Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Limits on Standing and Jurisdiction in Citizen Enforcement Actions: Steel Company v. Citizens for a Better Environment

Limits on Standing and Jurisdiction in Citizen Enforcement Actions: Steel Company v. Citizens for a Better Environment

Date: Mar 5, 1998
Limits on Standing and Jurisdiction in Citizen Enforcement Actions: Steel Company v. Citizens for a Better Environment Introduction Steel Company v. Citizens for a Better Environment, 523 U.S. 83...
No-Knock Warrant Execution: Establishing Reasonable Standards in Ramirez v. United States

No-Knock Warrant Execution: Establishing Reasonable Standards in Ramirez v. United States

Date: Mar 5, 1998
No-Knock Warrant Execution: Establishing Reasonable Standards in Ramirez v. United States Introduction United States v. Hernan Ramirez is a landmark 1998 decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Same-Sex Sexual Harassment Recognized as Discriminatory Under Title VII: ONCALE v. SUNDOWNER OFFSHORE SERVICES

Same-Sex Sexual Harassment Recognized as Discriminatory Under Title VII: ONCALE v. SUNDOWNER OFFSHORE SERVICES

Date: Mar 5, 1998
Same-Sex Sexual Harassment Recognized as Discriminatory Under Title VII: ONCALE v. SUNDOWNER OFFSHORE SERVICES Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case, ONCALE v. SUNDOWNER OFFSHORE SERVICES,...
Clarifying Mootness and Collateral Consequences in Parole Revocation: SPENCER v. KEMNA

Clarifying Mootness and Collateral Consequences in Parole Revocation: SPENCER v. KEMNA

Date: Mar 4, 1998
Clarifying Mootness and Collateral Consequences in Parole Revocation: SPENCER v. KEMNA Introduction Randy G. Spencer v. Mike Kemna, Superintendent, Western Missouri Correctional Center, et al. was...
Limitation of Judicial Panel Authority in Multidistrict Litigation: Analysis of LEXECON Inc. v. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes Lerach

Limitation of Judicial Panel Authority in Multidistrict Litigation: Analysis of LEXECON Inc. v. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes Lerach

Date: Mar 4, 1998
Limitation of Judicial Panel Authority in Multidistrict Litigation: Analysis of LEXECON Inc. v. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes Lerach Introduction The United States Supreme Court case Lexecon Inc. et...
Dischargeability of Medical Malpractice Judgments: Interpreting 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6)

Dischargeability of Medical Malpractice Judgments: Interpreting 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6)

Date: Mar 4, 1998
Dischargeability of Medical Malpractice Judgments: Interpreting 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6) Introduction The Supreme Court case MARGARET KAWAAUHAU, ET VIR, PETITIONERS v. PAUL W. GEIGER, 523 U.S. 57...
Affirming Absolute Legislative Immunity for Local Officials: Bogan & Roderick v. Scott-Harris

Affirming Absolute Legislative Immunity for Local Officials: Bogan & Roderick v. Scott-Harris

Date: Mar 4, 1998
Affirming Absolute Legislative Immunity for Local Officials: Bogan & Roderick v. Scott-Harris Introduction In the landmark case of Daniel Bogan and Marilyn Roderick v. Janet Scott-Harris, the United...
Prudential Standing of Competitors under the APA: National Credit Union Administration v. First National Bank Trust Co.

Prudential Standing of Competitors under the APA: National Credit Union Administration v. First National Bank Trust Co.

Date: Feb 26, 1998
Prudential Standing of Competitors under the APA: National Credit Union Administration v. First National Bank Trust Co. Introduction The Supreme Court case National Credit Union Administration v....
Defining 'Indian Country': Supreme Court Rules Native Village of Venetie Lands Not Included

Defining 'Indian Country': Supreme Court Rules Native Village of Venetie Lands Not Included

Date: Feb 26, 1998
Defining 'Indian Country': Supreme Court Rules Native Village of Venetie Lands Not Included Introduction Alaska v. Native Village of Venetie Tribal Government et al. (522 U.S. 520) is a landmark...
Claim Preclusion Defense Cannot Justify Removal: Rivet v. Regions Bank of Louisiana

Claim Preclusion Defense Cannot Justify Removal: Rivet v. Regions Bank of Louisiana

Date: Feb 25, 1998
Claim Preclusion Defense Cannot Justify Removal: Rivet v. Regions Bank of Louisiana Introduction Mary Anna Rivet et al. v. Regions Bank of Louisiana et al., 522 U.S. 470 (1998), is a landmark...
Reauditing Authority Under the GME Amendment: Regions Hospital v. Shalala

Reauditing Authority Under the GME Amendment: Regions Hospital v. Shalala

Date: Feb 25, 1998
Reauditing Authority Under the GME Amendment: Regions Hospital v. Shalala Introduction Regions Hospital v. Donna E. Shalala is a landmark 1998 decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Oubre v. Entergy Operations: Strengthening Protections for Age Discrimination Claims

Oubre v. Entergy Operations: Strengthening Protections for Age Discrimination Claims

Date: Jan 27, 1998
Oubre v. Entergy Operations: Strengthening Protections for Age Discrimination Claims Introduction The Supreme Court case Dolores M. OUBRE v. ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC., 522 U.S. 422 (1998), addresses...
No Exculpatory No: Supreme Court Affirms Brogan's False Statement Conviction under 18 U.S.C. §1001

No Exculpatory No: Supreme Court Affirms Brogan's False Statement Conviction under 18 U.S.C. §1001

Date: Jan 27, 1998
No Exculpatory No: Supreme Court Affirms Brogan's False Statement Conviction under 18 U.S.C. §1001 Introduction The United States Supreme Court, in James Brogan v. United States (522 U.S. 398, 1998),...
South Dakota v. Yankton Sioux Tribe: Diminishment of Reservation Boundaries Established

South Dakota v. Yankton Sioux Tribe: Diminishment of Reservation Boundaries Established

Date: Jan 27, 1998
South Dakota v. Yankton Sioux Tribe: Diminishment of Reservation Boundaries Established Introduction South Dakota v. Yankton Sioux Tribe et al., 522 U.S. 329 (1998), is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court...
Establishing the Bounds of 'Good-Faith Reasonable Doubt' in Employer Polls under the NLRA

Establishing the Bounds of 'Good-Faith Reasonable Doubt' in Employer Polls under the NLRA

Date: Jan 27, 1998
Establishing the Bounds of 'Good-Faith Reasonable Doubt' in Employer Polls under the NLRA Introduction In Allentown Mack Sales and Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 522 U.S. 359...
Privileges and Immunities Clause and Non-Resident Alimony Tax Deductions: Lunding v. NY Tax Appeals Tribunal

Privileges and Immunities Clause and Non-Resident Alimony Tax Deductions: Lunding v. NY Tax Appeals Tribunal

Date: Jan 22, 1998
Privileges and Immunities Clause and Non-Resident Alimony Tax Deductions: Lunding v. NY Tax Appeals Tribunal Introduction In Christopher H. Lunding, et ux., Petitioners v. New York Tax Appeals...
Supreme Court Upholds Agency Authority to Sanction Employees for False Statements in Misconduct Investigations

Supreme Court Upholds Agency Authority to Sanction Employees for False Statements in Misconduct Investigations

Date: Jan 22, 1998
Supreme Court Upholds Agency Authority to Sanction Employees for False Statements in Misconduct Investigations Introduction In the landmark case of Janice R. Lachance, Director, Office of Personnel...
BUCHANAN v. ANGELONE: Upholding Jury Discretion in Capital Sentencing Without Specific Mitigation Instructions

BUCHANAN v. ANGELONE: Upholding Jury Discretion in Capital Sentencing Without Specific Mitigation Instructions

Date: Jan 22, 1998
BUCHANAN v. ANGELONE: Upholding Jury Discretion in Capital Sentencing Without Specific Mitigation Instructions Introduction BUCHANAN v. ANGELONE, 522 U.S. 269 (1998), is a pivotal Supreme Court case...
Rogers v. United States: Evaluating Jury Instruction Requirements for Mens Rea in Firearm Possession

Rogers v. United States: Evaluating Jury Instruction Requirements for Mens Rea in Firearm Possession

Date: Jan 15, 1998
Rogers v. United States: Evaluating Jury Instruction Requirements for Mens Rea in Firearm Possession Introduction Rogers v. United States, 522 U.S. 252 (1998), addressed the critical issue of whether...
Full Faith and Credit Does Not Extend State Injunctions to Restrict Witness Testimony in Foreign Jurisdictions

Full Faith and Credit Does Not Extend State Injunctions to Restrict Witness Testimony in Foreign Jurisdictions

Date: Jan 14, 1998
Full Faith and Credit Does Not Extend State Injunctions to Restrict Witness Testimony in Foreign Jurisdictions Introduction The case of Kenneth Lee Baker and Steven Robert Baker, by his Next Friend,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert