Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

FERENS ET UX. v. JOHN DEERE CO.: Extending Van Dusen to Plaintiff-Initiated Venue Transfers Under 28 U.S.C. §1404(a)

FERENS ET UX. v. JOHN DEERE CO.: Extending Van Dusen to Plaintiff-Initiated Venue Transfers Under 28 U.S.C. §1404(a)

Date: Mar 6, 1990
FERENS ET UX. v. JOHN DEERE CO.: Extending Van Dusen to Plaintiff-Initiated Venue Transfers Under 28 U.S.C. §1404(a) Introduction Ferens et ux. v. John Deere Co., decided by the United States Supreme...
Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.: Addressing Mootness Through Legislative Changes

Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.: Addressing Mootness Through Legislative Changes

Date: Mar 6, 1990
Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.: Addressing Mootness Through Legislative Changes Introduction Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp., 494 U.S. 472 (1990), is a pivotal case in understanding the doctrine of...
Boyde v. California: Upholding Mandatory Sentencing Instructions in Capital Cases

Boyde v. California: Upholding Mandatory Sentencing Instructions in Capital Cases

Date: Mar 6, 1990
Boyde v. California: Upholding Mandatory Sentencing Instructions in Capital Cases Introduction Boyde v. California (494 U.S. 370, 1990) is a pivotal U.S. Supreme Court case that addresses the...
Unanimity Requirement in Capital Sentencing Violates Eighth Amendment: McKOY v. North Carolina

Unanimity Requirement in Capital Sentencing Violates Eighth Amendment: McKOY v. North Carolina

Date: Mar 6, 1990
Unanimity Requirement in Capital Sentencing Violates Eighth Amendment Case: McKOY v. North Carolina (494 U.S. 433) Court: U.S. Supreme Court Date: March 5, 1990 Introduction McKOY v. North Carolina...
Saffle, Warden, et al. v. Parks: Affirming the Constitutionality of Antisympathy Jury Instructions in Capital Sentencing

Saffle, Warden, et al. v. Parks: Affirming the Constitutionality of Antisympathy Jury Instructions in Capital Sentencing

Date: Mar 6, 1990
Saffle, Warden, et al. v. Parks: Affirming the Constitutionality of Antisympathy Jury Instructions in Capital Sentencing Introduction Saffle, Warden, et al. v. Parks (494 U.S. 484, 1990) is a pivotal...
Michigan v. Harvey: Upholding the Use of Statements in Impeachment Despite Sixth Amendment Violations

Michigan v. Harvey: Upholding the Use of Statements in Impeachment Despite Sixth Amendment Violations

Date: Mar 6, 1990
Michigan v. Harvey: Upholding the Use of Statements in Impeachment Despite Sixth Amendment Violations Introduction Michigan v. Harvey, 494 U.S. 344 (1990), is a pivotal United States Supreme Court...
Establishing Non-Retroactivity of Roberson's Rule in Collateral Review: Butler v. McKellar

Establishing Non-Retroactivity of Roberson's Rule in Collateral Review: Butler v. McKellar

Date: Mar 6, 1990
Non-Retroactive Application of Roberson's Rule in Collateral Habeas Corpus: A Comprehensive Analysis of Butler v. McKellar Introduction Butler v. McKellar, Warden, et al., 494 U.S. 407 (1990), is a...
Integrity of Aggravating Circumstances in Capital Sentencing: Blystone v. Pennsylvania

Integrity of Aggravating Circumstances in Capital Sentencing: Blystone v. Pennsylvania

Date: Mar 1, 1990
Integrity of Aggravating Circumstances in Capital Sentencing: Blystone v. Pennsylvania Introduction Blystone v. Pennsylvania, 494 U.S. 299 (1990), is a seminal Supreme Court case that addressed the...
Establishing Reasonable Suspicion for Protective Sweeps: Insights from MARYLAND v. BUIE

Establishing Reasonable Suspicion for Protective Sweeps: Insights from MARYLAND v. BUIE

Date: Mar 1, 1990
Establishing Reasonable Suspicion for Protective Sweeps: Insights from MARYLAND v. BUIE Introduction MARYLAND v. BUIE, 494 U.S. 325 (1990), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Extraterritorial Fourth Amendment Protections in United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez (1990)

Extraterritorial Fourth Amendment Protections in United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez (1990)

Date: Mar 1, 1990
Extraterritorial Fourth Amendment Protections in United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez (1990) Introduction United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez, 494 U.S. 259 (1990), is a landmark decision by the United...
Involuntary Medication of Mentally Ill Prisoners Without Judicial Hearing: Washington et al. v. Harper

Involuntary Medication of Mentally Ill Prisoners Without Judicial Hearing: Washington et al. v. Harper

Date: Feb 28, 1990
Involuntary Medication of Mentally Ill Prisoners Without Judicial Hearing: Washington et al. v. Harper Introduction Washington et al. v. Harper, 494 U.S. 210 (1990), is a landmark United States...
Zinermon v. Burch (494 U.S. 113): Expanding Procedural Due Process under 42 U.S.C. §1983 for Involuntary Mental Health Admissions

Zinermon v. Burch (494 U.S. 113): Expanding Procedural Due Process under 42 U.S.C. §1983 for Involuntary Mental Health Admissions

Date: Feb 28, 1990
Zinermon v. Burch (494 U.S. 113): Expanding Procedural Due Process under 42 U.S.C. §1983 for Involuntary Mental Health Admissions Introduction The Supreme Court case Zinermon et al. v. Burch (494...
Citizenship of Limited Partners and Complete Diversity: Carden v. Arkoma Associates

Citizenship of Limited Partners and Complete Diversity: Carden v. Arkoma Associates

Date: Feb 28, 1990
Citizenship of Limited Partners and Complete Diversity: Carden v. Arkoma Associates Introduction Carden v. Arkoma Associates, 494 U.S. 185 (1990), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that addresses...
Crandon v. United States: §209(a) Excludes Preemployment Severance Payments for Government Employment

Crandon v. United States: §209(a) Excludes Preemployment Severance Payments for Government Employment

Date: Feb 28, 1990
Crandon v. United States: §209(a) Excludes Preemployment Severance Payments for Government Employment Introduction Crandon et al. v. United States, 494 U.S. 152 (1990), is a pivotal Supreme Court...
Reves v. Ernst & Young: Establishing the 'Family Resemblance' Test for Defining Securities

Reves v. Ernst & Young: Establishing the 'Family Resemblance' Test for Defining Securities

Date: Feb 22, 1990
Reves v. Ernst & Young: Establishing the 'Family Resemblance' Test for Defining Securities Introduction Reves et al. v. Ernst & Young is a landmark 1990 decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Boundary of the Paperwork Reduction Act: OMB's Authority Over Disclosure Rules

Boundary of the Paperwork Reduction Act: OMB's Authority Over Disclosure Rules

Date: Feb 22, 1990
Boundary of the Paperwork Reduction Act: OMB's Authority Over Disclosure Rules Introduction DOLE, SECRETARY OF LABOR, ET AL. v. UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA ET AL. (494 U.S. 26) is a landmark 1990...
Presault v. Interstate Commerce Commission: Upholding the Rail-to-Trails Conversion Framework

Presault v. Interstate Commerce Commission: Upholding the Rail-to-Trails Conversion Framework

Date: Feb 22, 1990
Presault v. Interstate Commerce Commission: Upholding the Rail-to-Trails Conversion Framework Introduction In the landmark case Presault et ux. v. Interstate Commerce Commission et al., 494 U.S. 1...
Sullivan v. Everhart: Upholding Netting Regulations in Social Security Payments

Sullivan v. Everhart: Upholding Netting Regulations in Social Security Payments

Date: Feb 22, 1990
Sullivan v. Everhart: Upholding Netting Regulations in Social Security Payments Introduction Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. v. Everhart et al., 494 U.S. 83 (1990), is a...
Sullivan v. Zebley: Ensuring 'Comparable Severity' and Individualized Assessment in Child Disability Determinations under SSI

Sullivan v. Zebley: Ensuring 'Comparable Severity' and Individualized Assessment in Child Disability Determinations under SSI

Date: Feb 21, 1990
Sullivan v. Zebley: Ensuring 'Comparable Severity' and Individualized Assessment in Child Disability Determinations under SSI Introduction Sullivan v. Zebley, 493 U.S. 521 (1990), is a landmark case...
Limitation of Fifth Amendment Privilege in Custodial Child Production Orders

Limitation of Fifth Amendment Privilege in Custodial Child Production Orders

Date: Feb 21, 1990
Limitation of Fifth Amendment Privilege in Custodial Child Production Orders Introduction In Baltimore City Department of Social Services v. Bouknight, 493 U.S. 549 (1990), the United States Supreme...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert