Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Temporal Application of the Prison Litigation Reform Act's Attorney Fees Provision: Martin v. Hadix

Temporal Application of the Prison Litigation Reform Act's Attorney Fees Provision: Martin v. Hadix

Date: Jun 22, 1999
Temporal Application of the Prison Litigation Reform Act's Attorney Fees Provision: Martin v. Hadix Introduction Martin v. Hadix, 527 U.S. 343 (1999), is a pivotal Supreme Court case that addresses...
Eighth Amendment and Jury Deadlock Instructions: Louis Jones v. United States

Eighth Amendment and Jury Deadlock Instructions: Louis Jones v. United States

Date: Jun 22, 1999
Eighth Amendment and Jury Deadlock Instructions: Louis Jones v. United States Introduction Louis Jones, Petitioner v. United States (527 U.S. 373, 1999) is a landmark decision by the United States...
Supreme Court Upholds Nondiscriminatory Occupational Tax on Federal Judges' Compensation

Supreme Court Upholds Nondiscriminatory Occupational Tax on Federal Judges' Compensation

Date: Jun 22, 1999
Supreme Court Upholds Nondiscriminatory Occupational Tax on Federal Judges' Compensation Introduction In the landmark case of Jefferson County, Alabama v. William M. Acker, Jr., the United States...
OIG Investigators as Agency Representatives: Affirming Union Representation Rights under FSLMRS

OIG Investigators as Agency Representatives: Affirming Union Representation Rights under FSLMRS

Date: Jun 18, 1999
OIG Investigators as Agency Representatives: Affirming Union Representation Rights under FSLMRS Introduction In the landmark case of NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION, ETC., ET AL.,...
Brady Procedural Default and Exculpatory Evidence: Strickler v. Greene Commentary

Brady Procedural Default and Exculpatory Evidence: Strickler v. Greene Commentary

Date: Jun 18, 1999
Brady Procedural Default and Exculpatory Evidence: Strickler v. Greene Commentary Introduction Strickler v. Greene, 527 U.S. 263 (1999), is a significant United States Supreme Court decision that...
Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo v. Alliance Bond Fund: Clarifying the Scope of Preliminary Equitable Injunctions

Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo v. Alliance Bond Fund: Clarifying the Scope of Preliminary Equitable Injunctions

Date: Jun 18, 1999
Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo v. Alliance Bond Fund: Clarifying the Scope of Preliminary Equitable Injunctions Introduction The case of Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo, S.A., et al. v. Alliance Bond...
Broadcast Advertising of Lawful Private Casino Gambling Protected under First Amendment

Broadcast Advertising of Lawful Private Casino Gambling Protected under First Amendment

Date: Jun 15, 1999
Broadcast Advertising of Lawful Private Casino Gambling Protected under First Amendment Introduction Greater New Orleans Broadcasting Association, Inc., Etc., Petitioner v. United States et al. (527...
Final Decision Status of Rule 37(a)(4) Sanctions Against Attorneys: Cunningham v. Hamilton County

Final Decision Status of Rule 37(a)(4) Sanctions Against Attorneys: Cunningham v. Hamilton County

Date: Jun 15, 1999
Final Decision Status of Rule 37(a)(4) Sanctions Against Attorneys: Cunningham v. Hamilton County Introduction Cunningham v. Hamilton County, Ohio (527 U.S. 198) is a pivotal Supreme Court case...
EEOC's Authority to Award Compensatory Damages Affirmed in West v. Gibson

EEOC's Authority to Award Compensatory Damages Affirmed in West v. Gibson

Date: Jun 15, 1999
EEOC's Authority to Award Compensatory Damages Affirmed in West v. Gibson Introduction Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans Affairs v. Michael Gibson, 527 U.S. 212 (1999), is a landmark United...
Supreme Court Upholds APA Standards in PTO Factfinding Review

Supreme Court Upholds APA Standards in PTO Factfinding Review

Date: Jun 11, 1999
Supreme Court Upholds APA Standards in PTO Factfinding Review Introduction The case of Q. Todd Dickinson, Acting Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks v. Mary E. Zurko et al. (527 U.S. 150) presents...
Chicago's Gang Congregation Ordinance Struck Down: A Due Process Violation Due to Vagueness and Excessive Police Discretion

Chicago's Gang Congregation Ordinance Struck Down: A Due Process Violation Due to Vagueness and Excessive Police Discretion

Date: Jun 11, 1999
Chicago's Gang Congregation Ordinance Struck Down: A Due Process Violation Due to Vagueness and Excessive Police Discretion Introduction In the landmark case CITY OF CHICAGO v. MORALES et al., 527...
Confrontation Clause Reinforced: Accomplice Confessions Inocpating Defendants Excluded

Confrontation Clause Reinforced: Accomplice Confessions Inocpating Defendants Excluded

Date: Jun 11, 1999
Confrontation Clause Reinforced: Accomplice Confessions Inculpating Defendants Excluded Introduction In the landmark case of Benjamin Lee Lilly v. Virginia, the U.S. Supreme Court addressed critical...
Clarifying Harmless Error and Materiality in Federal Fraud Charges: Insights from Neder v. United States

Clarifying Harmless Error and Materiality in Federal Fraud Charges: Insights from Neder v. United States

Date: Jun 11, 1999
Clarifying Harmless Error and Materiality in Federal Fraud Charges: Insights from Neder v. United States Introduction The United States Supreme Court's decision in Ellis E. Neder, Jr., Petitioner v....
Interpretation of "Coal" in the Coal Lands Acts: Exclusion of Coalbed Methane Gas

Interpretation of "Coal" in the Coal Lands Acts: Exclusion of Coalbed Methane Gas

Date: Jun 8, 1999
Interpretation of "Coal" in the Coal Lands Acts: Exclusion of Coalbed Methane Gas Introduction In Amoco Production Company v. Southern Ute Indian Tribe (526 U.S. 865, 1999), the U.S. Supreme Court...
Exhaustion of State Remedies in Habeas Corpus: O'Sullivan v. Boerckel Decision

Exhaustion of State Remedies in Habeas Corpus: O'Sullivan v. Boerckel Decision

Date: Jun 8, 1999
Exhaustion of State Remedies in Habeas Corpus: O'Sullivan v. Boerckel Decision Introduction O'Sullivan v. Boerckel is a landmark 1999 United States Supreme Court case that addresses the procedural...
Amoco Production Co. v. Southern Ute Indian Tribe: Clarifying Coalbed Methane Gas Rights under the Coal Lands Acts of 1909 and 1910

Amoco Production Co. v. Southern Ute Indian Tribe: Clarifying Coalbed Methane Gas Rights under the Coal Lands Acts of 1909 and 1910

Date: Jun 8, 1999
Amoco Production Co. v. Southern Ute Indian Tribe: Clarifying Coalbed Methane Gas Rights under the Coal Lands Acts of 1909 and 1910 Introduction Amoco Production Company v. Southern Ute Indian Tribe...
Unanimous Jury Agreement on Specific Violations in Continuing Criminal Enterprise Cases

Unanimous Jury Agreement on Specific Violations in Continuing Criminal Enterprise Cases

Date: Jun 2, 1999
Unanimous Jury Agreement on Specific Violations in Continuing Criminal Enterprise Cases Introduction The case of Eddie Richardson v. United States, 526 U.S. 813 (1999), addressed a pivotal issue in...
Reconciling SSDI and ADA Claims: Supreme Court Establishes Framework in Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems

Reconciling SSDI and ADA Claims: Supreme Court Establishes Framework in Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems

Date: May 25, 1999
Reconciling SSDI and ADA Claims: Supreme Court Establishes Framework in Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Introduction In Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corporation, 526 U.S. 795 (1999),...
Media Presence in Home Arrests: WILSON v. LAYNE Establishes Fourth Amendment Protections

Media Presence in Home Arrests: WILSON v. LAYNE Establishes Fourth Amendment Protections

Date: May 25, 1999
Media Presence in Home Arrests: WILSON v. LAYNE Establishes Fourth Amendment Protections Introduction Charles H. Wilson, et ux., et al. v. Harry Layne, Deputy United States Marshal, etc., et al.,...
Expansion of FTC Jurisdiction Over Nonprofit Associations and the Necessity for Comprehensive Antitrust Analysis

Expansion of FTC Jurisdiction Over Nonprofit Associations and the Necessity for Comprehensive Antitrust Analysis

Date: May 25, 1999
Expansion of FTC Jurisdiction Over Nonprofit Associations and the Necessity for Comprehensive Antitrust Analysis Introduction CALIFORNIA DENTAL ASSOCIATION v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION (526 U.S. 756)...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert