Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Supreme Court Reinforces Prohibition of Statistical Sampling for Congressional Apportionment in Census Act

Supreme Court Reinforces Prohibition of Statistical Sampling for Congressional Apportionment in Census Act

Date: Jan 26, 1999
Supreme Court Reinforces Prohibition of Statistical Sampling for Congressional Apportionment in Census Act Introduction In the landmark case Department of Commerce et al. v. United States House of...
Expansion of FCC's Regulatory Authority in Local Telecommunications: ATT Corp. v. Iowa Utilities Board

Expansion of FCC's Regulatory Authority in Local Telecommunications: ATT Corp. v. Iowa Utilities Board

Date: Jan 26, 1999
Expansion of FCC's Regulatory Authority in Local Telecommunications: ATT Corp. v. Iowa Utilities Board Introduction The landmark case ATT Corp. et al. v. Iowa Utilities Board et al., decided by the...
ERISA Does Not Prohibit Amendments to Defined Benefit Plans: Hughes Aircraft Co. v. Jacobson

ERISA Does Not Prohibit Amendments to Defined Benefit Plans: Hughes Aircraft Co. v. Jacobson

Date: Jan 26, 1999
ERISA Does Not Prohibit Amendments to Defined Benefit Plans: Hughes Aircraft Co. v. Jacobson Introduction Hughes Aircraft Co. et al. v. Jacobson et al., 525 U.S. 432 (1999), is a landmark decision by...
RICO and McCarran-Ferguson Act: Federal and State Jurisdiction in Insurance Fraud Cases

RICO and McCarran-Ferguson Act: Federal and State Jurisdiction in Insurance Fraud Cases

Date: Jan 21, 1999
RICO and the McCarran-Ferguson Act: Federal and State Jurisdiction in Insurance Fraud Cases Introduction Humana Inc. et al. v. Forsyth et al., 525 U.S. 299 (1999), presents a pivotal Supreme Court...
Department of the Army v. Blue Fox, Inc.: Upholding Sovereign Immunity in Equitable Claims

Department of the Army v. Blue Fox, Inc.: Upholding Sovereign Immunity in Equitable Claims

Date: Jan 21, 1999
Department of the Army v. Blue Fox, Inc.: Upholding Sovereign Immunity in Equitable Claims Introduction In Department of the Army v. Blue Fox, Inc., 525 U.S. 255 (1999), the United States Supreme...
Extending §5 Preclearance Obligations to State-Mandated Voting Changes in Covered Jurisdictions: LOPEZ v. MONTEREY COUNTY

Extending §5 Preclearance Obligations to State-Mandated Voting Changes in Covered Jurisdictions: LOPEZ v. MONTEREY COUNTY

Date: Jan 21, 1999
Extending §5 Preclearance Obligations to State-Mandated Voting Changes in Covered Jurisdictions: LOPEZ v. MONTEREY COUNTY Introduction Lopez et al. v. Monterey County et al. (525 U.S. 266) is a...
RICO's Applicability in Insurance Fraud Cases Under the McCarran-Ferguson Act: Analysis of Humana Inc. v. Forsyth

RICO's Applicability in Insurance Fraud Cases Under the McCarran-Ferguson Act: Analysis of Humana Inc. v. Forsyth

Date: Jan 21, 1999
RICO's Applicability in Insurance Fraud Cases Under the McCarran-Ferguson Act: Analysis of Humana Inc. v. Forsyth Introduction Humana Inc. et al. v. Forsyth et al. (525 U.S. 299) is a pivotal Supreme...
Clarifying EMTALA's Stabilization Requirement: No Need to Prove Improper Motive Under § 1395dd(b)

Clarifying EMTALA's Stabilization Requirement: No Need to Prove Improper Motive Under § 1395dd(b)

Date: Jan 14, 1999
Clarifying EMTALA's Stabilization Requirement: No Need to Prove Improper Motive Under § 1395dd(b) Introduction Roberts, Guardian for Johnson v. Galen of Virginia, Inc., et al. (525 U.S. 249, 1999) is...
City of West Covina v. Perkins: Due Process and Notice Requirements in Property Seizures

City of West Covina v. Perkins: Due Process and Notice Requirements in Property Seizures

Date: Jan 14, 1999
City of West Covina v. Perkins: Due Process and Notice Requirements in Property Seizures Introduction City of West Covina v. Perkins et al. (525 U.S. 234, 1999) is a pivotal United States Supreme...
Exclusivity of the Warsaw Convention: EL AL Israel Airlines, Ltd. v. Tsui Yuan Tseng

Exclusivity of the Warsaw Convention: EL AL Israel Airlines, Ltd. v. Tsui Yuan Tseng

Date: Jan 13, 1999
Exclusivity of the Warsaw Convention: EL AL Israel Airlines, Ltd. v. Tsui Yuan Tseng Introduction The case of EL AL Israel Airlines, Ltd. v. Tsui Yuan Tseng (525 U.S. 155) represents a pivotal moment...
Protecting Political Speech: Supreme Court Strikes Down Colorado Initiative Petition Restrictions

Protecting Political Speech: Supreme Court Strikes Down Colorado Initiative Petition Restrictions

Date: Jan 13, 1999
Protecting Political Speech: Supreme Court Strikes Down Colorado Initiative Petition Restrictions Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case BUCKLEY, SECRETARY OF STATE OF COLORADO v. AMERICAN...
Per Se Group Boycott Rule Limited to Horizontal Agreements: Insights from NYNEX Corp. v. Discon, Inc.

Per Se Group Boycott Rule Limited to Horizontal Agreements: Insights from NYNEX Corp. v. Discon, Inc.

Date: Dec 15, 1998
Per Se Group Boycott Rule Limited to Horizontal Agreements: Insights from NYNEX Corp. v. Discon, Inc. Introduction The Supreme Court case NYNEX Corp. et al. v. Discon, Inc., 525 U.S. 128 (1998),...
Calderon v. Coleman: Reinforcing the Application of Brecht's Harmless-Error Analysis in Habeas Corpus Review

Calderon v. Coleman: Reinforcing the Application of Brecht's Harmless-Error Analysis in Habeas Corpus Review

Date: Dec 15, 1998
Calderon v. Coleman: Reinforcing the Application of Brecht's Harmless-Error Analysis in Habeas Corpus Review Introduction Calderon v. Coleman is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
Haddle v. Garrison: Affirming §1985(2) Protection for At-Will Employment Interference

Haddle v. Garrison: Affirming §1985(2) Protection for At-Will Employment Interference

Date: Dec 15, 1998
Haddle v. Garrison: Affirming §1985(2) Protection for At-Will Employment Interference Introduction Haddle v. Garrison et al., 525 U.S. 121 (1998), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
Limits of the "Search Incident to Citation" Exception Under the Fourth Amendment

Limits of the "Search Incident to Citation" Exception Under the Fourth Amendment

Date: Dec 9, 1998
Limits of the "Search Incident to Citation" Exception Under the Fourth Amendment Introduction Knowles v. Iowa, 525 U.S. 113 (1998), represents a pivotal moment in the interpretation of the Fourth...
Minnesota v. Carter: Clarification of Fourth Amendment Rights for Temporary Visitors

Minnesota v. Carter: Clarification of Fourth Amendment Rights for Temporary Visitors

Date: Dec 2, 1998
Minnesota v. Carter: Clarification of Fourth Amendment Rights for Temporary Visitors Introduction Minnesota v. Carter (525 U.S. 83, 1998) is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States Supreme...
Wright v. Universal Maritime Service Corp.: Affirming Judicial Forum Rights under the ADA

Wright v. Universal Maritime Service Corp.: Affirming Judicial Forum Rights under the ADA

Date: Nov 17, 1998
Wright v. Universal Maritime Service Corp.: Affirming Judicial Forum Rights under the ADA Introduction In Wright v. Universal Maritime Service Corp. et al., 525 U.S. 70 (1998), the United States...
Establishing the On-Sale Bar in Patent Law: PFAFF v. WELLS ELECTRONICS, INC.

Establishing the On-Sale Bar in Patent Law: PFAFF v. WELLS ELECTRONICS, INC.

Date: Nov 11, 1998
Establishing the On-Sale Bar in Patent Law: PFAFF v. WELLS ELECTRONICS, INC. Introduction PFAFF v. WELLS ELECTRONICS, INC., 525 U.S. 55 (1998), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
Enhancing Presidential Security: The Case for Secret Service Evidentiary Privilege

Enhancing Presidential Security: The Case for Secret Service Evidentiary Privilege

Date: Nov 10, 1998
Enhancing Presidential Security: The Case for Secret Service Evidentiary Privilege Introduction The case of Rubin, Secretary of the Treasury, et al. v. United States, through the Independent Counsel,...
Marquez v. Screen Actors Guild: Affirming the Scope of the Duty of Fair Representation in Union Security Clauses

Marquez v. Screen Actors Guild: Affirming the Scope of the Duty of Fair Representation in Union Security Clauses

Date: Nov 4, 1998
Marquez v. Screen Actors Guild: Affirming the Scope of the Duty of Fair Representation in Union Security Clauses Introduction MARQUEZ v. SCREEN ACTORS GUILD, INC., et al. (525 U.S. 33, 1998) is a...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert