Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
FERENS ET UX. v. JOHN DEERE CO.: Extending Van Dusen to Plaintiff-Initiated Venue Transfers Under 28 U.S.C. §1404(a) Introduction Ferens et ux. v. John Deere Co., decided by the United States Supreme...
Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.: Addressing Mootness Through Legislative Changes Introduction Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp., 494 U.S. 472 (1990), is a pivotal case in understanding the doctrine of...
Boyde v. California: Upholding Mandatory Sentencing Instructions in Capital Cases Introduction Boyde v. California (494 U.S. 370, 1990) is a pivotal U.S. Supreme Court case that addresses the...
Unanimity Requirement in Capital Sentencing Violates Eighth Amendment Case: McKOY v. North Carolina (494 U.S. 433) Court: U.S. Supreme Court Date: March 5, 1990 Introduction McKOY v. North Carolina...
Saffle, Warden, et al. v. Parks: Affirming the Constitutionality of Antisympathy Jury Instructions in Capital Sentencing Introduction Saffle, Warden, et al. v. Parks (494 U.S. 484, 1990) is a pivotal...
Michigan v. Harvey: Upholding the Use of Statements in Impeachment Despite Sixth Amendment Violations Introduction Michigan v. Harvey, 494 U.S. 344 (1990), is a pivotal United States Supreme Court...
Non-Retroactive Application of Roberson's Rule in Collateral Habeas Corpus: A Comprehensive Analysis of Butler v. McKellar Introduction Butler v. McKellar, Warden, et al., 494 U.S. 407 (1990), is a...
Integrity of Aggravating Circumstances in Capital Sentencing: Blystone v. Pennsylvania Introduction Blystone v. Pennsylvania, 494 U.S. 299 (1990), is a seminal Supreme Court case that addressed the...
Establishing Reasonable Suspicion for Protective Sweeps: Insights from MARYLAND v. BUIE Introduction MARYLAND v. BUIE, 494 U.S. 325 (1990), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Extraterritorial Fourth Amendment Protections in United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez (1990) Introduction United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez, 494 U.S. 259 (1990), is a landmark decision by the United...
Involuntary Medication of Mentally Ill Prisoners Without Judicial Hearing: Washington et al. v. Harper Introduction Washington et al. v. Harper, 494 U.S. 210 (1990), is a landmark United States...
Zinermon v. Burch (494 U.S. 113): Expanding Procedural Due Process under 42 U.S.C. §1983 for Involuntary Mental Health Admissions Introduction The Supreme Court case Zinermon et al. v. Burch (494...
Citizenship of Limited Partners and Complete Diversity: Carden v. Arkoma Associates Introduction Carden v. Arkoma Associates, 494 U.S. 185 (1990), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that addresses...
Crandon v. United States: §209(a) Excludes Preemployment Severance Payments for Government Employment Introduction Crandon et al. v. United States, 494 U.S. 152 (1990), is a pivotal Supreme Court...
Reves v. Ernst & Young: Establishing the 'Family Resemblance' Test for Defining Securities Introduction Reves et al. v. Ernst & Young is a landmark 1990 decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Boundary of the Paperwork Reduction Act: OMB's Authority Over Disclosure Rules Introduction DOLE, SECRETARY OF LABOR, ET AL. v. UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA ET AL. (494 U.S. 26) is a landmark 1990...
Presault v. Interstate Commerce Commission: Upholding the Rail-to-Trails Conversion Framework Introduction In the landmark case Presault et ux. v. Interstate Commerce Commission et al., 494 U.S. 1...
Sullivan v. Everhart: Upholding Netting Regulations in Social Security Payments Introduction Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. v. Everhart et al., 494 U.S. 83 (1990), is a...
Sullivan v. Zebley: Ensuring 'Comparable Severity' and Individualized Assessment in Child Disability Determinations under SSI Introduction Sullivan v. Zebley, 493 U.S. 521 (1990), is a landmark case...
Limitation of Fifth Amendment Privilege in Custodial Child Production Orders Introduction In Baltimore City Department of Social Services v. Bouknight, 493 U.S. 549 (1990), the United States Supreme...