Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Nichols v. United States: Upholding the Use of Uncounseled Misdemeanor Convictions in Sentencing Introduction Nichols v. United States (511 U.S. 738, 1994) is a landmark decision by the United States...
Successive Punishments: Montana's Dangerous Drug Tax and the Double Jeopardy Clause Introduction Department of Revenue of Montana v. Kurth Ranch et al., 511 U.S. 767 (1994), is a landmark United...
PUD No. 1 of Jefferson County v. Washington Dept. of Ecology: Upholding State-Imposed Stream Flow Conditions under §401 Clean Water Act Introduction In the landmark case PUD No. 1 of Jefferson County...
Applying the Connick Test Based on Employer's Reasonable Beliefs: Comprehensive Commentary on Waters v. Churchill Introduction Waters, Et Al., v. Churchill, Et Al. (511 U.S. 661, 1994) is a landmark...
Supreme Court Clarifies Supervisory Status of Nurses under the National Labor Relations Act Introduction In the landmark case National Labor Relations Board v. Health Care Retirement Corporation of...
Posters 'N' Things, Ltd. v. United States: Establishing the Scienter Requirement in Drug Paraphernalia Laws Introduction Posters 'N' Things, Ltd., et al. v. United States (511 U.S. 513, 1994) is a...
BFP v. Resolution Trust Corporation: Defining 'Reasonably Equivalent Value' in Bankruptcy Foreclosures Introduction The Supreme Court case BFP, Petitioner v. Resolution Trust Corporation addresses a...
Judicial Review Precluded for Presidential Base Closure Decisions under the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 Introduction In Dalton v. Specter (511 U.S. 462, 1994), the United States...
Mens Rea Requirement Affirmed for Possession of Unregistered Machineguns under the National Firearms Act Introduction In Harold E. Staples, III v. United States, 511 U.S. 600 (1994), the United...
Restricting Defendants' Rights to Collaterally Attack Prior Convictions under the Armed Career Criminal Act Introduction In Darren J. Custis v. United States, 511 U.S. 485 (1994), the United States...
Strict Equality Required in Compensatory Use Tax Schemes Under the Commerce Clause Introduction The case of Associated Industries of Missouri, et al. v. Lohman, Director of Revenue of Missouri, et...
Enforcement of Filed but Void ICC Tariffs in Bankruptcy Denied: Security Services, Inc. v. Kmart Corporation Introduction Security Services, Inc. v. Kmart Corporation, 511 U.S. 431 (1994), is a...
Flow Control Ordinances and the Dormant Commerce Clause: Analyzing C A Carbone, Inc. v. Town of Clarkstown Introduction C A Carbone, Inc. et al. v. Town of Clarkstown, New York (511 U.S. 383, 1994)...
Federal Law Governs Restoration of Civil Rights After Federal Conviction under 18 U.S.C. §921(a)(20) Introduction Lenard Ray Beecham, Petitioner v. United States is a landmark Supreme Court case...
Limitations on Federal Court Jurisdiction in Enforcing Settlement Agreements: Insights from Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Introduction Case: Matt T. KOKKONEN v. GUARDIAN LIFE INSurance Company of...
Supreme Court Clarifies RCRA Subtitle C Regulation of Municipal Waste Combustion Ash Introduction In the landmark case City of Chicago, et al. v. Environmental Defense Fund et al., 511 U.S. 328...
Admissibility of Confessions: Interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 3501(c) in United States v. Alvarez-Sanchez Introduction United States v. Pedro Alvarez-Sanchez (511 U.S. 350, 1994) is a landmark Supreme...
Limits on the Retroactive Application of Civil Rights Amendments: Rivers v. Roadway Express, Inc. Introduction In Rivers et al. v. Roadway Express, Inc., 511 U.S. 298 (1994), the United States...
Stansbury v. California: Redefining Custodial Interrogation under Miranda Introduction Stansbury v. California is a landmark 1994 U.S. Supreme Court decision that provides critical clarification on...
Presumption Against Retroactive Application of Civil Rights Statutes: Insights from LANDGRAF v. USI FILM PRODUCTS Introduction LANDGRAF v. USI FILM PRODUCTS et al. (511 U.S. 244, 1994) is a pivotal...