Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
PERS of Ohio v. Betts: Defining the Scope of §4(f)(2) Under the ADEA Introduction The Supreme Court case Public Employees Retirement System of Ohio v. Betts (492 U.S. 158, 1989) marks a significant...
United States Department of Justice v. Tax Analysts: Expanding FOIA Access to Agency-Controlled Court Decisions Introduction United States Department of Justice v. Tax Analysts (492 U.S. 136) is a...
Sable Communications v. FCC: Narrowing the Scope of Indecent Speech Regulation Introduction Sable Communications of California, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission (492 U.S. 115, 1989) is a...
States Not Constitutionally Required to Appoint Counsel for Indigent Death Row Inmates: An Analysis of Murray v. Giarratano Introduction Murray v. Giarratano, 492 U.S. 1 (1989), is a landmark Supreme...
Independent Federation of Flight Attendants v. Zipes: Limiting Attorney's Fees Against Blameless Intervenors under Title VII Introduction Independent Federation of Flight Attendants v. Zipes et al.,...
No Exemption for Attorney's Fees under Criminal Forfeiture Statute Affirmed Introduction Caplin Drysdale, Chartered v. United States, 491 U.S. 617 (1989) is a pivotal Supreme Court decision...
Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. Connaughton: Reinforcing the Actual Malice Standard in Public Figure Libel Cases Introduction Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. Connaughton (491 U.S. 657) is a...
Supreme Court Establishes §1983 as Sole Federal Remedy for §1981 Violations, Rejecting Respondeat Superior for Municipal Entities Introduction In JETT v. DALLAS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTrict, 491 U.S....
Mandatory Forfeiture of Assets Under §853: Insights from United States v. Monsanto Introduction In United States v. Monsanto, 491 U.S. 600 (1989), the United States Supreme Court addressed pivotal...
Regulating Sound Amplification in Public Forums: Ward v. Rock Against Racism Introduction Ward et al. v. Rock Against Racism (491 U.S. 781, 1989) is a pivotal Supreme Court case that addresses the...
Massachusetts v. Oakes: Clarifying Overbreadth in Child Nudity Statutes Introduction Massachusetts v. Oakes is a landmark case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on June 21, 1989. The case revolves...
Imposing Civil Damages for Publishing Victim's Name Violates First Amendment: The Florida Star v. B. J. F. Introduction The Florida Star v. B. J. F. is a pivotal United States Supreme Court case...
Establishing Standards for In Camera Review of Attorney-Client Communications in Crime-Fraud Exception: Insights from UNITED STATES v. ZOLIN ET AL. Introduction UNITED STATES v. ZOLIN ET AL., 491...
Texas v. Johnson: Affirming Flag Burning as Protected Speech Under the First Amendment Introduction Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989), is a seminal United States Supreme Court case that...
FACA's Applicability to Judicial Nomination Advisers: Public Citizen v. DOJ Introduction Public Citizen v. United States Department of Justice et al., 491 U.S. 440 (1989), is a landmark United States...
Federal Judicial Intervention in Utility Ratemaking: New Precedent from New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Council of New Orleans Introduction The Supreme Court case New Orleans Public Service, Inc....
Double Jeopardy and Multiple Sentences: Insights from Jones v. Thomas 1. Introduction The Supreme Court case Jones, Superintendent, Missouri Training Center for Men at Moberly v. Thomas, 491 U.S. 376...
Establishing Standards for 'Minor Disputes' in Railway Labor Relations: A Comprehensive Analysis of Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Railway Labor Executives' Association (1989) Introduction The case of...
Connecticut’s Beer-Price Affirmation Law and the Commerce Clause: A Comprehensive Analysis of Healy v. Beer Institute Introduction The case of Healy et al. v. The Beer Institute et al. examined the...