Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Mississippi v. Fordice: Upholding § 5 VRA Preclearance for Significant Voter Registration Changes

Mississippi v. Fordice: Upholding § 5 VRA Preclearance for Significant Voter Registration Changes

Date: Apr 1, 1997
Mississippi v. Fordice: Upholding § 5 VRA Preclearance for Significant Voter Registration Changes Introduction Young et al. v. Fordice et al. (520 U.S. 273, 1997) is a pivotal United States Supreme...
United States v. Lanier: Clarifying the Standard of Notice under 18 U.S.C. §242

United States v. Lanier: Clarifying the Standard of Notice under 18 U.S.C. §242

Date: Apr 1, 1997
United States v. Lanier: Clarifying the Standard of Notice under 18 U.S.C. §242 Introduction United States v. Lanier, 520 U.S. 259 (1997), addresses the crucial issue of the standard required to...
Must-Carry Provisions Upholding Broadcast Diversity in TURNER BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. v. FCC

Must-Carry Provisions Upholding Broadcast Diversity in TURNER BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. v. FCC

Date: Apr 1, 1997
Must-Carry Provisions Upholding Broadcast Diversity in TURNER BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. v. FCC Introduction Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission (520 U.S. 180, 1997)...
Supreme Court Upholds Montana's Parental Notice of Abortion Act: Clarifying Judicial Bypass Standards

Supreme Court Upholds Montana's Parental Notice of Abortion Act: Clarifying Judicial Bypass Standards

Date: Apr 1, 1997
Supreme Court Upholds Montana's Parental Notice of Abortion Act: Clarifying Judicial Bypass Standards Introduction LAMBERT, GALLATIN COUNTY ATTORNEY v. WICKLUND ET AL. (520 U.S. 292) is a landmark...
Expanding Judicial Standing under the Endangered Species Act: Bennett v. Spear Commentary

Expanding Judicial Standing under the Endangered Species Act: Bennett v. Spear Commentary

Date: Mar 20, 1997
Expanding Judicial Standing under the Endangered Species Act: Bennett v. Spear Commentary 1. Introduction Bennett et al. v. Spear et al., 520 U.S. 154 (1997), is a landmark United States Supreme...
Commissioner v. Estate of Hubert: Affirmation of Marital and Charitable Deduction Valuation Principles

Commissioner v. Estate of Hubert: Affirmation of Marital and Charitable Deduction Valuation Principles

Date: Mar 19, 1997
Commissioner v. Estate of Hubert: Affirmation of Marital and Charitable Deduction Valuation Principles Introduction In Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Estate of Hubert, Deceased, 520 U.S. 93...
Young v. Harper: Establishing Preparole Equivalence to Parole under Due Process Protections

Young v. Harper: Establishing Preparole Equivalence to Parole under Due Process Protections

Date: Mar 19, 1997
Young v. Harper: Establishing Preparole Equivalence to Parole under Due Process Protections Introduction The Supreme Court case Young et al. v. Harper, decided on March 18, 1997, addresses critical...
Vacatur of Ninth Circuit's Judgment in Arizonans for Official English v. Arizona

Vacatur of Ninth Circuit's Judgment in Arizonans for Official English v. Arizona

Date: Mar 4, 1997
Vacatur of Ninth Circuit's Judgment in Arizonans for Official English v. Arizona Introduction Arizonans for Official English et al. v. Arizona et al., 520 U.S. 43 (1997), is a significant Supreme...
Strict Interpretation of 18 U.S.C. §924(c): Federal Firearm Sentences Must Run Consecutively with All Other Imprisonment Terms

Strict Interpretation of 18 U.S.C. §924(c): Federal Firearm Sentences Must Run Consecutively with All Other Imprisonment Terms

Date: Mar 4, 1997
Strict Interpretation of 18 U.S.C. §924(c): Federal Firearm Sentences Must Run Consecutively with All Other Imprisonment Terms Introduction United States v. Gonzales et al., 520 U.S. 1 (1997) is a...
Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.: Upholding the Doctrine of Equivalents in Patent Law

Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.: Upholding the Doctrine of Equivalents in Patent Law

Date: Mar 4, 1997
Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.: Upholding the Doctrine of Equivalents in Patent Law Introduction In the landmark case of Warner-Jenkinson Co., Inc. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co....
Due Process Requirements for Class-Action Certification: Insights from ADAMS v. ROBERTSON

Due Process Requirements for Class-Action Certification: Insights from ADAMS v. ROBERTSON

Date: Mar 4, 1997
Due Process Requirements for Class-Action Certification: Insights from ADAMS v. ROBERTSON Introduction Adams et al. v. Robertson et al. (520 U.S. 83) is a significant Supreme Court decision that...
Materiality Not an Element in 18 U.S.C. §1014 False Statement Crimes: Insights from United States v. Wells et al.

Materiality Not an Element in 18 U.S.C. §1014 False Statement Crimes: Insights from United States v. Wells et al.

Date: Feb 27, 1997
Materiality Not an Element in 18 U.S.C. §1014 False Statement Crimes: Insights from United States v. Wells et al. Introduction United States v. Wells et al., 519 U.S. 482 (1997), is a pivotal Supreme...
Dunn v. CFTC: Supreme Court Affirms Exemption of Off-Exchange Foreign Currency Options

Dunn v. CFTC: Supreme Court Affirms Exemption of Off-Exchange Foreign Currency Options

Date: Feb 26, 1997
Dunn v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission: Affirming the Exemption of Off-Exchange Foreign Currency Options Introduction Dunn et al. v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission et al. (519 U.S. 465,...
Extension of Mimms Rule to Passengers: Maryland v. Wilson

Extension of Mimms Rule to Passengers: Maryland v. Wilson

Date: Feb 20, 1997
Extension of Mimms Rule to Passengers: Maryland v. Wilson Introduction Maryland v. Wilson, 519 U.S. 408 (1997), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that addresses the scope of...
Salary-Basis Test for Public-Sector Employees Under FLSA: A Comprehensive Analysis of *AUER v. ROBBINS*

Salary-Basis Test for Public-Sector Employees Under FLSA: A Comprehensive Analysis of *AUER v. ROBBINS*

Date: Feb 20, 1997
Salary-Basis Test for Public-Sector Employees Under FLSA: A Comprehensive Analysis of AUER v. ROBBINS Introduction AUER v. ROBBINS, 519 U.S. 452 (1997), is a landmark decision by the United States...
Fixed Buffer Zones Upheld, Floating Buffer Zones Struck Down under First Amendment in SCHENCK v. Pro-Choice Network of Western New York ET AL.

Fixed Buffer Zones Upheld, Floating Buffer Zones Struck Down under First Amendment in SCHENCK v. Pro-Choice Network of Western New York ET AL.

Date: Feb 20, 1997
Fixed Buffer Zones Upheld, Floating Buffer Zones Struck Down under First Amendment in SCHENCK v. Pro-Choice Network of Western New York ET AL. Introduction SCHENCK ET AL. v. PRO-CHOICE NETWORK OF...
Retroactive Cancellation of Early Release Credits Violates Ex Post Facto Clause

Retroactive Cancellation of Early Release Credits Violates Ex Post Facto Clause

Date: Feb 20, 1997
Retroactive Cancellation of Early Release Credits Violates Ex Post Facto Clause Introduction LYNCE v. MATHIS, SUPERINTENDENT, TOMOKA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, ET AL. (519 U.S. 433, 1997) The case of...
Eleventh Amendment Immunity Unaffected by Third-Party Indemnification: Regents v. Doe

Eleventh Amendment Immunity Unaffected by Third-Party Indemnification: Regents v. Doe

Date: Feb 20, 1997
Eleventh Amendment Immunity Unaffected by Third-Party Indemnification: Regents of the University of California v. Doe Introduction Regents of the University of California v. Doe (519 U.S. 425, 1997)...
Expansion of Anti-Retaliation Protections Under Title VII: Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.

Expansion of Anti-Retaliation Protections Under Title VII: Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.

Date: Feb 19, 1997
Expansion of Anti-Retaliation Protections Under Title VII: Robinson v. Shell Oil Co. Introduction Robinson v. Shell Oil Co. is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Defining "Person Entitled to Compensation" and Agency Standing in Workers' Compensation Law

Defining "Person Entitled to Compensation" and Agency Standing in Workers' Compensation Law

Date: Feb 19, 1997
Defining "Person Entitled to Compensation" and Agency Standing in Workers' Compensation Law Introduction Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc., et al. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert