Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Limits of Settlement-Only Class Certifications under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23: Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor Introduction The United States Supreme Court's decision in Amchem Products,...
UNITED STATES v. O'HAGAN: Establishing the Misappropriation Theory of Insider Trading under §10(b) and Rule 10b-5 Introduction United States v. James Herman O'Hagan is a landmark case decided by the...
Judicial Endorsement of Judicially-Produced Redistricting Plan: C. Martin Lawyer III v. Department of Justice et al. Introduction C. Martin Lawyer III, Appellant v. Department of Justice et al. is a...
Compelled Funding of Generic Advertising in Agricultural Marketing Orders and the First Amendment: Supreme Court's Decision in Glickman v. Wileman Brothers Elliott Introduction In Dan Glickman,...
Idaho v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe: Reinforcing Eleventh Amendment Sovereign Immunity in Tribal Land Disputes Introduction The landmark case of Idaho et al. v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe of Idaho et al. (521 U.S....
AEDPA's Chapter 153 Amendments Do Not Retroactively Apply to Pending Noncapital Habeas Corpus Cases Introduction In LINDH v. MURPHY, Warden (521 U.S. 320, 1997), the United States Supreme Court...
Kansas v. Hendricks: Upholding Civil Commitment for Sexually Violent Predators Introduction Kansas v. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346 (1997), is a seminal U.S. Supreme Court case that examined the...
Limits on FELA Recovery for Emotional Distress and Medical Monitoring: Metro-North Commuter Railroad Co. v. Buckley Introduction Metro-North Commuter Railroad Co. v. Buckley, 521 U.S. 424 (1997), is...
Private Prison Guards Not Entitled to Qualified Immunity Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Introduction In Richardson et al. v. McKnight (521 U.S. 399, 1997), the United States Supreme Court addressed a pivotal...
Establishment Clause Reaffirmed: Overruling Aguilar and Ball in Agostini v. Felton Introduction Agostini et al. v. Felton et al., 521 U.S. 203 (1997), marks a pivotal moment in the Supreme Court's...
Ownership of Submerged Lands: Insights from United States v. Alaska (521 U.S. 1) Introduction United States v. Alaska, 521 U.S. 1 (1997), addressed a significant dispute between the federal...
Supreme Court Rejects 'Last Predicate Act' Rule in Civil RICO Accrual, Mandates Reasonable Diligence for Fraudulent Concealment Introduction In the landmark case of Klehr et al. v. A.O. Smith Corp....
Supreme Court Affirms Judicial Redistricting Standards in Ameris v. Johnson Introduction Ameris v. Johnson is a landmark Supreme Court decision rendered on June 19, 1997, addressing the contentious...
Nominal Compensation Under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act: Insights from METROPOLITAN STEVEDORE CO. v. RAMBO Introduction The Supreme Court case METROPOLITAN STEVEDORE CO. v....
Simmons Rule Affirmed as a New Standard under Teague in O'DELL v. NETHERLAND Introduction O'DELL v. NETHERLAND, Warden, et al., 521 U.S. 151 (1997), is a pivotal case in the realm of U.S. Supreme...
Non-Retroactivity of FCA Amendments in Qui Tam Suits: Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Schumer Introduction Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Schumer is a pivotal United States...
Replacement-Value Standard for Cram Down Claims in Bankruptcy Established in Associates Commercial Corp. v. Rash Introduction Associates Commercial Corp. v. Rash et ux., 520 U.S. 953 (1997), is a...
Upholding Physician-Only Abortion Restrictions: An Analysis of Mazurek v. Armstrong Introduction Mazurek, Attorney General of Montana v. Armstrong et al., 520 U.S. 968 (1997), is a pivotal Supreme...
Establishing "Good Cause" for Discovery in Judicial Bias Claims: Insights from BRACY v. GRAMLEY, Warden Introduction BRACY v. GRAMLEY, Warden, 520 U.S. 899 (1997), is a landmark decision by the...
State Courts Not Required to Allow Interlocutory Appeals on Qualified Immunity: Johnson et al. v. Fankell Introduction Johnson et al. v. Fankell, 520 U.S. 911 (1997), addressed a critical issue...