Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Pre-emption of State Tort Actions by Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards: Insights from Geier v. American Honda Introduction In GEIER v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR COMPANY, Inc. (529 U.S. 861, 2000),...
Limiting Federal Arson Prosecution to Commerce-Related Use of Property: JONES v. UNITED STATES Introduction JONES v. UNITED STATES is a pivotal 2000 United States Supreme Court case that addressed...
Strict Scrutiny Affirmed for Content-Based Regulations: United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group Introduction The Supreme Court case United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc., 529 U.S....
Limitation of Congress' Authority under the Commerce Clause: Brzonkala v. Morrison et al. Introduction Brzonkala v. Morrison et al., 529 U.S. 598 (2000), is a significant case adjudicated by the...
Medicare Providers as Beneficiaries under 18 U.S.C. § 666(b): Supreme Court's Decision in Fischer v. United States Introduction In the landmark case of Jeffrey Allan Fischer v. United States (529...
Expanding Supervised Release Authority: Lessons from Cornell Johnson v. United States Introduction Cornell Johnson v. United States, 529 U.S. 694 (2000), is a landmark decision by the United States...
Supreme Court Upholds Interior Department's Regulatory Authority under the Taylor Grazing Act Introduction In the landmark case Public Lands Council, et al. v. Bruce Babbitt, Secretary of the...
Retroactive Sufficiency of Evidence and Ex Post Facto Protections in Carmell v. Texas Introduction Scott Leslie Carmell was convicted in 1996 of 15 counts of sexual offenses against his stepdaughter,...
Supreme Court Upholds Authority of Public Employers to Mandate Use of Compensatory Time Under FLSA Introduction In the landmark case of Edward Christensen, et al. v. Harris County et al., decided on...
Injury from Non-Racketeering Overt Acts Precludes RICO Conspiracy Claims: An Analysis of BECK v. PRUPIS Introduction The case of Robert A. Beck, II v. Ronald M. Prupis et al. (529 U.S. 494) is a...
Slack v. McDaniel: Enhancing Habeas Corpus Appeal Procedures Under AEDPA Introduction Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473 (2000), is a pivotal Supreme Court case that addresses the procedural mechanisms...
Due Process Requirements in Amending Judgments: Nelson v. Adams USA, Inc. Introduction Nelson v. Adams USA, Inc., 529 U.S. 460 (2000) is a landmark United States Supreme Court case that addresses the...
Procedural Defaults and Ineffective Assistance in Federal Habeas Corpus: Edwards v. Carpenter Analysis Introduction Ronald D. Edwards, Warden, Petitioner v. Robert W. Carpenter (529 U.S. 446) is a...
Limits of Res Judicata in Tribal Water Rights Claims: ARIZONA v. CALIFORNIA (530 U.S. 392, 2000) Introduction ARIZONA v. CALIFORNIA, 530 U.S. 392 (2000), is a landmark case adjudicated by the United...
Clarifying § 924(c)(1): Application of "Machinegun" as a Distinct Element in Federal Firearm Offenses Introduction Jaime Castillo, et al., Petitioners v. United States (530 U.S. 120, 2000) is a...
WILLIAMS v. TAYLOR: Defining "Failure to Develop" Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(e)(2) Introduction WILLIAMS v. TAYLOR, Warden, decided by the United States Supreme Court on April 18, 2000, addresses pivotal...
Supreme Court Clarifies Federal Habeas Relief Standards under AEDPA in WILLIAMS v. TAYLOR Introduction WILLIAMS v. TAYLOR, Warden, 529 U.S. 362 (2000), is a landmark decision by the United States...
Federal Preemption of State Tort Claims in Railroad Safety: Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Shanklin Introduction Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Shanklin, 529 U.S. 344 (2000), is a landmark Supreme...
Bond v. United States: Establishing Physical Manipulation of Carry-On Luggage as an Unreasonable Fourth Amendment Search Introduction Bond v. United States, 529 U.S. 334 (2000), is a landmark Supreme...
Content-Neutral Regulation of Public Nudity: A Comprehensive Analysis of City of Erie v. Pap's A.M. DBA Kandyland Introduction The Supreme Court case City of Erie, et al. v. Pap's A.M. DBA...