Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Jury Trial Rights in §1983 Regulatory Takings: City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes Introduction In the landmark case of City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd., and Monterey-Del Monte...
Monroe County Board of Education Liability for Student-On-Student Harassment Under Title IX Introduction In the landmark case of Aurelia Davis, as Next Friend of LaShonda D. v. Monroe County Board of...
Establishing Sovereignty Over Landfilled Portions of Ellis Island: New Jersey vs. New York Introduction The landmark case, State of New Jersey v. State of New York, adjudicated by the United States...
Supreme Court Reinforces Equal Protection in Welfare Residency Requirements: Saenz v. Roe Introduction Saenz v. Roe, 526 U.S. 489 (1999), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Reversing Summary Judgment in Racial Gerrymandering Claims: Hunt v. Cromartie (1999) Introduction JAMES B. HUNT, JR., GOVERNOR OF NORTH CAROLINA, ET AL., APPELLANTS v. MARTIN CROMARTIE ET AL. (526...
Ruhrgas AG v. Marathon Oil Company: Federal Courts' Discretion in Jurisdictional Sequencing in Removed Cases Introduction The case of Ruhrgas AG v. Marathon Oil Company et al. (526 U.S. 574)...
Clinton v. Goldsmith: Limiting the Jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Under the All Writs Act Introduction The Supreme Court case Clinton v. Goldsmith, 526 U.S. 529 (1999),...
Warrantless Seizure of Automobile under the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act: Florida v. White Analysis Introduction Florida v. White is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court...
Supreme Court Confirms Cross-Appeal Requirement and Limits Tribal Court Exhaustion Under the Price-Anderson Act Introduction In El Paso Natural Gas Company, et al. v. Laura Neztsosie et al., 526 U.S....
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Juan Anibal Aguirre-Aguirre: Establishing Chevron Deference in Immigration Law Introduction Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) v. Juan Anibal...
Bank of America National Trust v. 203 North LaSalle Street Partnership: Affirming the Absolute Priority Rule in Bankruptcy Reorganizations Introduction The Supreme Court case Bank of America National...
Sun-Diamond Growers v. United States: Clarifying the Scope of 18 U.S.C. § 201(c)(1)(A) on Illegal Gratuities Introduction The Supreme Court case UNITED STATES v. SUN-DIAMOND GROWERS OF CAlifornia,...
Chevron Deference Applied to Customs Regulations: The Precedent in United States v. Haggar Apparel Co. Introduction United States v. Haggar Apparel Co. is a landmark Supreme Court case decided on...
Supreme Court Upholds California's Insurance Regulation Law Against ERISA Preemption in UNUM v. Ward Introduction In UNUM Life Insurance Company of America v. John E. Ward, 526 U.S. 358 (1999), the...
Preservation of Fifth Amendment Self-Incrimination Rights at Sentencing Following Guilty Plea Introduction Mitchell v. United States, 526 U.S. 314 (1999), is a landmark decision by the United States...
Wyoming v. Houghton: Affirming Warrantless Searches of Passenger Property with Probable Cause Introduction Wyoming v. Houghton (526 U.S. 295, 1999) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme...
Supreme Court Establishes Boundaries for Qualified Immunity in Attorney Practice Interferences Introduction The landmark case Conn et al v. Gabbert (526 U.S. 286, 1999) addressed critical issues...
Murphy Brothers v. Michetti Pipe Stringing: Clarifying Removal Timelines Under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b) Introduction Murphy Brothers, Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc., 526 U.S. 344 (1999), is a...
Redefining Venue for Firearm Offenses in Relation to Violent Crimes: United States v. Rodriguez-Moreno Introduction United States v. Rodriguez-Moreno, 526 U.S. 275 (1999), addresses a critical issue...
Supreme Court Establishes APA Standards for Federal Circuit Review of PTO Factfinding Introduction The Supreme Court case Q. Todd Dickinson, Acting Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks v. Wallace...