Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Fixed Buffer Zones Upheld, Floating Buffer Zones Struck Down under First Amendment in SCHENCK v. Pro-Choice Network of Western New York ET AL.

Fixed Buffer Zones Upheld, Floating Buffer Zones Struck Down under First Amendment in SCHENCK v. Pro-Choice Network of Western New York ET AL.

Date: Feb 20, 1997
Fixed Buffer Zones Upheld, Floating Buffer Zones Struck Down under First Amendment in SCHENCK v. Pro-Choice Network of Western New York ET AL. Introduction SCHENCK ET AL. v. PRO-CHOICE NETWORK OF...
Retroactive Cancellation of Early Release Credits Violates Ex Post Facto Clause

Retroactive Cancellation of Early Release Credits Violates Ex Post Facto Clause

Date: Feb 20, 1997
Retroactive Cancellation of Early Release Credits Violates Ex Post Facto Clause Introduction LYNCE v. MATHIS, SUPERINTENDENT, TOMOKA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, ET AL. (519 U.S. 433, 1997) The case of...
Eleventh Amendment Immunity Unaffected by Third-Party Indemnification: Regents v. Doe

Eleventh Amendment Immunity Unaffected by Third-Party Indemnification: Regents v. Doe

Date: Feb 20, 1997
Eleventh Amendment Immunity Unaffected by Third-Party Indemnification: Regents of the University of California v. Doe Introduction Regents of the University of California v. Doe (519 U.S. 425, 1997)...
Expansion of Anti-Retaliation Protections Under Title VII: Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.

Expansion of Anti-Retaliation Protections Under Title VII: Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.

Date: Feb 19, 1997
Expansion of Anti-Retaliation Protections Under Title VII: Robinson v. Shell Oil Co. Introduction Robinson v. Shell Oil Co. is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that...
Defining "Person Entitled to Compensation" and Agency Standing in Workers' Compensation Law

Defining "Person Entitled to Compensation" and Agency Standing in Workers' Compensation Law

Date: Feb 19, 1997
Defining "Person Entitled to Compensation" and Agency Standing in Workers' Compensation Law Introduction Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc., et al. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs,...
No Equitable Tolling for § 6511 Tax Refund Claims: Commentary on United States v. Brockamp

No Equitable Tolling for § 6511 Tax Refund Claims: Commentary on United States v. Brockamp

Date: Feb 19, 1997
No Equitable Tolling for § 6511 Tax Refund Claims: Commentary on United States v. Brockamp Introduction United States v. Brockamp, Administrator of the Estate of McGill, Deceased, 519 U.S. 347...
Supreme Court Upholds California's Prevailing Wage Law Against ERISA Preemption

Supreme Court Upholds California's Prevailing Wage Law Against ERISA Preemption

Date: Feb 19, 1997
Supreme Court Upholds California's Prevailing Wage Law Against ERISA Preemption Introduction The landmark case California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement et al. v. Dillingham Construction,...
Standing and Differential Taxation under the Commerce and Equal Protection Clauses: Insights from General Motors Corp. v. Tracy

Standing and Differential Taxation under the Commerce and Equal Protection Clauses: Insights from General Motors Corp. v. Tracy

Date: Feb 19, 1997
Standing and Differential Taxation under the Commerce and Equal Protection Clauses: Insights from General Motors Corp. v. Tracy Introduction The case of General Motors Corp. v. Tracy, Tax...
Supreme Court Reaffirms Unconstitutionality of Amended §207 of the Indian Land Consolidation Act

Supreme Court Reaffirms Unconstitutionality of Amended §207 of the Indian Land Consolidation Act

Date: Jan 22, 1997
Supreme Court Reaffirms Unconstitutionality of Amended §207 of the Indian Land Consolidation Act Introduction The case of Babbitt, Secretary of the Interior, et al. v. Youpee et al., decided by the...
Payroll Method Affirmed: Defining 'Employer' Under Title VII in Walters v. Metropolitan Educational Enterprises

Payroll Method Affirmed: Defining 'Employer' Under Title VII in Walters v. Metropolitan Educational Enterprises

Date: Jan 15, 1997
Payroll Method Affirmed: Defining 'Employer' Under Title VII in Walters v. Metropolitan Educational Enterprises Introduction Walters v. Metropolitan Educational Enterprises, Inc., et al. is a seminal...
State Law Governs Directors' Liability in Federally Insured Savings Banks, Upholding Gross Negligence Floor Under §1821(k)

State Law Governs Directors' Liability in Federally Insured Savings Banks, Upholding Gross Negligence Floor Under §1821(k)

Date: Jan 15, 1997
State Law Governs Directors' Liability in Federally Insured Savings Banks, Upholding Gross Negligence Floor Under §1821(k) Introduction In Atherton v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as...
Old Chief v. United States: Reining in the Use of Prior Conviction Evidence to Prevent Unfair Prejudice

Old Chief v. United States: Reining in the Use of Prior Conviction Evidence to Prevent Unfair Prejudice

Date: Jan 8, 1997
Old Chief v. United States: Reining in the Use of Prior Conviction Evidence to Prevent Unfair Prejudice Introduction Old Chief v. United States, 519 U.S. 172 (1997), is a landmark decision by the...
Sentencing Consideration of Acquitted Conduct: Insights from United States v. Watts

Sentencing Consideration of Acquitted Conduct: Insights from United States v. Watts

Date: Jan 7, 1997
Sentencing Consideration of Acquitted Conduct: Insights from United States v. Watts Introduction United States v. Watts (519 U.S. 148, 1997) is a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that...
M.L.B. v. S.L.J.: Ensuring Equal Access to Parental Termination Appeals

M.L.B. v. S.L.J.: Ensuring Equal Access to Parental Termination Appeals

Date: Dec 17, 1996
M.L.B. v. S.L.J.: Ensuring Equal Access to Parental Termination Appeals Introduction M.L.B. v. S.L.J., Individually and as Next Friend of the Minor Children, S.L.J. and M.L.J., et ux. (519 U.S. 102)...
Complete Diversity at Judgment Time Validates Federal Adjudication in Caterpillar Inc. v. Lewis

Complete Diversity at Judgment Time Validates Federal Adjudication in Caterpillar Inc. v. Lewis

Date: Dec 11, 1996
Complete Diversity at Judgment Time Validates Federal Adjudication in Caterpillar Inc. v. Lewis Introduction Caterpillar Inc. v. Lewis, 519 U.S. 61 (1996), is a significant decision by the United...
O'GILVIE v. United States: Clarifying the Taxability of Punitive Damages in Personal Injury Litigation

O'GILVIE v. United States: Clarifying the Taxability of Punitive Damages in Personal Injury Litigation

Date: Dec 11, 1996
O'GILVIE v. United States: Clarifying the Taxability of Punitive Damages in Personal Injury Litigation Introduction O'GILVIE ET AL., MINORS v. UNITED STATES, 519 U.S. 79 (1996), is a pivotal Supreme...
Voluntariness of Consent to Search Not Dependent on Advising Free to Go: Comprehensive Commentary on Ohio v. Robinette

Voluntariness of Consent to Search Not Dependent on Advising Free to Go: Comprehensive Commentary on Ohio v. Robinette

Date: Nov 19, 1996
Voluntariness of Consent to Search Not Dependent on Advising Free to Go: Comprehensive Commentary on Ohio v. Robinette Introduction Ohio v. Robinette, 519 U.S. 33 (1996), is a seminal United States...
INS v. Yang: Expanding the Scope of Fraud Considerations in Waiver of Deportation

INS v. Yang: Expanding the Scope of Fraud Considerations in Waiver of Deportation

Date: Nov 14, 1996
INS v. Yang: Expanding the Scope of Fraud Considerations in Waiver of Deportation Introduction Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) v. Yueh-Shaio Yang, 519 U.S. 26 (1996), represents a...
Preclearance Requirements Under the Voting Rights Act: Insights from Lopez v. Monterey County

Preclearance Requirements Under the Voting Rights Act: Insights from Lopez v. Monterey County

Date: Nov 7, 1996
Preclearance Requirements Under the Voting Rights Act: Insights from Lopez et al. v. Monterey County Introduction Lopez et al. v. Monterey County, California, et al., 519 U.S. 9 (1996), is a...
Harmless Error Standard in Habeas Corpus: California et al. v. Roy

Harmless Error Standard in Habeas Corpus: California et al. v. Roy

Date: Nov 5, 1996
Harmless Error Standard in Habeas Corpus: California et al. v. Roy Introduction California et al. v. Roy, 519 U.S. 2 (1996), is a pivotal U.S. Supreme Court case that addresses the standards applied...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert