Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Saratoga Fishing Co. v. J. M. Martinac Co.: Defining "Other Property" in Admiralty Torts

Saratoga Fishing Co. v. J. M. Martinac Co.: Defining "Other Property" in Admiralty Torts

Date: Jun 3, 1997
Saratoga Fishing Co. v. J. M. Martinac Co.: Defining "Other Property" in Admiralty Torts Introduction Saratoga Fishing Co. v. J. M. Martinac Co. et al., 520 U.S. 875 (1997), marks a significant...
Supreme Court Affirms Negligent Acts as 'Accidents' Under Insurance Policy

Supreme Court Affirms Negligent Acts as 'Accidents' Under Insurance Policy

Date: Jun 3, 1997
Supreme Court Affirms Negligent Acts as 'Accidents' Under Insurance Policy Introduction Case: Lords Landing Village Condominium Council of Unit Owners v. Continental Insurance Co. Court: United...
Ripeness of Regulatory Takings Claims: The Supreme Court's Decision in SUITUM v. TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY

Ripeness of Regulatory Takings Claims: The Supreme Court's Decision in SUITUM v. TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY

Date: May 28, 1997
Ripeness of Regulatory Takings Claims: The Supreme Court's Decision in SUITUM v. TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY Introduction SUITUM v. TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY, 520 U.S. 725 (1997), is a...
United States v. Hyde: Affirming the Requirement of a Fair and Just Reason for Withdrawing Guilty Pleas

United States v. Hyde: Affirming the Requirement of a Fair and Just Reason for Withdrawing Guilty Pleas

Date: May 28, 1997
United States v. Hyde: Affirming the Requirement of a Fair and Just Reason for Withdrawing Guilty Pleas Introduction United States v. Hyde (520 U.S. 670, 1997) is a seminal Supreme Court decision...
Clinton v. Jones: Presidential Immunity in Civil Litigation

Clinton v. Jones: Presidential Immunity in Civil Litigation

Date: May 28, 1997
Clinton v. Jones: Presidential Immunity in Civil Litigation Introduction Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681 (1997), is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision that addresses the scope of...
Clarifying 'Maximum Term Authorized' in Federal Sentencing Guidelines

Clarifying 'Maximum Term Authorized' in Federal Sentencing Guidelines

Date: May 28, 1997
Clarifying 'Maximum Term Authorized' in Federal Sentencing Guidelines Introduction United States v. LaBonte et al., 520 U.S. 751 (1997), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that addressed the...
Separation of Powers and the Appointment of Inferior Officers: Insights from Edmond v. United States

Separation of Powers and the Appointment of Inferior Officers: Insights from Edmond v. United States

Date: May 20, 1997
Separation of Powers and the Appointment of Inferior Officers: Insights from Edmond v. United States Introduction In Edmond v. United States, 520 U.S. 651 (1997), the United States Supreme Court...
Limitations on § 1983 Claims in Prison Disciplinary Proceedings: Edwards v. Balisok

Limitations on § 1983 Claims in Prison Disciplinary Proceedings: Edwards v. Balisok

Date: May 20, 1997
Limitations on § 1983 Claims in Prison Disciplinary Proceedings: Edwards v. Balisok Introduction Edwards et al. v. Balisok, 520 U.S. 641 (1997), is a significant United States Supreme Court case that...
Commerce Clause Implications in CAMPS NEWFOUND/OWATONNA, INC. v. TOWN OF HARRISON

Commerce Clause Implications in CAMPS NEWFOUND/OWATONNA, INC. v. TOWN OF HARRISON

Date: May 20, 1997
Commerce Clause Implications in CAMPS NEWFOUND/OWATONNA, INC. v. TOWN OF HARRISON Introduction Camps Newfound/Owatonna, Inc. v. Town of Harrison is a landmark case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court...
ERISA § 510 Protection Extended to Non-Vested Welfare Benefits: Analysis of Inter-Modal Rail Employees Association v. ATSF Railway

ERISA § 510 Protection Extended to Non-Vested Welfare Benefits: Analysis of Inter-Modal Rail Employees Association v. ATSF Railway

Date: May 13, 1997
ERISA § 510 Protection Extended to Non-Vested Welfare Benefits: Analysis of Inter-Modal Rail Employees Association v. AT&SF Railway Introduction The Supreme Court case Inter-Modal Rail Employees...
Clarifying §5 Preclearance Requirements under the Voting Rights Act: Reno v. Bossier Parish School Board

Clarifying §5 Preclearance Requirements under the Voting Rights Act: Reno v. Bossier Parish School Board

Date: May 13, 1997
Clarifying §5 Preclearance Requirements under the Voting Rights Act: Reno v. Bossier Parish School Board Introduction In Reno, Attorney General v. Bossier Parish School Board et al., 520 U.S. 471...
Retroactivity of New Judicial Rules in Federal Habeas Corpus: LAMBRIX v. SINGLETARY Analysis

Retroactivity of New Judicial Rules in Federal Habeas Corpus: LAMBRIX v. SINGLETARY Analysis

Date: May 13, 1997
Retroactivity of New Judicial Rules in Federal Habeas Corpus: LAMBRIX v. SINGLETARY Analysis Introduction LAMBRIX v. SINGLETARY, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, 520 U.S. 518 (1997), is...
Clarifying Seaman Status Under the Jones Act: Substantial Connection Requires Common Ownership or Control

Clarifying Seaman Status Under the Jones Act: Substantial Connection Requires Common Ownership or Control

Date: May 13, 1997
Clarifying Seaman Status Under the Jones Act: Substantial Connection Requires Common Ownership or Control Introduction Harbor Tug Barge Co. v. Papai et ux. is a pivotal case decided by the U.S....
Reaffirming the Boundaries of Plain Error Review in Perjury Convictions: Johnson v. United States

Reaffirming the Boundaries of Plain Error Review in Perjury Convictions: Johnson v. United States

Date: May 13, 1997
Reaffirming the Boundaries of Plain Error Review in Perjury Convictions: Johnson v. United States Introduction Johnson v. United States, 520 U.S. 461 (1997), addresses the critical issue of how...
Limits on Municipal Liability Under Section 1983 for Single Hiring Decisions

Limits on Municipal Liability Under Section 1983 for Single Hiring Decisions

Date: Apr 29, 1997
Limits on Municipal Liability Under Section 1983 for Single Hiring Decisions Introduction In Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County, Oklahoma v. Brown, et al. (520 U.S. 397, 1997), the...
Minnesota's Fusion Candidacy Ban: Balancing Associational Rights and Election Regulation

Minnesota's Fusion Candidacy Ban: Balancing Associational Rights and Election Regulation

Date: Apr 29, 1997
Minnesota's Fusion Candidacy Ban: Balancing Associational Rights and Election Regulation Introduction Timmons, Acting Director, Ramsey County Department of Property Records and Revenue, et al., v....
Richards v. Wisconsin: Reinforcing the Fourth Amendment's Knock-and-Announce Requirement

Richards v. Wisconsin: Reinforcing the Fourth Amendment's Knock-and-Announce Requirement

Date: Apr 29, 1997
Richards v. Wisconsin: Reinforcing the Fourth Amendment's Knock-and-Announce Requirement Introduction Richards v. Wisconsin, 520 U.S. 385 (1997), is a landmark Supreme Court case that addressed the...
Limiting Tribal Jurisdiction Over Nonmember Civil Claims on State Highways Through Reservations

Limiting Tribal Jurisdiction Over Nonmember Civil Claims on State Highways Through Reservations

Date: Apr 29, 1997
Limiting Tribal Jurisdiction Over Nonmember Civil Claims on State Highways Through Reservations Introduction In the landmark case of Strate, Associate Tribal Judge, Tribal Court of the Three...
Title IV-D of the Social Security Act Does Not Confer Individual Enforceable Rights Under Section 1983

Title IV-D of the Social Security Act Does Not Confer Individual Enforceable Rights Under Section 1983

Date: Apr 22, 1997
Title IV-D of the Social Security Act Does Not Confer Individual Enforceable Rights Under Section 1983 Introduction In Blessing, Director, Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Freestone et al.,...
Limitations on Special Needs Justification for Suspicionless Drug Testing in Political Candidacy

Limitations on Special Needs Justification for Suspicionless Drug Testing in Political Candidacy

Date: Apr 16, 1997
Limitations on Special Needs Justification for Suspicionless Drug Testing in Political Candidacy Introduction CHANDLER v. MILLER, 520 U.S. 305 (1997), is a landmark decision by the United States...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert