Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Osborne v. Ohio: Upholding Constitutional Prohibition of Private Child Pornography Possession

Osborne v. Ohio: Upholding Constitutional Prohibition of Private Child Pornography Possession

Date: Apr 19, 1990
Osborne v. Ohio: Upholding Constitutional Prohibition of Private Child Pornography Possession Introduction Osborne v. Ohio (495 U.S. 103, 1990) is a pivotal U.S. Supreme Court case that addresses the...
Admissibility of Statements Post-Illegal Arrest: Insights from New York v. Harris

Admissibility of Statements Post-Illegal Arrest: Insights from New York v. Harris

Date: Apr 19, 1990
Admissibility of Statements Post-Illegal Arrest: Insights from New York v. Harris Introduction New York v. Harris, 495 U.S. 14 (1990), is a pivotal Supreme Court case that addresses the complexities...
Florida v. Wells: Mandating Standardized Protocols for Opening Containers in Inventory Searches under the Fourth Amendment

Florida v. Wells: Mandating Standardized Protocols for Opening Containers in Inventory Searches under the Fourth Amendment

Date: Apr 19, 1990
Florida v. Wells: Mandating Standardized Protocols for Opening Containers in Inventory Searches under the Fourth Amendment Introduction Florida v. Wells (539 So.2d 464, 1990) is a pivotal U.S....
Minnesota v. Olson: Establishing Privacy Rights for Overnight Guests under the Fourth Amendment

Minnesota v. Olson: Establishing Privacy Rights for Overnight Guests under the Fourth Amendment

Date: Apr 19, 1990
Minnesota v. Olson: Establishing Privacy Rights for Overnight Guests under the Fourth Amendment Introduction Minnesota v. Olson, 495 U.S. 91 (1990), is a landmark decision by the United States...
No Presumption Required for Replacement Opposition in Union Majority Evaluations

No Presumption Required for Replacement Opposition in Union Majority Evaluations

Date: Apr 18, 1990
No Presumption Required for Replacement Opposition in Union Majority Evaluations Introduction The case of National Labor Relations Board v. Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc. (494 U.S. 775, 1990)...
Supremacy of Management Rights in Contracting-Out Decisions: IRS v. FLRA

Supremacy of Management Rights in Contracting-Out Decisions: IRS v. FLRA

Date: Apr 18, 1990
Supremacy of Management Rights in Contracting-Out Decisions: IRS v. FLRA Introduction The Supreme Court case Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service v. Federal Labor Relations Authority...
EMPLOYMENT DIVISION v. SMITH: Limiting Free Exercise Protections Against Generally Applicable Laws

EMPLOYMENT DIVISION v. SMITH: Limiting Free Exercise Protections Against Generally Applicable Laws

Date: Apr 18, 1990
EMPLOYMENT DIVISION v. SMITH: Limiting Free Exercise Protections Against Generally Applicable Laws Introduction Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon et al. v. Smith et al.,...
Concurrent Jurisdiction Affirmed in Title VII Claims: An Analysis of YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC. v. DONNELLY

Concurrent Jurisdiction Affirmed in Title VII Claims: An Analysis of YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC. v. DONNELLY

Date: Apr 18, 1990
Concurrent Jurisdiction Affirmed in Title VII Claims: An Analysis of YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC. v. DONNELLY Introduction Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. Donnelly, 494 U.S. 820 (1990), is a pivotal...
Kaiser Aluminum v. Bonjorno: Clarifying Postjudgment Interest Applicability

Kaiser Aluminum v. Bonjorno: Clarifying Postjudgment Interest Applicability

Date: Apr 18, 1990
Kaiser Aluminum v. Bonjorno: Clarifying Postjudgment Interest Applicability Introduction In Kaiser Aluminum Chemical Corp. ET AL. v. Bonjorno ET AL., 494 U.S. 827 (1990), the United States Supreme...
Clarifying Voluntariness in Confessions: Insights from Degraffenreid v. McKellar

Clarifying Voluntariness in Confessions: Insights from Degraffenreid v. McKellar

Date: Apr 17, 1990
Clarifying Voluntariness in Confessions: Insights from Degraffenreid v. McKellar Introduction The case of Ray Charles Degraffenreid v. Kenneth D. McKellar Warden, 494 U.S. 1071 (1990), presents a...
Appellate Authority in Weighing Aggravating and Mitigating Factors in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Clemons v. Mississippi

Appellate Authority in Weighing Aggravating and Mitigating Factors in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Clemons v. Mississippi

Date: Mar 29, 1990
Appellate Authority in Weighing Aggravating and Mitigating Factors in Capital Sentencing: Insights from Clemons v. Mississippi Introduction Clemons v. Mississippi, 494 U.S. 738 (1990), is a pivotal...
Upheld Fee Limitations under the Black Lung Benefits Act: Analysis of United States Department of Labor v. Triplett et al.

Upheld Fee Limitations under the Black Lung Benefits Act: Analysis of United States Department of Labor v. Triplett et al.

Date: Mar 28, 1990
Upheld Fee Limitations under the Black Lung Benefits Act: Analysis of United States Department of Labor v. Triplett et al. Introduction United States Department of Labor v. Triplett et al., 494 U.S....
Austin v. Michigan State Chamber of Commerce: Regulating Corporate Political Expenditures

Austin v. Michigan State Chamber of Commerce: Regulating Corporate Political Expenditures

Date: Mar 28, 1990
Austin v. Michigan State Chamber of Commerce: Regulating Corporate Political Expenditures Introduction Austin, Michigan Secretary of State, et al. v. Michigan State Chamber of Commerce (494 U.S. 652,...
First Amendment Protections Overrule Grand Jury Testimony Secrecy: Butterworth v. Smith

First Amendment Protections Overrule Grand Jury Testimony Secrecy: Butterworth v. Smith

Date: Mar 22, 1990
First Amendment Protections Overrule Grand Jury Testimony Secrecy: Butterworth v. Smith Introduction Buttwerworth, Attorney General of Florida, et al. v. Smith is a landmark 1990 United States...
Supreme Court Upholds AWPA Private Lawsuits Despite State Workers' Compensation Exclusivity

Supreme Court Upholds AWPA Private Lawsuits Despite State Workers' Compensation Exclusivity

Date: Mar 22, 1990
Supreme Court Upholds AWPA Private Lawsuits Despite State Workers' Compensation Exclusivity Introduction The case of Adams Fruit Co., Inc. v. Barrett et al., decided by the United States Supreme...
Seventh Amendment Jury Trial Right Affirmed in Duty of Fair Representation Actions

Seventh Amendment Jury Trial Right Affirmed in Duty of Fair Representation Actions

Date: Mar 21, 1990
Seventh Amendment Jury Trial Right Affirmed in Duty of Fair Representation Actions Introduction In Chauffeurs, Teamsters and Helpers Local No. 391 v. Terry et al. (494 U.S. 558, 1990), the United...
United States v. Dalm: Strengthening Statutory Limitations on Tax Refund Suits

United States v. Dalm: Strengthening Statutory Limitations on Tax Refund Suits

Date: Mar 21, 1990
United States v. Dalm: Strengthening Statutory Limitations on Tax Refund Suits Introduction United States v. Dalm, 494 U.S. 596 (1990), is a pivotal case addressing the jurisdictional boundaries...
Seventh Amendment Protections in Collateral Estoppel: Insights from Lytle v. Schwitzer Turbochargers

Seventh Amendment Protections in Collateral Estoppel: Insights from Lytle v. Schwitzer Turbochargers

Date: Mar 21, 1990
Seventh Amendment Protections in Collateral Estoppel: Insights from Lytle v. Schwitzer Turbochargers Introduction Lytle v. Household Manufacturing, Inc., DBA Schwitzer Turbochargers, 494 U.S. 545...
Racial Discrimination in Venue Selection: Insights from Jerome Mallett v. Missouri

Racial Discrimination in Venue Selection: Insights from Jerome Mallett v. Missouri

Date: Mar 20, 1990
Racial Discrimination in Venue Selection: Insights from Jerome Mallett v. Missouri Introduction The case of Jerome Mallett v. Missouri addresses critical issues surrounding racial discrimination in...
Conflict of Interest in Criminal Defense: An Analysis of William George Bonin v. California

Conflict of Interest in Criminal Defense: An Analysis of William George Bonin v. California

Date: Mar 20, 1990
Conflict of Interest in Criminal Defense: An Analysis of William George Bonin v. California Introduction William George Bonin v. California (494 U.S. 1039) is a significant case that underscores the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert