Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Defining Retroactive Corrective Adjustments in Medicare Reimbursements: Good Samaritan Hospital v. Shalala

Defining Retroactive Corrective Adjustments in Medicare Reimbursements: Good Samaritan Hospital v. Shalala

Date: Jun 8, 1993
Defining Retroactive Corrective Adjustments in Medicare Reimbursements: Good Samaritan Hospital v. Shalala Introduction Good Samaritan Hospital et al. v. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human...
Limitation of Absolute Immunity for Court Reporters in Federal Criminal Proceedings: Antoine v. Byers Anderson

Limitation of Absolute Immunity for Court Reporters in Federal Criminal Proceedings: Antoine v. Byers Anderson

Date: Jun 8, 1993
Limitation of Absolute Immunity for Court Reporters in Federal Criminal Proceedings: Antoine v. Byers Anderson Introduction In ANTOINE v. BYERS ANDERSON, INC., the United States Supreme Court...
GILMORE v. TAYLOR: Supreme Court Establishes Falconer Rule as 'New' Under Teague, Restricts Federal Habeas Relief

GILMORE v. TAYLOR: Supreme Court Establishes Falconer Rule as 'New' Under Teague, Restricts Federal Habeas Relief

Date: Jun 8, 1993
GILMORE v. TAYLOR: Supreme Court Establishes Falconer Rule as 'New' Under Teague, Restricts Federal Habeas Relief Introduction In GILMORE v. TAYLOR (508 U.S. 333), the United States Supreme Court...
Establishing the "Plain Feel" Exception: Minnesota v. Dickerson (1993)

Establishing the "Plain Feel" Exception: Minnesota v. Dickerson (1993)

Date: Jun 8, 1993
Establishing the "Plain Feel" Exception: Minnesota v. Dickerson (1993) Introduction Minnesota v. Dickerson is a landmark 1993 decision by the United States Supreme Court that addressed the scope of...
Viewpoint Neutrality in Limited Public Forums: Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches Union Free School District

Viewpoint Neutrality in Limited Public Forums: Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches Union Free School District

Date: Jun 8, 1993
Viewpoint Neutrality in Limited Public Forums: Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches Union Free School District Introduction Lamb's Chapel et al. v. Center Moriches Union Free School District et al., 508...
Supreme Court Reaffirms Section 92 of the National Bank Act: Nationwide Insurance Sales by Small Community National Banks Confirmed

Supreme Court Reaffirms Section 92 of the National Bank Act: Nationwide Insurance Sales by Small Community National Banks Confirmed

Date: Jun 8, 1993
Supreme Court Reaffirms Section 92 of the National Bank Act: Nationwide Insurance Sales by Small Community National Banks Confirmed Introduction The case of United States National Bank of Oregon v....
Broad Interpretation of Firearm Usage in Drug Trafficking Under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)

Broad Interpretation of Firearm Usage in Drug Trafficking Under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)

Date: Jun 2, 1993
Broad Interpretation of Firearm Usage in Drug Trafficking Under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) Introduction Case: SMITH v. UNITED STATES, 508 U.S. 223 (1993) Court: U.S. Supreme Court Date: June 1, 1993 In...
ERISA Limits on Monetary Damages for Nonfiduciary Participation in Fiduciary Breaches: Analysis of MERTENS v. HEWITT ASSOCIATES (1993)

ERISA Limits on Monetary Damages for Nonfiduciary Participation in Fiduciary Breaches: Analysis of MERTENS v. HEWITT ASSOCIATES (1993)

Date: Jun 2, 1993
ERISA Limits on Monetary Damages for Nonfiduciary Participation in Fiduciary Breaches: Analysis of MERTENS v. HEWITT ASSOCIATES (1993) 1. Introduction MERTENS v. HEWITT ASSOCIATES is a landmark...
Right to Contribution in 10b-5 Actions Established in Musick v. Employers Insurance of Wausau

Right to Contribution in 10b-5 Actions Established in Musick v. Employers Insurance of Wausau

Date: Jun 2, 1993
Right to Contribution in 10b-5 Actions Established in Musick v. Employers Insurance of Wausau Introduction Musick, Peeler Garrett et al. v. Employers Insurance of Wausau et al. (508 U.S. 286, 1993)...
Supreme Court Reinforces Homestead Mortgagee Protections under Bankruptcy Code

Supreme Court Reinforces Homestead Mortgagee Protections under Bankruptcy Code

Date: Jun 2, 1993
Supreme Court Reinforces Homestead Mortgagee Protections under Bankruptcy Code Introduction In the landmark case of Nobelman ET UX. v. American Savings Bank, decided on June 1, 1993, the United...
Sullivan v. Louisiana: Non-Harmless Deficiency in Reasonable Doubt Instructions

Sullivan v. Louisiana: Non-Harmless Deficiency in Reasonable Doubt Instructions

Date: Jun 2, 1993
Sullivan v. Louisiana: Non-Harmless Deficiency in Reasonable Doubt Instructions Introduction Sullivan v. Louisiana, 508 U.S. 275 (1993), is a significant Supreme Court decision that addressed the...
Rational Basis Upholds Common Ownership Distinction in Cable Communications Policy Act

Rational Basis Upholds Common Ownership Distinction in Cable Communications Policy Act

Date: Jun 2, 1993
Rational Basis Upholds Common Ownership Distinction in Cable Communications Policy Act Introduction Federal Communications Commission et al. v. Beach Communications, Inc., et al. (508 U.S. 307) is a...
Prohibited Transactions under § 4975(c)(1)(A) in IR v. Keystone Consolidated Industries

Prohibited Transactions under § 4975(c)(1)(A) in IR v. Keystone Consolidated Industries

Date: May 25, 1993
Prohibited Transactions under § 4975(c)(1)(A) in Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc. Introduction Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Keystone Consolidated...
Enforcement of 28 U.S.C. § 1500 Jurisdictional Bar Affirmed in KEENE CORP. v. UNITED STATES

Enforcement of 28 U.S.C. § 1500 Jurisdictional Bar Affirmed in KEENE CORP. v. UNITED STATES

Date: May 25, 1993
Enforcement of 28 U.S.C. § 1500 Jurisdictional Bar Affirmed in KEENE CORP. v. UNITED STATES Introduction KEENE CORP. v. UNITED STATES, 508 U.S. 200 (1993), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that...
Agency Discretion in Federal Funding: Insights from Lincoln v. Vigil

Agency Discretion in Federal Funding: Insights from Lincoln v. Vigil

Date: May 25, 1993
Agency Discretion in Federal Funding: Insights from Lincoln v. Vigil Introduction Lincoln, Acting Director, Indian Health Service, et al. v. Vigil et al. is a seminal 1993 decision by the U.S....
United States v. Landano: Limiting Presumptions of Source Confidentiality under FOIA Exemption 7(D)

United States v. Landano: Limiting Presumptions of Source Confidentiality under FOIA Exemption 7(D)

Date: May 25, 1993
United States v. Landano: Limiting Presumptions of Source Confidentiality under FOIA Exemption 7(D) Introduction United States Department of Justice et al. v. Landano, 508 U.S. 165 (1993), represents...
State Tax Jurisdiction Over Tribal Members in Indian Country: Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Sac and Fox Nation

State Tax Jurisdiction Over Tribal Members in Indian Country: Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Sac and Fox Nation

Date: May 19, 1993
State Tax Jurisdiction Over Tribal Members in Indian Country: Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Sac and Fox Nation Introduction Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Sac and Fox Nation is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court...
Supreme Court Clarifies Appellate Court Jurisdiction in Patent Litigation: CARDINAL CHEMICAL CO. ET AL. v. MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Supreme Court Clarifies Appellate Court Jurisdiction in Patent Litigation: CARDINAL CHEMICAL CO. ET AL. v. MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Date: May 18, 1993
Supreme Court Clarifies Appellate Court Jurisdiction in Patent Litigation CARDINAL CHEMICAL CO. ET AL. v. MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC., 508 U.S. 83 (1993) Introduction The case of Cardinal Chemical Co....
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies under the FTCA: McNeil v. United States

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies under the FTCA: McNeil v. United States

Date: May 18, 1993
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies under the FTCA: McNeil v. United States Introduction McNeil v. United States, 508 U.S. 106 (1993), is a landmark case decided by the United States Supreme Court...
Deal v. United States: Interpreting 'Second or Subsequent Conviction' in §924(c)(1)

Deal v. United States: Interpreting 'Second or Subsequent Conviction' in §924(c)(1)

Date: May 18, 1993
Deal v. United States: Interpreting 'Second or Subsequent Conviction' in §924(c)(1) Introduction Deal v. United States, 508 U.S. 129 (1993), is a pivotal Supreme Court case that addresses the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert