Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

DOE v. UNITED STATES: Non-Testimonial Consent Directives and the Fifth Amendment

DOE v. UNITED STATES: Non-Testimonial Consent Directives and the Fifth Amendment

Date: Jun 23, 1988
DOE v. UNITED STATES: Non-Testimonial Consent Directives and the Fifth Amendment Introduction DOE v. UNITED STATES, 487 U.S. 201 (1988), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Virginia v. Friedman: Eliminating Residency Bar Admission Discrimination Under Privileges and Immunities

Virginia v. Friedman: Eliminating Residency Bar Admission Discrimination Under Privileges and Immunities

Date: Jun 21, 1988
Virginia v. Friedman: Eliminating Residency Bar Admission Discrimination Under Privileges and Immunities Introduction In Supreme Court of Virginia et al. v. Friedman, 487 U.S. 59 (1988), the United...
Affirmation of Anti-Discrimination Measures in Private Associations: New Precedent Established in New York State Club Association, Inc. v. City of New York

Affirmation of Anti-Discrimination Measures in Private Associations: New Precedent Established in New York State Club Association, Inc. v. City of New York

Date: Jun 21, 1988
Affirmation of Anti-Discrimination Measures in Private Associations: New Precedent Established in New York State Club Association, Inc. v. City of New York Introduction The landmark case of New York...
Nonparty Witnesses and Subject-Matter Jurisdiction: Insights from United States Catholic Conference v. Abortion Rights Mobilization

Nonparty Witnesses and Subject-Matter Jurisdiction: Insights from United States Catholic Conference v. Abortion Rights Mobilization

Date: Jun 21, 1988
Nonparty Witnesses and Subject-Matter Jurisdiction: Insights from United States Catholic Conference v. Abortion Rights Mobilization Introduction The Supreme Court case United States Catholic...
Contracted Prison Physicians Recognized as State Actors under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: An Analysis of WEST v. ATKINS

Contracted Prison Physicians Recognized as State Actors under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: An Analysis of WEST v. ATKINS

Date: Jun 21, 1988
Contracted Prison Physicians Recognized as State Actors under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: An Analysis of WEST v. ATKINS Introduction WEST v. ATKINS, 487 U.S. 42 (1988), is a landmark Supreme Court case that...
Federal Law Supremacy in Forum-Selection Clauses: Stewart Org. v. Ricoh Corp. Analysis

Federal Law Supremacy in Forum-Selection Clauses: Stewart Org. v. Ricoh Corp. Analysis

Date: Jun 21, 1988
Federal Law Supremacy in Forum-Selection Clauses: STEWART ORGANIZATION, INC. v. RICOH CORP. Analysis Introduction Stewart Organization, Inc., et al. v. Ricoh Corp., 487 U.S. 22 (1988), addresses a...
ERISA Preemption of State Garnishment Laws for Employee Welfare Benefit Plans: An Analysis of Mackey v. Lanier Collection Agency Service

ERISA Preemption of State Garnishment Laws for Employee Welfare Benefit Plans: An Analysis of Mackey v. Lanier Collection Agency Service

Date: Jun 18, 1988
ERISA Preemption of State Garnishment Laws for Employee Welfare Benefit Plans: An Analysis of Mackey et al. v. Lanier Collection Agency Service, Inc. Introduction The landmark case Mackey et al. v....
Clarifying Appellate Jurisdiction: Christianson v. Colt Industries and the Scope of Federal Circuit's Authority

Clarifying Appellate Jurisdiction: Christianson v. Colt Industries and the Scope of Federal Circuit's Authority

Date: Jun 18, 1988
Clarifying Appellate Jurisdiction: Christianson v. Colt Industries and the Scope of Federal Circuit's Authority Introduction Christianson et al. v. Colt Industries Operating Corp., 486 U.S. 800...
Congressional Supremacy in Naturalization Affirmed in INS v. Pangilinan

Congressional Supremacy in Naturalization Affirmed in INS v. Pangilinan

Date: Jun 18, 1988
Congressional Supremacy in Naturalization Affirmed in INS v. Pangilinan Introduction The case of Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Pangilinan et al., 486 U.S. 875 (1988), presents a pivotal...
Unfettered Licensing Discretion and First Amendment: City of Lakewood v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co.

Unfettered Licensing Discretion and First Amendment: City of Lakewood v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co.

Date: Jun 18, 1988
Unfettered Licensing Discretion and First Amendment: City of Lakewood v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co. Introduction City of Lakewood v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co., 486 U.S. 750 (1988), is a landmark...
BENDIX AUTOLITE CORP. v. MIDWESCO ENTERPRISES: Commerce Clause Implications on Tolling Statutes

BENDIX AUTOLITE CORP. v. MIDWESCO ENTERPRISES: Commerce Clause Implications on Tolling Statutes

Date: Jun 18, 1988
Commerce Clause Implications of Ohio's Tolling Statute: A Comprehensive Analysis of BENDIX AUTOLITE CORP. v. MIDWESCO ENTERPRISES Introduction BENDIX AUTOLITE CORP. v. MIDWESCO ENTERPRISES, Inc., 486...
Appearance of Partiality as Grounds for Judicial Disqualification: Insights from LILJEBERG v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.

Appearance of Partiality as Grounds for Judicial Disqualification: Insights from LILJEBERG v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.

Date: Jun 18, 1988
Appearance of Partiality as Grounds for Judicial Disqualification: Insights from LILJEBERG v. Health Services Acquisition Corp. Introduction LILJEBERG v. HEALTH SERVICES ACQUISITION CORP. (486 U.S....
Supreme Court Limits APA Review of CIA Employee Terminations under NSA §102(c)

Supreme Court Limits APA Review of CIA Employee Terminations under NSA §102(c)

Date: Jun 16, 1988
Supreme Court Limits APA Review of CIA Employee Terminations under NSA §102(c) Introduction Webster, Director of Central Intelligence v. Doe, 486 U.S. 592 (1988), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision...
Hague Service Convention Applicability to Substituted Service on Domestic Subsidiaries

Hague Service Convention Applicability to Substituted Service on Domestic Subsidiaries

Date: Jun 16, 1988
Hague Service Convention Applicability to Substituted Service on Domestic Subsidiaries Introduction Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Schlunk, 486 U.S. 694 (1988), is a landmark decision by the...
DOE's Discretion Under Section 161(v) in Huffman v. Western Nuclear

DOE's Discretion Under Section 161(v) in Huffman v. Western Nuclear

Date: Jun 16, 1988
DOE's Discretion Under Section 161(v) in Huffman et al. v. Western Nuclear, Inc., et al. Introduction Huffman et al. v. Western Nuclear, Inc., et al. is a landmark case decided by the United States...
Enhancing the Edwards Rule: Arizona v. Roberson and Its Implications

Enhancing the Edwards Rule: Arizona v. Roberson and Its Implications

Date: Jun 16, 1988
Enhancing the Edwards Rule: Arizona v. Roberson and Its Implications Introduction Arizona v. Roberson, 486 U.S. 675 (1988), marks a pivotal moment in the interpretation and application of the Edwards...
Sun Oil Co. v. Wortman ET AL. (486 U.S. 717) – Navigation of Full Faith and Credit Clause in Applying State Statutes of Limitations

Sun Oil Co. v. Wortman ET AL. (486 U.S. 717) – Navigation of Full Faith and Credit Clause in Applying State Statutes of Limitations

Date: Jun 16, 1988
Sun Oil Co. v. Wortman ET AL. (486 U.S. 717) – Navigation of Full Faith and Credit Clause in Applying State Statutes of Limitations Introduction Sun Oil Co. v. Wortman ET AL. is a pivotal case...
Pinter v. Dahl: Supreme Court Establishes Key Precedents on In Pari Delicto Defense and 'Seller' Definition in Securities Act §12(1)

Pinter v. Dahl: Supreme Court Establishes Key Precedents on In Pari Delicto Defense and 'Seller' Definition in Securities Act §12(1)

Date: Jun 16, 1988
Pinter v. Dahl: Supreme Court Establishes Key Precedents on In Pari Delicto Defense and 'Seller' Definition in Securities Act §12(1) Introduction Pinter et al. v. Dahl et al. is a landmark 1988...
SHAPERO v. KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION: Upholding First Amendment Protections in Legal Advertising

SHAPERO v. KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION: Upholding First Amendment Protections in Legal Advertising

Date: Jun 14, 1988
SHAPERO v. KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION: Upholding First Amendment Protections in Legal Advertising Introduction SHAPERO v. KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, 486 U.S. 466 (1988), is a landmark United States...
Limits of the Collateral Order Doctrine in Immunity and Forum Non Conveniens: The Van Cauwenberghe v. Biard Precedent

Limits of the Collateral Order Doctrine in Immunity and Forum Non Conveniens: The Van Cauwenberghe v. Biard Precedent

Date: Jun 14, 1988
Limits of the Collateral Order Doctrine in Immunity and Forum Non Conveniens: The Van Cauwenberghe v. Biard Precedent Introduction Van Cauwenberghe v. Biard, 486 U.S. 517 (1988), is a landmark case...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert