Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

First Amendment and Commercial Speech: Cincinnati v. Discovery Networks

First Amendment and Commercial Speech: Cincinnati v. Discovery Networks

Date: Mar 25, 1993
First Amendment and Commercial Speech: Cincinnati v. Discovery Networks Introduction CITY OF CINCINNATI v. DISCOVERY NETWORK, INC., ET AL. (507 U.S. 410, 1993) is a landmark United States Supreme...
Federal Tax Lien Supremacy Over Private Judgment Lien on After-Acquired Real Property: United States v. McDermott

Federal Tax Lien Supremacy Over Private Judgment Lien on After-Acquired Real Property: United States v. McDermott

Date: Mar 25, 1993
Federal Tax Lien Supremacy Over Private Judgment Lien on After-Acquired Real Property: United States v. McDermott Introduction United States v. McDermott et al. is a pivotal Supreme Court case...
Flores v. Reno: Validating INS Regulation 242.24 on Alien Juvenile Detention

Flores v. Reno: Validating INS Regulation 242.24 on Alien Juvenile Detention

Date: Mar 24, 1993
Flores v. Reno: Validating INS Regulation 242.24 on Alien Juvenile Detention Introduction Flores v. Reno, 507 U.S. 292 (1993) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that addressed...
Intentional Tortious Acts as Non-Commercial Activities under FSIA: Saudi Arabia v. Nelson

Intentional Tortious Acts as Non-Commercial Activities under FSIA: Saudi Arabia v. Nelson

Date: Mar 24, 1993
Intentional Tortious Acts as Non-Commercial Activities under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act: Saudi Arabia v. Nelson Introduction Saudi Arabia, et al. v. Nelson et ux. is a pivotal United States...
States Not Constitutionally Required to Provide Mitigating Circumstance Instructions Without Supporting Evidence: Insights from DeLuna v. Lashley

States Not Constitutionally Required to Provide Mitigating Circumstance Instructions Without Supporting Evidence: Insights from DeLuna v. Lashley

Date: Mar 9, 1993
States Not Constitutionally Required to Provide Mitigating Circumstance Instructions Without Supporting Evidence: Insights from DeLuna v. Lashley Introduction The case of DeLuna, Superintendent,...
Reiter v. Cooper: Upholding Counterclaims under the Interstate Commerce Act

Reiter v. Cooper: Upholding Counterclaims under the Interstate Commerce Act

Date: Mar 9, 1993
Reiter v. Cooper: Upholding Counterclaims under the Interstate Commerce Act Introduction Reiter, et al. v. Cooper, Trustee for Carolina Motor Express, Inc., et al., 507 U.S. 258 (1993), is a pivotal...
NLRA Does Not Preempt State Proprietary Enforcement of Prehire Labor Agreements

NLRA Does Not Preempt State Proprietary Enforcement of Prehire Labor Agreements

Date: Mar 9, 1993
NLRA Does Not Preempt State Proprietary Enforcement of Prehire Labor Agreements Introduction In the landmark case of Building Construction Trades Council of the Metropolitan District v. Associated...
Federal Tort Claims Act Excludes Antarctica from Sovereign Immunity Waiver: Smith v. United States

Federal Tort Claims Act Excludes Antarctica from Sovereign Immunity Waiver: Smith v. United States

Date: Mar 9, 1993
Federal Tort Claims Act Excludes Antarctica from Sovereign Immunity Waiver: Smith v. United States Introduction Smith v. United States, 507 U.S. 197 (1993), is a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme...
Limiting Fugitive Dismissal: Ortega-Rodriguez v. United States Sets New Precedent on Appellate Dismissal Rules

Limiting Fugitive Dismissal: Ortega-Rodriguez v. United States Sets New Precedent on Appellate Dismissal Rules

Date: Mar 9, 1993
Limiting Fugitive Dismissal: Ortega-Rodriguez v. United States Sets New Precedent on Appellate Dismissal Rules Introduction Ortega-Rodriguez v. United States, 507 U.S. 234 (1993), represents a...
Standard Notice Pleading Applicable to Municipal Liability under 42 U.S.C. §1983: Leatherman v. Tarrant County

Standard Notice Pleading Applicable to Municipal Liability under 42 U.S.C. §1983: Leatherman v. Tarrant County

Date: Mar 4, 1993
Standard Notice Pleading Applicable to Municipal Liability under 42 U.S.C. §1983: Leatherman v. Tarrant County Introduction Leatherman, et al. v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and...
Clarifying RICO §1962(c): Participation in Operation or Management as a Prerequisite for Liability

Clarifying RICO §1962(c): Participation in Operation or Management as a Prerequisite for Liability

Date: Mar 4, 1993
Clarifying RICO §1962(c): Participation in Operation or Management as a Prerequisite for Liability Introduction Reves, et al. v. Ernst Young, 507 U.S. 170 (1993), is a significant United States...
Voinovich v. Quilter: Upholding Majority-Minority Districts and Clarifying Burden Under the Voting Rights Act

Voinovich v. Quilter: Upholding Majority-Minority Districts and Clarifying Burden Under the Voting Rights Act

Date: Mar 3, 1993
Voinovich v. Quilter: Upholding Majority-Minority Districts and Clarifying Burden Under the Voting Rights Act Introduction Voinovich, Governor of Ohio, et al. v. Quilter, Speaker Pro Tempore of Ohio...
Kansas Act Jurisdiction in Indian Country: NEGONSOTT v. SAMUELS Commentary

Kansas Act Jurisdiction in Indian Country: NEGONSOTT v. SAMUELS Commentary

Date: Feb 25, 1993
Kansas Act Jurisdiction in Indian Country: NEGONSOTT v. SAMUELS Introduction NEGONSOTT v. SAMUELS, WARDEN, ET AL. (507 U.S. 99, 1993) is a pivotal United States Supreme Court decision that addresses...
Affirmation of the Innocent Owner Defense in Civil Forfeiture Cases: United States v. 92 Buena Vista Avenue

Affirmation of the Innocent Owner Defense in Civil Forfeiture Cases: United States v. 92 Buena Vista Avenue

Date: Feb 25, 1993
Affirmation of the Innocent Owner Defense in Civil Forfeiture Cases: United States v. 92 Buena Vista Avenue Introduction United States v. A Parcel of Land, Buildings, Appurtenances, and Improvements,...
Enhancement of Sentences for Perjury: Analysis of United States v. Dunnigan

Enhancement of Sentences for Perjury: Analysis of United States v. Dunnigan

Date: Feb 24, 1993
Enhancement of Sentences for Perjury: Analysis of United States v. Dunnigan Introduction United States v. Dunnigan, 507 U.S. 87 (1993), is a landmark Supreme Court case that addresses the...
Fex v. Michigan: Clarification on Commencement of the 180-Day Period under the Interstate Agreement on Detainers

Fex v. Michigan: Clarification on Commencement of the 180-Day Period under the Interstate Agreement on Detainers

Date: Feb 24, 1993
Fex v. Michigan: Clarification on Commencement of the 180-Day Period under the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Introduction Fex v. Michigan, decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on February 23, 1993,...
ITEL Containers International Corp. v. Huddleston: Upholding State Taxation on International Container Leases

ITEL Containers International Corp. v. Huddleston: Upholding State Taxation on International Container Leases

Date: Feb 24, 1993
ITEL Containers International Corp. v. Huddleston: Upholding State Taxation on International Container Leases Introduction In ITEL Containers International Corporation v. Huddleston, Commissioner of...
Reaffirmation of State Primacy in Redistricting: GroWe v. Emison

Reaffirmation of State Primacy in Redistricting: GroWe v. Emison

Date: Feb 24, 1993
Reaffirmation of State Primacy in Redistricting: GroWe v. Emison Introduction GroWe, Secretary of State of Minnesota, et al., v. Emison et al. is a landmark 1993 U.S. Supreme Court decision that...
Establishing Fixed Baselines for Submerged Lands: Insights from United States v. State of Louisiana et al.

Establishing Fixed Baselines for Submerged Lands: Insights from United States v. State of Louisiana et al.

Date: Feb 23, 1993
Establishing Fixed Baselines for Submerged Lands: Insights from United States v. State of Louisiana et al. Introduction The case of United States v. State of Louisiana et al. (507 U.S. 7) represents...
United States v. Nachtigal: Defining Petty Offenses and Sixth Amendment Rights in DUI Cases

United States v. Nachtigal: Defining Petty Offenses and Sixth Amendment Rights in DUI Cases

Date: Feb 23, 1993
United States v. Nachtigal: Defining Petty Offenses and Sixth Amendment Rights in DUI Cases Introduction United States v. Nachtigal, 507 U.S. 1 (1993), is a pivotal Supreme Court case that examines...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert