Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

Jury Trial Rights in §1983 Regulatory Takings: City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes

Jury Trial Rights in §1983 Regulatory Takings: City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes

Date: May 25, 1999
Jury Trial Rights in §1983 Regulatory Takings: City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes Introduction In the landmark case of City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd., and Monterey-Del Monte...
Monroe County Board of Education Liability for Student-On-Student Harassment Under Title IX

Monroe County Board of Education Liability for Student-On-Student Harassment Under Title IX

Date: May 25, 1999
Monroe County Board of Education Liability for Student-On-Student Harassment Under Title IX Introduction In the landmark case of Aurelia Davis, as Next Friend of LaShonda D. v. Monroe County Board of...
Establishing Sovereignty Over Landfilled Portions of Ellis Island: New Jersey vs. New York

Establishing Sovereignty Over Landfilled Portions of Ellis Island: New Jersey vs. New York

Date: May 18, 1999
Establishing Sovereignty Over Landfilled Portions of Ellis Island: New Jersey vs. New York Introduction The landmark case, State of New Jersey v. State of New York, adjudicated by the United States...
Supreme Court Reinforces Equal Protection in Welfare Residency Requirements: Saenz v. Roe

Supreme Court Reinforces Equal Protection in Welfare Residency Requirements: Saenz v. Roe

Date: May 18, 1999
Supreme Court Reinforces Equal Protection in Welfare Residency Requirements: Saenz v. Roe Introduction Saenz v. Roe, 526 U.S. 489 (1999), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Reversing Summary Judgment in Racial Gerrymandering Claims: Hunt v. Cromartie (1999)

Reversing Summary Judgment in Racial Gerrymandering Claims: Hunt v. Cromartie (1999)

Date: May 18, 1999
Reversing Summary Judgment in Racial Gerrymandering Claims: Hunt v. Cromartie (1999) Introduction JAMES B. HUNT, JR., GOVERNOR OF NORTH CAROLINA, ET AL., APPELLANTS v. MARTIN CROMARTIE ET AL. (526...
Ruhrgas AG v. Marathon Oil Company: Federal Courts' Discretion in Jurisdictional Sequencing in Removed Cases

Ruhrgas AG v. Marathon Oil Company: Federal Courts' Discretion in Jurisdictional Sequencing in Removed Cases

Date: May 18, 1999
Ruhrgas AG v. Marathon Oil Company: Federal Courts' Discretion in Jurisdictional Sequencing in Removed Cases Introduction The case of Ruhrgas AG v. Marathon Oil Company et al. (526 U.S. 574)...
Clinton v. Goldsmith: Limiting the Jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Under the All Writs Act

Clinton v. Goldsmith: Limiting the Jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Under the All Writs Act

Date: May 18, 1999
Clinton v. Goldsmith: Limiting the Jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Under the All Writs Act Introduction The Supreme Court case Clinton v. Goldsmith, 526 U.S. 529 (1999),...
Warrantless Seizure of Automobile under the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act: Florida v. White Analysis

Warrantless Seizure of Automobile under the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act: Florida v. White Analysis

Date: May 18, 1999
Warrantless Seizure of Automobile under the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act: Florida v. White Analysis Introduction Florida v. White is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Supreme Court Confirms Cross-Appeal Requirement and Limits Tribal Court Exhaustion Under the Price-Anderson Act

Supreme Court Confirms Cross-Appeal Requirement and Limits Tribal Court Exhaustion Under the Price-Anderson Act

Date: May 4, 1999
Supreme Court Confirms Cross-Appeal Requirement and Limits Tribal Court Exhaustion Under the Price-Anderson Act Introduction In El Paso Natural Gas Company, et al. v. Laura Neztsosie et al., 526 U.S....
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Juan Anibal Aguirre-Aguirre: Establishing Chevron Deference in Immigration Law

Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Juan Anibal Aguirre-Aguirre: Establishing Chevron Deference in Immigration Law

Date: May 4, 1999
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Juan Anibal Aguirre-Aguirre: Establishing Chevron Deference in Immigration Law Introduction Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) v. Juan Anibal...
Bank of America National Trust v. 203 North LaSalle Street Partnership: Affirming the Absolute Priority Rule in Bankruptcy Reorganizations

Bank of America National Trust v. 203 North LaSalle Street Partnership: Affirming the Absolute Priority Rule in Bankruptcy Reorganizations

Date: May 4, 1999
Bank of America National Trust v. 203 North LaSalle Street Partnership: Affirming the Absolute Priority Rule in Bankruptcy Reorganizations Introduction The Supreme Court case Bank of America National...
Sun-Diamond Growers v. United States: Clarifying the Scope of 18 U.S.C. § 201(c)(1)(A) on Illegal Gratuities

Sun-Diamond Growers v. United States: Clarifying the Scope of 18 U.S.C. § 201(c)(1)(A) on Illegal Gratuities

Date: Apr 28, 1999
Sun-Diamond Growers v. United States: Clarifying the Scope of 18 U.S.C. § 201(c)(1)(A) on Illegal Gratuities Introduction The Supreme Court case UNITED STATES v. SUN-DIAMOND GROWERS OF CAlifornia,...
Chevron Deference Applied to Customs Regulations: The Precedent in United States v. Haggar Apparel Co.

Chevron Deference Applied to Customs Regulations: The Precedent in United States v. Haggar Apparel Co.

Date: Apr 22, 1999
Chevron Deference Applied to Customs Regulations: The Precedent in United States v. Haggar Apparel Co. Introduction United States v. Haggar Apparel Co. is a landmark Supreme Court case decided on...
Supreme Court Upholds California's Insurance Regulation Law Against ERISA Preemption in UNUM v. Ward

Supreme Court Upholds California's Insurance Regulation Law Against ERISA Preemption in UNUM v. Ward

Date: Apr 21, 1999
Supreme Court Upholds California's Insurance Regulation Law Against ERISA Preemption in UNUM v. Ward Introduction In UNUM Life Insurance Company of America v. John E. Ward, 526 U.S. 358 (1999), the...
Preservation of Fifth Amendment Self-Incrimination Rights at Sentencing Following Guilty Plea

Preservation of Fifth Amendment Self-Incrimination Rights at Sentencing Following Guilty Plea

Date: Apr 6, 1999
Preservation of Fifth Amendment Self-Incrimination Rights at Sentencing Following Guilty Plea Introduction Mitchell v. United States, 526 U.S. 314 (1999), is a landmark decision by the United States...
Wyoming v. Houghton: Affirming Warrantless Searches of Passenger Property with Probable Cause

Wyoming v. Houghton: Affirming Warrantless Searches of Passenger Property with Probable Cause

Date: Apr 6, 1999
Wyoming v. Houghton: Affirming Warrantless Searches of Passenger Property with Probable Cause Introduction Wyoming v. Houghton (526 U.S. 295, 1999) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
Supreme Court Establishes Boundaries for Qualified Immunity in Attorney Practice Interferences

Supreme Court Establishes Boundaries for Qualified Immunity in Attorney Practice Interferences

Date: Apr 6, 1999
Supreme Court Establishes Boundaries for Qualified Immunity in Attorney Practice Interferences Introduction The landmark case Conn et al v. Gabbert (526 U.S. 286, 1999) addressed critical issues...
Murphy Brothers v. Michetti Pipe Stringing: Clarifying Removal Timelines Under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b)

Murphy Brothers v. Michetti Pipe Stringing: Clarifying Removal Timelines Under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b)

Date: Apr 6, 1999
Murphy Brothers v. Michetti Pipe Stringing: Clarifying Removal Timelines Under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b) Introduction Murphy Brothers, Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc., 526 U.S. 344 (1999), is a...
Redefining Venue for Firearm Offenses in Relation to Violent Crimes: United States v. Rodriguez-Moreno

Redefining Venue for Firearm Offenses in Relation to Violent Crimes: United States v. Rodriguez-Moreno

Date: Mar 31, 1999
Redefining Venue for Firearm Offenses in Relation to Violent Crimes: United States v. Rodriguez-Moreno Introduction United States v. Rodriguez-Moreno, 526 U.S. 275 (1999), addresses a critical issue...
Supreme Court Establishes APA Standards for Federal Circuit Review of PTO Factfinding

Supreme Court Establishes APA Standards for Federal Circuit Review of PTO Factfinding

Date: Mar 25, 1999
Supreme Court Establishes APA Standards for Federal Circuit Review of PTO Factfinding Introduction The Supreme Court case Q. Todd Dickinson, Acting Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks v. Wallace...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert