Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Enhancing the Edwards Rule: Arizona v. Roberson and Its Implications Introduction Arizona v. Roberson, 486 U.S. 675 (1988), marks a pivotal moment in the interpretation and application of the Edwards...
Sun Oil Co. v. Wortman ET AL. (486 U.S. 717) – Navigation of Full Faith and Credit Clause in Applying State Statutes of Limitations Introduction Sun Oil Co. v. Wortman ET AL. is a pivotal case...
Pinter v. Dahl: Supreme Court Establishes Key Precedents on In Pari Delicto Defense and 'Seller' Definition in Securities Act §12(1) Introduction Pinter et al. v. Dahl et al. is a landmark 1988...
SHAPERO v. KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION: Upholding First Amendment Protections in Legal Advertising Introduction SHAPERO v. KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, 486 U.S. 466 (1988), is a landmark United States...
Limits of the Collateral Order Doctrine in Immunity and Forum Non Conveniens: The Van Cauwenberghe v. Biard Precedent Introduction Van Cauwenberghe v. Biard, 486 U.S. 517 (1988), is a landmark case...
Allied Tube Conduit Corp. v. Indian Head, Inc.: Limiting Noerr Antitrust Immunity in Private Standard-Setting Context Introduction The Supreme Court case Allied Tube Conduit Corp. v. Indian Head,...
Johnson v. Mississippi (1988): Prohibition on Capital Sentencing Based on Vacated Convictions under the Eighth Amendment Introduction Johnson v. Mississippi is a landmark case decided by the United...
Michigan v. Chesternut: Reevaluating Fourth Amendment Seizures in Police Pursuits Introduction Michigan v. Chesternut (486 U.S. 567, 1988) is a landmark Supreme Court decision that reexamined the...
Clarifying the Scope of the Discretionary Function Exception in FTCA: Berkovitz v. United States Introduction Berkovitz et al. v. United States, 486 U.S. 531 (1988), is a landmark Supreme Court...
Prejudgment Interest Awarded Against the U.S. Postal Service Under Title VII Introduction Loeffler v. Frank, Postmaster General of the United States, 486 U.S. 549 (1988), is a landmark Supreme Court...
CARTWRIGHT v. MAYNARD: Defining Constitutional Limits on Aggravating Circumstances in Capital Sentencing Introduction CARTWRIGHT v. MAYNARD, 486 U.S. 356 (1988), is a landmark United States Supreme...
Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.: State Tort Claims and Federal Preemption Under §301 Introduction Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc. is a landmark 1988 United States Supreme...
First Amendment Protections Extend to Paid Petition Circulators: Comprehensive Commentary on Meyer v. Grant Introduction Meyer, Colorado Secretary of State, et al. v. Grant et al. is a landmark 1988...
CLARK v. JETER: US Supreme Court Rules 6-Year Paternity Statute Limits Violates Equal Protection Introduction CLARK v. JETER (486 U.S. 456, 1988) is a landmark United States Supreme Court case that...
Supreme Court Clarifies Federal Supremacy in FELA Claims: Prejudgment Interest Prohibited Under Federal Law Introduction Monessen Southwestern Railway Co. v. Morgan, 486 U.S. 330 (1988), addressed...
Unanimity Requirement in Capital Sentencing: Mills v. Maryland Sets New Precedent Introduction Mills v. Maryland, 486 U.S. 367 (1988), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that addresses the...
McCoy v. Wisconsin Court of Appeals: Upholding Enhanced Withdrawal Requirements for Appointed Appellate Counsel Introduction McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District 1 is a landmark Supreme...
Commerce Clause and Tax Reciprocity: Supreme Court Invalidates Ohio’s Ethanol Tax Credit Scheme Introduction New Energy Company of Indiana v. Limbach, Tax Commissioner of Ohio, et al. (486 U.S. 269,...
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Martin Exploration Management Co.: Establishing Uniform Deregulatory Treatment for Overlapping Natural Gas Provisions Introduction Federal Energy Regulatory...
Satterwhite v. Texas: Reinforcing Sixth Amendment Rights in Capital Sentencing Introduction Satterwhite v. Texas, 486 U.S. 249 (1988), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...