Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Defendants Entitled to Qualified Immunity Cannot Immediately Appeal Summary Judgment on Fact-Based Issues: Johnson v. Jones Introduction In the landmark decision of Tyson Johnson, et al., Petitioners...
Strict Scrutiny for All Racial Classifications: Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Federico Pena Commentary Introduction Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Federico Pena, 515 U.S. 200 (1995), is a landmark...
Milwaukee v. National Gypsum: Affirming Mandatory Prejudgment Interest in Admiralty Collision Cases Introduction The case of City of Milwaukee v. Cement Division, National Gypsum Co., et al. (515...
Reaffirming Brillhart: Discretionary Standards for Declaratory Judgments in Parallel State Proceedings Introduction Leslie Wilton, etc., Petitioners v. Seven Falls Company et al., 515 U.S. 277...
Invalid Appointments Do Not Confer De Facto Validity: Insights from Ryder v. United States Introduction Ryder v. United States, 515 U.S. 177 (1995), is a significant Supreme Court decision that...
Modification of Disability Awards Based on Wage-Earning Capacity under LHWCA §22 Introduction The case of Metropolitan Stevedore Company v. John Rambo, decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on June 12,...
Reno v. Koray: Defining 'Official Detention' Under 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b) Introduction Reno v. Koray is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court, decided on June 5, 1995. The case...
NEBRASKA v. WYOMING and Colorado: Reinforcing Strict Amendments in Original Jurisdiction Water Disputes Introduction NEBRASKA v. WYOMING and Colorado, 515 U.S. 1 (1995), is a pivotal U.S. Supreme...
Continued Custody Under Consecutive Sentences: Analysis of Garrotte v. Fordice (1995) Introduction Garrotte v. Fordice, 515 U.S. 39 (1995), is a pivotal United States Supreme Court decision that...
State Law Governs Limitations Period for WARN Civil Actions Introduction The case NORTH STAR STEEL COMPANY, PETITIONER v. CHARLES A. THOMAS et al. and CROWN CORK SEAL CO., INC., PETITIONER v. UNITED...
Independent Judicial Review of Arbitration Agreements: Insights from First Options v. Kaplan Introduction The case of First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan, et al., decided by the U.S. Supreme...
U.S. Term Limits and the Exclusivity of Constitutional Qualifications Introduction In U.S. Term Limits, Inc., et al. v. Thornton et al. (514 U.S. 779, 1995), the United States Supreme Court addressed...
Knock and Announce: A Fourth Amendment Inquiry Established in Wilson v. Arkansas Introduction Wilson v. Arkansas, 514 U.S. 927 (1995), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case that...
KANSAS v. COLORADO (514 U.S. 673): Upholding Interstate Compact Enforcement and Defining ‘Usable’ Water Depletions Introduction KANSAS v. COLORADO, decided on May 15, 1995, by the United States...
Purkett v. Elem: Clarifying the Boundaries of Batson Claims in Jury Selection Introduction Purkett v. Elem (514 U.S. 765, 1995) is a seminal United States Supreme Court decision that addresses the...
FHA Exemption Under § 3607(b)(1) Excludes Family Composition Rules in Single-Family Zoning Introduction City of Edmonds v. Oxford House, Inc., et al., 514 U.S. 725 (1995), is a landmark case...
Supremacy Clause Prevents Retroactive Application of Tolling Statutes: REYNOLDSVILLE CASKET CO., ET AL. v. HYDE Introduction Reynoldsville Casket Co., et al. v. Hyde is a significant United States...
Excluding Judicial Proceedings from 18 U.S.C. §1001: A Comprehensive Analysis of Hubbard v. United States Introduction Hubbard v. United States, 514 U.S. 695 (1995), is a pivotal Supreme Court...
United States v. Lopez: Defining the Boundaries of the Commerce Clause Introduction United States v. Lopez (514 U.S. 549) is a landmark Supreme Court decision that marked a significant limitation on...
Supreme Court Clarifies ERISA Preemption: Hospital Surcharges in New York Not Preempted Under §514(a) Introduction In the landmark decision of New York State Conference of Blue Cross Blue Shield...