Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

United States v. Williams: Affirming Third-Party Refund Suits Under 28 U.S.C. §1346(a)(1)

United States v. Williams: Affirming Third-Party Refund Suits Under 28 U.S.C. §1346(a)(1)

Date: Apr 26, 1995
United States v. Williams: Affirming Third-Party Refund Suits Under 28 U.S.C. §1346(a)(1) Introduction United States v. Williams, 514 U.S. 527 (1995), is a pivotal Supreme Court case that examines...
California Department of Corrections v. Morales: Ex Post Facto Implications on Parole Hearings

California Department of Corrections v. Morales: Ex Post Facto Implications on Parole Hearings

Date: Apr 26, 1995
California Department of Corrections v. Morales: Ex Post Facto Implications on Parole Hearings Introduction California Department of Corrections, et al. v. Morales, 514 U.S. 499 (1995), addressed a...
Supreme Court Reinforces Binding Nature of Bankruptcy Court Injunctions in Celotex v. Edwards

Supreme Court Reinforces Binding Nature of Bankruptcy Court Injunctions in Celotex v. Edwards

Date: Apr 20, 1995
Supreme Court Reinforces Binding Nature of Bankruptcy Court Injunctions in Celotex Corp. v. Edwards et ux. Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case Celotex Corp. v. Edwards et ux. (514 U.S. 300,...
First Amendment Protections Extended to Truthful Product Labeling: The Coors Brewing Case

First Amendment Protections Extended to Truthful Product Labeling: The Coors Brewing Case

Date: Apr 20, 1995
First Amendment Protections Extended to Truthful Product Labeling: The Coors Brewing Case Introduction In the landmark case Rubin, Secretary of the Treasury v. Coors Brewing Co., the United States...
No-Tolling Rule for Reconsideration Motions in Deportation Cases: Stone v. INS

No-Tolling Rule for Reconsideration Motions in Deportation Cases: Stone v. INS

Date: Apr 20, 1995
No-Tolling Rule for Reconsideration Motions in Deportation Cases: Stone v. INS Introduction Stone v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 514 U.S. 386 (1995), is a landmark decision by the United...
Anonymous Campaign Literature and First Amendment Rights: Insights from McIntyre v. Ohio Election Commission

Anonymous Campaign Literature and First Amendment Rights: Insights from McIntyre v. Ohio Election Commission

Date: Apr 20, 1995
Anonymous Campaign Literature and First Amendment Rights: Insights from McIntyre v. Ohio Election Commission Introduction McIntyre v. Ohio Election Commission, 514 U.S. 334 (1995), is a seminal...
KYLES v. WHITLEY: Reinforcing Prosecutorial Disclosure Obligations Under Brady

KYLES v. WHITLEY: Reinforcing Prosecutorial Disclosure Obligations Under Brady

Date: Apr 20, 1995
KYLES v. WHITLEY: Reinforcing Prosecutorial Disclosure Obligations Under Brady Introduction KYLES v. WHITLEY (514 U.S. 419, 1995) stands as a pivotal Supreme Court decision that underscores the...
Heintz v. Jenkins: Attorneys Classified as Debt Collectors under the FDCPA

Heintz v. Jenkins: Attorneys Classified as Debt Collectors under the FDCPA

Date: Apr 19, 1995
Heintz v. Jenkins: Attorneys Classified as Debt Collectors under the FDCPA Introduction Heintz v. Jenkins (514 U.S. 291) is a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that clarified the scope of...
State Common-Law Liability When Federal Safety Standards Are Absent: Comprehensive Analysis of Freightliner Corp. v. Myrick

State Common-Law Liability When Federal Safety Standards Are Absent: Comprehensive Analysis of Freightliner Corp. v. Myrick

Date: Apr 19, 1995
State Common-Law Liability When Federal Safety Standards Are Absent: Comprehensive Analysis of Freightliner Corp. v. Myrick Introduction The case of Freightliner Corp. v. Myrick et al. (514 U.S. 280)...
Separation of Powers Under Scrutiny: Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm Establishes Firm Boundary

Separation of Powers Under Scrutiny: Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm Establishes Firm Boundary

Date: Apr 19, 1995
Separation of Powers Under Scrutiny: Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm Establishes Firm Boundary Introduction Plaut, et al. v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc., et al. (514 U.S. 211) is a landmark decision by the...
Shalala v. Whitecotton: Clarifying Burden of Proof in Vaccine Injury Claims

Shalala v. Whitecotton: Clarifying Burden of Proof in Vaccine Injury Claims

Date: Apr 19, 1995
Shalala v. Whitecotton: Clarifying Burden of Proof in Vaccine Injury Claims Introduction Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. Whitecotton et al. is a landmark 1995 decision by the...
Reaffirming State Sales Taxes on Interstate Transportation Services: Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Jefferson Lines, Inc.

Reaffirming State Sales Taxes on Interstate Transportation Services: Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Jefferson Lines, Inc.

Date: Apr 4, 1995
Reaffirming State Sales Taxes on Interstate Transportation Services: Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Jefferson Lines, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Jefferson Lines,...
Color as a Trademark Under the Lanham Act: Comprehensive Analysis of Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co.

Color as a Trademark Under the Lanham Act: Comprehensive Analysis of Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co.

Date: Mar 29, 1995
Color as a Trademark Under the Lanham Act: Comprehensive Analysis of Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co. Introduction Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co., 514 U.S. 159 (1995), is a landmark...
California Rule Upholding: Consolidation of Assistance Units in AFDC Program

California Rule Upholding: Consolidation of Assistance Units in AFDC Program

Date: Mar 23, 1995
California Rule Upholding: Consolidation of Assistance Units in AFDC Program Introduction The landmark case Anderson, Director, California Department of Social Services, et al., v. Edwards, etc., et...
Director of OWCP Lacks Standing Under § 921(c): Implications for Agency Review Powers

Director of OWCP Lacks Standing Under § 921(c): Implications for Agency Review Powers

Date: Mar 22, 1995
Director of OWCP Lacks Standing Under § 921(c): Implications for Agency Review Powers Introduction In the landmark case Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Newport News Shipbuilding...
Fugitive Dismissal Rule and Teague Doctrine: Comprehensive Analysis of GOEKE v. BRANCH

Fugitive Dismissal Rule and Teague Doctrine: Comprehensive Analysis of GOEKE v. BRANCH

Date: Mar 21, 1995
Fugitive Dismissal Rule and Teague Doctrine: Comprehensive Analysis of GOEKE v. BRANCH Introduction GOEKE, SUPERINTENDENT, RENZ CORRECTIONAL CENTER v. BRANCH, 514 U.S. 115 (1995), represents a...
Agency Interpretation Over GAAP in Medicare Reimbursements: Shalala v. Guernsey Memorial Hospital

Agency Interpretation Over GAAP in Medicare Reimbursements: Shalala v. Guernsey Memorial Hospital

Date: Mar 7, 1995
Agency Interpretation Over GAAP in Medicare Reimbursements: Shalala v. Guernsey Memorial Hospital Introduction In the landmark case Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. Guernsey...
Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Schoonejongen: Defining Valid Amendment Procedures under ERISA §402(b)(3)

Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Schoonejongen: Defining Valid Amendment Procedures under ERISA §402(b)(3)

Date: Mar 7, 1995
Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Schoonejongen: Defining Valid Amendment Procedures under ERISA §402(b)(3) Introduction Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Schoonejongen, 514 U.S. 73 (1995), is a pivotal U.S. Supreme...
FAA Preempts New York Law: Enforcing Arbitral Awards of Punitive Damages in MASTROBUONO v. SHEARSON LEHMAN HUTTON, INC.

FAA Preempts New York Law: Enforcing Arbitral Awards of Punitive Damages in MASTROBUONO v. SHEARSON LEHMAN HUTTON, INC.

Date: Mar 7, 1995
FAA Preempts New York Law: Enforcing Arbitral Awards of Punitive Damages in MASTROBUONO v. SHEARSON LEHMAN HUTTON, INC. Introduction MASTROBUONO v. SHEARSON LEHMAN HUTTON, INC., 514 U.S. 52 (1995),...
Exclusionary Rule and Clerical Errors: Comprehensive Analysis of Arizona v. Evans

Exclusionary Rule and Clerical Errors: Comprehensive Analysis of Arizona v. Evans

Date: Mar 2, 1995
Exclusionary Rule and Clerical Errors: Comprehensive Analysis of Arizona v. Evans Introduction Arizona v. Evans, 514 U.S. 1 (1995), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert