Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Double Jeopardy and Capital Sentencing: Analysis of Joe L. Sorola v. Texas Introduction The landmark case of Joe L. Sorola v. Texas, decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1989, addresses pivotal...
Affirming Judicial Discretion in Facilitating Notice for ADEA Collective Actions Introduction Hohoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. Sperling et al., 493 U.S. 165 (1989), is a landmark decision by the United...
Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los Angeles: Expanding § 1983 Remedies for Labor Law Violations Introduction In Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los Angeles, 493 U.S. 103 (1989), the...
BREININGER v. SHEET METAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION LOCAL UNION NO. 6: Federal Courts' Jurisdiction Over Fair Representation Claims Introduction BREININGER v. SHEET METAL WORKERS...
Individual Attorney Liability Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 Affirmed Introduction The Supreme Court case PAVELIC LeFLORE v. MARVEL ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, A DIVISION OF CADENCE INDUSTRIES...
Chesapeake Ohio Railway Co. v. Schwalb et al.: Expanding Maritime Employment Coverage under the LHWCA Introduction Chesapeake Ohio Railway Co. v. Schwalb et al. (493 U.S. 40, 1989) is a landmark...
Sperry Corp. Reinforces Constitutionality of Congressional User Fee Deductions in International Claims Arbitration Introduction United States v. Sperry Corp. ET AL. (493 U.S. 52) is a landmark...
Mandatory Compliance with RCRA Citizen Suit Notice Requirements Established in HALLSTROM v. TILLAMOOK COUNTY Introduction Hallstrom et ux. v. Tillamook County, 493 U.S. 20 (1989), is a landmark U.S....
Direct Action Proviso Does Not Apply to Insurer-Initiated Federal Workers' Compensation Suits Introduction NORTHBROOK NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. v. BREWER (493 U.S. 6) is a pivotal decision by the United...
Wilkerson v. Texas: Reinforcing Standards Against Racial Bias in Jury Selection Introduction Wilkerson v. Texas, 493 U.S. 924 (1989), is a significant case in the realm of constitutional law,...
Supreme Court Denial of Certiorari in Schiro v. Indiana: Implications on Double Jeopardy and Death Penalty Review Introduction Schiro v. Indiana (493 U.S. 910, 1989) presents a critical examination...
RICO Liability Without Profit-Making Element: Insights from Michael McMonagle v. Northeast Women's Center, Inc. Introduction The case of Michael McMonagle v. Northeast Women's Center, Inc. (493 U.S....
Divestiture as an Injunctive Remedy in Private Antitrust Actions: Insights from California v. American Stores Company Introduction California v. American Stores Company, 492 U.S. 1301 (1989), is a...
County of Allegheny v. ACLU: Defining the Boundaries of Religious Displays under the Establishment Clause Introduction County of Allegheny v. American Civil Liberties Union, Greater Pittsburgh...
Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: Supreme Court Affirms Missouri's Limits on Public Facilities and Employees in Abortion Regulation Introduction Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, 492...
Protection of Sixth Amendment Rights in Sentencing: Powell v. Texas Introduction Powell v. Texas, 492 U.S. 680 (1989), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that significantly...
Yakima Indian Nation v. Brendale: Defining Tribal Zoning Authority over Non-Indian Fee Lands Introduction Yakima Indian Nation v. Brendale (492 U.S. 408, 1989) is a pivotal United States Supreme...
SUNY v. Fox: Establishing the 'Reasonable Fit' Standard for Commercial Speech Restrictions Introduction In Board of Trustees of the State University of New York v. Fox et al., 492 U.S. 469 (1989),...
Eighth Amendment's Excessive Fines Clause Does Not Apply to Private Punitive Damages Introduction Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc., et al. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc., et al., 492 U.S. 257...
Execution of Mentally Retarded Individuals: A Comprehensive Analysis of PENRY v. LYNAUGH Introduction PENRY v. LYNAUGH, 492 U.S. 302 (1989), is a landmark case in the realm of capital punishment and...