Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Limitation on FEC's Authority to Independently Petition the Supreme Court: Analysis of FEC v. NRA Political Victory Fund

Limitation on FEC's Authority to Independently Petition the Supreme Court: Analysis of FEC v. NRA Political Victory Fund

Date: Dec 7, 1994
Limitation on FEC's Authority to Independently Petition the Supreme Court: Analysis of FEC v. NRA Political Victory Fund Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case Federal Election Commission (FEC)...
REICH v. COLLINS: Establishing Protections Against Retroactive Tax Amendments

REICH v. COLLINS: Establishing Protections Against Retroactive Tax Amendments

Date: Dec 7, 1994
REICH v. COLLINS: Establishing Protections Against Retroactive Tax Amendments Introduction REICH v. COLLINS, Revenue Commissioner of Georgia, et al. (513 U.S. 106, 1994) is a landmark Supreme Court...
United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc.: Affirming Scienter Requirement for Performer Age in Child Pornography Law

United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc.: Affirming Scienter Requirement for Performer Age in Child Pornography Law

Date: Nov 30, 1994
United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc.: Affirming Scienter Requirement for Performer Age in Child Pornography Law Introduction United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc., et al. is a landmark 1994...
Supreme Court Establishes PATH is Not Protected by Eleventh Amendment Immunity in Hess v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation

Supreme Court Establishes PATH is Not Protected by Eleventh Amendment Immunity in Hess v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation

Date: Nov 15, 1994
Supreme Court Establishes PATH is Not Protected by Eleventh Amendment Immunity in Hess v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation Introduction In Hess and Walsh v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson...
Supreme Court Clarifies Vacatur Limitations in Moot Cases Arising from Settlement

Supreme Court Clarifies Vacatur Limitations in Moot Cases Arising from Settlement

Date: Nov 9, 1994
Supreme Court Clarifies Vacatur Limitations in Moot Cases Arising from Settlement Introduction In the landmark case U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Company v. Bonner Mall Partnership, 513 U.S. 18 (1994), the...
Shabani Case Establishes No Overt Act Requirement for Drug Conspiracy Under 21 U.S.C. § 846

Shabani Case Establishes No Overt Act Requirement for Drug Conspiracy Under 21 U.S.C. § 846

Date: Nov 2, 1994
Shabani Case Establishes No Overt Act Requirement for Drug Conspiracy Under 21 U.S.C. § 846 Introduction The case of United States v. Shabani (513 U.S. 10) marks a significant decision by the United...
Johnson v. De Grandy: Supreme Court Defines Vote Dilution Standards under the Voting Rights Act

Johnson v. De Grandy: Supreme Court Defines Vote Dilution Standards under the Voting Rights Act

Date: Jul 1, 1994
Johnson v. De Grandy: Supreme Court Defines Vote Dilution Standards under the Voting Rights Act Introduction In the landmark case Johnson, Speaker of the Florida House of Representatives, et al., v....
OPERATION RESCUE v. WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER: Establishing Buffer Zones for Clinic Access

OPERATION RESCUE v. WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER: Establishing Buffer Zones for Clinic Access

Date: Jul 1, 1994
Operation Rescue v. Women’s Health Center: Establishing Buffer Zones for Clinic Access Introduction Operation Rescue, Inc. v. Women’s Health Center, Inc. (512 U.S. 753, 1994) is a landmark decision...
Size of Governing Authority Not Subject to Vote Dilution Challenges under §2 of the Voting Rights Act

Size of Governing Authority Not Subject to Vote Dilution Challenges under §2 of the Voting Rights Act

Date: Jul 1, 1994
Size of Governing Authority Not Subject to Vote Dilution Challenges under §2 of the Voting Rights Act Introduction In the landmark case Holder, Individually and in His Official Capacity as County...
Reaffirming Constitutional Protections in Serious Contempt Fines: International Union v. Bagwell

Reaffirming Constitutional Protections in Serious Contempt Fines: International Union v. Bagwell

Date: Jul 1, 1994
Reaffirming Constitutional Protections in Serious Contempt Fines: International Union v. Bagwell Introduction International Union, United Mine Workers of America, et al. v. Bagwell, et al., 512 U.S....
Clarifying the Constitutionality of California’s Death Penalty Sentencing Factors: Analysis of Tuilaepa v. California

Clarifying the Constitutionality of California’s Death Penalty Sentencing Factors: Analysis of Tuilaepa v. California

Date: Jul 1, 1994
Clarifying the Constitutionality of California’s Death Penalty Sentencing Factors: Analysis of Tuilaepa v. California Introduction Tuilaepa v. California, 512 U.S. 967 (1994), is a landmark Supreme...
McFarland v. Scott: Expanding the Right to Counsel and Stay of Execution for Capital Defendants

McFarland v. Scott: Expanding the Right to Counsel and Stay of Execution for Capital Defendants

Date: Jul 1, 1994
McFarland v. Scott: Expanding the Right to Counsel and Stay of Execution for Capital Defendants Introduction In the landmark case McFarland v. Scott, 512 U.S. 849 (1994), the United States Supreme...
Kiryas Joel v. Grumet: Affirming the Establishment Clause's Boundaries on Religious Favoritism in Education

Kiryas Joel v. Grumet: Affirming the Establishment Clause's Boundaries on Religious Favoritism in Education

Date: Jun 28, 1994
Kiryas Joel v. Grumet: Affirming the Establishment Clause's Boundaries on Religious Favoritism in Education Introduction Board of Education of Kiryas Joel Village School District v. Grumet (512 U.S....
Must-Carry Provisions and First Amendment Protections: Analyzing Turner Broadcasting v. FCC

Must-Carry Provisions and First Amendment Protections: Analyzing Turner Broadcasting v. FCC

Date: Jun 28, 1994
Must-Carry Provisions and First Amendment Protections: Analyzing Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. FCC Supreme Court of the United States, 512 U.S. 622 (1994) Introduction The case of Turner...
Refining the Hearsay Exception: Insights from Williamson v. United States

Refining the Hearsay Exception: Insights from Williamson v. United States

Date: Jun 28, 1994
Refining the Hearsay Exception: Insights from Williamson v. United States 1. Introduction Williamson v. United States, 512 U.S. 594 (1994), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that delves into the...
Establishing the 'Rough Proportionality' Test for Land Use Exactions: Analysis of DOLAN v. CITY OF TIGARD

Establishing the 'Rough Proportionality' Test for Land Use Exactions: Analysis of DOLAN v. CITY OF TIGARD

Date: Jun 25, 1994
Establishing the 'Rough Proportionality' Test for Land Use Exactions: Analysis of DOLAN v. CITY OF TIGARD Introduction DOLAN v. CITY OF TIGARD, 512 U.S. 374 (1994), is a landmark United States...
Limits on §1983 Damages Claims Arising from Unconstitutional Convictions

Limits on §1983 Damages Claims Arising from Unconstitutional Convictions

Date: Jun 25, 1994
Limits on §1983 Damages Claims Arising from Unconstitutional Convictions Introduction HECK v. HUMPHREY et al., 512 U.S. 477 (1994), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Honda Motor Co. v. Oberg (1994): Reinforcing Due Process in Punitive Damages Awards

Honda Motor Co. v. Oberg (1994): Reinforcing Due Process in Punitive Damages Awards

Date: Jun 25, 1994
Honda Motor Co. v. Oberg (1994): Reinforcing Due Process in Punitive Damages Awards 1. Introduction Honda Motor Co., Ltd. v. Oberg, 512 U.S. 415 (1994), stands as a pivotal Supreme Court decision...
Clarifying Ambiguous Requests for Counsel in Custodial Interrogations: Insights from Davis v. United States

Clarifying Ambiguous Requests for Counsel in Custodial Interrogations: Insights from Davis v. United States

Date: Jun 25, 1994
Clarifying Ambiguous Requests for Counsel in Custodial Interrogations: Insights from Davis v. United States Introduction Davis v. United States is a landmark 1994 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court...
Shannon v. United States: Juror Instructions on Insanity Verdicts Not Mandated

Shannon v. United States: Juror Instructions on Insanity Verdicts Not Mandated

Date: Jun 25, 1994
Shannon v. United States: Juror Instructions on Insanity Verdicts Not Mandated Introduction Shannon v. United States, 512 U.S. 573 (1994), is a pivotal United States Supreme Court case that addressed...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert