Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Holly Farms Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board: Defining Employee Status for Live-Haul Crews under the NLRA Introduction Holly Farms Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 517 U.S. 392 (1996),...
Due Process Protection and the Burden of Proof in Competency Proceedings: Cooper v. Oklahoma Introduction Cooper v. Oklahoma, 517 U.S. 348 (1996), addresses a critical issue in criminal law: the...
Age Discrimination in Employment: Reversing Prima Facie Requirements under the ADEA Introduction In O'CONNOR v. CONSOLIDATED COIN CATERERS CORP., the United States Supreme Court addressed a pivotal...
Limitation of Equitable Dismissal in First Federal Habeas Petitions: LONCHAR v. THOMAS, Warden Introduction LONCHAR v. THOMAS, Warden, 517 U.S. 314 (1996), is a pivotal United States Supreme Court...
Expanding Voting Rights Act §5 to Political Party Conventions: Morse v. Republican Party of Virginia Introduction Morse et al. v. Republican Party of Virginia et al. (517 U.S. 186, 1996) is a...
Single Punishment Principle in Conspiracy and Continuing Criminal Enterprise Cases: Rutledge v. United States Introduction Rutledge v. United States, 517 U.S. 292 (1996), is a seminal case in United...
Sovereign Immunity Under the Eleventh Amendment and the Indian Commerce Clause in Seminole Tribe v. Florida Introduction Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida, 517 U.S. 44 (1996), is a landmark...
Federal Preemption of State Insurance Regulations: Barnett Bank v. Florida Insurance Commissioner Introduction Barnett Bank of Marion County, N.A. v. Bill Nelson, Florida Insurance Commissioner, et...
Upholding Executive Discretion in Census Enumeration: Wisconsin v. Oklahoma et al. Introduction Wisconsin v. City of New York et al., Oklahoma, 517 U.S. 1 (1996), is a pivotal United States Supreme...
RCRA Limits on Private Cost Recovery: Supreme Court Establishes Boundaries for Citizen Suits Introduction Meghrig, et al. v. KFC Western, Inc. (516 U.S. 479) is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that...
ERISA §502(a)(3): Individual Right to Equitable Relief Affirmed in Varity Corp. v. Howe Introduction Varity Corp. v. Howe et al., 516 U.S. 489 (1996), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that...
Restricting Implied Indemnification Claims under the Tucker Act: Analysis of Hercules, Inc. v. United States Introduction In Hercules, Inc. et al. v. United States, 516 U.S. 417 (1996), the United...
Bennis v. Michigan: Upholding Strict Forfeiture of Innocent Co-Owner’s Property Introduction Bennis v. Michigan is a pivotal United States Supreme Court case decided on March 4, 1996, that examines...
Full Faith and Credit Applied to State Court Settlements Releasing Exclusively Federal Claims: The Matsushita v. Epstein Decision Introduction In the landmark case of Matsushita Electric Industrial...
Limits on SAA Section 2 Liability: Supreme Court Rules in Norfolk Western v. Hiles Introduction NORFOLK WESTERN RAILWAY CO. v. HILES (516 U.S. 400) is a pivotal 1996 Supreme Court decision that...
BEHRENS v. PELLETIER: Clarifying the Limits of Qualified Immunity Appeals Introduction BEHRENS v. PELLETIER, 516 U.S. 299 (1996), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Dormant Commerce Clause Reinforced: Unconstitutional Intangibles Tax in Fulton Corp. v. Faulkner Introduction Fulton Corp. v. Faulkner, Secretary of Revenue of North Carolina is a landmark decision...
PEACOCK v. THOMAS: Federal Courts Lack Ancillary Jurisdiction to Impose Liability on Third Parties for ERISA Judgments Introduction Peacock v. Thomas, 516 U.S. 349 (1996), is a landmark U.S. Supreme...
Neal v. United States: Upholding Statutory Interpretation Over Sentencing Guidelines for LSD Trafficking Introduction Neal v. United States is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court,...
Expansion of Federal Jurisdiction Under the Expedited Funds Availability Act: Insights from Bank One Chicago, N.A. v. Midwest Bank Trust Co. Introduction The Supreme Court case Bank One Chicago, N.A....