Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Comprehensive Commentary on Posters 'N' Things, Ltd. v. United States (1994)

Comprehensive Commentary on Posters 'N' Things, Ltd. v. United States (1994)

Date: May 24, 1994
Posters 'N' Things, Ltd. v. United States: Establishing the Scienter Requirement in Drug Paraphernalia Laws Introduction Posters 'N' Things, Ltd., et al. v. United States (511 U.S. 513, 1994) is a...
BFP v. Resolution Trust Corporation: Defining 'Reasonably Equivalent Value' in Bankruptcy Foreclosures

BFP v. Resolution Trust Corporation: Defining 'Reasonably Equivalent Value' in Bankruptcy Foreclosures

Date: May 24, 1994
BFP v. Resolution Trust Corporation: Defining 'Reasonably Equivalent Value' in Bankruptcy Foreclosures Introduction The Supreme Court case BFP, Petitioner v. Resolution Trust Corporation addresses a...
Judicial Review Precluded for Presidential Base Closure Decisions under the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990

Judicial Review Precluded for Presidential Base Closure Decisions under the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990

Date: May 24, 1994
Judicial Review Precluded for Presidential Base Closure Decisions under the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 Introduction In Dalton v. Specter (511 U.S. 462, 1994), the United States...
Mens Rea Requirement Affirmed for Possession of Unregistered Machineguns under the National Firearms Act

Mens Rea Requirement Affirmed for Possession of Unregistered Machineguns under the National Firearms Act

Date: May 24, 1994
Mens Rea Requirement Affirmed for Possession of Unregistered Machineguns under the National Firearms Act Introduction In Harold E. Staples, III v. United States, 511 U.S. 600 (1994), the United...
Strict Equality Required in Compensatory Use Tax Schemes Under the Commerce Clause

Strict Equality Required in Compensatory Use Tax Schemes Under the Commerce Clause

Date: May 24, 1994
Strict Equality Required in Compensatory Use Tax Schemes Under the Commerce Clause Introduction The case of Associated Industries of Missouri, et al. v. Lohman, Director of Revenue of Missouri, et...
Restricting Defendants' Rights to Collaterally Attack Prior Convictions under the Armed Career Criminal Act

Restricting Defendants' Rights to Collaterally Attack Prior Convictions under the Armed Career Criminal Act

Date: May 24, 1994
Restricting Defendants' Rights to Collaterally Attack Prior Convictions under the Armed Career Criminal Act Introduction In Darren J. Custis v. United States, 511 U.S. 485 (1994), the United States...
Enforcement of Filed but Void ICC Tariffs in Bankruptcy Denied: Security Services, Inc. v. Kmart Corporation

Enforcement of Filed but Void ICC Tariffs in Bankruptcy Denied: Security Services, Inc. v. Kmart Corporation

Date: May 17, 1994
Enforcement of Filed but Void ICC Tariffs in Bankruptcy Denied: Security Services, Inc. v. Kmart Corporation Introduction Security Services, Inc. v. Kmart Corporation, 511 U.S. 431 (1994), is a...
Flow Control Ordinances and the Dormant Commerce Clause: Analyzing C A Carbone, Inc. v. Town of Clarkstown

Flow Control Ordinances and the Dormant Commerce Clause: Analyzing C A Carbone, Inc. v. Town of Clarkstown

Date: May 17, 1994
Flow Control Ordinances and the Dormant Commerce Clause: Analyzing C A Carbone, Inc. v. Town of Clarkstown Introduction C A Carbone, Inc. et al. v. Town of Clarkstown, New York (511 U.S. 383, 1994)...
Federal Law Governs Restoration of Civil Rights After Federal Conviction under 18 U.S.C. §921(a)(20)

Federal Law Governs Restoration of Civil Rights After Federal Conviction under 18 U.S.C. §921(a)(20)

Date: May 17, 1994
Federal Law Governs Restoration of Civil Rights After Federal Conviction under 18 U.S.C. §921(a)(20) Introduction Lenard Ray Beecham, Petitioner v. United States is a landmark Supreme Court case...
Limitations on Federal Court Jurisdiction in Enforcing Settlement Agreements: Insights from Kokkonen v. Guardian Life

Limitations on Federal Court Jurisdiction in Enforcing Settlement Agreements: Insights from Kokkonen v. Guardian Life

Date: May 17, 1994
Limitations on Federal Court Jurisdiction in Enforcing Settlement Agreements: Insights from Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Introduction Case: Matt T. KOKKONEN v. GUARDIAN LIFE INSurance Company of...
Supreme Court Clarifies RCRA Subtitle C Regulation of Municipal Waste Combustion Ash

Supreme Court Clarifies RCRA Subtitle C Regulation of Municipal Waste Combustion Ash

Date: May 3, 1994
Supreme Court Clarifies RCRA Subtitle C Regulation of Municipal Waste Combustion Ash Introduction In the landmark case City of Chicago, et al. v. Environmental Defense Fund et al., 511 U.S. 328...
Admissibility of Confessions: Interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 3501(c) in United States v. Alvarez-Sanchez

Admissibility of Confessions: Interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 3501(c) in United States v. Alvarez-Sanchez

Date: May 3, 1994
Admissibility of Confessions: Interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 3501(c) in United States v. Alvarez-Sanchez Introduction United States v. Pedro Alvarez-Sanchez (511 U.S. 350, 1994) is a landmark Supreme...
Limits on the Retroactive Application of Civil Rights Amendments: Rivers v. Roadway Express, Inc.

Limits on the Retroactive Application of Civil Rights Amendments: Rivers v. Roadway Express, Inc.

Date: Apr 27, 1994
Limits on the Retroactive Application of Civil Rights Amendments: Rivers v. Roadway Express, Inc. Introduction In Rivers et al. v. Roadway Express, Inc., 511 U.S. 298 (1994), the United States...
Stansbury v. California: Redefining Custodial Interrogation under Miranda

Stansbury v. California: Redefining Custodial Interrogation under Miranda

Date: Apr 27, 1994
Stansbury v. California: Redefining Custodial Interrogation under Miranda Introduction Stansbury v. California is a landmark 1994 U.S. Supreme Court decision that provides critical clarification on...
Presumption Against Retroactive Application of Civil Rights Statutes: Insights from LANDGRAF v. USI FILM PRODUCTS

Presumption Against Retroactive Application of Civil Rights Statutes: Insights from LANDGRAF v. USI FILM PRODUCTS

Date: Apr 27, 1994
Presumption Against Retroactive Application of Civil Rights Statutes: Insights from LANDGRAF v. USI FILM PRODUCTS Introduction LANDGRAF v. USI FILM PRODUCTS et al. (511 U.S. 244, 1994) is a pivotal...
Disclaimer of Pre-Gift Tax Trust Interests Subject to Federal Gift Tax

Disclaimer of Pre-Gift Tax Trust Interests Subject to Federal Gift Tax

Date: Apr 21, 1994
Disclaimer of Pre-Gift Tax Trust Interests Subject to Federal Gift Tax Introduction United States v. Irvine et al., 511 U.S. 224 (1994), is a significant Supreme Court decision addressing the...
Proportionate Share Approach in Admiralty Settlements: McDermott, Inc. v. AmClyde Et Al.

Proportionate Share Approach in Admiralty Settlements: McDermott, Inc. v. AmClyde Et Al.

Date: Apr 21, 1994
Proportionate Share Approach in Admiralty Settlements: McDermott, Inc. v. AmClyde Et Al. Introduction McDermott, Inc. v. AmClyde Et Al., 511 U.S. 202 (1994), is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case...
J.E.B. v. Alabama: Extending Batson to Prohibit Gender-Based Jury Selection Discrimination

J.E.B. v. Alabama: Extending Batson to Prohibit Gender-Based Jury Selection Discrimination

Date: Apr 20, 1994
J.E.B. v. Alabama: Extending Batson to Prohibit Gender-Based Jury Selection Discrimination Introduction In J.E.B., Petitioner v. Alabama ex rel. T.B., 511 U.S. 127 (1994), the United States Supreme...
Enhancing Jury Impartiality: Gender-Based Peremptory Challenges Forbidden in J.E.B. v. Alabama

Enhancing Jury Impartiality: Gender-Based Peremptory Challenges Forbidden in J.E.B. v. Alabama

Date: Apr 20, 1994
Enhancing Jury Impartiality: Gender-Based Peremptory Challenges Forbidden in J.E.B. v. Alabama Introduction The Supreme Court case J.E.B. v. Alabama Ex Rel. T.B., decided on April 19, 1994, marks a...
Aiding and Abetting Liability Under §10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act: Central Bank of Denver, N.A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N.A. (1994)

Aiding and Abetting Liability Under §10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act: Central Bank of Denver, N.A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N.A. (1994)

Date: Apr 20, 1994
Aiding and Abetting Liability Under §10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act: Central Bank of Denver, N.A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N.A. (1994) Introduction Central Bank of Denver, N.A. v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert