Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Limitation of Pro Se Representation: No Constitutional Right on Direct Appeals Introduction Salvador Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District is a landmark decision by the...
Driver's Privacy Protection Act of 1994: Upholding Federal Authority under the Commerce Clause Introduction Background, Key Issues, and Parties Involved The case of Reno et al. v. Condon et al.,...
Establishing Citizen Standing for Civil Penalties under the Clean Water Act: Friends of the Earth v. Laidlaw Introduction Friends of the Earth, Incorporated, et al., Petitioners v. Laidlaw...
Reaffirming Strict Scrutiny in Federal Affirmative Action: Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Rodney Slater Introduction Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Rodney Slater is a seminal case decided by the United...
Illinois v. Wardlow: Reevaluating Reasonable Suspicion in Police Stops Introduction Illinois v. Wardlow (528 U.S. 119) is a pivotal Supreme Court case that delves into the nuances of the Fourth...
Troxel v. Granville: Affirming Fundamental Parental Rights over Broad Grandparent Visitation Statutes Introduction Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (2000), is a landmark decision by the United States...
Defense Counsel's Agreement as Waiver of Interstate Agreement on Detainers Rights: New Precedent in New York v. Hill Introduction New York v. Hill (528 U.S. 110) is a landmark decision by the United...
Limits on Congressional Power to Abrogate State Sovereign Immunity under the ADEA Introduction In J. Daniel Kimel, Jr., et al., Petitioners v. Florida Board of Regents et al., 528 U.S. 62 (2000), the...
Overbreadth Doctrine in First Amendment Challenges: LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT v. UNITED REPORTING PUBLISHING CORPORATION Introduction In the landmark case of Los Angeles Police Department v....
Drye v. United States: Federal Tax Liens and the Nature of Property Interests Introduction Rohn F. Drye, Jr. v. United States, 528 U.S. 49 (1999), is a significant Supreme Court case that delves into...
FIORE v. WHITE: Clarifying Retroactive Application of Statutory Interpretations in Criminal Convictions Introduction FIORE v. WHITE is a significant case adjudicated by the United States Supreme...
Enhanced Standards for Rule 23(b)(1)(B) Class Action Certification in Ortiz v. Fibreboard Introduction In Esteban Ortiz, et al., Petitioners v. Fibreboard Corporation et al., the U.S. Supreme Court...
Supreme Court Limits Congressional Power to Abrogate State Sovereign Immunity in Patent Infringement: Florida Prepaid v. College Savings Bank Introduction The Supreme Court case Florida Prepaid...
Supreme Court Upholds State Sovereign Immunity Against False Advertising Claims Under TRCA Introduction In COLLEGE SAVINGS BANK v. FLORIDA PREPAID Postsecondary Education Expense Board, 527 U.S. 666...
Sovereign Immunity Reinforced: Limits on Congressional Power to Subject Nonconsenting States to Private Suits in Their Own Courts Introduction In the landmark case of John H. Alden, et al.,...
Kolstad v. American Dental Association: Employer's State of Mind as Basis for Punitive Damages Under Title VII Introduction Kolstad v. American Dental Association is a landmark decision by the United...
ADA Title II Integration Mandate in Tommy Olmstead et al. v. L.C. (527 U.S. 581) Introduction The landmark decision in Tommy Olmstead, Commissioner, Georgia Department of Human Resources, et al.,...
Re-defining Disability Under the ADA: Monocular Vision and Employment Standards Introduction Albertsons, Inc. v. Hallie Kirkingburg is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case decided on June 22, 1999. The...
Murphy v. UPS: Refining ADA Disability Assessments in the Context of Mitigating Measures Introduction In Vaughn L. Murphy v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 527 U.S. 516 (1999), the United States...
United States v. Sutton and Hinton: Redefining Disability Under the ADA Introduction United States v. Sutton and Hinton, 527 U.S. 471 (1999), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that significantly...