Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

CERCLA Liability of Parent Corporations for Subsidiaries' Environmental Actions: Insights from United States v. Bestfoods

CERCLA Liability of Parent Corporations for Subsidiaries' Environmental Actions: Insights from United States v. Bestfoods

Date: Jun 9, 1998
CERCLA Liability of Parent Corporations for Subsidiaries' Environmental Actions: Insights from United States v. Bestfoods Introduction United States v. Bestfoods (524 U.S. 51, 1998) is a landmark...
Cass County v. Leech Lake Band: Affirming Taxability of Reacquired Alienable Reservation Land

Cass County v. Leech Lake Band: Affirming Taxability of Reacquired Alienable Reservation Land

Date: Jun 9, 1998
Cass County v. Leech Lake Band: Affirming Taxability of Reacquired Alienable Reservation Land Introduction Cass County, Minnesota, et al. v. Leech Lake Band of Chippewa Indians, 524 U.S. 103 (1998),...
Congressional Supremacy in Admiralty Survival Actions: Dooley v. Korean Air Lines Co.

Congressional Supremacy in Admiralty Survival Actions: Dooley v. Korean Air Lines Co.

Date: Jun 9, 1998
Congressional Supremacy in Admiralty Survival Actions: Dooley v. Korean Air Lines Co. Introduction Dooley v. Korean Air Lines Co., 524 U.S. 116 (1998), presents a pivotal moment in admiralty law...
Supreme Court Clarifies COBRA Eligibility: Geissal v. Moore Medical Corp.

Supreme Court Clarifies COBRA Eligibility: Geissal v. Moore Medical Corp.

Date: Jun 9, 1998
Supreme Court Clarifies COBRA Eligibility: Geissal v. Moore Medical Corp. Introduction In the landmark case of Geissal, Beneficiary and Representative of the Estate of Geissal, Deceased v. Moore...
Supreme Court Holds "Carry" Includes Firearm Transport in Vehicles under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)

Supreme Court Holds "Carry" Includes Firearm Transport in Vehicles under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)

Date: Jun 9, 1998
Supreme Court Holds "Carry" Includes Firearm Transport in Vehicles under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) Introduction MUSCARELLO v. UNITED STATES (524 U.S. 125, 1998) is a landmark decision by the United...
Limitations on Lesser Included Offense Instructions in Felony Murder Trials: Hopkins v. Reeves

Limitations on Lesser Included Offense Instructions in Felony Murder Trials: Hopkins v. Reeves

Date: Jun 9, 1998
Limitations on Lesser Included Offense Instructions in Felony Murder Trials: Hopkins v. Reeves Introduction Hopkins, Warden v. Reeves, 524 U.S. 88 (1998), is a landmark decision by the United States...
UNITED STATES v. BEGGERLY ET AL.: Clarifying Jurisdictional Boundaries Under Rule 60(b) and the Quiet Title Act

UNITED STATES v. BEGGERLY ET AL.: Clarifying Jurisdictional Boundaries Under Rule 60(b) and the Quiet Title Act

Date: Jun 9, 1998
UNITED STATES v. BEGGERLY ET AL.: Clarifying Jurisdictional Boundaries Under Rule 60(b) and the Quiet Title Act Introduction UNITED STATES v. BEGGERLY ET AL., 524 U.S. 38 (1998), is a landmark...
Affirmation of Voter Standing Under FECA: Analysis of Federal Election Commission v. Akins et al.

Affirmation of Voter Standing Under FECA: Analysis of Federal Election Commission v. Akins et al.

Date: Jun 2, 1998
Affirmation of Voter Standing Under FECA: Analysis of Federal Election Commission v. Akins et al. Introduction The Supreme Court case Federal Election Commission v. Akins et al., 524 U.S. 11 (1998),...
Venue Determination in Money Laundering Cases: Insights from UNITED STATES v. CABRALES

Venue Determination in Money Laundering Cases: Insights from UNITED STATES v. CABRALES

Date: Jun 2, 1998
Venue Determination in Money Laundering Cases: Insights from UNITED STATES v. CABRALES Introduction UNITED STATES v. CABRALES (524 U.S. 1, 1998) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
Limitations on Declaratory Judgments in Federal Habeas Proceedings: Insights from Calderon v. Ashmus

Limitations on Declaratory Judgments in Federal Habeas Proceedings: Insights from Calderon v. Ashmus

Date: May 27, 1998
Limitations on Declaratory Judgments in Federal Habeas Proceedings: Insights from Calderon v. Ashmus Introduction Arthur Calderon, Warden, et al. v. Troy A. Ashmus (523 U.S. 740, 1998) is a pivotal...
Tribal Sovereign Immunity in Commercial Activities: Insights from Kiowa Tribe v. Manufacturing Technologies

Tribal Sovereign Immunity in Commercial Activities: Insights from Kiowa Tribe v. Manufacturing Technologies

Date: May 27, 1998
Tribal Sovereign Immunity in Commercial Activities: Insights from Kiowa Tribe v. Manufacturing Technologies Introduction The landmark case Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma v. Manufacturing Technologies, Inc.,...
New Jersey v. New York: Sovereignty Over Ellis Island Established

New Jersey v. New York: Sovereignty Over Ellis Island Established

Date: May 27, 1998
New Jersey v. New York: Sovereignty Over Ellis Island Established Introduction The case of State of New Jersey v. State of New York, 523 U.S. 767 (1998), addressed a long-standing boundary dispute...
Substantive Due Process in High-Speed Police Pursuits: County of Sacramento v. Philip Lewis Estate

Substantive Due Process in High-Speed Police Pursuits: County of Sacramento v. Philip Lewis Estate

Date: May 27, 1998
Substantive Due Process in High-Speed Police Pursuits: County of Sacramento v. Philip Lewis Estate Introduction In County of Sacramento v. Philip Lewis Estate, 523 U.S. 833 (1998), the United States...
Agency-Fee Objectors Exempted from Mandatory Arbitration Exhaustion: ALPA v. Miller Commentary

Agency-Fee Objectors Exempted from Mandatory Arbitration Exhaustion: ALPA v. Miller Commentary

Date: May 27, 1998
Agency-Fee Objectors Exempted from Mandatory Arbitration Exhaustion: ALPA v. Miller Commentary Introduction Air Line Pilots Association, Petitioner v. Robert A. Miller et al., 523 U.S. 866 (1998),...
Affirming Non-Taxpayer Bar to Tax Refund Claims: MONTANA v. CROW TRIBE OF INDIANS

Affirming Non-Taxpayer Bar to Tax Refund Claims: MONTANA v. CROW TRIBE OF INDIANS

Date: May 19, 1998
Affirming Non-Taxpayer Bar to Tax Refund Claims: MONTANA v. CROW TRIBE OF INDIANS Introduction The Supreme Court case Montana v. Crow Tribe of Indians, 523 U.S. 696 (1998), addresses the complex...
Bousley v. United States: Expanding Grounds for Collateral Attacks on Guilty Pleas

Bousley v. United States: Expanding Grounds for Collateral Attacks on Guilty Pleas

Date: May 19, 1998
Bousley v. United States: Expanding Grounds for Collateral Attacks on Guilty Pleas Introduction Bousley v. United States, 523 U.S. 614 (1998), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that addresses the...
MARTINEZ-VILLAREAL v. STEWART: Defining "Second or Successive" Habeas Applications under AEDPA

MARTINEZ-VILLAREAL v. STEWART: Defining "Second or Successive" Habeas Applications under AEDPA

Date: May 19, 1998
MARTINEZ-VILLAREAL v. STEWART: Defining "Second or Successive" Habeas Applications under AEDPA Introduction In MARTINEZ-VILLAREAL v. STEWART, 523 U.S. 637 (1998), the United States Supreme Court...
Ripeness Before Implementation: Supreme Court Limits Judicial Review of Forest Plans

Ripeness Before Implementation: Supreme Court Limits Judicial Review of Forest Plans

Date: May 19, 1998
Ripeness Before Implementation: Supreme Court Limits Judicial Review of Forest Plans Introduction Ohio Forestry Association, Inc. v. Sierra Club et al. (523 U.S. 726, 1998) is a pivotal United States...
Editorial Discretion in Public Broadcast Candidate Debates: Arkansas Educational Television Commission v. Forbes

Editorial Discretion in Public Broadcast Candidate Debates: Arkansas Educational Television Commission v. Forbes

Date: May 19, 1998
Editorial Discretion in Public Broadcast Candidate Debates: Arkansas Educational Television Commission v. Forbes Introduction In the landmark case Arkansas Educational Television Commission v. Ralph...
Limitation of § 301(a) Jurisdiction in Collective Bargaining Agreement Challenges: The Textron Lycoming v. UAW Decision

Limitation of § 301(a) Jurisdiction in Collective Bargaining Agreement Challenges: The Textron Lycoming v. UAW Decision

Date: May 19, 1998
Limitation of § 301(a) Jurisdiction in Collective Bargaining Agreement Challenges: The Textron Lycoming v. UAW Decision Introduction Textron Lycoming Reciprocating Engine Division, Avco Corp.,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert