Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Double Jeopardy Clarified: Civil vs. Criminal Sanctions in Hudson v. United States

Double Jeopardy Clarified: Civil vs. Criminal Sanctions in Hudson v. United States

Date: Dec 11, 1997
Double Jeopardy Clarified: Civil vs. Criminal Sanctions in Hudson v. United States Introduction John Hudson, Larry Baresel, and Jack Butler Rackley v. United States (522 U.S. 93) is a seminal case...
Supreme Court Upholds Finality Doctrine in §1983 Claims: Jefferson v. City of Tarrant

Supreme Court Upholds Finality Doctrine in §1983 Claims: Jefferson v. City of Tarrant

Date: Dec 10, 1997
Supreme Court Upholds Finality Doctrine in §1983 Claims: Jefferson v. City of Tarrant Introduction In Jefferson, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Jefferson, Deceased, et al. v. City...
Procedural Default Sua Sponte Not Mandatory: Insights from Trest v. Cain

Procedural Default Sua Sponte Not Mandatory: Insights from Trest v. Cain

Date: Dec 10, 1997
Procedural Default Sua Sponte Not Mandatory: Insights from Trest v. Cain Introduction Trest v. Cain, 522 U.S. 87 (1997), is a landmark Supreme Court case that addresses the obligations of federal...
Supreme Court Upholds Federal Election Day: Murphy v. Love et al.

Supreme Court Upholds Federal Election Day: Murphy v. Love et al.

Date: Dec 3, 1997
Supreme Court Upholds Federal Election Day: Murphy v. Love et al. Introduction In Murphy J. Foster, Jr., Governor of Louisiana, et al., Petitioners v. G. Scott Love, Paul S. Bergeron, Kathleen B....
Expansion of Federal Bribery Prohibitions and RICO Conspiracy Interpretation in Salinas v. United States

Expansion of Federal Bribery Prohibitions and RICO Conspiracy Interpretation in Salinas v. United States

Date: Dec 3, 1997
Expansion of Federal Bribery Prohibitions and RICO Conspiracy Interpretation in Salinas v. United States Introduction Mario Salinas v. United States is a significant case decided by the U.S. Supreme...
Monroe v. United States: Upholding Default Voting Rules under the Voting Rights Act

Monroe v. United States: Upholding Default Voting Rules under the Voting Rights Act

Date: Nov 18, 1997
Monroe v. United States: Upholding Default Voting Rules under the Voting Rights Act Introduction City of Monroe et al. v. United States, 522 U.S. 34 (1997), presents a pivotal case concerning the...
Intent to Defraud Not Required for Misapplication of Title IV Funds - Bates v. United States

Intent to Defraud Not Required for Misapplication of Title IV Funds - Bates v. United States

Date: Nov 5, 1997
Intent to Defraud Not Required for Misapplication of Title IV Funds - Bates v. United States Introduction Bates v. United States, 522 U.S. 23 (1997) is a landmark case adjudicated by the United...
Overruling Albrecht: State Oil Co. v. Barkat U. Khan and Khan Associates, Inc. (522 U.S. 3)

Overruling Albrecht: State Oil Co. v. Barkat U. Khan and Khan Associates, Inc. (522 U.S. 3)

Date: Nov 5, 1997
Overruling Albrecht: State Oil Co. v. Barkat U. Khan and Khan Associates, Inc. (522 U.S. 3) Introduction In State Oil Company v. Barkat U. Khan and Khan Associates, Inc. (522 U.S. 3, 1997), the...
Enhancing Judicial Authority: Supreme Court Clarifies Summary Contempt Powers in Watson v. Pounders

Enhancing Judicial Authority: Supreme Court Clarifies Summary Contempt Powers in Watson v. Pounders

Date: Jun 28, 1997
Enhancing Judicial Authority: Supreme Court Clarifies Summary Contempt Powers in Watson v. Pounders Introduction Watson v. Pounders is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court,...
Federal Government Cannot Compel State Law Enforcement Officers: Insights from Printz v. United States

Federal Government Cannot Compel State Law Enforcement Officers: Insights from Printz v. United States

Date: Jun 28, 1997
Federal Government Cannot Compel State Law Enforcement Officers: Insights from Printz v. United States Introduction In the landmark case Printz v. United States, 521 U.S. 898 (1997), the United...
Vacco v. Quill: Upholding the Prohibition on Assisted Suicide under Equal Protection

Vacco v. Quill: Upholding the Prohibition on Assisted Suicide under Equal Protection

Date: Jun 27, 1997
Vacco v. Quill: Upholding the Prohibition on Assisted Suicide under Equal Protection Introduction Vacco v. Quill, 521 U.S. 793 (1997), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Standing of Legislators in Constitutional Challenges: An Analysis of Raines v. Byrd

Standing of Legislators in Constitutional Challenges: An Analysis of Raines v. Byrd

Date: Jun 27, 1997
Standing of Legislators in Constitutional Challenges: An Analysis of Raines v. Byrd Introduction Raines v. Byrd (521 U.S. 811, 1997) is a landmark Supreme Court decision that addresses the issue of...
Washington v. Glucksberg: Supreme Court Upholds State Prohibition on Assisted Suicide

Washington v. Glucksberg: Supreme Court Upholds State Prohibition on Assisted Suicide

Date: Jun 27, 1997
Washington v. Glucksberg: Supreme Court Upholds State Prohibition on Assisted Suicide Introduction Washington v. Glucksberg (521 U.S. 702, 1997) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
CDA's Indecent and Patently Offensive Communication Restrictions Unconstitutional Under the First Amendment

CDA's Indecent and Patently Offensive Communication Restrictions Unconstitutional Under the First Amendment

Date: Jun 27, 1997
CDA's Indecent and Patently Offensive Communication Restrictions Unconstitutional Under the First Amendment Introduction In the landmark case of Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union (1997), the...
Boerne v. Flores: RFRA Exceeds Congressional Enforcement Power under the Fourteenth Amendment

Boerne v. Flores: RFRA Exceeds Congressional Enforcement Power under the Fourteenth Amendment

Date: Jun 26, 1997
Boerne v. Flores: RFRA Exceeds Congressional Enforcement Power under the Fourteenth Amendment Introduction Boerne v. Flores is a landmark Supreme Court decision rendered on June 25, 1997, addressing...
Limits of Settlement-Only Class Certifications under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23: Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor

Limits of Settlement-Only Class Certifications under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23: Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor

Date: Jun 26, 1997
Limits of Settlement-Only Class Certifications under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23: Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor Introduction The United States Supreme Court's decision in Amchem Products,...
UNITED STATES v. O'HAGAN: Establishing the Misappropriation Theory of Insider Trading under §10(b) and Rule 10b-5

UNITED STATES v. O'HAGAN: Establishing the Misappropriation Theory of Insider Trading under §10(b) and Rule 10b-5

Date: Jun 26, 1997
UNITED STATES v. O'HAGAN: Establishing the Misappropriation Theory of Insider Trading under §10(b) and Rule 10b-5 Introduction United States v. James Herman O'Hagan is a landmark case decided by the...
Judicial Endorsement of Judicially-Produced Redistricting Plan: C. Martin Lawyer III v. Department of Justice et al.

Judicial Endorsement of Judicially-Produced Redistricting Plan: C. Martin Lawyer III v. Department of Justice et al.

Date: Jun 26, 1997
Judicial Endorsement of Judicially-Produced Redistricting Plan: C. Martin Lawyer III v. Department of Justice et al. Introduction C. Martin Lawyer III, Appellant v. Department of Justice et al. is a...
Compelled Funding of Generic Advertising in Agricultural Marketing Orders and the First Amendment: Supreme Court's Decision in Glickman v. Wileman Brothers Elliott

Compelled Funding of Generic Advertising in Agricultural Marketing Orders and the First Amendment: Supreme Court's Decision in Glickman v. Wileman Brothers Elliott

Date: Jun 26, 1997
Compelled Funding of Generic Advertising in Agricultural Marketing Orders and the First Amendment: Supreme Court's Decision in Glickman v. Wileman Brothers Elliott Introduction In Dan Glickman,...
Idaho v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe: Reinforcing Eleventh Amendment Sovereign Immunity in Tribal Land Disputes

Idaho v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe: Reinforcing Eleventh Amendment Sovereign Immunity in Tribal Land Disputes

Date: Jun 24, 1997
Idaho v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe: Reinforcing Eleventh Amendment Sovereign Immunity in Tribal Land Disputes Introduction The landmark case of Idaho et al. v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe of Idaho et al. (521 U.S....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert