Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Expanding Supervised Release Authority: Lessons from Cornell Johnson v. United States

Expanding Supervised Release Authority: Lessons from Cornell Johnson v. United States

Date: May 16, 2000
Expanding Supervised Release Authority: Lessons from Cornell Johnson v. United States Introduction Cornell Johnson v. United States, 529 U.S. 694 (2000), is a landmark decision by the United States...
Supreme Court Upholds Interior Department's Regulatory Authority under the Taylor Grazing Act

Supreme Court Upholds Interior Department's Regulatory Authority under the Taylor Grazing Act

Date: May 16, 2000
Supreme Court Upholds Interior Department's Regulatory Authority under the Taylor Grazing Act Introduction In the landmark case Public Lands Council, et al. v. Bruce Babbitt, Secretary of the...
Retroactive Sufficiency of Evidence and Ex Post Facto Protections in Carmell v. Texas

Retroactive Sufficiency of Evidence and Ex Post Facto Protections in Carmell v. Texas

Date: May 2, 2000
Retroactive Sufficiency of Evidence and Ex Post Facto Protections in Carmell v. Texas Introduction Scott Leslie Carmell was convicted in 1996 of 15 counts of sexual offenses against his stepdaughter,...
Supreme Court Upholds Authority of Public Employers to Mandate Use of Compensatory Time Under FLSA

Supreme Court Upholds Authority of Public Employers to Mandate Use of Compensatory Time Under FLSA

Date: May 2, 2000
Supreme Court Upholds Authority of Public Employers to Mandate Use of Compensatory Time Under FLSA Introduction In the landmark case of Edward Christensen, et al. v. Harris County et al., decided on...
Injury from Non-Racketeering Overt Acts Precludes RICO Conspiracy Claims: An Analysis of BECK v. PRUPIS

Injury from Non-Racketeering Overt Acts Precludes RICO Conspiracy Claims: An Analysis of BECK v. PRUPIS

Date: Apr 27, 2000
Injury from Non-Racketeering Overt Acts Precludes RICO Conspiracy Claims: An Analysis of BECK v. PRUPIS Introduction The case of Robert A. Beck, II v. Ronald M. Prupis et al. (529 U.S. 494) is a...
Slack v. McDaniel: Enhancing Habeas Corpus Appeal Procedures Under AEDPA

Slack v. McDaniel: Enhancing Habeas Corpus Appeal Procedures Under AEDPA

Date: Apr 27, 2000
Slack v. McDaniel: Enhancing Habeas Corpus Appeal Procedures Under AEDPA Introduction Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473 (2000), is a pivotal Supreme Court case that addresses the procedural mechanisms...
Due Process Requirements in Amending Judgments: Nelson v. Adams USA, Inc.

Due Process Requirements in Amending Judgments: Nelson v. Adams USA, Inc.

Date: Apr 26, 2000
Due Process Requirements in Amending Judgments: Nelson v. Adams USA, Inc. Introduction Nelson v. Adams USA, Inc., 529 U.S. 460 (2000) is a landmark United States Supreme Court case that addresses the...
Procedural Defaults and Ineffective Assistance in Federal Habeas Corpus: Edwards v. Carpenter

Procedural Defaults and Ineffective Assistance in Federal Habeas Corpus: Edwards v. Carpenter

Date: Apr 26, 2000
Procedural Defaults and Ineffective Assistance in Federal Habeas Corpus: Edwards v. Carpenter Analysis Introduction Ronald D. Edwards, Warden, Petitioner v. Robert W. Carpenter (529 U.S. 446) is a...
Limits of Res Judicata in Tribal Water Rights Claims: ARIZONA v. CALIFORNIA (530 U.S. 392, 2000)

Limits of Res Judicata in Tribal Water Rights Claims: ARIZONA v. CALIFORNIA (530 U.S. 392, 2000)

Date: Apr 26, 2000
Limits of Res Judicata in Tribal Water Rights Claims: ARIZONA v. CALIFORNIA (530 U.S. 392, 2000) Introduction ARIZONA v. CALIFORNIA, 530 U.S. 392 (2000), is a landmark case adjudicated by the United...
Clarifying § 924(c)(1): Application of "Machinegun" as a Distinct Element in Federal Firearm Offenses

Clarifying § 924(c)(1): Application of "Machinegun" as a Distinct Element in Federal Firearm Offenses

Date: Apr 25, 2000
Clarifying § 924(c)(1): Application of "Machinegun" as a Distinct Element in Federal Firearm Offenses Introduction Jaime Castillo, et al., Petitioners v. United States (530 U.S. 120, 2000) is a...
WILLIAMS v. TAYLOR: Defining "Failure to Develop" Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(e)(2)

WILLIAMS v. TAYLOR: Defining "Failure to Develop" Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(e)(2)

Date: Apr 19, 2000
WILLIAMS v. TAYLOR: Defining "Failure to Develop" Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(e)(2) Introduction WILLIAMS v. TAYLOR, Warden, decided by the United States Supreme Court on April 18, 2000, addresses pivotal...
Supreme Court Clarifies Federal Habeas Relief Standards under AEDPA in WILLIAMS v. TAYLOR

Supreme Court Clarifies Federal Habeas Relief Standards under AEDPA in WILLIAMS v. TAYLOR

Date: Apr 19, 2000
Supreme Court Clarifies Federal Habeas Relief Standards under AEDPA in WILLIAMS v. TAYLOR Introduction WILLIAMS v. TAYLOR, Warden, 529 U.S. 362 (2000), is a landmark decision by the United States...
Federal Preemption of State Tort Claims in Railroad Safety: Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Shanklin

Federal Preemption of State Tort Claims in Railroad Safety: Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Shanklin

Date: Apr 18, 2000
Federal Preemption of State Tort Claims in Railroad Safety: Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Shanklin Introduction Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Shanklin, 529 U.S. 344 (2000), is a landmark Supreme...
Bond v. United States: Establishing Physical Manipulation of Carry-On Luggage as an Unreasonable Fourth Amendment Search

Bond v. United States: Establishing Physical Manipulation of Carry-On Luggage as an Unreasonable Fourth Amendment Search

Date: Apr 18, 2000
Bond v. United States: Establishing Physical Manipulation of Carry-On Luggage as an Unreasonable Fourth Amendment Search Introduction Bond v. United States, 529 U.S. 334 (2000), is a landmark Supreme...
Content-Neutral Regulation of Public Nudity: A Comprehensive Analysis of City of Erie v. Pap's A.M. DBA Kandyland

Content-Neutral Regulation of Public Nudity: A Comprehensive Analysis of City of Erie v. Pap's A.M. DBA Kandyland

Date: Mar 30, 2000
Content-Neutral Regulation of Public Nudity: A Comprehensive Analysis of City of Erie v. Pap's A.M. DBA Kandyland Introduction The Supreme Court case City of Erie, et al. v. Pap's A.M. DBA...
Issue Exhaustion Not Required for Judicial Review in Social Security Claims

Issue Exhaustion Not Required for Judicial Review in Social Security Claims

Date: Mar 29, 2000
Issue Exhaustion Not Required for Judicial Review in Social Security Claims Introduction Juatassa Sims v. Kenneth Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 530 U.S. 103 (2000), is a landmark U.S....
Ex Post Facto Implications in Parole Rule Amendments: Garner v. Jones Analysis

Ex Post Facto Implications in Parole Rule Amendments: Garner v. Jones Analysis

Date: Mar 29, 2000
Ex Post Facto Implications in Parole Rule Amendments: Garner v. Jones Analysis Introduction The landmark case Garner v. Jones, 529 U.S. 244 (2000), deliberated on the constitutional boundaries of...
Florida v. J.L.: Strengthening the Reliability Requirement for Anonymous Tips in Fourth Amendment Investigations

Florida v. J.L.: Strengthening the Reliability Requirement for Anonymous Tips in Fourth Amendment Investigations

Date: Mar 29, 2000
Florida v. J.L.: Strengthening the Reliability Requirement for Anonymous Tips in Fourth Amendment Investigations Introduction Florida v. J.L., 529 U.S. 266 (2000), is a landmark United States Supreme...
Walmart v. Samara Brothers: Establishing the Necessity of Secondary Meaning for Unregistered Trade Dress Protection

Walmart v. Samara Brothers: Establishing the Necessity of Secondary Meaning for Unregistered Trade Dress Protection

Date: Mar 23, 2000
Walmart v. Samara Brothers: Establishing the Necessity of Secondary Meaning for Unregistered Trade Dress Protection Introduction Walmart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Brothers, Inc., 529 U.S. 205 (2000), is...
Southworth v. Board of Regents: Affirming Viewpoint Neutrality in Mandatory Student Fees

Southworth v. Board of Regents: Affirming Viewpoint Neutrality in Mandatory Student Fees

Date: Mar 23, 2000
Southworth v. Board of Regents: Affirming Viewpoint Neutrality in Mandatory Student Fees Introduction In Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v. Scott Harold Southworth et al., 529...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert