Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Posters 'N' Things, Ltd. v. United States: Establishing the Scienter Requirement in Drug Paraphernalia Laws Introduction Posters 'N' Things, Ltd., et al. v. United States (511 U.S. 513, 1994) is a...
BFP v. Resolution Trust Corporation: Defining 'Reasonably Equivalent Value' in Bankruptcy Foreclosures Introduction The Supreme Court case BFP, Petitioner v. Resolution Trust Corporation addresses a...
Judicial Review Precluded for Presidential Base Closure Decisions under the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 Introduction In Dalton v. Specter (511 U.S. 462, 1994), the United States...
Mens Rea Requirement Affirmed for Possession of Unregistered Machineguns under the National Firearms Act Introduction In Harold E. Staples, III v. United States, 511 U.S. 600 (1994), the United...
Strict Equality Required in Compensatory Use Tax Schemes Under the Commerce Clause Introduction The case of Associated Industries of Missouri, et al. v. Lohman, Director of Revenue of Missouri, et...
Restricting Defendants' Rights to Collaterally Attack Prior Convictions under the Armed Career Criminal Act Introduction In Darren J. Custis v. United States, 511 U.S. 485 (1994), the United States...
Enforcement of Filed but Void ICC Tariffs in Bankruptcy Denied: Security Services, Inc. v. Kmart Corporation Introduction Security Services, Inc. v. Kmart Corporation, 511 U.S. 431 (1994), is a...
Flow Control Ordinances and the Dormant Commerce Clause: Analyzing C A Carbone, Inc. v. Town of Clarkstown Introduction C A Carbone, Inc. et al. v. Town of Clarkstown, New York (511 U.S. 383, 1994)...
Federal Law Governs Restoration of Civil Rights After Federal Conviction under 18 U.S.C. §921(a)(20) Introduction Lenard Ray Beecham, Petitioner v. United States is a landmark Supreme Court case...
Limitations on Federal Court Jurisdiction in Enforcing Settlement Agreements: Insights from Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Introduction Case: Matt T. KOKKONEN v. GUARDIAN LIFE INSurance Company of...
Supreme Court Clarifies RCRA Subtitle C Regulation of Municipal Waste Combustion Ash Introduction In the landmark case City of Chicago, et al. v. Environmental Defense Fund et al., 511 U.S. 328...
Admissibility of Confessions: Interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 3501(c) in United States v. Alvarez-Sanchez Introduction United States v. Pedro Alvarez-Sanchez (511 U.S. 350, 1994) is a landmark Supreme...
Limits on the Retroactive Application of Civil Rights Amendments: Rivers v. Roadway Express, Inc. Introduction In Rivers et al. v. Roadway Express, Inc., 511 U.S. 298 (1994), the United States...
Stansbury v. California: Redefining Custodial Interrogation under Miranda Introduction Stansbury v. California is a landmark 1994 U.S. Supreme Court decision that provides critical clarification on...
Presumption Against Retroactive Application of Civil Rights Statutes: Insights from LANDGRAF v. USI FILM PRODUCTS Introduction LANDGRAF v. USI FILM PRODUCTS et al. (511 U.S. 244, 1994) is a pivotal...
Disclaimer of Pre-Gift Tax Trust Interests Subject to Federal Gift Tax Introduction United States v. Irvine et al., 511 U.S. 224 (1994), is a significant Supreme Court decision addressing the...
Proportionate Share Approach in Admiralty Settlements: McDermott, Inc. v. AmClyde Et Al. Introduction McDermott, Inc. v. AmClyde Et Al., 511 U.S. 202 (1994), is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case...
J.E.B. v. Alabama: Extending Batson to Prohibit Gender-Based Jury Selection Discrimination Introduction In J.E.B., Petitioner v. Alabama ex rel. T.B., 511 U.S. 127 (1994), the United States Supreme...
Enhancing Jury Impartiality: Gender-Based Peremptory Challenges Forbidden in J.E.B. v. Alabama Introduction The Supreme Court case J.E.B. v. Alabama Ex Rel. T.B., decided on April 19, 1994, marks a...
Aiding and Abetting Liability Under §10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act: Central Bank of Denver, N.A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N.A. (1994) Introduction Central Bank of Denver, N.A. v....