Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

FELKER v. TURPIN: Defining Habeas Corpus Jurisdiction under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996

FELKER v. TURPIN: Defining Habeas Corpus Jurisdiction under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996

Date: Jun 29, 1996
FELKER v. TURPIN: Defining Habeas Corpus Jurisdiction under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 Introduction FELKER v. TURPIN, 518 U.S. 651 (1996), is a landmark decision by the...
Independent Political Party Expenditures Protected by the First Amendment

Independent Political Party Expenditures Protected by the First Amendment

Date: Jun 27, 1996
Independent Political Party Expenditures Protected by the First Amendment Introduction In the landmark case of Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee et al. v. Federal Election Commission,...
United States v. Virginia: Affirming Equal Protection in Single-Sex Education

United States v. Virginia: Affirming Equal Protection in Single-Sex Education

Date: Jun 27, 1996
United States v. Virginia: Affirming Equal Protection in Single-Sex Education Introduction United States v. Virginia (1996) serves as a landmark Supreme Court decision addressing gender-based...
State Common-Law Negligence Claims Not Pre-empted by Medical Device Amendments: Medtronic v. Lohr

State Common-Law Negligence Claims Not Pre-empted by Medical Device Amendments: Medtronic v. Lohr

Date: Jun 27, 1996
State Common-Law Negligence Claims Not Pre-empted by Medical Device Amendments: Medtronic v. Lohr Introduction In the landmark case Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr et vir, 518 U.S. 470 (1996), the United...
Systemwide Bounds Violation Requires Demonstration of Widespread Injury: An In-Depth Commentary on Lewis v. Casey (1996)

Systemwide Bounds Violation Requires Demonstration of Widespread Injury: An In-Depth Commentary on Lewis v. Casey (1996)

Date: Jun 25, 1996
Systemwide Bounds Violation Requires Demonstration of Widespread Injury: An In-Depth Commentary on Lewis v. Casey (1996) Introduction Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343 (1996), is a pivotal United States...
United States v. Ursery: In Rem Civil Forfeitures and the Double Jeopardy Clause

United States v. Ursery: In Rem Civil Forfeitures and the Double Jeopardy Clause

Date: Jun 25, 1996
United States v. Ursery: In Rem Civil Forfeitures and the Double Jeopardy Clause Introduction United States v. Ursery, 518 U.S. 267 (1996), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Lewis v. United States: Defining the Boundaries of the Sixth Amendment Jury Trial Right

Lewis v. United States: Defining the Boundaries of the Sixth Amendment Jury Trial Right

Date: Jun 25, 1996
Lewis v. United States: Defining the Boundaries of the Sixth Amendment Jury Trial Right Introduction Lewis v. United States, 518 U.S. 322 (1996), is a landmark Supreme Court case that addresses the...
Gasperini v. Center for Humanities: Reconciling State Damages Review with the Seventh Amendment

Gasperini v. Center for Humanities: Reconciling State Damages Review with the Seventh Amendment

Date: Jun 25, 1996
Gasperini v. Center for Humanities: Reconciling State Damages Review with the Seventh Amendment Introduction GASPERINI v. CENTER FOR HUMANITIES, INC., 518 U.S. 415 (1996), is a landmark Supreme Court...
Noncompensatory Penalties as Ordinary Unsecured Claims in Bankruptcy: United States v. Reorganized CF I Fabricators of Utah, Inc.

Noncompensatory Penalties as Ordinary Unsecured Claims in Bankruptcy: United States v. Reorganized CF I Fabricators of Utah, Inc.

Date: Jun 21, 1996
Noncompensatory Penalties as Ordinary Unsecured Claims in Bankruptcy: United States v. Reorganized CF I Fabricators of Utah, Inc. Introduction United States v. Reorganized CF I Fabricators of Utah,...
Gray v. Netherlands Warden: Procedural Default and Due Process in Federal Habeas Corpus Review

Gray v. Netherlands Warden: Procedural Default and Due Process in Federal Habeas Corpus Review

Date: Jun 21, 1996
Gray v. Netherlands Warden: Procedural Default and Due Process in Federal Habeas Corpus Review Introduction Gray v. Netherlands Warden, 518 U.S. 152 (1996), is a landmark case addressing the...
Antitrust Immunity for Post-Impasse Employer Agreements in Multiemployer Collective Bargaining: An Analysis of Brown et al. v. Pro Football, Inc.

Antitrust Immunity for Post-Impasse Employer Agreements in Multiemployer Collective Bargaining: An Analysis of Brown et al. v. Pro Football, Inc.

Date: Jun 21, 1996
Antitrust Immunity for Post-Impasse Employer Agreements in Multiemployer Collective Bargaining: An Analysis of Brown et al. v. Pro Football, Inc. Introduction Brown, et al. v. Pro Football, Inc. (518...
Sovereign Immunity Affirmed: Limited Remedies for §504(a) Violations

Sovereign Immunity Affirmed: Limited Remedies for §504(a) Violations

Date: Jun 21, 1996
Sovereign Immunity Affirmed: Limited Remedies for §504(a) Violations Introduction Lane v. Pena, Secretary of Transportation, et al., 518 U.S. 187 (1996), addresses a critical issue in disability...
Departures Below Statutory Minimums: Insights from Melendez v. United States

Departures Below Statutory Minimums: Insights from Melendez v. United States

Date: Jun 18, 1996
Departures Below Statutory Minimums: Insights from Melendez v. United States Introduction Melenendez v. United States is a pivotal 1996 Supreme Court case that delves into the intricacies of federal...
Severability in State Legislation: An Analysis of Leavitt v. Jane L.

Severability in State Legislation: An Analysis of Leavitt v. Jane L.

Date: Jun 18, 1996
Severability in State Legislation: An Analysis of Leavitt v. Jane L. Introduction The landmark U.S. Supreme Court case, Leavitt, Governor of Utah, et al. v. Jane L. et al., 518 U.S. 137 (1996),...
Abuse of Discretion in Appellate Review of Sentencing Departures: KOON v. UNITED STATES

Abuse of Discretion in Appellate Review of Sentencing Departures: KOON v. UNITED STATES

Date: Jun 14, 1996
Abuse of Discretion in Appellate Review of Sentencing Departures: KOON v. UNITED STATES Introduction KOON v. UNITED STATES, 518 U.S. 81 (1996), addresses the standards by which appellate courts...
Recognition of Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege under Rule 501: Insights from JAFFEE v. REDMOND

Recognition of Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege under Rule 501: Insights from JAFFEE v. REDMOND

Date: Jun 14, 1996
Recognition of Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege under Rule 501: Insights from JAFFEE v. REDMOND Introduction In the landmark case of Jaffee, Special Administrator for Allen, Deceased v. Redmond et...
Montana v. Egelhoff: Upholding Statutory Limits on Voluntary Intoxication in Criminal Liability

Montana v. Egelhoff: Upholding Statutory Limits on Voluntary Intoxication in Criminal Liability

Date: Jun 14, 1996
Montana v. Egelhoff: Upholding Statutory Limits on Voluntary Intoxication in Criminal Liability Introduction Montana v. Egelhoff, 518 U.S. 37 (1996), is a landmark decision by the United States...
Strict Scrutiny Applied to Racial Gerrymandering in Shaw v. Hunt

Strict Scrutiny Applied to Racial Gerrymandering in Shaw v. Hunt

Date: Jun 14, 1996
Strict Scrutiny Applied to Racial Gerrymandering in Shaw v. Hunt Introduction Shaw et al. v. Hunt, Governor of North Carolina, et al. (517 U.S. 899) was a landmark decision by the United States...
Strict Scrutiny Confirmed in Racial Gerrymandering Cases: Commentary on Bush v. Vera

Strict Scrutiny Confirmed in Racial Gerrymandering Cases: Commentary on Bush v. Vera

Date: Jun 14, 1996
Strict Scrutiny Confirmed in Racial Gerrymandering Cases: Commentary on Bush v. Vera Introduction In the landmark case BUSH, GOVERNOR OF TEXAS, ET AL. v. VERA ET AL. (517 U.S. 952, 1996), the United...
DEGEN v. UNITED STATES: The Supreme Court Limits Fugitive Disentitlement in Civil Forfeiture Actions

DEGEN v. UNITED STATES: The Supreme Court Limits Fugitive Disentitlement in Civil Forfeiture Actions

Date: Jun 11, 1996
DEGEN v. UNITED STATES: The Supreme Court Limits Fugitive Disentitlement in Civil Forfeiture Actions Introduction DEGEN v. UNITED STATES (517 U.S. 820) is a pivotal Supreme Court decision rendered on...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert