Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

AEDPA's Chapter 153 Amendments Do Not Retroactively Apply to Pending Noncapital Habeas Corpus Cases

AEDPA's Chapter 153 Amendments Do Not Retroactively Apply to Pending Noncapital Habeas Corpus Cases

Date: Jun 24, 1997
AEDPA's Chapter 153 Amendments Do Not Retroactively Apply to Pending Noncapital Habeas Corpus Cases Introduction In LINDH v. MURPHY, Warden (521 U.S. 320, 1997), the United States Supreme Court...
Kansas v. Hendricks: Upholding Civil Commitment for Sexually Violent Predators

Kansas v. Hendricks: Upholding Civil Commitment for Sexually Violent Predators

Date: Jun 24, 1997
Kansas v. Hendricks: Upholding Civil Commitment for Sexually Violent Predators Introduction Kansas v. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346 (1997), is a seminal U.S. Supreme Court case that examined the...
Limits on FELA Recovery for Emotional Distress and Medical Monitoring: Metro-North Commuter Railroad Co. v. Buckley

Limits on FELA Recovery for Emotional Distress and Medical Monitoring: Metro-North Commuter Railroad Co. v. Buckley

Date: Jun 24, 1997
Limits on FELA Recovery for Emotional Distress and Medical Monitoring: Metro-North Commuter Railroad Co. v. Buckley Introduction Metro-North Commuter Railroad Co. v. Buckley, 521 U.S. 424 (1997), is...
Private Prison Guards Not Entitled to Qualified Immunity Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Private Prison Guards Not Entitled to Qualified Immunity Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Date: Jun 24, 1997
Private Prison Guards Not Entitled to Qualified Immunity Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Introduction In Richardson et al. v. McKnight (521 U.S. 399, 1997), the United States Supreme Court addressed a pivotal...
Establishment Clause Reaffirmed: Overruling Aguilar and Ball in Agostini v. Felton

Establishment Clause Reaffirmed: Overruling Aguilar and Ball in Agostini v. Felton

Date: Jun 24, 1997
Establishment Clause Reaffirmed: Overruling Aguilar and Ball in Agostini v. Felton Introduction Agostini et al. v. Felton et al., 521 U.S. 203 (1997), marks a pivotal moment in the Supreme Court's...
Ownership of Submerged Lands: Insights from United States v. Alaska (521 U.S. 1)

Ownership of Submerged Lands: Insights from United States v. Alaska (521 U.S. 1)

Date: Jun 20, 1997
Ownership of Submerged Lands: Insights from United States v. Alaska (521 U.S. 1) Introduction United States v. Alaska, 521 U.S. 1 (1997), addressed a significant dispute between the federal...
Supreme Court Rejects 'Last Predicate Act' Rule in Civil RICO Accrual, Mandates Reasonable Diligence for Fraudulent Concealment

Supreme Court Rejects 'Last Predicate Act' Rule in Civil RICO Accrual, Mandates Reasonable Diligence for Fraudulent Concealment

Date: Jun 20, 1997
Supreme Court Rejects 'Last Predicate Act' Rule in Civil RICO Accrual, Mandates Reasonable Diligence for Fraudulent Concealment Introduction In the landmark case of Klehr et al. v. A.O. Smith Corp....
Supreme Court Affirms Judicial Redistricting Standards in Abrams v. Johnson

Supreme Court Affirms Judicial Redistricting Standards in Abrams v. Johnson

Date: Jun 20, 1997
Supreme Court Affirms Judicial Redistricting Standards in Ameris v. Johnson Introduction Ameris v. Johnson is a landmark Supreme Court decision rendered on June 19, 1997, addressing the contentious...
Nominal Compensation Under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act: Insights from METROPOLITAN STEVEDORE CO. v. RAMBO

Nominal Compensation Under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act: Insights from METROPOLITAN STEVEDORE CO. v. RAMBO

Date: Jun 20, 1997
Nominal Compensation Under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act: Insights from METROPOLITAN STEVEDORE CO. v. RAMBO Introduction The Supreme Court case METROPOLITAN STEVEDORE CO. v....
Simmons Rule Affirmed as a New Standard under Teague in O'DELL v. NETHERLAND

Simmons Rule Affirmed as a New Standard under Teague in O'DELL v. NETHERLAND

Date: Jun 20, 1997
Simmons Rule Affirmed as a New Standard under Teague in O'DELL v. NETHERLAND Introduction O'DELL v. NETHERLAND, Warden, et al., 521 U.S. 151 (1997), is a pivotal case in the realm of U.S. Supreme...
Non-Retroactivity of FCA Amendments in Qui Tam Suits: Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Schumer

Non-Retroactivity of FCA Amendments in Qui Tam Suits: Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Schumer

Date: Jun 17, 1997
Non-Retroactivity of FCA Amendments in Qui Tam Suits: Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Schumer Introduction Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Schumer is a pivotal United States...
Replacement-Value Standard for Cram Down Claims in Bankruptcy Established in Associates Commercial Corp. v. Rash

Replacement-Value Standard for Cram Down Claims in Bankruptcy Established in Associates Commercial Corp. v. Rash

Date: Jun 17, 1997
Replacement-Value Standard for Cram Down Claims in Bankruptcy Established in Associates Commercial Corp. v. Rash Introduction Associates Commercial Corp. v. Rash et ux., 520 U.S. 953 (1997), is a...
Upholding Physician-Only Abortion Restrictions: An Analysis of Mazurek v. Armstrong

Upholding Physician-Only Abortion Restrictions: An Analysis of Mazurek v. Armstrong

Date: Jun 17, 1997
Upholding Physician-Only Abortion Restrictions: An Analysis of Mazurek v. Armstrong Introduction Mazurek, Attorney General of Montana v. Armstrong et al., 520 U.S. 968 (1997), is a pivotal Supreme...
Establishing "Good Cause" for Discovery in Judicial Bias Claims: Insights from BRACY v. GRAMLEY, Warden

Establishing "Good Cause" for Discovery in Judicial Bias Claims: Insights from BRACY v. GRAMLEY, Warden

Date: Jun 10, 1997
Establishing "Good Cause" for Discovery in Judicial Bias Claims: Insights from BRACY v. GRAMLEY, Warden Introduction BRACY v. GRAMLEY, Warden, 520 U.S. 899 (1997), is a landmark decision by the...
State Courts Not Required to Allow Interlocutory Appeals on Qualified Immunity: Johnson v. Fankell

State Courts Not Required to Allow Interlocutory Appeals on Qualified Immunity: Johnson v. Fankell

Date: Jun 10, 1997
State Courts Not Required to Allow Interlocutory Appeals on Qualified Immunity: Johnson et al. v. Fankell Introduction Johnson et al. v. Fankell, 520 U.S. 911 (1997), addressed a critical issue...
Due Process in Suspension of Tenured Public Employees: Insights from Gilbert v. Homar

Due Process in Suspension of Tenured Public Employees: Insights from Gilbert v. Homar

Date: Jun 10, 1997
Due Process in Suspension of Tenured Public Employees: Insights from Gilbert v. Homar Introduction The United States Supreme Court case GILBERT, PRESIDENT, EAST STROUDSBURG UNIVERSITY, ET AL. v....
ERISA Preemption and State Taxation: Insights from De Buono v. NYSA-ILA Medical and Clinical Services Fund

ERISA Preemption and State Taxation: Insights from De Buono v. NYSA-ILA Medical and Clinical Services Fund

Date: Jun 3, 1997
ERISA Preemption and State Taxation: Insights from De Buono v. NYSA-ILA Medical and Clinical Services Fund Introduction The Supreme Court case De Buono, New York Commissioner of Health, et al. v....
McMillian v. Monroe County: Defining County Liability Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

McMillian v. Monroe County: Defining County Liability Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Date: Jun 3, 1997
McMillian v. Monroe County: Defining County Liability Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Introduction McMillian v. Monroe County, Alabama, 520 U.S. 781 (1997), is a pivotal U.S. Supreme Court decision that...
Arkansas v. Farm Credit Services of Central Arkansas: Limiting Federal Judicial Intervention in State Tax Matters

Arkansas v. Farm Credit Services of Central Arkansas: Limiting Federal Judicial Intervention in State Tax Matters

Date: Jun 3, 1997
Arkansas v. Farm Credit Services of Central Arkansas: Limiting Federal Judicial Intervention in State Tax Matters 1. Introduction Arkansas v. Farm Credit Services of Central Arkansas et al., 520 U.S....
ERISA Pre-empts State Community Property Laws in Testamentary Transfers: BOGGS v. BOGGS ET AL.

ERISA Pre-empts State Community Property Laws in Testamentary Transfers: BOGGS v. BOGGS ET AL.

Date: Jun 3, 1997
ERISA Pre-empts State Community Property Laws in Testamentary Transfers: BOGGS v. BOGGS ET AL. 1. Introduction BOGGS v. BOGGS ET AL. (520 U.S. 833, 1997) is a landmark decision by the United States...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert