Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Defining Jurisdictional Limits on Tax Refunds: Analysis of COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. LUNDY

Defining Jurisdictional Limits on Tax Refunds: Analysis of COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. LUNDY

Date: Jan 18, 1996
Defining Jurisdictional Limits on Tax Refunds: Analysis of COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. LUNDY Introduction Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Lundy, 516 U.S. 235 (1996), addressed critical...
Loss-of-Society Damages Exclusion under DOHSA in International Air Crashes: ZICHERMAN v. KOREAN AIR LINES CO., LTD.

Loss-of-Society Damages Exclusion under DOHSA in International Air Crashes: ZICHERMAN v. KOREAN AIR LINES CO., LTD.

Date: Jan 17, 1996
Loss-of-Society Damages Exclusion under DOHSA in International Air Crashes: ZICHERMAN v. KOREAN AIR LINES CO., LTD. Introduction The Supreme Court case Zicherman, Individually and as Executrix of the...
State Remedies Affirmed in Maritime Wrongful-Death Cases: Yamaha Motor Corp. v. Calhoun

State Remedies Affirmed in Maritime Wrongful-Death Cases: Yamaha Motor Corp. v. Calhoun

Date: Jan 10, 1996
State Remedies Affirmed in Maritime Wrongful-Death Cases: Yamaha Motor Corp. v. Calhoun Introduction The Supreme Court case Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A., et al. v. Calhoun et al. established a...
Supreme Court Upholds Broad Authority to GVR in Light of New Agency Interpretations: Lawrence v. Chater

Supreme Court Upholds Broad Authority to GVR in Light of New Agency Interpretations: Lawrence v. Chater

Date: Jan 9, 1996
Supreme Court Upholds Broad Authority to GVR in Light of New Agency Interpretations: Lawrence v. Chater Introduction Lawrence, Guardian and Next Friend on Behalf of Lawrence, a Minor v. Chater,...
Classification of Deadhead Transportation Time Under the Hours of Service Act: Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co.

Classification of Deadhead Transportation Time Under the Hours of Service Act: Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co.

Date: Jan 9, 1996
Classification of Deadhead Transportation Time Under the Hours of Service Act Introduction The case of Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers et al. v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co. et al....
Stutson v. United States: Establishing Applicability of 'Excusable Neglect' in Rule 4(b) Appeals

Stutson v. United States: Establishing Applicability of 'Excusable Neglect' in Rule 4(b) Appeals

Date: Jan 9, 1996
Stutson v. United States: Establishing Applicability of 'Excusable Neglect' in Rule 4(b) Appeals Introduction Stutson v. United States, 516 U.S. 193 (1996), is a significant decision by the United...
Active Employment of Firearms in Drug Trafficking Crimes: A Landmark Decision in Bailey v. United States

Active Employment of Firearms in Drug Trafficking Crimes: A Landmark Decision in Bailey v. United States

Date: Dec 7, 1995
Active Employment of Firearms in Drug Trafficking Crimes: A Landmark Decision in Bailey v. United States Introduction The United States Supreme Court's decision in Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S....
Appellate Immunity of Remand Orders in Bankruptcy Removal Cases

Appellate Immunity of Remand Orders in Bankruptcy Removal Cases

Date: Dec 6, 1995
Appellate Immunity of Remand Orders in Bankruptcy Removal Cases Introduction In the landmark case Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca, 516 U.S. 124 (1995), the United States Supreme Court addressed...
Thompson v. Keenohane: Independent Review of 'In Custody' Miranda Determinations

Thompson v. Keenohane: Independent Review of 'In Custody' Miranda Determinations

Date: Nov 30, 1995
Thompson v. Keenohane: Independent Review of 'In Custody' Miranda Determinations Introduction Thompson v. Keenohane, Warden, et al. (516 U.S. 99), decided by the U.S. Supreme Court on November 29,...
Broad Interpretation of "Employee" Under NLRA Includes Dual-role Union Organizers

Broad Interpretation of "Employee" Under NLRA Includes Dual-role Union Organizers

Date: Nov 29, 1995
Broad Interpretation of "Employee" Under NLRA Includes Dual-role Union Organizers Introduction NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. TOWN COUNTRY ELECTRIC, INC., ET AL. is a seminal 1995 U.S. Supreme...
Justifiable Reliance Standard Established for Fraudulent Debt Exceptions under 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(2)(A) in FIELD ET AL. v. MANS

Justifiable Reliance Standard Established for Fraudulent Debt Exceptions under 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(2)(A) in FIELD ET AL. v. MANS

Date: Nov 29, 1995
Justifiable Reliance Standard Established for Fraudulent Debt Exceptions under 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(2)(A) in FIELD ET AL. v. MANS Introduction In the landmark case of Field et al. v. Mans, 516 U.S. 59...
Freely Agreement Asset Forfeiture: The Libretti Precedent

Freely Agreement Asset Forfeiture: The Libretti Precedent

Date: Nov 8, 1995
Freely Agreement Asset Forfeiture: The Libretti Precedent Introduction Libretti v. United States, 516 U.S. 29 (1995), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that addresses the procedural requirements...
Redefining Setoff Rights in Bankruptcy Proceedings: A Comprehensive Analysis of Citizens Bank of Maryland v. Strumpf

Redefining Setoff Rights in Bankruptcy Proceedings: A Comprehensive Analysis of Citizens Bank of Maryland v. Strumpf

Date: Nov 1, 1995
Redefining Setoff Rights in Bankruptcy Proceedings: A Comprehensive Analysis of Citizens Bank of Maryland v. Strumpf Introduction Citizens Bank of Maryland v. Strumpf is a landmark case decided by...
Clarifying River Boundaries: The Island Exception Applied in LOUISIANA v. MISSISSIPPI (1995)

Clarifying River Boundaries: The Island Exception Applied in LOUISIANA v. MISSISSIPPI (1995)

Date: Nov 1, 1995
Clarifying River Boundaries: The Island Exception Applied in LOUISIANA v. MISSISSIPPI (1995) Introduction LOUISIANA v. MISSISSIPPI et al. is a landmark Supreme Court case adjudicated on October 31,...
Ensuring Due Process: The Requirement of Independent Psychiatric Evaluation in Capital Sentencing - Tuggle v. Netherland

Ensuring Due Process: The Requirement of Independent Psychiatric Evaluation in Capital Sentencing - Tuggle v. Netherland

Date: Oct 31, 1995
Ensuring Due Process: The Requirement of Independent Psychiatric Evaluation in Capital Sentencing Tuggle v. Netherland, Warden, 516 U.S. 10 (1995) Introduction Tuggle v. Netherland is a landmark...
Wood v. Bartholomew: Defining the Boundaries of Brady Obligations in the Context of Inadmissible Evidence

Wood v. Bartholomew: Defining the Boundaries of Brady Obligations in the Context of Inadmissible Evidence

Date: Oct 11, 1995
Wood v. Bartholomew: Defining the Boundaries of Brady Obligations in the Context of Inadmissible Evidence Introduction Wood v. Bartholomew, 516 U.S. 1 (1995), is a landmark decision by the United...
Strict Scrutiny for Racial Gerrymandering: Insights from Miller v. Johnson

Strict Scrutiny for Racial Gerrymandering: Insights from Miller v. Johnson

Date: Jun 30, 1995
Strict Scrutiny for Racial Gerrymandering: Insights from Miller v. Johnson Introduction Miller, Et Al. v. Johnson Et Al., 515 U.S. 900 (1995), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
Reinforcing Viewpoint Neutrality in Public University Funding: Rosenberger v. University of Virginia (1995)

Reinforcing Viewpoint Neutrality in Public University Funding: Rosenberger v. University of Virginia (1995)

Date: Jun 30, 1995
Reinforcing Viewpoint Neutrality in Public University Funding: Rosenberger v. University of Virginia (1995) Introduction ROSENBERGER v. RECTOR AND VISITORS of the University of Virginia (1995) stands...
Private Religious Displays in Public Forums and the Establishment Clause: Analysis of Capitol Square Review v. Pinette

Private Religious Displays in Public Forums and the Establishment Clause: Analysis of Capitol Square Review v. Pinette

Date: Jun 30, 1995
Private Religious Displays in Public Forums and the Establishment Clause: Analysis of Capitol Square Review v. Pinette Introduction In the landmark case Capitol Square Review and Advisory Board, et...
Standing Requirements in Racial Gerrymandering Claims: Insights from United States v. Hays et al.

Standing Requirements in Racial Gerrymandering Claims: Insights from United States v. Hays et al.

Date: Jun 30, 1995
Standing Requirements in Racial Gerrymandering Claims: Insights from United States v. Hays et al. Introduction United States v. Hays et al. (515 U.S. 737, 1995) is a significant Supreme Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert