Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Res Judicata and the Right to Opt-Out in Federal Class Actions: An Analysis of TICOR TITLE INSURANCE CO. v. BROWN

Res Judicata and the Right to Opt-Out in Federal Class Actions: An Analysis of TICOR TITLE INSURANCE CO. v. BROWN

Date: Apr 5, 1994
Res Judicata and the Right to Opt-Out in Federal Class Actions: An Analysis of TICOR TITLE INSURANCE CO., ET AL. v. BROWN ET AL. (511 U.S. 117) Introduction The Supreme Court case TICOR TITLE...
Supreme Court Ruling: Oregon's Waste Disposal Fees Invalidated under the Negative Commerce Clause

Supreme Court Ruling: Oregon's Waste Disposal Fees Invalidated under the Negative Commerce Clause

Date: Apr 5, 1994
Supreme Court Ruling: Oregon's Waste Disposal Fees Invalidated under the Negative Commerce Clause Introduction In the landmark case of Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental...
Powell v. Nevada: Retroactive Applicability of the 48-Hour Probable Cause Rule

Powell v. Nevada: Retroactive Applicability of the 48-Hour Probable Cause Rule

Date: Mar 31, 1994
Powell v. Nevada: Retroactive Applicability of the 48-Hour Probable Cause Rule Introduction Powell v. Nevada (511 U.S. 79, 1994) is a seminal U.S. Supreme Court decision that addresses the...
United States v. Granderson: Clarifying Sentencing Guidelines for Probation Revocation

United States v. Granderson: Clarifying Sentencing Guidelines for Probation Revocation

Date: Mar 23, 1994
United States v. Granderson: Clarifying Sentencing Guidelines for Probation Revocation Introduction United States v. Granderson, 511 U.S. 39 (1994), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that addresses...
Reaffirmation of Jury Instructions Defining Reasonable Doubt: Victor v. Nebraska

Reaffirmation of Jury Instructions Defining Reasonable Doubt: Victor v. Nebraska

Date: Mar 23, 1994
Reaffirmation of Jury Instructions Defining Reasonable Doubt: Victor v. Nebraska Introduction Victor v. Nebraska, 511 U.S. 1 (1994), addressed the constitutionality of specific jury instructions...
Custom Doctrine and Property Rights Under Scrutiny: STEVENS v. CITY OF CANNON BEACH

Custom Doctrine and Property Rights Under Scrutiny: STEVENS v. CITY OF CANNON BEACH

Date: Mar 22, 1994
Custom Doctrine and Property Rights Under Scrutiny: STEVENS v. CITY OF CANNON BEACH Introduction STEVENS v. CITY OF CANNON BEACH, 510 U.S. 1207 (1994), is a pivotal case that explores the...
Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music: Commercial Parody Recognized as Fair Use

Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music: Commercial Parody Recognized as Fair Use

Date: Mar 8, 1994
Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music: Commercial Parody Recognized as Fair Use Introduction Campbell, AKA Skyywalker, et al. v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994), is a landmark United States...
Extrajudicial Source Doctrine in Judicial Recusal: Analysis of LITEKY ET AL. v. UNITED STATES

Extrajudicial Source Doctrine in Judicial Recusal: Analysis of LITEKY ET AL. v. UNITED STATES

Date: Mar 8, 1994
Extrajudicial Source Doctrine in Judicial Recusal: Analysis of LITEKY ET AL. v. UNITED STATES Introduction LITEKY ET AL. v. UNITED STATES, 510 U.S. 540 (1994), is a pivotal Supreme Court case that...
FOGERTY v. FANTASY, INC.: Establishing an Evenhanded Standard for Attorney Fees under 17 U.S.C. §505

FOGERTY v. FANTASY, INC.: Establishing an Evenhanded Standard for Attorney Fees under 17 U.S.C. §505

Date: Mar 2, 1994
FOGERTY v. FANTASY, INC.: Establishing an Evenhanded Standard for Attorney Fees under 17 U.S.C. §505 Introduction FOGERTY v. FANTASY, INC. is a landmark case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on...
Congressional Diminishment of Indian Reservations Established in Hagen v. Utah

Congressional Diminishment of Indian Reservations Established in Hagen v. Utah

Date: Feb 24, 1994
Congressional Diminishment of Indian Reservations Established in Hagen v. Utah Introduction Hagen v. Utah, 510 U.S. 399 (1994), is a landmark Supreme Court case that addressed the extent of...
Appellate Review of Qualified Immunity: Insights from ELDER v. HOLLOWAY

Appellate Review of Qualified Immunity: Insights from ELDER v. HOLLOWAY

Date: Feb 24, 1994
Appellate Review of Qualified Immunity: Insights from ELDER v. HOLLOWAY Introduction ELDER v. HOLLOWAY et al., 510 U.S. 510 (1994), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that redefined the parameters...
Caspari v. Bohlen: Upholding Teague's Nonretroactivity in Double Jeopardy for Noncapital Sentencing

Caspari v. Bohlen: Upholding Teague's Nonretroactivity in Double Jeopardy for Noncapital Sentencing

Date: Feb 24, 1994
Caspari v. Bohlen: Upholding Teague's Nonretroactivity in Double Jeopardy for Noncapital Sentencing Introduction Caspari v. Bohlen (510 U.S. 383, 1994) is a pivotal United States Supreme Court...
Forum Non Conveniens in Admiralty Cases: Insights from American Dredging Co. v. Miller

Forum Non Conveniens in Admiralty Cases: Insights from American Dredging Co. v. Miller

Date: Feb 24, 1994
Forum Non Conveniens in Admiralty Cases: Insights from American Dredging Co. v. Miller Introduction American Dredging Co. v. Miller, 510 U.S. 443 (1994), is a pivotal case in United States Supreme...
Supreme Court Establishes Privacy Act Supremacy Over Labor Statute in Protecting Employee Addresses

Supreme Court Establishes Privacy Act Supremacy Over Labor Statute in Protecting Employee Addresses

Date: Feb 24, 1994
Supreme Court Establishes Privacy Act Supremacy Over Labor Statute in Protecting Employee Addresses Introduction In the landmark case United States Department of Defense, et al. v. Federal Labor...
Restricting Bivens Actions to Federal Agents: The Supreme Court in FDIC v. Meyer

Restricting Bivens Actions to Federal Agents: The Supreme Court in FDIC v. Meyer

Date: Feb 24, 1994
Restricting Bivens Actions to Federal Agents: The Supreme Court in FDIC v. Meyer Introduction Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) v. Meyer (510 U.S. 471) is a landmark decision rendered by...
The Death Penalty's Constitutional Future: Insights from CALLINS v. COLLINS Decision

The Death Penalty's Constitutional Future: Insights from CALLINS v. COLLINS Decision

Date: Feb 23, 1994
The Death Penalty's Constitutional Future: Insights from CALLINS v. COLLINS Decision Introduction CALLINS v. COLLINS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, 510 U.S....
Permitting Reinstatement Despite Employee Perjury: An Analysis of ABF Freight System, Inc. v. NLRB

Permitting Reinstatement Despite Employee Perjury: An Analysis of ABF Freight System, Inc. v. NLRB

Date: Jan 25, 1994
Permitting Reinstatement Despite Employee Perjury: An Analysis of ABF Freight System, Inc. v. NLRB Introduction The Supreme Court case ABF Freight System, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board (510...
ALBRIGHT v. OLIVER ET AL.: Reinforcing Fourth Amendment Protections Against Unwarranted Prosecutions

ALBRIGHT v. OLIVER ET AL.: Reinforcing Fourth Amendment Protections Against Unwarranted Prosecutions

Date: Jan 25, 1994
ALBRIGHT v. OLIVER ET AL.: Reinforcing Fourth Amendment Protections Against Unwarranted Prosecutions Introduction The United States Supreme Court's decision in ALBRIGHT v. OLIVER et al., 510 U.S. 266...
RICO Without Economic Motive: Insights from National Organization for Women, Inc. v. Scheidler et al.

RICO Without Economic Motive: Insights from National Organization for Women, Inc. v. Scheidler et al.

Date: Jan 25, 1994
RICO Without Economic Motive: Insights from National Organization for Women, Inc. v. Scheidler et al. Introduction National Organization for Women, Inc., Etc., et al. v. Scheidler et al. (510 U.S....
Supreme Court Upholds State's Discretion on Property Tax Exemptions under Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act

Supreme Court Upholds State's Discretion on Property Tax Exemptions under Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act

Date: Jan 25, 1994
Supreme Court Upholds State's Discretion on Property Tax Exemptions under Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act Introduction In Department of Revenue of Oregon v. ACF Industries, Inc.,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert