Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

U.S. Supreme Court Case Commentaries

State Waiver of Eleventh Amendment Immunity Through Case Removal to Federal Court

State Waiver of Eleventh Amendment Immunity Through Case Removal to Federal Court

Date: May 14, 2002
State Waiver of Eleventh Amendment Immunity Through Case Removal to Federal Court Introduction Paul D. Lapides v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, 535 U.S. 613 (2002), presents a...
Regulating Secondary Effects: Los Angeles v. Alameda Books Establishes Nuanced First Amendment Zoning Standards

Regulating Secondary Effects: Los Angeles v. Alameda Books Establishes Nuanced First Amendment Zoning Standards

Date: May 14, 2002
Regulating Secondary Effects: Los Angeles v. Alameda Books Establishes Nuanced First Amendment Zoning Standards Introduction The landmark case CITY OF LOS ANGELES v. ALAMEDA BOOKS, INC. addressed the...
Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission: Upholding Forward-Looking Cost Methodology in Telecommunications Ratemaking

Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission: Upholding Forward-Looking Cost Methodology in Telecommunications Ratemaking

Date: May 14, 2002
Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission: Upholding Forward-Looking Cost Methodology in Telecommunications Ratemaking Introduction Verizon Communications Inc. et al. v....
Staying Executions Pending Atkins v. Virginia: An In-Depth Legal Analysis

Staying Executions Pending Atkins v. Virginia: An In-Depth Legal Analysis

Date: May 2, 2002
Staying Executions Pending Atkins v. Virginia: An In-Depth Legal Analysis Introduction The intersection of capital punishment and intellectual disabilities has long been a contentious area within...
US Airways v. Robert Barnett: Balancing Seniority Systems and Reasonable Accommodations under the ADA

US Airways v. Robert Barnett: Balancing Seniority Systems and Reasonable Accommodations under the ADA

Date: Apr 30, 2002
US Airways v. Robert Barnett: Balancing Seniority Systems and Reasonable Accommodations under the ADA Case: US Airways, Inc., Petitioner v. Robert Barnett Court: United States Supreme Court Decided:...
Unconstitutional Restrictions on Commercial Speech in Drug Compounding: An Analysis of Thompson v. Western States Medical Center

Unconstitutional Restrictions on Commercial Speech in Drug Compounding: An Analysis of Thompson v. Western States Medical Center

Date: Apr 30, 2002
Unconstitutional Restrictions on Commercial Speech in Drug Compounding: An Analysis of Thompson v. Western States Medical Center Introduction Thompson v. Western States Medical Center, 535 U.S. 357...
Temporary Development Moratoria Do Not Constitute Per Se Takings Under the Fifth Amendment: Analysis of Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. TRPA

Temporary Development Moratoria Do Not Constitute Per Se Takings Under the Fifth Amendment: Analysis of Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. TRPA

Date: Apr 24, 2002
Temporary Development Moratoria Do Not Constitute Per Se Takings Under the Fifth Amendment: Analysis of Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. TRPA Introduction The United States Supreme Court,...
Federal Tax Liens and Tenancy by the Entirety: Insights from United States v. Craft

Federal Tax Liens and Tenancy by the Entirety: Insights from United States v. Craft

Date: Apr 18, 2002
Federal Tax Liens and Tenancy by the Entirety: Insights from United States v. Craft Introduction United States v. Craft, 535 U.S. 274 (2002), is a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that...
ASHCROFT v. Free Speech Coalition: Striking Down Overbroad Virtual Child Pornography Provisions of CPPA

ASHCROFT v. Free Speech Coalition: Striking Down Overbroad Virtual Child Pornography Provisions of CPPA

Date: Apr 17, 2002
ASHCROFT v. Free Speech Coalition: Striking Down Overbroad Virtual Child Pornography Provisions of CPPA Introduction The case of ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al. v. FREE SPEECH COALITION et al....
SSA's Interpretation of Disability Duration Upheld: Barnhart v. Walton

SSA's Interpretation of Disability Duration Upheld: Barnhart v. Walton

Date: Mar 28, 2002
SSA's Interpretation of Disability Duration Upheld: Barnhart v. Walton Introduction In Barnhart v. Walton, 535 U.S. 212 (2002), the United States Supreme Court addressed a pivotal issue regarding the...
Foreclosure of Backpay Awards to Undocumented Workers Under IRCA: Insights from Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. NLRB

Foreclosure of Backpay Awards to Undocumented Workers Under IRCA: Insights from Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. NLRB

Date: Mar 28, 2002
Foreclosure of Backpay Awards to Undocumented Workers Under IRCA: Insights from Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. NLRB Introduction Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board,...
Affirming the Necessity of Demonstrating Adverse Effect in Conflicted Counsel Cases: MICKENS v. TAYLOR

Affirming the Necessity of Demonstrating Adverse Effect in Conflicted Counsel Cases: MICKENS v. TAYLOR

Date: Mar 28, 2002
Affirming the Necessity of Demonstrating Adverse Effect in Conflicted Counsel Cases: MICKENS v. TAYLOR Introduction Background: In Walter Mickens, Jr. v. John Taylor, Warden, the United States...
Supreme Court Upholds 'No-Fault' Evictions in Public Housing for Drug-Related Activities

Supreme Court Upholds 'No-Fault' Evictions in Public Housing for Drug-Related Activities

Date: Mar 27, 2002
Supreme Court Upholds 'No-Fault' Evictions in Public Housing for Drug-Related Activities Introduction The landmark Supreme Court case, Department of Housing and Urban Development v. Rucker, 535 U.S....
Ragsdale v. Wolverine World Wide, Inc.: Limiting Administrative Overreach in FMLA Regulations

Ragsdale v. Wolverine World Wide, Inc.: Limiting Administrative Overreach in FMLA Regulations

Date: Mar 20, 2002
Ragsdale v. Wolverine World Wide, Inc.: Limiting Administrative Overreach in FMLA Regulations Introduction Ragsdale et al. v. Wolverine World Wide, Inc. (535 U.S. 81) is a pivotal Supreme Court...
Supreme Court Affirms EEOC's Relation-Back Rule: Insights from EDELMAN v. LYNCHBURG COLLEGE

Supreme Court Affirms EEOC's Relation-Back Rule: Insights from EDELMAN v. LYNCHBURG COLLEGE

Date: Mar 20, 2002
Supreme Court Affirms EEOC's Relation-Back Rule: Insights from EDELMAN v. LYNCHBURG COLLEGE Introduction The United States Supreme Court, in Leonard EDELMAN v. LYNCHBURG COLLEGE, 535 U.S. 106 (2002),...
Silent Defendants Can Utilize Rule 52(b) Plain-Error Review for Rule 11 Violations

Silent Defendants Can Utilize Rule 52(b) Plain-Error Review for Rule 11 Violations

Date: Mar 5, 2002
Silent Defendants Can Utilize Rule 52(b) Plain-Error Review for Rule 11 Violations Introduction In the landmark case of United States v. Alphonso Vonn, 535 U.S. 55 (2002), the United States Supreme...
Judicial Compensation Protection under the Compensation Clause: Analyzing the Dissent in Clements, Rigdon, and Hindes v. United States

Judicial Compensation Protection under the Compensation Clause: Analyzing the Dissent in Clements, Rigdon, and Hindes v. United States

Date: Mar 5, 2002
Judicial Compensation Protection under the Compensation Clause: Analyzing the Dissent in Clements, Rigdon, and Hindes v. United States Introduction In the case of Clements v. United States, along...
Equitable Tolling Applies to Bankruptcy Lookback Periods: Young v. United States

Equitable Tolling Applies to Bankruptcy Lookback Periods: Young v. United States

Date: Mar 5, 2002
Equitable Tolling Applies to Bankruptcy Lookback Periods: Young v. United States Introduction Cornelius P. Young, et ux., Petitioner v. United States is a landmark decision by the United States...
Affirming FERC’s Authority Over Unbundled Retail Transmission Under the Federal Power Act

Affirming FERC’s Authority Over Unbundled Retail Transmission Under the Federal Power Act

Date: Mar 5, 2002
Affirming FERC’s Authority Over Unbundled Retail Transmission Under the Federal Power Act Introduction New York et al. Petitioners v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission et al., 535 U.S. 1 (2002),...
Lt. Raygor & Goodchild v. Regents of the University of Minnesota: Limits on Supplemental Jurisdiction under §1367(d)

Lt. Raygor & Goodchild v. Regents of the University of Minnesota: Limits on Supplemental Jurisdiction under §1367(d)

Date: Feb 28, 2002
Lt. Raygor & Goodchild v. Regents of the University of Minnesota: Limits on Supplemental Jurisdiction under §1367(d) Introduction In the landmark case LANCE RAYGOR and JAMES GOODCHILD v. REGENTS OF...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert