Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

FDA Lacks Authority to Regulate Tobacco Under the FDCA

FDA Lacks Authority to Regulate Tobacco Under the FDCA

Date: Mar 22, 2000
FDA Lacks Authority to Regulate Tobacco Under the FDCA Introduction Food and Drug Administration, et al. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation et al. (529 U.S. 120, 2000) is a landmark Supreme...
Cortez Byrd Chips, Inc. v. Bill Harbert Construction Company: Expanding Venue Flexibility under the FAA

Cortez Byrd Chips, Inc. v. Bill Harbert Construction Company: Expanding Venue Flexibility under the FAA

Date: Mar 22, 2000
Cortez Byrd Chips, Inc. v. Bill Harbert Construction Company: Expanding Venue Flexibility under the FAA Introduction Cortez Byrd Chips, Inc. v. Bill Harbert Construction Company, 529 U.S. 193 (2000),...
Federal Preemption of State Oil Tanker Regulations Confirmed in United States v. Locke, Intertanko (2000)

Federal Preemption of State Oil Tanker Regulations Confirmed in United States v. Locke, Intertanko (2000)

Date: Mar 7, 2000
Federal Preemption of State Oil Tanker Regulations Confirmed in United States v. Locke, Intertanko (2000) Introduction The case of United States v. Locke, Intertanko, decided by the U.S. Supreme...
Portuondo v. Agard: Affirming Prosecutorial Rights to Comment on Defendant's Testimonial Tailoring

Portuondo v. Agard: Affirming Prosecutorial Rights to Comment on Defendant's Testimonial Tailoring

Date: Mar 7, 2000
Portuondo v. Agard: Affirming Prosecutorial Rights to Comment on Defendant's Testimonial Tailoring Introduction Portuondo v. Agard, 529 U.S. 61 (2000), is a pivotal United States Supreme Court...
Supervised Release Commencement: Strict Interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 3624(e) in United States v. Roy Lee Johnson

Supervised Release Commencement: Strict Interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 3624(e) in United States v. Roy Lee Johnson

Date: Mar 2, 2000
Supervised Release Commencement: Strict Interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 3624(e) in United States v. Roy Lee Johnson Introduction United States v. Roy Lee Johnson, 529 U.S. 53 (2000), is a landmark...
Shalala v. Illinois Council on Long Term Care: § 405(h) Bars Federal-Question Jurisdiction in Medicare Provider Challenges

Shalala v. Illinois Council on Long Term Care: § 405(h) Bars Federal-Question Jurisdiction in Medicare Provider Challenges

Date: Mar 1, 2000
Shalala v. Illinois Council on Long Term Care: § 405(h) Bars Federal-Question Jurisdiction in Medicare Provider Challenges Introduction In Shalala v. Illinois Council on Long Term Care, Inc., the...
Flores-ORTEGA v. ROE: Redefining the Standard for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Appeal Procedures

Flores-ORTEGA v. ROE: Redefining the Standard for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Appeal Procedures

Date: Feb 24, 2000
Flores-ORTEGA v. ROE: Redefining the Standard for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Appeal Procedures Introduction Flores-ORTEGA v. ROE (528 U.S. 470, 2000) is a significant United States Supreme...
ERISA Fiduciary Duty Does Not Extend to HMO Physician Treatment Decisions

ERISA Fiduciary Duty Does Not Extend to HMO Physician Treatment Decisions

Date: Feb 24, 2000
ERISA Fiduciary Duty Does Not Extend to HMO Physician Treatment Decisions Introduction Lori Pagram, et al., Petitioners v. Cynthia Herdrich, 530 U.S. 211 (2000), presents a pivotal moment in the...
RICE v. CAYETANO and the Fifteenth Amendment: Racial Voting Restrictions Invalidated

RICE v. CAYETANO and the Fifteenth Amendment: Racial Voting Restrictions Invalidated

Date: Feb 24, 2000
RICE v. CAYETANO and the Fifteenth Amendment: Racial Voting Restrictions Invalidated Introduction RICE v. CAYETANO, 528 U.S. 495 (2000), represents a pivotal moment in American constitutional law,...
Establishing the Fixed Limitations Period for Civil RICO Claims: Rejection of the Injury and Pattern Discovery Rule

Establishing the Fixed Limitations Period for Civil RICO Claims: Rejection of the Injury and Pattern Discovery Rule

Date: Feb 24, 2000
Establishing the Fixed Limitations Period for Civil RICO Claims: Rejection of the Injury and Pattern Discovery Rule Introduction Mark Rotella v. Angela M. Wood et al., 528 U.S. 549 (2000), is a...
United States v. Hubbell: Expanding Fifth Amendment Protections in Document Production

United States v. Hubbell: Expanding Fifth Amendment Protections in Document Production

Date: Feb 23, 2000
United States v. Hubbell: Expanding Fifth Amendment Protections in Document Production Introduction United States v. Webster L. Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27 (2000), is a landmark Supreme Court decision that...
Supreme Court Ruling on Impermissible State Taxation of Nonunitary Income: Hunt-Wesson, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board of California

Supreme Court Ruling on Impermissible State Taxation of Nonunitary Income: Hunt-Wesson, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board of California

Date: Feb 23, 2000
Supreme Court Ruling on Impermissible State Taxation of Nonunitary Income: Hunt-Wesson, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board of California 1. Introduction Hunt-Wesson, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board of...
Deemed Payment of Tax Remittances: Insights from Baral v. United States

Deemed Payment of Tax Remittances: Insights from Baral v. United States

Date: Feb 23, 2000
Deemed Payment of Tax Remittances: Insights from Baral v. United States Introduction In Baral v. United States, 528 U.S. 431 (2000), the United States Supreme Court addressed critical issues...
Appellate Authority in Judgments as a Matter of Law: WEISGRAM v. MARLEY COMPANY

Appellate Authority in Judgments as a Matter of Law: WEISGRAM v. MARLEY COMPANY

Date: Feb 23, 2000
Appellate Authority in Judgments as a Matter of Law: WEISGRAM v. MARLEY COMPANY Introduction WEISGRAM v. MARLEY COMPANY, 528 U.S. 440 (2000), is a pivotal Supreme Court decision that clarifies the...
Reno v. Bossier Parish School Board: Section 5 Voting Rights Act and Nonretrogressive Discriminatory Purpose

Reno v. Bossier Parish School Board: Section 5 Voting Rights Act and Nonretrogressive Discriminatory Purpose

Date: Jan 25, 2000
Reno v. Bossier Parish School Board: Section 5 Voting Rights Act and Nonretrogressive Discriminatory Purpose Introduction Reno v. Bossier Parish School Board, 528 U.S. 320 (2000), is a pivotal United...
State Contribution Limits on Political Campaigns Upheld: Extending BUCKLEY v. VALEO

State Contribution Limits on Political Campaigns Upheld: Extending BUCKLEY v. VALEO

Date: Jan 25, 2000
State Contribution Limits on Political Campaigns Upheld: Extending BUCKLEY v. VALEO Introduction In the landmark case of Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General of Missouri, et al. v. Shrink...
Martinez-Salazar Decision: Upholding Peremptory Challenge Rights under Federal Rules

Martinez-Salazar Decision: Upholding Peremptory Challenge Rights under Federal Rules

Date: Jan 20, 2000
Martinez-Salazar Decision: Upholding Peremptory Challenge Rights under Federal Rules Introduction United States v. Abel Martinez-Salazar is a landmark 2000 decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Clarifying Jury Instructions in Capital Sentencing: Analysis of Weeks v. Angelone

Clarifying Jury Instructions in Capital Sentencing: Analysis of Weeks v. Angelone

Date: Jan 20, 2000
Clarifying Jury Instructions in Capital Sentencing: Analysis of Weeks v. Angelone Introduction Weeks v. Angelone, 528 U.S. 225 (2000), is a significant U.S. Supreme Court case that delves into the...
Supreme Court Upholds California's Wende Procedure for Appointed Appellate Counsel: Smith v. Robbins

Supreme Court Upholds California's Wende Procedure for Appointed Appellate Counsel: Smith v. Robbins

Date: Jan 20, 2000
Supreme Court Upholds California's Wende Procedure for Appointed Appellate Counsel: Smith v. Robbins Introduction In George Smith, Warden, Petitioner v. Lee Robbins (528 U.S. 259, 2000), the United...
Gutierrez v. Ada and Camacho: Defining Majority in Guamanian Gubernatorial Elections

Gutierrez v. Ada and Camacho: Defining Majority in Guamanian Gubernatorial Elections

Date: Jan 20, 2000
Gutierrez v. Ada and Camacho: Defining Majority in Guamanian Gubernatorial Elections Introduction Gutierrez v. Ada and Camacho, 528 U.S. 250 (2000), is a landmark decision by the United States...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert