Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Limiting Appellate Jurisdiction: Analysis of Swint v. Chambers County Commission Introduction Swint v. Chambers County Commission, 514 U.S. 35 (1995), is a pivotal United States Supreme Court...
Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.: Defining 'Prospectus' and Limiting §12(2) to Public Offerings Introduction Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., 513 U.S. 561 (1995), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
Federal Admiralty Jurisdiction Confirmed in Grubart v. Great Lakes Dredge Dock Co. Introduction In the landmark case of Jerome B. Grubart, Inc. v. Great Lakes Dredge Dock Co. et al., decided by the...
First Amendment Restrictions on Honoraria Bans: Analysis of United States v. National Treasury Employees Union Introduction United States et al. v. National Treasury Employees Union et al., 513 U.S....
Harris v. Alabama: Judicial Discretion in Capital Sentencing Under the Eighth Amendment Introduction Harris v. Alabama, 513 U.S. 504 (1995) is a seminal Supreme Court case that addressed the...
Interest Accrual on Withdrawal Charge Begins on First Day of Plan Year Following Withdrawal: Milwaukee Brewery Workers' Pension Plan v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co. Introduction Milwaukee Brewery...
O'Neal v. McAninch: Reevaluating Harmless Error in Federal Habeas Corpus Petitions Introduction O'Neal v. McAninch, 513 U.S. 432 (1995) marks a pivotal moment in the interpretation of harmless error...
Amtrak as Government Entity: Constitutional Implications for First Amendment Protections Introduction In LeBron v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak), the petitioner, Michael A. Lebron,...
SCHLUP v. DELO: Establishing the Carrier Standard for Actual Innocence in Habeas Corpus Petitions Introduction SCHLUP v. DELO (513 U.S. 298, 1995) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
Exhaustion of State Remedies in Federal Habeas Corpus: Duncan v. Henry Introduction Duncan, Warden v. Henry, 513 U.S. 364 (1995), is a pivotal United States Supreme Court decision that addressed the...
After-Acquired Evidence and ADEA Remedies: McKENNON v. NASHVILLE BANNER PUBLISHING CO. Introduction McKENNON v. NASHVILLE BANNER PUBLISHING CO. is a landmark Supreme Court decision that addresses the...
Strict Interpretation of PVPA §2543: Selling Seed Only for Replanting Purposes 1. Introduction The Supreme Court case Asgrow Seed Company v. Denny Winterboer and Becky Winterboer, DBA DeeBee's...
ADA Preemption Clarified: Enforcing Airline Frequent Flyer Contracts vs. State Consumer Fraud Regulations Introduction The landmark case American Airlines, Inc. v. Wolens, decided by the U.S. Supreme...
Enforceability of Waivers in Plea Discussions: United States v. Gary Mezzanatto Commentary Introduction United States v. Gary Mezzanatto, 513 U.S. 196 (1995), stands as a pivotal Supreme Court...
Broad Interpretation of Federal Arbitration Act Reinforces Interstate Commerce Clause Introduction The case of ALLIED-BRUCE TERMINIX COMPANIES, INC., AND TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, PETITIONERS...
National Banks as Agents in Annuity Sales: A New Precedent Introduction In the landmark case NationsBank of North Carolina, N.A., et al. v. Variable Annuity Life Insurance Co. et al., the United...
Tome v. United States: Prior Consistent Statements Must Predate Alleged Motive Introduction Matthew Wayne Tome v. United States, 513 U.S. 150 (1995), is a pivotal Supreme Court case that refined the...
States May Tax Interest from Repurchase Agreements Involving Federal Securities: Loewenstein v. Nebraska Department of Revenue Introduction In Loewenstein v. Nebraska Department of Revenue, the U.S....
Section 1151 of the Veterans' Benefits Statute: No Fault Requirement Established Introduction In the landmark case of Jesse Brown, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Petitioner v. Fred P. Gardner, 513...