Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Miranda: Dickerson v. United States Reinforces Constitutional Safeguards Against Coerced Confessions

Affirmation of Miranda: Dickerson v. United States Reinforces Constitutional Safeguards Against Coerced Confessions

Date: Jun 27, 2000
Affirmation of Miranda: Dickerson v. United States Reinforces Constitutional Safeguards Against Coerced Confessions Introduction Charles Thomas Dickerson v. United States, 530 U.S. 428 (2000), is a...
Mandatory Operation of PLRA's Automatic Stay Upheld: Analyzing Miller v. French et al.

Mandatory Operation of PLRA's Automatic Stay Upheld: Analyzing Miller v. French et al.

Date: Jun 20, 2000
Mandatory Operation of PLRA's Automatic Stay Upheld: Analyzing Miller v. French et al. Introduction In Charles B. Miller, Superintendent, Pendleton Correctional Facility, et al. v. Richard A. French...
Supremacy of Federal Law Over State Sanctions: Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council

Supremacy of Federal Law Over State Sanctions: Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council

Date: Jun 20, 2000
Supremacy of Federal Law Over State Sanctions: Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council Introduction Crosby, Secretary of Administration and Finance of Massachusetts, et al. v. National Foreign Trade...
Santa Fe Independent School District v. Jane Doe: Establishing Limits on Student-Led Prayer in Public Schools

Santa Fe Independent School District v. Jane Doe: Establishing Limits on Student-Led Prayer in Public Schools

Date: Jun 20, 2000
Santa Fe Independent School District v. Jane Doe: Establishing Limits on Student-Led Prayer in Public Schools Introduction In the landmark case of Santa Fe Independent School District v. Jane Doe,...
Supreme Court Expands ERISA §502(a)(3) to Allow Suits Against Nonfiduciaries: Comprehensive Analysis of Harris Trust v. Salomon Smith Barney Inc., 530 U.S. 238 (2000)

Supreme Court Expands ERISA §502(a)(3) to Allow Suits Against Nonfiduciaries: Comprehensive Analysis of Harris Trust v. Salomon Smith Barney Inc., 530 U.S. 238 (2000)

Date: Jun 13, 2000
Supreme Court Expands ERISA §502(a)(3) to Allow Suits Against Nonfiduciaries Introduction The case of Harris Trust and Savings Bank, etc., Petitioners v. Salomon Smith Barney Inc., et al. (530 U.S....
Supreme Court Upholds Non-Fiduciary Status of HMO Decisions under ERISA: Pegram v. Herdrich

Supreme Court Upholds Non-Fiduciary Status of HMO Decisions under ERISA: Pegram v. Herdrich

Date: Jun 13, 2000
Supreme Court Upholds Non-Fiduciary Status of HMO Decisions under ERISA: Pegram v. Herdrich Introduction In PEGRAM et al. v. HERDRICH, 530 U.S. 211 (2000), the United States Supreme Court addressed...
REEVES v. SANDERSON PLUMBING PRODUCTS, INC.: Establishing Standards for Proving Age Discrimination

REEVES v. SANDERSON PLUMBING PRODUCTS, INC.: Establishing Standards for Proving Age Discrimination

Date: Jun 13, 2000
REEVES v. SANDERSON PLUMBING PRODUCTS, INC.: Establishing Standards for Proving Age Discrimination Introduction REEVES v. SANDERSON PLUMBING PRODUCTS, INC. is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court...
RAMDASS v. ANGELONE: Clarifying the Boundaries of Simmons in Parole Ineligibility Instructions

RAMDASS v. ANGELONE: Clarifying the Boundaries of Simmons in Parole Ineligibility Instructions

Date: Jun 13, 2000
RAMDASS v. ANGELONE: Clarifying the Boundaries of Simmons in Parole Ineligibility Instructions Introduction In the landmark case of Bobby Lee Ramdass v. Ronald J. Angelone, Director, Virginia...
Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products: Establishing the Sufficiency of Indirect Evidence in Age Discrimination Claims

Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products: Establishing the Sufficiency of Indirect Evidence in Age Discrimination Claims

Date: Jun 13, 2000
Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products: Establishing the Sufficiency of Indirect Evidence in Age Discrimination Claims Introduction REEVES v. SANDERSON PLUMBING PRODUCTS, INC. (530 U.S. 133, 2000) is...
Court Clarifies Lesser Included Offense Standards in Bank Robbery Cases

Court Clarifies Lesser Included Offense Standards in Bank Robbery Cases

Date: Jun 13, 2000
Court Clarifies Lesser Included Offense Standards in Bank Robbery Cases Introduction In Floyd J. Carter v. United States, 530 U.S. 255 (2000), the United States Supreme Court addressed a pivotal...
Mixed Eligibility and Treatment Decisions by HMOs Do Not Constitute ERISA Fiduciary Acts: Pegram v. Herdrich

Mixed Eligibility and Treatment Decisions by HMOs Do Not Constitute ERISA Fiduciary Acts: Pegram v. Herdrich

Date: Jun 13, 2000
Mixed Eligibility and Treatment Decisions by HMOs Do Not Constitute ERISA Fiduciary Acts: Pegram v. Herdrich Introduction In Pegram et al. v. Herdrich, 530 U.S. 211 (2000), the United States Supreme...
Exclusive Authority of Trustees under 11 U.S.C. §506(c): Insights from Hartford Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Union Planters Bank

Exclusive Authority of Trustees under 11 U.S.C. §506(c): Insights from Hartford Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Union Planters Bank

Date: May 31, 2000
Exclusive Authority of Trustees under 11 U.S.C. §506(c): Insights from Hartford Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Union Planters Bank Introduction The United States Supreme Court case Hartford...
Preserving Substantive Burden of Proof for Tax Claims in Bankruptcy: Raleigh v. Illinois Dept. of Revenue

Preserving Substantive Burden of Proof for Tax Claims in Bankruptcy: Raleigh v. Illinois Dept. of Revenue

Date: May 31, 2000
Preserving Substantive Burden of Proof for Tax Claims in Bankruptcy: Raleigh v. Illinois Dept. of Revenue Introduction The Supreme Court case Thomas E. Raleigh, Chapter 7 Trustee for the Estate of...
Limitation of False Claims Act: States Excluded from Qui Tam Liability

Limitation of False Claims Act: States Excluded from Qui Tam Liability

Date: May 23, 2000
Limitation of False Claims Act: States Excluded from Qui Tam Liability Introduction Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States ex rel. Stevens (529 U.S. 765) is a pivotal Supreme Court case...
Waiver of Objection in the Admission of Prior Convictions: Ohler v. United States

Waiver of Objection in the Admission of Prior Convictions: Ohler v. United States

Date: May 23, 2000
Waiver of Objection in the Admission of Prior Convictions: Ohler v. United States Introduction Maria Suzuki Ohler v. United States (529 U.S. 753, 2000) is a landmark Supreme Court case that addresses...
Pre-emption of State Tort Actions by Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards: Insights from Geier v. American Honda

Pre-emption of State Tort Actions by Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards: Insights from Geier v. American Honda

Date: May 23, 2000
Pre-emption of State Tort Actions by Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards: Insights from Geier v. American Honda Introduction In GEIER v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR COMPANY, Inc. (529 U.S. 861, 2000),...
Limiting Federal Arson Prosecution to Commerce-Related Use of Property: JONES v. UNITED STATES

Limiting Federal Arson Prosecution to Commerce-Related Use of Property: JONES v. UNITED STATES

Date: May 23, 2000
Limiting Federal Arson Prosecution to Commerce-Related Use of Property: JONES v. UNITED STATES Introduction JONES v. UNITED STATES is a pivotal 2000 United States Supreme Court case that addressed...
Strict Scrutiny Affirmed for Content-Based Regulations: United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group

Strict Scrutiny Affirmed for Content-Based Regulations: United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group

Date: May 23, 2000
Strict Scrutiny Affirmed for Content-Based Regulations: United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group Introduction The Supreme Court case United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc., 529 U.S....
Limitation of Congress' Authority under the Commerce Clause: Brzonkala v. Morrison et al.

Limitation of Congress' Authority under the Commerce Clause: Brzonkala v. Morrison et al.

Date: May 16, 2000
Limitation of Congress' Authority under the Commerce Clause: Brzonkala v. Morrison et al. Introduction Brzonkala v. Morrison et al., 529 U.S. 598 (2000), is a significant case adjudicated by the...
Medicare Providers as Beneficiaries under 18 U.S.C. § 666(b): Supreme Court's Decision in Fischer v. United States

Medicare Providers as Beneficiaries under 18 U.S.C. § 666(b): Supreme Court's Decision in Fischer v. United States

Date: May 16, 2000
Medicare Providers as Beneficiaries under 18 U.S.C. § 666(b): Supreme Court's Decision in Fischer v. United States Introduction In the landmark case of Jeffrey Allan Fischer v. United States (529...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert