Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Transient Jurisdiction Affirmed: Burnham v. Superior Court of California

Transient Jurisdiction Affirmed: Burnham v. Superior Court of California

Date: May 30, 1990
Transient Jurisdiction Affirmed: Burnham v. Superior Court of California Introduction In Burnham v. Superior Court of California, 495 U.S. 604 (1990), the United States Supreme Court addressed a...
Grady v. Corbin: Expanding Double Jeopardy Protections in Successive Prosecutions

Grady v. Corbin: Expanding Double Jeopardy Protections in Successive Prosecutions

Date: May 30, 1990
Grady v. Corbin: Expanding Double Jeopardy Protections in Successive Prosecutions Introduction Grady v. Corbin, 495 U.S. 508 (1990), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that significantly broadened...
Federal Interpretation of 'Burglary' in 18 U.S.C. § 924(e): Establishing a Uniform Definition Independent of State Law

Federal Interpretation of 'Burglary' in 18 U.S.C. § 924(e): Establishing a Uniform Definition Independent of State Law

Date: May 30, 1990
Federal Interpretation of 'Burglary' in 18 U.S.C. § 924(e): Establishing a Uniform Definition Independent of State Law Introduction Taylor v. United States, 495 U.S. 575 (1990), is a landmark Supreme...
United States v. Munoz-Flores: Upholding the Origination Clause through Program-Specific Revenue Measures

United States v. Munoz-Flores: Upholding the Origination Clause through Program-Specific Revenue Measures

Date: May 22, 1990
United States v. Munoz-Flores: Upholding the Origination Clause through Program-Specific Revenue Measures Introduction United States v. Munoz-Flores, 495 U.S. 385 (1990), is a pivotal Supreme Court...
Federal Preemption Affirmed: California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on Minimum Stream Flow Rates

Federal Preemption Affirmed: California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on Minimum Stream Flow Rates

Date: May 22, 1990
Federal Preemption Affirmed: California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on Minimum Stream Flow Rates Introduction California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ET AL. (495 U.S. 490) is a...
Davis v. United States: Defining "For the Use Of" in Charitable Contributions

Davis v. United States: Defining "For the Use Of" in Charitable Contributions

Date: May 22, 1990
Davis v. United States: Defining "For the Use Of" in Charitable Contributions Introduction Davis et ux. v. United States, 495 U.S. 472 (1990), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that addresses the...
State Regulation of Alcohol Sales in Federal Enclaves Upheld under the Twenty-first Amendment

State Regulation of Alcohol Sales in Federal Enclaves Upheld under the Twenty-first Amendment

Date: May 22, 1990
State Regulation of Alcohol Sales in Federal Enclaves Upheld under the Twenty-first Amendment Introduction NORTH DAKOTA ET AL. v. UNITED STATES, 495 U.S. 423 (1990), is a pivotal Supreme Court...
Hughey v. United States: Limiting VWPA Restitution to the Convicted Offense

Hughey v. United States: Limiting VWPA Restitution to the Convicted Offense

Date: May 22, 1990
Hughey v. United States: Limiting VWPA Restitution to the Convicted Offense Introduction Hughey v. United States, 495 U.S. 411 (1990), is a landmark Supreme Court case that addressed the scope of...
Preemption of Union Tort Liability Under Section 301: Analysis of Steelworkers of America v. Rawson

Preemption of Union Tort Liability Under Section 301: Analysis of Steelworkers of America v. Rawson

Date: May 15, 1990
Preemption of Union Tort Liability Under Section 301: Analysis of Steelworkers of America v. Rawson Introduction United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC v. Rawson, Individually and as Guardian ad...
Antitrust Injury Requirement in Vertical Maximum-Price-Fixing: Insights from Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co.

Antitrust Injury Requirement in Vertical Maximum-Price-Fixing: Insights from Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co.

Date: May 15, 1990
Antitrust Injury Requirement in Vertical Maximum-Price-Fixing: Insights from Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co. Introduction The landmark case of Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co.,...
Abuse of Writ in Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions: Delo v. Stokes

Abuse of Writ in Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions: Delo v. Stokes

Date: May 12, 1990
Abuse of Writ in Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions: Delo v. Stokes Introduction Delo, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center v. Stokes (495 U.S. 320) is a pivotal decision by the United States...
Sealing Requirements under Title III: Insights from United States v. Ojeda Rios et al.

Sealing Requirements under Title III: Insights from United States v. Ojeda Rios et al.

Date: May 1, 1990
Sealing Requirements under Title III: Insights from United States v. Ojeda Rios et al. Introduction United States v. Ojeda Rios et al., 495 U.S. 257 (1990), is a landmark Supreme Court case that...
Divestiture Recognized as Injunctive Relief Under Section 16 of the Clayton Act: Comprehensive Analysis of California v. American Stores Co.

Divestiture Recognized as Injunctive Relief Under Section 16 of the Clayton Act: Comprehensive Analysis of California v. American Stores Co.

Date: May 1, 1990
Divestiture Recognized as Injunctive Relief Under Section 16 of the Clayton Act: Comprehensive Analysis of California v. American Stores Co. Introduction California v. American Stores Co., 495 U.S....
Waiver of Eleventh Amendment Immunity through Statutory Consent to Suit: Insights from Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp. v. Feeney

Waiver of Eleventh Amendment Immunity through Statutory Consent to Suit: Insights from Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp. v. Feeney

Date: May 1, 1990
Waiver of Eleventh Amendment Immunity through Statutory Consent to Suit: Insights from Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp. v. Feeney Introduction The Supreme Court case Port Authority Trans-Hudson...
Whitmore v. Arkansas: Supreme Court Affirms Strict Standing Requirements in Death Penalty Cases

Whitmore v. Arkansas: Supreme Court Affirms Strict Standing Requirements in Death Penalty Cases

Date: Apr 25, 1990
Whitmore v. Arkansas: Supreme Court Affirms Strict Standing Requirements in Death Penalty Cases Introduction In Whitmore v. Arkansas, 495 U.S. 149 (1990), the United States Supreme Court addressed a...
Renewal Rights Protection in Derivative Works: Insights from STEWART v. ABEND

Renewal Rights Protection in Derivative Works: Insights from STEWART v. ABEND

Date: Apr 25, 1990
Renewal Rights Protection in Derivative Works: Insights from STEWART v. ABEND Introduction Stewart et al. v. Abend, DBA Authors Research Co. is a landmark case decided by the United States Supreme...
Exclusion of U.S. Territories from 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Liability: Analysis of NGIRAINGAS v. SANCHEZ

Exclusion of U.S. Territories from 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Liability: Analysis of NGIRAINGAS v. SANCHEZ

Date: Apr 25, 1990
Exclusion of U.S. Territories from 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Liability: Analysis of NGIRAINGAS v. SANCHEZ Introduction Ngiraingas et al. v. Sanchez et al., 495 U.S. 182 (1990), is a landmark United States...
Balancing Fair Trial Rights and Venue Restrictions: Commentary on Swindler v. State

Balancing Fair Trial Rights and Venue Restrictions: Commentary on Swindler v. State

Date: Apr 24, 1990
Balancing Fair Trial Rights and Venue Restrictions: Commentary on Swindler v. State Introduction The case of John Edward Swindler v. A.L. Lockhart, adjudicated on April 23, 1990, presents a crucial...
VENEGAS v. MITCHELL: Upholding Contingent-Fee Agreements Beyond §1988 Statutory Fees

VENEGAS v. MITCHELL: Upholding Contingent-Fee Agreements Beyond §1988 Statutory Fees

Date: Apr 19, 1990
VENEGAS v. MITCHELL: Upholding Contingent-Fee Agreements Beyond §1988 Statutory Fees Introduction VENEGAS v. MITCHELL is a significant Supreme Court case decided on April 18, 1990, addressing the...
Limits on Federal Judicial Power to Impose Taxes in Desegregation Remedies

Limits on Federal Judicial Power to Impose Taxes in Desegregation Remedies

Date: Apr 19, 1990
Limits on Federal Judicial Power to Impose Taxes in Desegregation Remedies Introduction Missouri et al. v. Jenkins et al. (495 U.S. 33) is a pivotal Supreme Court case decided on April 18, 1990,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert