Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Establishing Reasonableness Standards for Airport User Fees under the Anti-Head Tax Act

Establishing Reasonableness Standards for Airport User Fees under the Anti-Head Tax Act

Date: Jan 25, 1994
Establishing Reasonableness Standards for Airport User Fees under the Anti-Head Tax Act Introduction Northwest Airlines, Inc., et al. v. County of Kent, Michigan, et al. (510 U.S. 355) is a landmark...
Exclusivity of Administrative Review under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Amendments Act: Analysis of Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. Reich

Exclusivity of Administrative Review under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Amendments Act: Analysis of Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. Reich

Date: Jan 20, 1994
Exclusivity of Administrative Review under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Amendments Act: Analysis of Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. Reich Introduction Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. Reich, 510 U.S. 200...
Double Jeopardy and Sentencing Enhancements: Insights from Schiro v. Farley

Double Jeopardy and Sentencing Enhancements: Insights from Schiro v. Farley

Date: Jan 20, 1994
Double Jeopardy and Sentencing Enhancements: Insights from Schiro v. Farley Introduction Schiro v. Farley, Superintendent, Indiana State Prison, et al., 510 U.S. 222 (1994) is a landmark United...
Affirmation of Military Judges' Appointment and Tenure Under the Appointments and Due Process Clauses

Affirmation of Military Judges' Appointment and Tenure Under the Appointments and Due Process Clauses

Date: Jan 20, 1994
Affirmation of Military Judges' Appointment and Tenure Under the Appointments and Due Process Clauses Introduction WEISS v. UNITED STATES (510 U.S. 163) is a landmark decision by the United States...
Ratzlaf v. United States (1994): Reaffirming the Necessity of Knowledge of Illegality for Willful Structuring Convictions

Ratzlaf v. United States (1994): Reaffirming the Necessity of Knowledge of Illegality for Willful Structuring Convictions

Date: Jan 12, 1994
Ratzlaf v. United States (1994): Reaffirming the Necessity of Knowledge of Illegality for Willful Structuring Convictions Introduction Ratzlaf et ux. v. United States is a landmark Supreme Court...
ERISA Fiduciary Duties Applied to "Free Funds" in Participating Group Annuity Contracts

ERISA Fiduciary Duties Applied to "Free Funds" in Participating Group Annuity Contracts

Date: Dec 14, 1993
ERISA Fiduciary Duties Applied to "Free Funds" in Participating Group Annuity Contracts Introduction The landmark case John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as...
United States v. James Daniel Good: Establishing Due Process Protections in Civil Forfeiture of Real Property

United States v. James Daniel Good: Establishing Due Process Protections in Civil Forfeiture of Real Property

Date: Dec 14, 1993
United States v. James Daniel Good: Establishing Due Process Protections in Civil Forfeiture of Real Property Introduction United States v. James Daniel Good Real Property et al., 510 U.S. 43 (1993),...
Strict Enforcement of Certiorari Question Requirements Upheld in Izumi Seimitsu Kogyo K.K. v. U.S. Phillips Corp.

Strict Enforcement of Certiorari Question Requirements Upheld in Izumi Seimitsu Kogyo K.K. v. U.S. Phillips Corp.

Date: Dec 1, 1993
Strict Enforcement of Certiorari Question Requirements Upheld in Izumi Seimitsu Kogyo K.K. v. U.S. Phillips Corp. Introduction The case of Izumi Seimitsu Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha v. U.S. Phillips...
Organizational Standing under the Immigration Reform and Control Act: INS v. Legalization Assistance Project

Organizational Standing under the Immigration Reform and Control Act: INS v. Legalization Assistance Project

Date: Nov 27, 1993
Organizational Standing under the Immigration Reform and Control Act: INS v. Legalization Assistance Project Introduction The Supreme Court case Immigration and Naturalization Service et al. v....
Parental Reimbursement for Private Education in Inadequate Public IEPs Under IDEA: Florence County School District v. Carter

Parental Reimbursement for Private Education in Inadequate Public IEPs Under IDEA: Florence County School District v. Carter

Date: Nov 10, 1993
Parental Reimbursement for Private Education in Inadequate Public IEPs Under IDEA: Florence County School District v. Carter Introduction The case of Florence County School District Four et al. v....
Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.: Redefining Abusive Work Environment Standards Under Title VII

Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.: Redefining Abusive Work Environment Standards Under Title VII

Date: Nov 10, 1993
Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.: Redefining Abusive Work Environment Standards Under Title VII Introduction Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. (510 U.S. 17, 1993) is a landmark decision by the United...
HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE CO. v. CALIFORNIA: Defining the Scope of Antitrust Immunity in Insurance Conspiracies

HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE CO. v. CALIFORNIA: Defining the Scope of Antitrust Immunity in Insurance Conspiracies

Date: Jun 29, 1993
HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE CO. v. CALIFORNIA: Defining the Scope of Antitrust Immunity in Insurance Conspiracies Introduction Hartford Fire Insurance Co. et al. v. California et al., 509 U.S. 764...
Daubert Standard: Redefining the Admission of Expert Testimony in Federal Courts

Daubert Standard: Redefining the Admission of Expert Testimony in Federal Courts

Date: Jun 29, 1993
Daubert Standard: Redefining the Admission of Expert Testimony in Federal Courts Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case DAUBERT v. MERRELL DOW PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (509 U.S. 579, 1993)...
Austin v. United States: Exceeding Limits of the Excessive Fines Clause in Civil Forfeiture

Austin v. United States: Exceeding Limits of the Excessive Fines Clause in Civil Forfeiture

Date: Jun 29, 1993
Austin v. United States: Exceeding Limits of the Excessive Fines Clause in Civil Forfeiture Introduction Austin v. United States (509 U.S. 602) is a landmark Supreme Court case decided on June 28,...
UNITED STATES v. DIXON et al.: Reinforcing Blockburger in Double Jeopardy Analysis

UNITED STATES v. DIXON et al.: Reinforcing Blockburger in Double Jeopardy Analysis

Date: Jun 29, 1993
UNITED STATES v. DIXON et al.: Reinforcing Blockburger in Double Jeopardy Analysis Introduction UNITED STATES v. DIXON et al., 509 U.S. 688 (1993), is a seminal Supreme Court decision that clarifies...
Alexander v. United States: RICO Forfeiture and First Amendment Implications

Alexander v. United States: RICO Forfeiture and First Amendment Implications

Date: Jun 29, 1993
Alexander v. United States: RICO Forfeiture and First Amendment Implications Introduction Alexander v. United States, 509 U.S. 544 (1993), is a landmark Supreme Court case that addresses the...
Shaw v. Reno: Stricter Scrutiny for Racial Gerrymandering Under the Equal Protection Clause

Shaw v. Reno: Stricter Scrutiny for Racial Gerrymandering Under the Equal Protection Clause

Date: Jun 29, 1993
Shaw v. Reno: Stricter Scrutiny for Racial Gerrymandering Under the Equal Protection Clause Introduction Shaw, et al. v. Reno, Attorney General, et al. is a landmark 1993 decision by the United...
Establishing Reasonableness in Punitive Damages: TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp.

Establishing Reasonableness in Punitive Damages: TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp.

Date: Jun 26, 1993
Establishing Reasonableness in Punitive Damages: TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp. Introduction In the landmark case of TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp., 509 U.S. 443...
Edge Broadcasting Co. v. United States: Upholding Federal Restrictions on Lottery Advertising

Edge Broadcasting Co. v. United States: Upholding Federal Restrictions on Lottery Advertising

Date: Jun 26, 1993
Edge Broadcasting Co. v. United States: Upholding Federal Restrictions on Lottery Advertising Introduction The landmark case of UNITED STATES, ET AL. v. EDGE BROADCASTING CO., T/A POWER 94 addressed...
ST. MARY'S HONOR CENTER v. HICKS: Clarifying the Burden of Persuasion in Title VII Discrimination Cases

ST. MARY'S HONOR CENTER v. HICKS: Clarifying the Burden of Persuasion in Title VII Discrimination Cases

Date: Jun 26, 1993
ST. MARY'S HONOR CENTER v. HICKS: Clarifying the Burden of Persuasion in Title VII Discrimination Cases Introduction St. Mary's Honor Center, et al. v. Hicks, 509 U.S. 502 (1993), is a landmark...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert