Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Anonymous Campaign Literature and First Amendment Rights: Insights from McIntyre v. Ohio Election Commission Introduction McIntyre v. Ohio Election Commission, 514 U.S. 334 (1995), is a seminal...
KYLES v. WHITLEY: Reinforcing Prosecutorial Disclosure Obligations Under Brady Introduction KYLES v. WHITLEY (514 U.S. 419, 1995) stands as a pivotal Supreme Court decision that underscores the...
Heintz v. Jenkins: Attorneys Classified as Debt Collectors under the FDCPA Introduction Heintz v. Jenkins (514 U.S. 291) is a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that clarified the scope of...
State Common-Law Liability When Federal Safety Standards Are Absent: Comprehensive Analysis of Freightliner Corp. v. Myrick Introduction The case of Freightliner Corp. v. Myrick et al. (514 U.S. 280)...
Separation of Powers Under Scrutiny: Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm Establishes Firm Boundary Introduction Plaut, et al. v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc., et al. (514 U.S. 211) is a landmark decision by the...
Shalala v. Whitecotton: Clarifying Burden of Proof in Vaccine Injury Claims Introduction Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. Whitecotton et al. is a landmark 1995 decision by the...
Reaffirming State Sales Taxes on Interstate Transportation Services: Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Jefferson Lines, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Jefferson Lines,...
Color as a Trademark Under the Lanham Act: Comprehensive Analysis of Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co. Introduction Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co., 514 U.S. 159 (1995), is a landmark...
California Rule Upholding: Consolidation of Assistance Units in AFDC Program Introduction The landmark case Anderson, Director, California Department of Social Services, et al., v. Edwards, etc., et...
Director of OWCP Lacks Standing Under § 921(c): Implications for Agency Review Powers Introduction In the landmark case Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Newport News Shipbuilding...
Fugitive Dismissal Rule and Teague Doctrine: Comprehensive Analysis of GOEKE v. BRANCH Introduction GOEKE, SUPERINTENDENT, RENZ CORRECTIONAL CENTER v. BRANCH, 514 U.S. 115 (1995), represents a...
Agency Interpretation Over GAAP in Medicare Reimbursements: Shalala v. Guernsey Memorial Hospital Introduction In the landmark case Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. Guernsey...
Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Schoonejongen: Defining Valid Amendment Procedures under ERISA §402(b)(3) Introduction Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Schoonejongen, 514 U.S. 73 (1995), is a pivotal U.S. Supreme...
FAA Preempts New York Law: Enforcing Arbitral Awards of Punitive Damages in MASTROBUONO v. SHEARSON LEHMAN HUTTON, INC. Introduction MASTROBUONO v. SHEARSON LEHMAN HUTTON, INC., 514 U.S. 52 (1995),...
Exclusionary Rule and Clerical Errors: Comprehensive Analysis of Arizona v. Evans Introduction Arizona v. Evans, 514 U.S. 1 (1995), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Limiting Appellate Jurisdiction: Analysis of Swint v. Chambers County Commission Introduction Swint v. Chambers County Commission, 514 U.S. 35 (1995), is a pivotal United States Supreme Court...
Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.: Defining 'Prospectus' and Limiting §12(2) to Public Offerings Introduction Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., 513 U.S. 561 (1995), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
Federal Admiralty Jurisdiction Confirmed in Grubart v. Great Lakes Dredge Dock Co. Introduction In the landmark case of Jerome B. Grubart, Inc. v. Great Lakes Dredge Dock Co. et al., decided by the...
First Amendment Restrictions on Honoraria Bans: Analysis of United States v. National Treasury Employees Union Introduction United States et al. v. National Treasury Employees Union et al., 513 U.S....
Harris v. Alabama: Judicial Discretion in Capital Sentencing Under the Eighth Amendment Introduction Harris v. Alabama, 513 U.S. 504 (1995) is a seminal Supreme Court case that addressed the...