Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Establishing Reasonableness Standards for Airport User Fees under the Anti-Head Tax Act Introduction Northwest Airlines, Inc., et al. v. County of Kent, Michigan, et al. (510 U.S. 355) is a landmark...
Exclusivity of Administrative Review under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Amendments Act: Analysis of Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. Reich Introduction Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. Reich, 510 U.S. 200...
Double Jeopardy and Sentencing Enhancements: Insights from Schiro v. Farley Introduction Schiro v. Farley, Superintendent, Indiana State Prison, et al., 510 U.S. 222 (1994) is a landmark United...
Affirmation of Military Judges' Appointment and Tenure Under the Appointments and Due Process Clauses Introduction WEISS v. UNITED STATES (510 U.S. 163) is a landmark decision by the United States...
Ratzlaf v. United States (1994): Reaffirming the Necessity of Knowledge of Illegality for Willful Structuring Convictions Introduction Ratzlaf et ux. v. United States is a landmark Supreme Court...
ERISA Fiduciary Duties Applied to "Free Funds" in Participating Group Annuity Contracts Introduction The landmark case John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as...
United States v. James Daniel Good: Establishing Due Process Protections in Civil Forfeiture of Real Property Introduction United States v. James Daniel Good Real Property et al., 510 U.S. 43 (1993),...
Strict Enforcement of Certiorari Question Requirements Upheld in Izumi Seimitsu Kogyo K.K. v. U.S. Phillips Corp. Introduction The case of Izumi Seimitsu Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha v. U.S. Phillips...
Organizational Standing under the Immigration Reform and Control Act: INS v. Legalization Assistance Project Introduction The Supreme Court case Immigration and Naturalization Service et al. v....
Parental Reimbursement for Private Education in Inadequate Public IEPs Under IDEA: Florence County School District v. Carter Introduction The case of Florence County School District Four et al. v....
Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.: Redefining Abusive Work Environment Standards Under Title VII Introduction Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. (510 U.S. 17, 1993) is a landmark decision by the United...
HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE CO. v. CALIFORNIA: Defining the Scope of Antitrust Immunity in Insurance Conspiracies Introduction Hartford Fire Insurance Co. et al. v. California et al., 509 U.S. 764...
Daubert Standard: Redefining the Admission of Expert Testimony in Federal Courts Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case DAUBERT v. MERRELL DOW PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (509 U.S. 579, 1993)...
Austin v. United States: Exceeding Limits of the Excessive Fines Clause in Civil Forfeiture Introduction Austin v. United States (509 U.S. 602) is a landmark Supreme Court case decided on June 28,...
UNITED STATES v. DIXON et al.: Reinforcing Blockburger in Double Jeopardy Analysis Introduction UNITED STATES v. DIXON et al., 509 U.S. 688 (1993), is a seminal Supreme Court decision that clarifies...
Alexander v. United States: RICO Forfeiture and First Amendment Implications Introduction Alexander v. United States, 509 U.S. 544 (1993), is a landmark Supreme Court case that addresses the...
Shaw v. Reno: Stricter Scrutiny for Racial Gerrymandering Under the Equal Protection Clause Introduction Shaw, et al. v. Reno, Attorney General, et al. is a landmark 1993 decision by the United...
Establishing Reasonableness in Punitive Damages: TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp. Introduction In the landmark case of TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp., 509 U.S. 443...
Edge Broadcasting Co. v. United States: Upholding Federal Restrictions on Lottery Advertising Introduction The landmark case of UNITED STATES, ET AL. v. EDGE BROADCASTING CO., T/A POWER 94 addressed...
ST. MARY'S HONOR CENTER v. HICKS: Clarifying the Burden of Persuasion in Title VII Discrimination Cases Introduction St. Mary's Honor Center, et al. v. Hicks, 509 U.S. 502 (1993), is a landmark...