Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Supremacy Clause Affirmed: State Workers' Compensation Laws Applicable to Federally Owned Nuclear Facilities Operated by Private Contractors

Supremacy Clause Affirmed: State Workers' Compensation Laws Applicable to Federally Owned Nuclear Facilities Operated by Private Contractors

Date: May 24, 1988
Supremacy Clause Affirmed: State Workers' Compensation Laws Applicable to Federally Owned Nuclear Facilities Operated by Private Contractors Introduction Goodyear Atomic Corp. v. Miller ET AL. is a...
Mississippi's Penalty Statute Upholding Equal Protection: Insights from BANKERS LIFE CASUALTY CO. v. CRENSHAW

Mississippi's Penalty Statute Upholding Equal Protection: Insights from BANKERS LIFE CASUALTY CO. v. CRENSHAW

Date: May 17, 1988
Mississippi's Penalty Statute Upholding Equal Protection: Insights from Bankers Life Casualty Co. v. Crenshaw Introduction Bankers Life Casualty Co. v. Crenshaw (486 U.S. 71, 1988) is a pivotal U.S....
State Use Tax Compliance Under the Commerce Clause: Insights from D. H. Holmes Co., Ltd. v. McNamara

State Use Tax Compliance Under the Commerce Clause: Insights from D. H. Holmes Co., Ltd. v. McNamara

Date: May 17, 1988
State Use Tax Compliance Under the Commerce Clause: Insights from D. H. Holmes Co., Ltd. v. McNamara Introduction D. H. Holmes Co., Ltd. v. McNamara, 486 U.S. 24 (1988), is a landmark Supreme Court...
EEOC v. Commercial Office Products Co.: Defining 'Termination' in Worksharing Agreements under Title VII

EEOC v. Commercial Office Products Co.: Defining 'Termination' in Worksharing Agreements under Title VII

Date: May 17, 1988
EEOC v. Commercial Office Products Co.: Defining 'Termination' in Worksharing Agreements under Title VII Introduction Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) v. Commercial Office Products Co....
Federal Preemption Affirmed: FCC's Authority to Override Local Cable Signal Standards

Federal Preemption Affirmed: FCC's Authority to Override Local Cable Signal Standards

Date: May 17, 1988
Federal Preemption Affirmed: FCC's Authority to Override Local Cable Signal Standards Introduction City of New York et al. v. Federal Communications Commission et al., 486 U.S. 57 (1988) explores the...
Defining "Willfulness" under the Fair Labor Standards Act: Supreme Court Establishes "Knowing or Reckless" Standard

Defining "Willfulness" under the Fair Labor Standards Act: Supreme Court Establishes "Knowing or Reckless" Standard

Date: May 17, 1988
Defining "Willfulness" under the Fair Labor Standards Act: Supreme Court Establishes "Knowing or Reckless" Standard Introduction McLAUGHLIN, Secretary of Labor v. RICHLAND SHOE CO., 486 U.S. 128...
FOIA Requires Disclosure of Presentence Investigation Reports to Inmates: Analysis of U.S. v. Julian

FOIA Requires Disclosure of Presentence Investigation Reports to Inmates: Analysis of U.S. v. Julian

Date: May 17, 1988
FOIA Requires Disclosure of Presentence Investigation Reports to Inmates: Analysis of United States Department of Justice et al. v. Julian et al. (486 U.S. 1) Introduction The landmark Supreme Court...
No Fourth Amendment Protection for Warrantless Trash Searches: California v. Greenwood

No Fourth Amendment Protection for Warrantless Trash Searches: California v. Greenwood

Date: May 17, 1988
No Fourth Amendment Protection for Warrantless Trash Searches: California v. Greenwood Introduction California v. Greenwood, 486 U.S. 35 (1988), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
Limitations on the Relitigation Exception to the Anti-Injunction Act in Federal Maritime Litigation

Limitations on the Relitigation Exception to the Anti-Injunction Act in Federal Maritime Litigation

Date: May 17, 1988
Limitations on the Relitigation Exception to the Anti-Injunction Act in Federal Maritime Litigation Introduction Chick Kam Choo et al. v. Exxon Corp. et al. (486 U.S. 140) is a landmark United States...
State-Action Doctrine Limited in Medical Peer Review: Insights from PATRICK v. BURGET

State-Action Doctrine Limited in Medical Peer Review: Insights from PATRICK v. BURGET

Date: May 17, 1988
State-Action Doctrine Limited in Medical Peer Review: Insights from PATRICK v. BURGET Introduction The Supreme Court case PATRICK v. BURGET et al., 486 U.S. 94 (1988), addresses the intersection of...
Business Electronics Corp. v. Sharp Electronics Corp.: Defining the Limits of Vertical Restraints under the Sherman Act

Business Electronics Corp. v. Sharp Electronics Corp.: Defining the Limits of Vertical Restraints under the Sherman Act

Date: May 3, 1988
Business Electronics Corp. v. Sharp Electronics Corp.: Defining the Limits of Vertical Restraints under the Sherman Act Introduction Business Electronics Corporation v. Sharp Electronics Corporation,...
Authority of the Solicitor General in Representing the United States: Insights from United States v. Providence Journal Co.

Authority of the Solicitor General in Representing the United States: Insights from United States v. Providence Journal Co.

Date: May 3, 1988
Authority of the Solicitor General in Representing the United States: Insights from United States v. Providence Journal Co. ET AL. (485 U.S. 693) 1. Introduction United States v. Providence Journal...
Defining Materiality in Denaturalization: Comprehensive Analysis of KUNGYS v. UNITED STATES

Defining Materiality in Denaturalization: Comprehensive Analysis of KUNGYS v. UNITED STATES

Date: May 3, 1988
Defining Materiality in Denaturalization: Comprehensive Analysis of KUNGYS v. UNITED STATES Introduction KUNGYS v. UNITED STATES, 485 U.S. 759 (1988), represents a pivotal Supreme Court decision that...
Huddleson v. United States: Admissibility of Similar Acts Evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b)

Huddleson v. United States: Admissibility of Similar Acts Evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b)

Date: May 3, 1988
Huddleson v. United States: Admissibility of Similar Acts Evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) Introduction Huddleson v. United States, 485 U.S. 681 (1988), is a landmark Supreme Court case...
Exclusive Union Representation at Company-Level Proceedings: Landers v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

Exclusive Union Representation at Company-Level Proceedings: Landers v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

Date: Apr 28, 1988
Exclusive Union Representation at Company-Level Proceedings: Insights from Landers v. National Railroad Passenger Corp. Introduction The landmark case Landers v. National Railroad Passenger...
Hicks v. Feiock: Clarifying Civil vs. Criminal Contempt and Due Process Implications

Hicks v. Feiock: Clarifying Civil vs. Criminal Contempt and Due Process Implications

Date: Apr 28, 1988
Hicks v. Feiock: Clarifying Civil vs. Criminal Contempt and Due Process Implications Introduction Hicks, District Attorney for County of Orange, California, Acting on Behalf of Feiock v. Feiock AJ is...
Employment Division v. Smith: Reevaluating Religious Freedom in Employment Law

Employment Division v. Smith: Reevaluating Religious Freedom in Employment Law

Date: Apr 28, 1988
Employment Division v. Smith: Reevaluating Religious Freedom in Employment Law Introduction Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of the State of Oregon, ET AL. v. Smith is a pivotal...
Reevaluation of § 1981 Interpretation in Patterson v. McLean Credit Union

Reevaluation of § 1981 Interpretation in Patterson v. McLean Credit Union

Date: Apr 26, 1988
Reevaluation of § 1981 Interpretation in Patterson v. McLean Credit Union Introduction Patterson v. McLean Credit Union, 485 U.S. 617 (1988), presents a significant moment in the interpretation of...
Ronald S. Monroe v. Hilton Butler: Implications of Brady Violations and Death Penalty Efficacy

Ronald S. Monroe v. Hilton Butler: Implications of Brady Violations and Death Penalty Efficacy

Date: Apr 26, 1988
Ronald S. Monroe v. Hilton Butler: Implications of Brady Violations and Death Penalty Efficacy Introduction Ronald S. Monroe v. Hilton Butler, 485 U.S. 1024 (1988), is a significant case that...
Limitation of § 8(b)(4) of the NLRA on Union Handbilling: DeBartolo Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast Building Construction Trades Council

Limitation of § 8(b)(4) of the NLRA on Union Handbilling: DeBartolo Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast Building Construction Trades Council

Date: Apr 21, 1988
Limitation of § 8(b)(4) of the NLRA on Union Handbilling: DeBartolo Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast Building Construction Trades Council Introduction The Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert