disability Determinations in Bowen v. Yuckert

U.S. Supreme Court Validates SSA's Severity Regulation in Disability Determinations in Bowen v. Yuckert

Date: Jun 9, 1987
U.S. Supreme Court Validates SSA's Severity Regulation in Disability Determinations in Bowen v. Yuckert Introduction In the landmark case of Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. Yuckert,...
Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements under the Federal Arbitration Act: Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahon

Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements under the Federal Arbitration Act: Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahon

Date: Jun 9, 1987
Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements under the Federal Arbitration Act: Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahon Introduction Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahon (482 U.S. 220, 1987) is a...
State Sovereignty over Navigable Waterbeds Affirmed: Utah Division of State Lands v. United States

State Sovereignty over Navigable Waterbeds Affirmed: Utah Division of State Lands v. United States

Date: Jun 9, 1987
State Sovereignty over Navigable Waterbeds Affirmed: Utah Division of State Lands v. United States Introduction Utah Division of State Lands v. United States et al., 482 U.S. 193 (1987), represents a...
Enforcing Past Obligations Under the Pecos River Compact: Analysis of TEXAS v. NEW MEXICO (1987)

Enforcing Past Obligations Under the Pecos River Compact: Analysis of TEXAS v. NEW MEXICO (1987)

Date: Jun 9, 1987
Enforcing Past Obligations Under the Pecos River Compact: Analysis of TEXAS v. NEW MEXICO (1987) Introduction TEXAS v. NEW MEXICO is a seminal case adjudicated by the United States Supreme Court in...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert