Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Transient Jurisdiction Affirmed: Burnham v. Superior Court of California Introduction In Burnham v. Superior Court of California, 495 U.S. 604 (1990), the United States Supreme Court addressed a...
Grady v. Corbin: Expanding Double Jeopardy Protections in Successive Prosecutions Introduction Grady v. Corbin, 495 U.S. 508 (1990), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that significantly broadened...
Federal Interpretation of 'Burglary' in 18 U.S.C. § 924(e): Establishing a Uniform Definition Independent of State Law Introduction Taylor v. United States, 495 U.S. 575 (1990), is a landmark Supreme...
United States v. Munoz-Flores: Upholding the Origination Clause through Program-Specific Revenue Measures Introduction United States v. Munoz-Flores, 495 U.S. 385 (1990), is a pivotal Supreme Court...
Federal Preemption Affirmed: California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on Minimum Stream Flow Rates Introduction California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ET AL. (495 U.S. 490) is a...
Davis v. United States: Defining "For the Use Of" in Charitable Contributions Introduction Davis et ux. v. United States, 495 U.S. 472 (1990), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that addresses the...
State Regulation of Alcohol Sales in Federal Enclaves Upheld under the Twenty-first Amendment Introduction NORTH DAKOTA ET AL. v. UNITED STATES, 495 U.S. 423 (1990), is a pivotal Supreme Court...
Hughey v. United States: Limiting VWPA Restitution to the Convicted Offense Introduction Hughey v. United States, 495 U.S. 411 (1990), is a landmark Supreme Court case that addressed the scope of...
Preemption of Union Tort Liability Under Section 301: Analysis of Steelworkers of America v. Rawson Introduction United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC v. Rawson, Individually and as Guardian ad...
Antitrust Injury Requirement in Vertical Maximum-Price-Fixing: Insights from Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co. Introduction The landmark case of Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co.,...
Abuse of Writ in Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions: Delo v. Stokes Introduction Delo, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center v. Stokes (495 U.S. 320) is a pivotal decision by the United States...
Sealing Requirements under Title III: Insights from United States v. Ojeda Rios et al. Introduction United States v. Ojeda Rios et al., 495 U.S. 257 (1990), is a landmark Supreme Court case that...
Divestiture Recognized as Injunctive Relief Under Section 16 of the Clayton Act: Comprehensive Analysis of California v. American Stores Co. Introduction California v. American Stores Co., 495 U.S....
Waiver of Eleventh Amendment Immunity through Statutory Consent to Suit: Insights from Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp. v. Feeney Introduction The Supreme Court case Port Authority Trans-Hudson...
Whitmore v. Arkansas: Supreme Court Affirms Strict Standing Requirements in Death Penalty Cases Introduction In Whitmore v. Arkansas, 495 U.S. 149 (1990), the United States Supreme Court addressed a...
Renewal Rights Protection in Derivative Works: Insights from STEWART v. ABEND Introduction Stewart et al. v. Abend, DBA Authors Research Co. is a landmark case decided by the United States Supreme...
Exclusion of U.S. Territories from 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Liability: Analysis of NGIRAINGAS v. SANCHEZ Introduction Ngiraingas et al. v. Sanchez et al., 495 U.S. 182 (1990), is a landmark United States...
Balancing Fair Trial Rights and Venue Restrictions: Commentary on Swindler v. State Introduction The case of John Edward Swindler v. A.L. Lockhart, adjudicated on April 23, 1990, presents a crucial...
VENEGAS v. MITCHELL: Upholding Contingent-Fee Agreements Beyond §1988 Statutory Fees Introduction VENEGAS v. MITCHELL is a significant Supreme Court case decided on April 18, 1990, addressing the...
Limits on Federal Judicial Power to Impose Taxes in Desegregation Remedies Introduction Missouri et al. v. Jenkins et al. (495 U.S. 33) is a pivotal Supreme Court case decided on April 18, 1990,...