Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

CWA v. Beck: Defining the Limits of Union Agency Fee Expenditures

CWA v. Beck: Defining the Limits of Union Agency Fee Expenditures

Date: Jun 30, 1988
CWA v. Beck: Defining the Limits of Union Agency Fee Expenditures Introduction The Supreme Court case Communications Workers of America et al. v. Beck et al., 487 U.S. 735 (1988), addressed the...
Face-to-Face Confrontation Under the Sixth Amendment: Analyzing COY v. IOWA

Face-to-Face Confrontation Under the Sixth Amendment: Analyzing COY v. IOWA

Date: Jun 30, 1988
Face-to-Face Confrontation Under the Sixth Amendment: Analyzing COY v. IOWA Introduction COY v. IOWA, 487 U.S. 1012 (1988), addressed a critical issue concerning the balance between a defendant's...
Independent Source Doctrine Reinforced in Murray v. United States

Independent Source Doctrine Reinforced in Murray v. United States

Date: Jun 28, 1988
Independent Source Doctrine Reinforced in Murray v. United States Introduction Murray v. United States (487 U.S. 533, 1988) is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that addressed the complexities...
Frisby v. Schultz: Upholding Residential Picketing Regulations under the First Amendment

Frisby v. Schultz: Upholding Residential Picketing Regulations under the First Amendment

Date: Jun 28, 1988
Frisby v. Schultz: Upholding Residential Picketing Regulations under the First Amendment Introduction Frisby et al. v. Schultz et al., 487 U.S. 474 (1988), is a landmark Supreme Court case that...
Establishing the Government Contractor Defense in State Tort Law: BOYLE v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

Establishing the Government Contractor Defense in State Tort Law: BOYLE v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

Date: Jun 28, 1988
Establishing the Government Contractor Defense in State Tort Law: BOYLE v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP. Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case, Boyle, Personal Representative of the Heirs and...
Pierce v. Underwood: Clarifying 'Substantially Justified' under the Equal Access to Justice Act

Pierce v. Underwood: Clarifying 'Substantially Justified' under the Equal Access to Justice Act

Date: Jun 28, 1988
Pierce v. Underwood: Clarifying 'Substantially Justified' under the Equal Access to Justice Act Introduction In Pierce v. Underwood et al. (487 U.S. 552, 1988), the United States Supreme Court...
Government Liability for Negligent Supervision: Insights from Sheridan v. United States

Government Liability for Negligent Supervision: Insights from Sheridan v. United States

Date: Jun 25, 1988
Government Liability for Negligent Supervision: Insights from Sheridan v. United States Introduction Sheridan v. United States, 487 U.S. 392 (1988), is a landmark decision by the United States...
Balancing Judicial Discretion under the Speedy Trial Act: Insights from United States v. Taylor

Balancing Judicial Discretion under the Speedy Trial Act: Insights from United States v. Taylor

Date: Jun 25, 1988
Balancing Judicial Discretion under the Speedy Trial Act: Insights from United States v. Taylor Introduction United States v. Taylor, 487 U.S. 326 (1988), is a landmark Supreme Court case that delves...
Equal Protection and Educational Transportation: Kadrmás v. Dickinson Public Schools

Equal Protection and Educational Transportation: Kadrmás v. Dickinson Public Schools

Date: Jun 25, 1988
Equal Protection and Educational Transportation: Kadrmás v. Dickinson Public Schools Introduction Kadrmás et al. v. Dickinson Public Schools et al. (487 U.S. 450, 1988) is a pivotal United States...
Supremacy of FERC Cost Allocation Over State Prudence Reviews: Insights from Mississippi Power Light Co. v. Mississippi ex rel. Moore

Supremacy of FERC Cost Allocation Over State Prudence Reviews: Insights from Mississippi Power Light Co. v. Mississippi ex rel. Moore

Date: Jun 25, 1988
Supremacy of FERC Cost Allocation Over State Prudence Reviews: Insights from Mississippi Power Light Co. v. Mississippi ex rel. Moore Introduction In Mississippi Power Light Co. v. Mississippi ex...
Strict Specificity in Appellate Notices: Analysis of Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.

Strict Specificity in Appellate Notices: Analysis of Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.

Date: Jun 25, 1988
Strict Specificity in Appellate Notices: Analysis of Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co. Introduction Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co. (487 U.S. 312, 1988) is a landmark United States Supreme Court...
Patterson v. Illinois: Affirming Sixth Amendment Waivers in Post-Indictment Questioning via Miranda Warnings

Patterson v. Illinois: Affirming Sixth Amendment Waivers in Post-Indictment Questioning via Miranda Warnings

Date: Jun 25, 1988
Patterson v. Illinois: Affirming Sixth Amendment Waivers in Post-Indictment Questioning via Miranda Warnings Introduction Patterson v. Illinois, 487 U.S. 285 (1988), is a pivotal United States...
Houston v. Lack, Warden: Establishing Filing Time for Pro Se Prisoners’ Notices of Appeal

Houston v. Lack, Warden: Establishing Filing Time for Pro Se Prisoners’ Notices of Appeal

Date: Jun 25, 1988
Houston v. Lack, Warden: Establishing Filing Time for Pro Se Prisoners’ Notices of Appeal Introduction Houston v. Lack, Warden, 487 U.S. 266 (1988), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case...
Supreme Court Limits Bivens Remedies in Schweiker v. Chilicky: Implications for Disability Benefit Recipients

Supreme Court Limits Bivens Remedies in Schweiker v. Chilicky: Implications for Disability Benefit Recipients

Date: Jun 25, 1988
Supreme Court Limits Bivens Remedies in Schweiker v. Chilicky: Implications for Disability Benefit Recipients Introduction In the landmark case of Schweiker et al. v. Chilicky et al., decided by the...
Florida v. Long: Establishing Liability Date for Discriminatory Pension Plans under Title VII

Florida v. Long: Establishing Liability Date for Discriminatory Pension Plans under Title VII

Date: Jun 23, 1988
Florida v. Long: Establishing Liability Date for Discriminatory Pension Plans under Title VII Introduction In Florida et al. v. Long et al., 487 U.S. 223 (1988), the United States Supreme Court...
Bank of Nova Scotia v. United States: Upholding the Harmless-Error Principle in Grand Jury Indictment Dismissals

Bank of Nova Scotia v. United States: Upholding the Harmless-Error Principle in Grand Jury Indictment Dismissals

Date: Jun 23, 1988
Bank of Nova Scotia v. United States: Upholding the Harmless-Error Principle in Grand Jury Indictment Dismissals Introduction Bank of Nova Scotia v. United States, 487 U.S. 250 (1988), is a pivotal...
FELDER v. CASEY: Federal Supremacy Over State Notice-of-Claim Statutes in Civil Rights Litigation

FELDER v. CASEY: Federal Supremacy Over State Notice-of-Claim Statutes in Civil Rights Litigation

Date: Jun 23, 1988
FELDER v. CASEY: Federal Supremacy Over State Notice-of-Claim Statutes in Civil Rights Litigation Introduction FELDER v. CASEY, 487 U.S. 131 (1988), is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision...
Preservation of Impartial Jury Rights in Capital Cases: Analysis of ROSS v. OKLAHOMA

Preservation of Impartial Jury Rights in Capital Cases: Analysis of ROSS v. OKLAHOMA

Date: Jun 23, 1988
Preservation of Impartial Jury Rights in Capital Cases: Analysis of ROSS v. OKLAHOMA Introduction Ross v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 81 (1988), is a significant United States Supreme Court case that...
Braswell v. United States: Affirming the Collective Entity Doctrine Against Fifth Amendment Claims by Corporate Custodians

Braswell v. United States: Affirming the Collective Entity Doctrine Against Fifth Amendment Claims by Corporate Custodians

Date: Jun 23, 1988
Braswell v. United States: Affirming the Collective Entity Doctrine Against Fifth Amendment Claims by Corporate Custodians Introduction Braswell v. United States, 487 U.S. 99 (1988), is a landmark...
Affirmation of Texas 'Special Issues' Capital Sentencing Framework in FRANKLIN v. LYNAUGH

Affirmation of Texas 'Special Issues' Capital Sentencing Framework in FRANKLIN v. LYNAUGH

Date: Jun 23, 1988
Affirmation of Texas 'Special Issues' Capital Sentencing Framework in FRANKLIN v. LYNAUGH Introduction The landmark case FRANKLIN v. LYNAUGH, decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on June 22, 1988,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert