Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Recognizing Asymptomatic HIV Infection as a Disability under the ADA

Recognizing Asymptomatic HIV Infection as a Disability under the ADA

Date: Jun 26, 1998
Recognizing Asymptomatic HIV Infection as a Disability under the ADA Introduction Bragdon v. Abbott et al., 524 U.S. 624 (1998), is a landmark Supreme Court case that addressed the scope of the...
NEA v. Finley: Supreme Court Upholds Facially Valid Grant-Making Criteria for Artistic Excellence and Decency

NEA v. Finley: Supreme Court Upholds Facially Valid Grant-Making Criteria for Artistic Excellence and Decency

Date: Jun 26, 1998
NEA v. Finley: Supreme Court Upholds Facially Valid Grant-Making Criteria for Artistic Excellence and Decency Introduction In National Endowment for the Arts, et al. v. Finley et al., 524 U.S. 569...
Unconstitutional Retroactive Liability: Eastern Enterprises v. Apfel

Unconstitutional Retroactive Liability: Eastern Enterprises v. Apfel

Date: Jun 26, 1998
Unconstitutional Retroactive Liability: Eastern Enterprises v. Apfel Introduction Eastern Enterprises v. Apfel, 524 U.S. 498 (1998), is a significant Supreme Court case that addresses the...
Clinton v. City of New York: Reinforcing the Presentment Clause and Separation of Powers

Clinton v. City of New York: Reinforcing the Presentment Clause and Separation of Powers

Date: Jun 26, 1998
Clinton v. City of New York: Reinforcing the Presentment Clause and Separation of Powers Introduction Clinton, President of the United States, et al. v. City of New York et al., 524 U.S. 417 (1998),...
Exclusionary Rule Not Applicable in Parole Revocation Hearings: Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole v. Scott

Exclusionary Rule Not Applicable in Parole Revocation Hearings: Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole v. Scott

Date: Jun 23, 1998
Exclusionary Rule Not Applicable in Parole Revocation Hearings: Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole v. Scott Introduction Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole v. Scott, 524 U.S. 357...
Establishing Gross Disproportionality: The Bajakajian Decision on the Excessive Fines Clause

Establishing Gross Disproportionality: The Bajakajian Decision on the Excessive Fines Clause

Date: Jun 23, 1998
Establishing Gross Disproportionality: The Bajakajian Decision on the Excessive Fines Clause Introduction UNITED STATES v. BAJAKAJIAN, 524 U.S. 321 (1998), is a landmark Supreme Court case that...
Establishing Liability Under Title IX: Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School District

Establishing Liability Under Title IX: Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School District

Date: Jun 23, 1998
Establishing Liability Under Title IX: Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School District Introduction Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School District, 524 U.S. 274 (1998), is a landmark Supreme Court...
Preserving Removal Jurisdiction Despite Eleventh Amendment Immunity Claims: SCHACHT v. WISCONSIN DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS

Preserving Removal Jurisdiction Despite Eleventh Amendment Immunity Claims: SCHACHT v. WISCONSIN DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS

Date: Jun 23, 1998
Preserving Removal Jurisdiction Despite Eleventh Amendment Immunity Claims: Schacht v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections (1998) Introduction Schacht v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections is a...
Caron v. United States: Expanding Federal Firearm Restrictions for Restored Offenders

Caron v. United States: Expanding Federal Firearm Restrictions for Restored Offenders

Date: Jun 23, 1998
Caron v. United States: Expanding Federal Firearm Restrictions for Restored Offenders Introduction Caron v. United States, 524 U.S. 308 (1998), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that addresses the...
Appealability of District Court Remand Orders in Social Security Disability Cases Under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)

Appealability of District Court Remand Orders in Social Security Disability Cases Under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)

Date: Jun 16, 1998
Appealability of District Court Remand Orders in Social Security Disability Cases Under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) Introduction Forney v. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security is a landmark decision by the...
Willful Violation of Firearms Licensing Requirements: Insights from Bryan v. United States

Willful Violation of Firearms Licensing Requirements: Insights from Bryan v. United States

Date: Jun 16, 1998
Willful Violation of Firearms Licensing Requirements: Insights from Bryan v. United States Introduction Bryan v. United States, 524 U.S. 184 (1998), is a landmark Supreme Court case that delves into...
Preemption of State-Law Claims by Federal Filed-Tariff Requirements in AT&T v. Central Office Telephone

Preemption of State-Law Claims by Federal Filed-Tariff Requirements in AT&T v. Central Office Telephone

Date: Jun 16, 1998
Preemption of State-Law Claims by Federal Filed-Tariff Requirements in AT&T v. Central Office Telephone Introduction American Telephone Telegraph Co. v. Central Office Telephone, Inc. (524 U.S. 214,...
Expanding ADA Protections to State Prison Inmates

Expanding ADA Protections to State Prison Inmates

Date: Jun 16, 1998
Expanding ADA Protections to State Prison Inmates Introduction Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al. v. Yeskey, 524 U.S. 206 (1998), addresses a critical intersection between disability...
Interest on Lawyers Trust Accounts as Private Property: Analysis of Phillips v. Washington Legal Foundation

Interest on Lawyers Trust Accounts as Private Property: Analysis of Phillips v. Washington Legal Foundation

Date: Jun 16, 1998
Interest on Lawyers Trust Accounts as Private Property: Analysis of Phillips v. Washington Legal Foundation Introduction The United States Supreme Court case Phillips et al. v. Washington Legal...
HOHN v. UNITED STATES: Supreme Court Establishes Jurisdiction Over Denials of Certificates of Appealability

HOHN v. UNITED STATES: Supreme Court Establishes Jurisdiction Over Denials of Certificates of Appealability

Date: Jun 16, 1998
HOHN v. UNITED STATES: Supreme Court Establishes Jurisdiction Over Denials of Certificates of Appealability Introduction HOHN v. UNITED STATES (524 U.S. 236, 1998) is a landmark decision by the U.S....
CERCLA Liability of Parent Corporations for Subsidiaries' Environmental Actions: Insights from United States v. Bestfoods

CERCLA Liability of Parent Corporations for Subsidiaries' Environmental Actions: Insights from United States v. Bestfoods

Date: Jun 9, 1998
CERCLA Liability of Parent Corporations for Subsidiaries' Environmental Actions: Insights from United States v. Bestfoods Introduction United States v. Bestfoods (524 U.S. 51, 1998) is a landmark...
Cass County v. Leech Lake Band: Affirming Taxability of Reacquired Alienable Reservation Land

Cass County v. Leech Lake Band: Affirming Taxability of Reacquired Alienable Reservation Land

Date: Jun 9, 1998
Cass County v. Leech Lake Band: Affirming Taxability of Reacquired Alienable Reservation Land Introduction Cass County, Minnesota, et al. v. Leech Lake Band of Chippewa Indians, 524 U.S. 103 (1998),...
Congressional Supremacy in Admiralty Survival Actions: Dooley v. Korean Air Lines Co.

Congressional Supremacy in Admiralty Survival Actions: Dooley v. Korean Air Lines Co.

Date: Jun 9, 1998
Congressional Supremacy in Admiralty Survival Actions: Dooley v. Korean Air Lines Co. Introduction Dooley v. Korean Air Lines Co., 524 U.S. 116 (1998), presents a pivotal moment in admiralty law...
Supreme Court Holds "Carry" Includes Firearm Transport in Vehicles under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)

Supreme Court Holds "Carry" Includes Firearm Transport in Vehicles under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)

Date: Jun 9, 1998
Supreme Court Holds "Carry" Includes Firearm Transport in Vehicles under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) Introduction MUSCARELLO v. UNITED STATES (524 U.S. 125, 1998) is a landmark decision by the United...
Limitations on Lesser Included Offense Instructions in Felony Murder Trials: Hopkins v. Reeves

Limitations on Lesser Included Offense Instructions in Felony Murder Trials: Hopkins v. Reeves

Date: Jun 9, 1998
Limitations on Lesser Included Offense Instructions in Felony Murder Trials: Hopkins v. Reeves Introduction Hopkins, Warden v. Reeves, 524 U.S. 88 (1998), is a landmark decision by the United States...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert