Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Agency Discretion in Federal Funding: Insights from Lincoln v. Vigil Introduction Lincoln, Acting Director, Indian Health Service, et al. v. Vigil et al. is a seminal 1993 decision by the U.S....
United States v. Landano: Limiting Presumptions of Source Confidentiality under FOIA Exemption 7(D) Introduction United States Department of Justice et al. v. Landano, 508 U.S. 165 (1993), represents...
State Tax Jurisdiction Over Tribal Members in Indian Country: Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Sac and Fox Nation Introduction Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Sac and Fox Nation is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court...
Supreme Court Clarifies Appellate Court Jurisdiction in Patent Litigation CARDINAL CHEMICAL CO. ET AL. v. MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC., 508 U.S. 83 (1993) Introduction The case of Cardinal Chemical Co....
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies under the FTCA: McNeil v. United States Introduction McNeil v. United States, 508 U.S. 106 (1993), is a landmark case decided by the United States Supreme Court...
Deal v. United States: Interpreting 'Second or Subsequent Conviction' in §924(c)(1) Introduction Deal v. United States, 508 U.S. 129 (1993), is a pivotal Supreme Court case that addresses the...
Binding Authority of Sentencing Guidelines Commentary Established in Stinson v. United States Introduction Terry Lynn Stinson v. United States, 508 U.S. 36 (1993), is a landmark decision by the...
MOREAU v. KLEVENHAGEN: Defining Compensatory Time in Public Sector under FLSA Introduction Moreau et al. v. Klevenhagen, Sheriff, Harris County, Texas, et al. is a seminal 1993 U.S. Supreme Court...
McCarran Amendment and Federal Sovereign Immunity: Insights from United States v. Idaho Introduction The case of United States v. Idaho, Ex Rel. Director, Idaho Department of Water Resources,...
No Coconspirator Exception: Supreme Court Clarifies Fourth Amendment Standing in United States v. Padilla Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case, United States v. Padilla et al. (508 U.S. 77,...
Establishing Objective Baselessness in Antitrust Claims: Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. Introduction The case of Professional Real Estate Investors,...
Limiting Automatic Rent Adjustments in Section 8 Housing: Insights from Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Group Introduction Cisneros, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, et al. v. Alpine Ridge Group...
United States v. Olano and Gray: Clarifying the "Plain Error" Standard under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 52(b) Introduction United States v. Guy W. Olano, Jr., and Raymond M. Gray, AJ, 507...
Federal Common Law Limitations on Tax Recovery: Insights from United States v. California Introduction United States v. California, 507 U.S. 746 (1993), represents a pivotal moment in the interplay...
Florida CPA Solicitation Ban Violates First Amendment Protections Introduction In the landmark case Edenfield v. Fane, the United States Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of Florida's...
Kotteakos Standard Applied to Collateral Review of Doyle Errors in Habeas Corpus Proceedings Introduction Todd A. Brecht v. Gordon A. Abrahamson is a landmark 1993 decision by the United States...
Federal Preemption of State Negligence Claims in Railroad Safety: An Analysis of CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Lizzie Beatrice Easterwood Introduction CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Lizzie Beatrice...
Miranda Claims Remain Open to Federal Habeas Review Despite STONE v. POWELL Introduction Pamela Withrow v. Robert Allen Williams, Jr. is a landmark Supreme Court decision delivered on April 21, 1993....
Enforcement and Modification of Interstate Water Decrees: An Analysis of NEBRASKA v. WYOMING et al. Introduction NEBRASKA v. WYOMING et al. (507 U.S. 584, 1993) is a landmark decision by the United...
Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins: Clarifying ADEA Liability and Willfulness Standards Introduction Hazen Paper Co., et al. v. Biggins, 507 U.S. 604 (1993), is a pivotal United States Supreme Court decision...