Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Broader Interpretation of "Take" Under the Endangered Species Act: Inclusion of Habitat Modification

Broader Interpretation of "Take" Under the Endangered Species Act: Inclusion of Habitat Modification

Date: Jun 30, 1995
Broader Interpretation of "Take" Under the Endangered Species Act: Inclusion of Habitat Modification Introduction Babbitt, Secretary of Interior, et al., v. Sweet Home Chapter of Communities for a...
Vernonia v. Acton: Upholding Random Drug Testing in Public School Athletics

Vernonia v. Acton: Upholding Random Drug Testing in Public School Athletics

Date: Jun 27, 1995
Vernonia v. Acton: Upholding Random Drug Testing in Public School Athletics Introduction Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton ET UX., Guardians ad Litem for Acton (515 U.S. 646, 1995) is a landmark...
Florida Bar v. Went For It, Inc. (1995): Upholding Restrictions on Targeted Legal Solicitations

Florida Bar v. Went For It, Inc. (1995): Upholding Restrictions on Targeted Legal Solicitations

Date: Jun 22, 1995
Florida Bar v. Went For It, Inc. (1995): Upholding Restrictions on Targeted Legal Solicitations Introduction Florida Bar v. Went For It, Inc. is a landmark Supreme Court case decided on June 21,...
United States v. Aguilar: Narrowing the Scope of Obstruction of Justice under §1503 and Expanding Wiretap Disclosure Prohibitions under §2232(c)

United States v. Aguilar: Narrowing the Scope of Obstruction of Justice under §1503 and Expanding Wiretap Disclosure Prohibitions under §2232(c)

Date: Jun 22, 1995
United States v. Aguilar: Narrowing the Scope of Obstruction of Justice under §1503 and Expanding Wiretap Disclosure Prohibitions under §2232(c) Introduction United States v. Aguilar, 515 U.S. 593...
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Clauses in Maritime Bills of Lading Under COGSA: Insights from Vimar Seguros v. M/V Sky Reefer

Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Clauses in Maritime Bills of Lading Under COGSA: Insights from Vimar Seguros v. M/V Sky Reefer

Date: Jun 20, 1995
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Clauses in Maritime Bills of Lading Under COGSA: Insights from Vimar Seguros v. M/V Sky Reefer Introduction In the landmark case Vimar Seguros y Reaseguros, S.A. v....
Reaffirming Wolff: Limitations on State-Created Liberty Interests in Prison Disciplinary Hearings

Reaffirming Wolff: Limitations on State-Created Liberty Interests in Prison Disciplinary Hearings

Date: Jun 20, 1995
Reaffirming Wolff: Limitations on State-Created Liberty Interests in Prison Disciplinary Hearings Introduction In the landmark case Sandin, Unit Team Manager, Halawa Correctional Facility v. Conner...
United States v. Gaudin: Jury Determination of Materiality in §1001 False Statements Cases

United States v. Gaudin: Jury Determination of Materiality in §1001 False Statements Cases

Date: Jun 20, 1995
United States v. Gaudin: Jury Determination of Materiality in §1001 False Statements Cases Introduction United States v. Gaudin, 515 U.S. 506 (1995), is a landmark decision by the United States...
Limits on Section 1983 Relief in State Tax Cases: Analysis of National Private Truck Council, Inc. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

Limits on Section 1983 Relief in State Tax Cases: Analysis of National Private Truck Council, Inc. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

Date: Jun 20, 1995
Limits on Section 1983 Relief in State Tax Cases: Analysis of National Private Truck Council, Inc. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission Introduction National Private Truck Council, Inc., et al. v. Oklahoma Tax...
Protecting Speaker's Autonomy: Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston

Protecting Speaker's Autonomy: Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston

Date: Jun 20, 1995
Protecting Speaker's Autonomy: Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston Introduction Hurley et al. v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston, Inc., et al.,...
Defining Seaman Status under the Jones Act: Insights from Chandris, Inc. v. Latsis

Defining Seaman Status under the Jones Act: Insights from Chandris, Inc. v. Latsis

Date: Jun 15, 1995
Defining Seaman Status under the Jones Act: Insights from Chandris, Inc. v. Latsis Introduction Chandris, Inc., et al. v. Antonios Latsis is a landmark Supreme Court case decided on June 14, 1995....
Double Jeopardy and Sentencing Guidelines: Insights from Witte v. United States

Double Jeopardy and Sentencing Guidelines: Insights from Witte v. United States

Date: Jun 15, 1995
Double Jeopardy and Sentencing Guidelines: Insights from Witte v. United States Introduction The United States Supreme Court's decision in Steven Kurt Witte, Petitioner v. United States, 515 U.S. 389...
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Schleier: Exclusion of Age Discrimination Settlements from Gross Income

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Schleier: Exclusion of Age Discrimination Settlements from Gross Income

Date: Jun 15, 1995
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Schleier: Exclusion of Age Discrimination Settlements from Gross Income Introduction Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Schleier, 515 U.S. 323 (1995), is a...
Defining State Taxation Limits on Indian Tribes: Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Chickasaw Nation

Defining State Taxation Limits on Indian Tribes: Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Chickasaw Nation

Date: Jun 15, 1995
Defining State Taxation Limits on Indian Tribes: Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Chickasaw Nation Introduction Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Chickasaw Nation (515 U.S. 450, 1995) is a pivotal Supreme Court...
Judicial Review Established for Scope-of-Employment Certifications under the Westfall Act in Gutierrez de Martinez v. Lamagno

Judicial Review Established for Scope-of-Employment Certifications under the Westfall Act in Gutierrez de Martinez v. Lamagno

Date: Jun 15, 1995
Judicial Review Established for Scope-of-Employment Certifications under the Westfall Act in Gutierrez de Martinez v. Lamagno Introduction Gutierrez de Martinez et al. v. Lamagno et al. (515 U.S....
Limiting Federal Courts’ Remedial Authority in School Desegregation Cases: A Comprehensive Commentary on MISSOURI v. JENKINS

Limiting Federal Courts’ Remedial Authority in School Desegregation Cases: A Comprehensive Commentary on MISSOURI v. JENKINS

Date: Jun 13, 1995
Limiting Federal Courts’ Remedial Authority in School Desegregation Cases: A Comprehensive Commentary on MISSOURI v. JENKINS Introduction Missouri, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. KALIMA JENKINS, ET AL.,...
Defendants Entitled to Qualified Immunity Cannot Immediately Appeal Summary Judgment on Fact-Based Issues: Johnson v. Jones

Defendants Entitled to Qualified Immunity Cannot Immediately Appeal Summary Judgment on Fact-Based Issues: Johnson v. Jones

Date: Jun 13, 1995
Defendants Entitled to Qualified Immunity Cannot Immediately Appeal Summary Judgment on Fact-Based Issues: Johnson v. Jones Introduction In the landmark decision of Tyson Johnson, et al., Petitioners...
Strict Scrutiny for All Racial Classifications: Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Federico Pena Commentary

Strict Scrutiny for All Racial Classifications: Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Federico Pena Commentary

Date: Jun 13, 1995
Strict Scrutiny for All Racial Classifications: Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Federico Pena Commentary Introduction Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Federico Pena, 515 U.S. 200 (1995), is a landmark...
Milwaukee v. National Gypsum: Affirming Mandatory Prejudgment Interest in Admiralty Collision Cases

Milwaukee v. National Gypsum: Affirming Mandatory Prejudgment Interest in Admiralty Collision Cases

Date: Jun 13, 1995
Milwaukee v. National Gypsum: Affirming Mandatory Prejudgment Interest in Admiralty Collision Cases Introduction The case of City of Milwaukee v. Cement Division, National Gypsum Co., et al. (515...
Reaffirming Brillhart: Discretionary Standards for Declaratory Judgments in Parallel State Proceedings

Reaffirming Brillhart: Discretionary Standards for Declaratory Judgments in Parallel State Proceedings

Date: Jun 13, 1995
Reaffirming Brillhart: Discretionary Standards for Declaratory Judgments in Parallel State Proceedings Introduction Leslie Wilton, etc., Petitioners v. Seven Falls Company et al., 515 U.S. 277...
Invalid Appointments Do Not Confer De Facto Validity: Insights from Ryder v. United States

Invalid Appointments Do Not Confer De Facto Validity: Insights from Ryder v. United States

Date: Jun 13, 1995
Invalid Appointments Do Not Confer De Facto Validity: Insights from Ryder v. United States Introduction Ryder v. United States, 515 U.S. 177 (1995), is a significant Supreme Court decision that...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert